Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Alamy Stock Photo

Plans for 30 homes in Meath Gaeltacht quashed over concerns about use of Irish language

Conradh na Gaeilge said the ruling is an important victory that will inspire the whole Gaeltacht community.

THE HIGH COURT has quashed a planning permission granted for 30 houses and a guesthouse in the Ráth Chairn Gaeltacht in Co Meath.

Justice Bronagh O’Hanlon quashed the decision on grounds that she was not satisfied that the proposed development complied with requirements to show that it would enhance the use of the Irish language in the area.

The action was brought against An Bord Pleanála’s June 2020 permission for the planned development, on a site between the local primary school and community centre.

The challenge was brought Comharchumann Ráth Chairn, a local development co-operative charged with implementing a language plan to increase the amount of Irish in the area, had challenged the decision.

Seamás Ó Tuathail SC, with Dáithí MacCárthaigh BL, instructed by Colm McGeehin, of Prospect Law solicitors for the co-operative claimed the board had erred in not holding that a language impact statement (LIS) submitted on behalf of the developer, Colm Griffin, from Ráth Chairn, was inadequate.

The author of the LIS had no qualifications in language planning or social linguistics and the LIS is inadequate for reasons including it underestimated the numbers who speak Irish in the locality, it was claimed.

A planning condition that 70% of the 30 houses be provided for Irish speakers “unless otherwise agreed by the developer and the Council” amounted to an unauthorised delegation of the Board’s powers, it was also claimed.

It was further alleged that the rights of the applicant as a linguistic minority have been violated, particularly the right not to be assimilated.

The board denied the claims and had opposed the group’s action.

In her judgement, the judge said that she was satisfied to make an order quashing the decision.

The judge said she was not sataisfied that an analysis carried out by a planning consultant on behalf of the developer was sufficient to clearly show that the proposed development would enhance the use of the Irish language in the Co Meath Gaeltacht.

Proposed developments in Gaeltacht areas are required under national and local planning requirements to show that they must increase the use of the Irish language, the court added.

However in this case the court was not satisfied that it had been proven that the proposed development would comply such requirements contained in the County Meath Development plan in regards to the Ráth Chairn area.

The judge also awarded the applicants their legal costs of the action.

Conradh na Gaeilge congratulated Comharchumann Ráth Cairn, its legal team and the wider community for their victory in the High Court.

The Irish-speaking group said it was an important ruling that will inspire the whole Gaeltacht community.

Conradh na Gaeilge president Niall Comer said: “This whole process highlights the weaknesses of the planning system in relation to the protection of the Irish language in the Gaeltacht.

“No Gaeltacht community should have to rely on the courts to protect its future as a Gaeltacht community.

“It is clear, as demanded by Conradh na Gaeilge and the Gaeltacht communities, that there is a need to develop a national policy for housing planning in the Gaeltacht, a policy aimed at ensuring that housing planning in the Gaeltacht is focused entirely on sustaining and strengthening communities of the Gaeltacht.”

View 36 comments
Close
36 Comments
This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic. Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy here before taking part.
Leave a Comment
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Lily Martin
    Favourite Lily Martin
    Report
    Feb 15th 2023, 7:50 PM

    He may as well say 250,000. It’s all lies and obfuscation.

    172
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Paul Furey
    Favourite Paul Furey
    Report
    Feb 15th 2023, 6:35 PM

    Judging the by the hundreds and hundreds of apartments and houses having gone up and are still going up around the Malahide Road from Clare Hall to Balgriffen and all the way back to the east into Belmayne (the traffic will be far madder in a couple of years), beside Northside Shopping centre and to the west of Swords…..I’ll go with 30,000 figure :)

    90
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Peter
    Favourite Peter
    Report
    Feb 15th 2023, 7:34 PM

    Personally I would be inclined to listen to the CSO on this than anybody else regardless of what Leo says or thinks.

    79
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute KilkennyProud
    Favourite KilkennyProud
    Report
    Feb 15th 2023, 8:08 PM

    @Peter: Maybe read the article before commenting next time and you won’t end up agreeing with Leo.

    58
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Ní neart go cur le chéile.
    Favourite Ní neart go cur le chéile.
    Report
    Feb 15th 2023, 8:56 PM

    So over 6k properties gone missing or magically came out? Put CSO and CIS data (addresses) together, easily to find out where it went wrong, fix it and move on. Jeez, has to argue it like kids. What’s point? Of course Leo would pick a better figure

    52
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Roibeard Ó Riain
    Favourite Roibeard Ó Riain
    Report
    Feb 15th 2023, 8:04 PM

    Support the journal. They are the bestest journal writers everer

    36
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Michael Costello
    Favourite Michael Costello
    Report
    Feb 16th 2023, 1:45 AM

    Surely it can’t be that hard to count the number of houses built from 1st January to the 31st December. What is the Office of the Land Registry for. You can’t sell a house if its not registered with the Land Registry. The first thing a builder must do to enable him sell a new build is to register it with this office and he can’t do that if the title deeds of the house is not registered.

    34
Submit a report
Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
Thank you for the feedback
Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.

Leave a commentcancel

 
JournalTv
News in 60 seconds