Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Putin and Medvedev arrive at the United Russia congress in Moscow. Ivan Sekretarev/AP/Press Association Images

Putin to run for Russian presidency in 2012

Vladimir Putin is to run for the Russian presidency next year, while current president Dmitry Medvedev is set to take over as prime minister.

VLADIMIR PUTIN IS to run for the Russian presidency in 2012.

His decision to run almost certainly ensures a return to the office he previously held for eight years and likely foreshadows more years of strongman rule.

His United Russia party also approved his proposal that the current president Dmitry Medvedev take over his Putin’s role as prime minister.

Putin ruled Russia as president from 2000 to 2008 with a steely command that was widely criticised in the West as a retreat from democracy.

As  constitutional changes have extended the presidential term to six years from four, Putin’s power is likely to be even more enhanced. If he wins two terms in a row, Putin will have been atop the Russian hierarchy for almost a quarter century.

Uncontested

Putin’s nomination at a congress of the United Russia party end months of intense speculation as to whether he would seek to return to the Kremlin or whether he would allow the more mild-mannered and reform-leaning Medvedev to seek another term in next year’s election.

Despite apparently growing discontent among ordinary Russians with the party, United Russia exerts such an overwhelming presence in the country’s politics that Putin’s election and Medvedev’s switch to the premiership is virtually ensured.

Not only have genuine opposition parties been marginalised, but Putin’s personal popularity is immense among Russians who laud him as the strong and decisive figure needed by a sprawling country troubled by corruption, an Islamist insurgency and a vast gap between the impoverished and the grandiosely super-rich.

The presidential election, for which a date has not been set, is preceded by national parliamentary elections on December 4, in which United Russia will seek to retain its dominance; the party has 312 of the 450 seats in the current parliament.

Putin started a carefully orchestrated series of maneuvers at today’s session of the party congress by proposing that Medvedev head the party list for the December elections. Medvedev then proposed that Putin be the party’s presidential candidate, and Putin returned to the stage to accept the proposal and express support for Medvedev as prime minister.

The congress approved the moves with no apparent opposition.

Economic decisions

Moving Medvedev to the premiership could set him up to take the brunt of criticism for austerity measures that Putin has warned will be necessary for Russia amid global economic turmoil.

Putin also proposed that Russia’s richest citizens face higher taxes. The flat income tax that came into effect during Putin’s 2000-2008 presidency has been widely praised as improving tax collection and Putin’s proposal would not change that, but he called for increases in consumption and real estate taxes that hit the rich comparatively harder.

The period for formal submission of presidential candidates’ names has not yet begun, and it is unclear who might choose to challenge Putin for president.

Putin became prime minister in 2008 after two terms as president, stepping aside because of constitutional term limits, but as Russia’s most powerful and popular politician he nonetheless overshadowed Medvedev, his handpicked successor in the presidency.

Medvedev was widely seen as a caretaker figure. As president, he has struck a reformist posture, calling for improvements in Russia’s unreliable court system and for efforts against the country’s endemic corruption. But his initiatives have produced little tangible result.

Putin, who built his popularity on the back of strong economic growth, told the party congress on Friday that salaries and pensions would continue to grow, and he promised increased funding for education, health care and housing.

But he also cautioned that the government may need to take unpopular steps to cope with the global financial turmoil.

“The task of the government is not only to pour honey into a cup, but sometimes to give bitter medicine,” Putin said. “But this should always be done openly and honestly, and then the overwhelming majority of people will understand their government.”

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Close
11 Comments
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Wooden Spoon
    Favourite Wooden Spoon
    Report
    Aug 13th 2022, 7:11 AM

    The reality is that we’ll never not have nuclear weapons. The big players may in fact reduce their numbers, but reducing their number of nukes will only be an exchange for upgrading their stocks to more powerful ones.

    62
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Eric Foley
    Favourite Eric Foley
    Report
    Aug 13th 2022, 12:11 PM

    @Wooden Spoon: what’s more ‘powerful’ than a hydrogen bomb? Nothing.

    4
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Brendan Gordon
    Favourite Brendan Gordon
    Report
    Aug 13th 2022, 3:15 PM

    @Eric Foley: Ten Hydrogen bombs in one unit, called a MIRV. Much more threatening than a single hydrogen bomb dropped by an aircraft. There’s ALWAYS a potential upgrade, be it in yield, reliability or delivery versatility.

    6
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Bramley Hawthorne
    Favourite Bramley Hawthorne
    Report
    Aug 13th 2022, 9:35 AM

    We should be rightly proud of our diplomatic staff engaged in this work. It may not be successful but it shows that our small neutral country can declare before the world that there is another way, that the endless manufacture of weapons of mass destruction can only lead to annihilation. Pity this report is one-sided but we should be thankful for any effort.
    Well played Ireland!

    50
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Paolo
    Favourite Paolo
    Report
    Aug 13th 2022, 7:26 AM

    Headline is misleading….

    34
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Lad
    Favourite Lad
    Report
    Aug 13th 2022, 7:22 AM

    Given our status in the UN security council currently I feel we should definitely be able to influence and negotiate for a good deal, maybe three for the price of two?

    22
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Ajax Penumbra
    Favourite Ajax Penumbra
    Report
    Aug 13th 2022, 7:34 AM

    @Lad: Free keg of Guinness for every five weapons decommissioned; be grand!

    Seriously, though— even outside of Ireland’s position on the UNSC, we have a decent amount of respect and influence in the area of nuclear nonproliferation and weapons control in general. During the summer, Ireland presented a draft declaration to protect civilians from explosive weapons in populated areas which is due to be signed this October. This is a big success for Ireland and the negotiation team and is a major accomplishment during our time on the UNSC.

    48
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Jonny Parkinson
    Favourite Jonny Parkinson
    Report
    Aug 13th 2022, 12:41 PM

    Arguably Nuclear weapons has brought a level of piece between large military powers, if there were no fear of nuclear attack I think a lot of conflicts may have escalated a lot more. NATO have stayed out of the Ukraine war in fear of Russian retaliation could you imagine what would happen if we didn’t have anything hold them back it would be carnage.

    10
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Rian Lynch
    Favourite Rian Lynch
    Report
    Aug 13th 2022, 2:16 PM

    @Jonny Parkinson: to hold who back ? and who is ‘we’ ?

    5
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute THINK Paddy THINK
    Favourite THINK Paddy THINK
    Report
    Aug 14th 2022, 2:16 AM

    The article is a propaganda stunt.

    It fails to mention which countries have used atomic weapons

    It is putting the whole emphasis of danger on Russia.

    It forgets that Ireland is de facto no longer neutral and voiceless in the nuclear arms issue.

    4
Submit a report
Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
Thank you for the feedback
Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.
JournalTv
News in 60 seconds