Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.
You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.
If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.
THERE WAS AN increase in racist incidents flagged with an NGO in the first six months of this year, with higher levels of violence, threats and discrimination in public spaces reported.
The European Network Against Racism Ireland (Enar) host a website, iReport.ie, which allows victims and members of the public who witness racism, to report it confidentially. Today the organisation said there was a significantly higher level of reporting in this six month period than all previously recorded periods.
A total of 190 reports were received during that period, with assault appearing in 22 cases, including ten with physical injury and two threats to kill or cause serious harm. Of the 22 assaults, three were against women and three were against mixed-gender groups, but the report shows men are significantly more likely to be targeted by violence.
Today’s report includes a number of examples of reported incidents:
I was on my way to work when a man swung a folded newspaper at me, hitting me and called me a ‘f***ing black woman’. I was in shock.
One of them stopped, leaned in front of the victims face and began racially abusing him. When the man failed to react, he pulled off his headphones and said something along the lines of ‘this is what I hate about this country, all the ‘blacks’ coming in here taking our jobs. After this it escalated into a violent racist attack.
Eighteen incidents required medical treatment or resulted in serious health problems for the victims.
One involved children experiencing bleach burns on eyes and skin after they were sprayed by other children in their neighbourhood.
Two involved severe beatings of the victim, with unknown extent of injuries at time of reporting.
Eight resulted in physical injuries not requiring immediate hospitalisation.
In two cases clothes were ripped from the bodies of victims during the assaults.
Verbal abuse
The largest proportion of incidents submitted concerned verbal abuse. In 43 cases, the incidents involved perpetrators who were known to the person targeted by the abuse. Ten of these perpetrators were staff members in public institutions and 12 were neighbours.
My nextdoor neighbour came onto my property shouting that his partner was going to kill me, calling me a ‘foreign bastard’ and a ‘dirty foreign bitch’.
He called me a ‘Filthy jew’ and a ‘baby killer’, and said that I should have been ‘Killed by the nazis’.
A neighbour’s son kept calling my mixed race son a nigger and a monkey and a black bastard. He warned him a few times to stop saying such things. I went and asked his parents to please speak to their child as this was unacceptable. I was told to f**k off and that all my kids should watch their back…
At the Trinity Ball, a person approached a girl of Arab descent shouting ‘Allahu Akbar’.
In one incident, it is claimed a councillor told a member of the Travelling community that if they were a housing officer, they would not give them a place in their neighbourhood.
‘…bringing in the likes of dirt like you and I have 220 people waiting to be housed. Why would I help you?’
Advertisement
Social media
Enar said 53 reports concerned the publication of racist statements in media and social media. Of these, 34 were published on social media sites like Facebook and Twitter.
“Facebook has been a particular producer of collective racist statements as people respond to negative news stories or posts about ethnic groups and share them with their networks,” the report notes.
“It has also been home to new Irish white supremacist groups, anti-immigration groups and Islamophobic groups emerging online with links to (and mostly dominated by members of) international far-right groups.”
According to the report, only 30 of the 190 cases were reported to gardaí.
Twenty cases involving violence were not reported to gardaí Two people said they had previous responses from gardaí to previous incidents, four did not think the gardaí would do anything, one was concerned about the offenders’ response, and four said that the type of incident was too common (despite involving violence).
A number of victims who reported incidents on the site said their fear as a result was so significant that it impacted on their ability to engage in normal everyday activities like attending school or going to work, shopping or talking to neighbours.
Shane O’Curry, director of Enar Ireland, said the report reveals “worrying levels of institutional racism”.
We must clearly understand this: these attitudes and practices have the effect of normalising racist crimes against people.
“We need to be proactive in confronting racism. It is not good enough to blame minorities for the failure of society to integrate them when such high levels of racism are allowed to fester,” he added. “The responsibility must be on the state to first address the racism in its own institutions.”
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
How is this institutional racism? This is individuals, in some cases children, reacting to a changing Ireland. When I grew up, you could get grief because you were a North/Southsider, a culchie, a nordie, etc – the music is still the same, just different dancers…
@Jodus: What they mean by institutional racism is that the state enforces immigration policies. Like occasionally deporting people, requiring them to prove claims for asylum, placing them in direct provision, not allowing them to travel in and out of the country freely, not giving them exactly the same rights as citizens until they become citizens etc. The only non-institutionally racist state in their view is one without borders.
@Henry Porter: Racism exists in Ireland. You don’t have to accept anonymous reports as facts to accept that as a fact. Treating anonymous reports as fact is just silly.
