We need your help now
Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.
You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.
If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.
Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
By continuing, you are indicating that you accept our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
IRELAND’S DIRECT PROVISION system that has seen asylum seekers lose years of their lives could be set to change.
Minister for Justice France Fitzgerald has said that it is now the aim of the government to streamline the current system and make it so that cases are dealt with in a period of six months to a year.
Speaking on RTÉ Radio’s This Week programme, she said, “[The] system need to be more effective and efficient. Unlike the rest of Europe we have a very complicated system with many levels.”
This follows the publication of a report by a working group into the asylum and protection process offered in Ireland.
The nexus of the report was that no person should have to remain in the Irish Direct Provision system for more than five years.
The minister stated that these extensive delays are down to the complicated system that exists in Ireland which involves five layers of processing, creating the possibility for five judicial reviews. The aim is to cut this down to two.
More than 3,600 asylum seekers are currently in Direct Provision centres around Ireland with 1,500 of these having been in the system for more than 5 years.
Direct Provision accommodation has been a feature in Ireland for the past 15 years. In May, it was found that one individual had been living within the system for 11 years.
In a statement this afternoon, the Irish Human Rights and Equality Commission has issued a statement urging the implementation of the working group’s recommendations.
Chief commissioner of the group, Emily Logan, said, “The introduction of a time limit of 12 months for decisions on protection status, along with the right to work for new applicants if a decision is not made within nine months, forms the overarching recommendations of the working group report.”
Fitzgerald went on to say that the country requires a fair asylum assessment system that is also “rigorous” and that will send individuals who do not meet the required criteria back to their countries of origin.
On the potential for an increase in deportations as part of the introduction of a new system, she said:
Many people say you should have a strict system, and yet when they hear about individual cases, they always want to make the individual case for the particular circumstances.
I think what we need to have in place is a system that is quick, that is efficient, that is fair, but equally, if people come illegally into this country, they should not be allowed to stay.
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
What about the people of Indonesia? Are they ok? but i guess we have to have an article about Darwin because its in the 1st world.
@Dónal MacAonghusa:
As long as everybody is safe and well down at the local Christian Caucasian yacht club, that’s the main thing.
@Dónal MacAonghusa: the article quite clearly states re Indonesia “there were no reports of any casualties or any major damage” maybe read the articles in future before you start crying like a little baby.
@Dónal MacAonghusa: you’ve obviously never been to Darwin!
@Dónal MacAonghusa: true. Reportage is very poor in over populated countries. However, it’s Mother Nature’s way of putting things right that humans are putting wrong.
@Tim O’Brien:
doesn’t fit with the narrative for some
Not the only area to he hit unfortunately. More news hopefully later
have your say