Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Alamy Stock Photo

Prince Harry settles phone hacking claim against Mirror Group Newspapers

The Royal Family Prince was previously awarded €164,500 by the British High Court in December.

PRINCE HARRY HAS settled the remaining parts of his phone hacking claim against the publisher of the Daily Mirror, the British High Court has heard.

Harry, 39, sued Mirror Group Newspapers (MGN) for damages, claiming journalists at its publications were linked to methods including phone hacking, so-called “blagging” – gaining information by deception – and use of private investigators for unlawful activities.

In December, a judge ruled that phone hacking became “widespread and habitual” at MGN titles in the late 1990s and was practised “even to some extent” during the Leveson Inquiry into press standards in 2011.

Mr Justice Fancourt also concluded that Harry’s phone was hacked “to a modest extent” by MGN, awarding him £140,600 (€164,500) in damages.

london-uk-08th-may-2023-the-british-newspaper-daily-mirror-is-sold-at-a-newsstand-on-10-05-2023-the-trial-of-prince-harry-against-the-publisher-mirror-group-newspapers-mgn-is-to-begin-it-is Prince Harry accused the Mirror Group Newspapers, publisher of The Daily Mirror, of phone-hacking and blagging. Alamy Alamy

Thirty-three articles in Harry’s claim were examined during the trial last year, with 15 articles found to have been the product of unlawful information gathering. A further 115 articles were in his claim, which may have been the subject of a further trial.

However, during a hearing in London this morning, Harry’s barrister David Sherborne confirmed a settlement had been reached between the Prince and MGN.

He said: “MGN will pay the Duke of Sussex a substantial additional sum by way of damages and all the costs of his claim.”

The barrister said this included an interim payment towards the costs of £400,000 (€468,177).

During today’s hearing, Justice Fancourt said the publisher should pay so-called “generic” legal costs to the people currently involved in the legal action against MGN.

The judge said: “On the generic issues, there can be little doubt that the claimants were successful.”

The final figure of costs is yet to be assessed, but the High Court in London heard the group of people who sued the publisher were currently seeking payment of around £1.9 million from MGN towards the legal costs of bringing those allegations to court.

Justice Fancourt ruled that the interim payment should be made ahead of a further assessment of costs.

Other legal challenges

The announcement comes after Harry withdrew his High Court libel claim against the publisher of the Mail on Sunday last month.

He sued Associated Newspapers Limited (ANL) over a February 2022 article about his legal challenge against the Home Office following a decision to change his publicly funded security arrangements when visiting the UK.

Harry’s case at trial was heard alongside similar claims brought by actor Michael Turner, who is known professionally as Michael Le Vell and is most famous for playing Kevin Webster in Coronation Street, actress Nikki Sanderson, and Fiona Wightman, the ex-wife of comedian Paul Whitehouse.

The claims brought by Sanderson and Wightman were dismissed because they were made too late, despite the judge finding that some of their complaints were proved.

In his ruling on this morning, Justice Fancourt ruled that Sanderson and Wightman should pay MGN the legal costs of defending their individual claims.

london-england-uk-20th-june-2023-coronation-street-actor-michael-le-vell-is-seen-arriving-at-high-court-for-the-phone-hacking-trial-against-mirror-group-newspapers-mgn-a-number-of-high-profile Michael (Le Vell) Turner was ordered to pay the Mirror Group's legal costs this morning. Alamy Alamy

The judge also ruled that Turner should pay MGN’s costs of responding to his claim from the date of 5 March 2022, where an offer was made.

Roger Mallalieu KC, for MGN, previously said the publisher would be seeking interim payments from the trio – who are said to be insured for their adverse costs – of around £100,000 each.

Mr Justice Fancourt ruled that 90% of the interim payments should be made to MGN, with some deductions.

An MGN spokesperson said: “We are pleased to have reached this agreement, which gives our business further clarity to move forward from events that took place many years ago and for which we have apologised.”

Author
Press Association
View 6 comments
Close
6 Comments
This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic. Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy here before taking part.
Leave a Comment
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.

    Leave a commentcancel

     
    JournalTv
    News in 60 seconds