Absolutely right the state inforcment om migrants is place , we are a small nation with finite resources. We can’t be expected to welcome every economic or displaced foreign nationals live of the state. Charity should begin with our own citizens.
@Henry Porter I don’t agree with making abusive comments on any person Irish or otherwise Let me remind you Henry this name calling and abusive comments of people is happening every day on the Journal. I don’t see to many or you queuing up to Challenge it.
If you read the article you would notice that a quarter of racist verbal abuse came from workers in public institutions.
If the Gardai are not responding to Violent racist attacks and if the Government are not taking measures to reduce racism in public institutions it will fester.
The report was no anonymous but carried out by The European Network Against Racism Ireland (Enar). Can you substantiate why you are claiming it is anonymous?
@AlanH -AFC: All figure show that inward migration is a plus for the economy. Also standing in solidarity with people helps make sure they stand in solidarity with you. Lets punch upwards not sidewards or down!
@Turlough Conway: I said that the reports’ plural are anonymous. Can you name the individuals who made the reports to ENAR? No – that makes them anonymous. Perfectly understandably by the way. Of course many victims don’t want to report such incidents publicly.
But taking such reports at face value really is mad. People have been known to report things that didn’t happen you know, or exaggerate things that did. It happens in the real world all the time and is done by people of all skin colours.
@Marlowemallow: Here’s what just one faked hate crime looks like. This one was reported to police and all. Everyone important made outraged statements about it and condemned islamophobia. People wrote message of love and support’ around the campus for her:
““During the course of the investigation, the female complainant admitted that she fabricated the story about her physical attack as well as the removal of her hijab and wallet by two white males,” Lafayette police said in a statement. “This incident is no longer under investigation by the Lafayette Police Department.”
LAFAYETTE, La. — A woman will be charged with filing a false report after she admitted to making up a story about two men robbing her near the University of Louisiana at Lafayette campus.
Karl Ratcliff, spokesman for the Lafayette Police Department, confirmed the charge Friday.
The woman told UL police she was walking on Smith Street near campus when two white men attacked her, yelled racial slurs and stole her wallet and hijab, a head covering sometimes worn by Muslim women. The woman also initially said one of the men was wearing a Donald Trump hat.”
@Clever Jake: They’re non EU citizens. How are they getting into this country if they don’t have work and a work visa lined up? 62% of Africans are unemployed. How can this be?
@Clever Jake… As marlowemellow’s point below illustrates, just because “Black Africans are almost seven times more likely to report” stuff, doesn’t necessarily translate into a seven-fold likelihood of discrimination having actually taken place..
@Clever Jake: “Black Africans recorded the highest unemployment rate (36%), and were four times more likely to be unemployed than White Irish individuals.” http://emn.ie/index.jsp?p=100&n=105&a=269
Your argument is false. The report is also out of date from a different economic climate of 2010.
@Karl Bauer: Joking aside, even by their own standards I’m quite shocked by the viciousness of the racist comments by Marlowemallow, MackPilon et al. They really have reached an extremely radical and fundamentalist new low in their hate-filled views. These are not the type of views that will be tolerated by Irish people, and the only solace is that the persons posting these lies and racist comments aren’t even Irish, thankfully.
The Increase in illegal immigration, bogus asylum seekers and a ban on debate of all the above in our Dail will inevitably lead to animosity and polarization of Irish and immigrant communities.
Having said, i would take these ‘incidents’ with a pinch of salt – more likely foreign funded NGO trying to maintain relevance. For a country that went from mono ehtnic to 1 in 5 foreign born in less than 20 years I would say we are quite a patient people
The judgement and determinations section on courts.ie is good. Gives accounts of asylum scammers, how long they’ve been in the country, the number of times they’ve appealed deportation orders etc. Racism quangos love this stuff. Otherwise they’d all have to get real jobs.
Here’s one of the phenomena that he’s talking about. It may or may not be technically illegal to move here from the UK and claim asylum but that’s not really what people are talking about. If it’s not illegal, it should be. And these are the ones who are within the system. No one has statistics for those who are not in the system because that’s how being undocumented works. As the Irish in the US can demonstrate.
“The number of asylum claims is set to almost treble by the end of the year, with applications from Pakistani and Bangladesh nationals accounting for most of the increase.
Claims by Pakistani nationals have increased eightfold so far this year, while claims from Bangladeshis are up almost fourfold.
People from the two nations now account for 54 per cent of all asylum claims being made in the Republic, compared with just 19 per cent of claims last year.
According to the Department of Justice, applications from those nations are increasing much faster than from other countries because the Irish system is being used by young men on student visas in the UK to prolong their stays in Europe.
A department review found that most of those from Pakistan and Bangladesh claiming asylum here had travelled from England to Scotland and then taken a car ferry to Northern Ireland. They then travel to the Republic and lodge their asylum claims.”
Shhhh! The journal are trying to downplay it and discredit what the Irish Times described as the ‘highest racism and hate crimes reported on record’.
The journal is a ‘good weather reporter’, it doesnt do negative stories about Ireland, im starting to think they’re the spin department for the Gov in order to promote Ireland.Inc.
A negative gov report barely sees the light of day and hasn’t since the 80′s and the journal is the ideal outlet for the positive crap churned out.
@Meanderingsz: There are some things I don’t agree with, however I’d be happy to sit down and debate them, that’s what’s done in any civilised society. Burning a child’s skin with bleach, hitting people, shouting abuse, come on, that’s abhorrent in any society.
Who would have guessed a colossal increase in immigration in a very short period of time would lead to conflict in a country with very little experience with it
Why ? It might have something to do with the social welfare system in a lot of cases but certainly not in all of them . There are a lot of genuine people coming in to get a new start and want to work.
@Carl Nolan: You’ve just answered my question, most of them get more here on one weeks welfare than they’d get for working a whole year in their own country.
Yes, this kind of racism is absolutely vile, no excuses. But you won’t see many media reports showing the toll mass immigration from foreign cultures is having on Europe or even only little old Ireland. Always the positive spin (they do our crappy jobs – do they?) or from the POV of the minority. I just read about Maria Ladenburger, daughtet of an EU official, raped & murdered recently in Germany by an Afghan immigrant whose people she was trying to help. Shocking, but not surprising that only the Daily Mail and Express seem to have carried the story.
But why would that story be more newsworthy than if a European carried out the rape?
Also there was a story about a 13 year old who was purportedly gang raped in Berlin by immigrants. This story was everywhere. There were mass protests. It turned out the story was engineered by the Kremlin to affect Merkels party in local elections in a continuing bid to de-stabilise the EU. You wont read that in the express or Mail. Not on their agenda.
@Turough: do we have problem with the MSM not covering the crimes of white Europeans? Maybe I’m just old fashioned, but I believe their job is to report on the facts, not to ignore or whitewash them or worry about how they will be received.
who did the crappy jobs before the crappy job doers arrived? someone must have had. taxi driving is not on the skills list nether is nannying, cleaning or shop keeping. keep them coming the business buddies say, i think its illegal and goes against work visa rules.
It would be interesting if we could find out how many people actually left Ireland because of racism. 190 alleged cases of racism made to a website but how many people packed there bags the following morning and went looking for a better, safer and more tolerable Society than our own. ” Welcome to Ireland, it’s not perfect but if you don’t like it then thanks for coming, wishing your better luck where you stop next”. we as a nation have being abused enough by other nations. ” no Irish need apply” is still advertised in Poland today just like it was in America and England for past generations. Sticks and stones baby, sticks and stones. Anyway who reports crimes of hate to a website instead of the gardai. I wonder if this is not a quango seeking attention to keeps its funding.
So if there is institutionalised racism in a country against minorities the solution is not to fix it but for teh affected parties to move on. Are you saying that Irish people who sufferred racism in foreign lands should just have moved on?
@Fox in the Box: Integration is something that the individual who arrives in a new culture does or doesn’t do. And of course there are degrees of it. The dichotomy you’ve created is the wrong one.
From your own chart of ‘targeted racialised group’
What race are Muslims?
What race are Jews?
These are religions and their followers and are not a racial group.
@Maurice Bourke: The way the doctrine of islamophobia works is by starting from the supposed viewpoint of the bad guy, not from any objective criteria. It’s viewpoint epistemology. What they mean is that people who shout ‘Allahu Akbar’ at a woman in a hijab are making prejudiced assumptions about her based on visual characteristics, making a negative judgment based on those assumptions and then engaging in an act of injustice by insulting her.
The bad guy is therefore treating her in a ‘racialized’ manner because the islamophobia-peddlers have essentially redefined racism to mean: ‘making assumptions about and judging someone negatively based on their physical appearance where that person is low on the privilege scale as defined by islamophobia-peddlers’.
@Marlowemallow:
I find it interesting they included 9 cases of where the white Irish were racially targeted. Thought the white Irish would have the highest rating on the privilege scale and would be the bad guy by what you’re saying?
@Maurice Bourke: That’s PR. Observe these groups by what they actually do, where they spend their time, money and resources. That’s the only way to understand what they’re really about.
It’s like lefties who make all the right noises about how they oppose all kinds of religious fundamentalism equally. Talk is cheap. What they do and don’t do always tells the truth.
“You really are a relic of the past, borders will no longer exist in the future when there are no jobs because of technological advancements.”
If that ever happens, it will be hundreds of years before the entire world is free of all jobs. Until then there will always be people who have more and people who have less.
“Nationalism is dead”
You’d like it to be, however this is not the case. Just look at the turnout for national holidays across the globe.
” It is always those that seek to deny others the same privilege they have based on illogical, uneducated arguments that bring calamity on society, blaming people over institutions for what they perceive to be attacks on this false notion of their identity.”
Tell that to Sweden or, soon to be, Canada.
“While you have an ability to write English correctly you have no substance to your argument.”
Says the guy who’s basing his entire post on a Star Trek fantasy land.
“And that is the problem for this generation, their voice is empty and hollow, lacking any semblance of interest in actual knowledge of how the structures of political economies work, how society and culture mesh and how historical analysis is paramount to understanding the future.”
Arrogance killed the Remain campaign. Arrogance killed the Clinton campaign. Arrogance will kill the social justice movement.
@John Smith: You true believers in the religion of Progress are regressing us all into a Dark Age much worse than the ones that occupy your imaginations. I’m not a nationalist, by the way. What is it they say about assumptions again?
How about you ‘Progressives’ hold off on dismantling borders until we get those space stations going on Mars ok? Or when algal biodiesel and robots and the Singularity have reduced humanity to the same sterile, lunar, robotic unity that you worship. In the meantime the rest of us will get on with trying to limit the harm you’re doing to human life back in the real world.
@John Smith: That’s not what Islamophobia means in this context. This is an anti-racism lobby group. They describe muslims as a racialized group. That is what they mean by islamophobia.
@Fox in the Box: I treat members of minority groups as individuals. Therefore I can and will ‘call out’ those individuals who happen to be members of minority groups who refuse to integrate. And in fact, the only aspects of integration that are really necessary are both quite basic and entirely within the power of the individual.
Not preaching jihad, not supporting the muslim brotherhood, not treating women as second class citizens, not carrying out FGM, not sending your children to be forcibly married abroad, not teaching your children bigotry against infidels, not excluding them from music and art classes, not forcing them to wear hijabs or banning them from mixed-sex swimming lessons – such things are in fact entirely within the power of the individual who either chooses to do or not do them.
And no, of course integrating won’t protect you against racism. It’s not something you do for the reward of being treated with the basic respect that you’re already entitled to. It’s something you do or do not do for its own sake.
Social media do they mean the journal If you make critical remarks about travelers or say EU emigration policy is wrong does that make you racist and guilty of a hate crime Sounds a bit Orwellian
@Mairtin Cathbhar: According to them, yes. They will tell you with a straight face that Irish women might prefer the more open sexism of, say, Pakistan, to the slightly more subtle kind we have here. They’ll describe the arrival in Germany of mass sexual harassment combined with theft in public spaces as a ‘cultural quirk’ – that’s how an Irish Times columnist described Cologne on New Year’s Eve. But of course the first resort of such ‘anti-racists’ is to simply lie when confronted with conflicts of cultures and values.
Cultural diversity and differences should be embraced. In equal measure we should avoid PC and feel openly unashamed about our culture and help visitors who choose to live with us, integrate.
Mairtin, that depends, to claim that a persons skin colour makes them incompatible with our culture is racist but to express a genuine concern about integrating convicted criminals is not. The difference is one actual is a mark of the character of the person the other isn’t
@Mairtin Cathbhar: Not all cultural differences can be embraced if you have a given set of values and wish to live in a functioning society. FGM, honour killings, child marriage, jihadism, anti-infidel bigotry, sex slavery, slavery, unequal inheritance and divorce rights, death penalties for leaving a religion and for adultery or premarital sex – none of those should be embraced if you disagree with them.
@Dave O Keeffe: Yes, yes, a nice clean rap sheet issued by your local friendly Afghan police station is wonderful evidence of lack of criminal history. Or better still, the all-clear from Somali police.
Sharia law is incompatible with fundamental human rights as determined by the ECHR and House of Lords. There are states and areas of the world which implement sharia law – usually with the support of a majority of those states’ populations.
If a state is founded on a legal code which is itself inherently illegal, what possible sense can it make to rely on convictions or absence thereof of citizens of that state or area? None.
A Pakistani Christian may be convicted of blasphemy. They are not guilty of any crime by Irish legal standards. An 60 year old Indonesian Christian woman may be found guilty of selling alcohol and caned. She is not guilty of any crime by Irish legal standards.
A Somali muslim may marry a 9 year old, rape his wives and war captive sex slaves, engage in polygamy, execute captured enemies, stone an apostate, beat his wife for disobedience, kill his child for premarital sex – and not be convicted of any crime in Somalia.
@Dave O Keeffe: You said that integrating “convicted criminals” is a genuine (i.e. acceptable) concern.
The point is that integrating some convicted criminals should cause no concern while integrating some people who are not convicted criminals should cause major concern. In other words, a clean criminal background check is a hopelessly flawed basis for deciding whether concerns about integration are well-founded or not.
Marlow, I used criminal conviction as a marker of character. Obviously it shouldn’t be the only criteria and obviously the nature of such a conviction should be considered. Character should be the basis, nothing else.
It depends on if your remarks are based on fact or prejudice and what your intention is.
So I could say that all banksters are settled people therefore settled people are corrupt.
It might be technically true but it would be prejudicial to make that conclusion.
@Dave O Keeffe: Fine. Currently character is not a criteria for being admitted or denied entry to the country. But if such a test were possible how would an Irish civil servant assess the character of an Iraqi asylum seeker? The Iraqi constitution enshrines sharia as the supreme law of Iraq.
WE have to factor in mental illness into this. There are a number of mentally deranged individuals in this country lacking any sort of verbal filter. If they’re not shouting racial abuse then they’re accusing a white irish person of being a snob on the street or looking down on them or something else. Or they will go nuts if you don’t give them a cigarette.
The implication of that is that no amount of “education” or government policy is ever going to change that.
mental illness or not they didn’t lick it off the street, the racist messages were picked up somewhere.
And the solution is not a better verbal filter, rather than stopping people sharing their racist opinions perhaps it would be better to change their opinions in the first place?!
Nice way of burying you head in the sand and washing your hands of it fred – put it down to something thats ‘not our fault’ and cant be changed…
You see, by calling them “morons”, you’re simply dismissing the issue at large. Until people start calling it like it is (bigots as wrote afterwards), we are still going to have incidents like these occurring on a frequent basis.
If the concerns are genuine then they can be demonstrated thus by reasonable argument.
If a person is being bigoted and racist then they should be called out on it with substantiation.
“Radicalisation comes from militarised foreign policy, nothing else.”
Absolute rubbish and I hope you really don’t believe that. If radicalisation comes from foreign policy, why are countries which have nothing to do with military interventions in Muslim countries also suffering from radical Islamic attacks?
“The construct of borders in a non-argument, we are past that in the main. ”
In your head maybe, however this is simply not the case in a practical or legal sense.
“If you think it will be hundreds of years before all jobs are gone you are probably right, more like half of jobs will be gone in the next 20 to 40 years.”
The exact same thing was said when electricity was invented. The reality is that technology drives a change in the way in which we work and removes jobs that are no longer necessary, however it creates spin-off industries and jobs which didn’t exist previously. Prime example would be the fact that computers were supposed to kill the office worker (IE the typewriter) and instead office jobs have grown exponentially since their introduction.
“turnout for the holidays? What?”
My point there is pretty obvious to anyone who doesn’t want to play purposely obtuse. Nationalism is popular, on top of this nationalist parties are growing in popularity at a rapid pace. While you claim that nationalism is dead more and more people are drifting towards nationalist parties.
“Canada or Sweden? What again?”
Sweden, otherwise known as the rape capital of Europe where Feminist snow plowing programmes result in the shut-down of the national transportation infrastructure. A running joke of a country now:
@John Smith: Complete nonsense. The people on the receiving end of militarised foreign policy has agency of their own just like you. They have their own cultures and histories that long predate your shortened historical viewpoint. Including their own military and imperial histories. Anyway, it’s your western-centric viewpoint that is the dinosaur thankfully.
Oh look another progressive liberal rag painting Ireland as the worst place in the world to live. I would love to know how many in the groups above targeted each other, I remover a recent story of a certain group of irish who want their own culture protesting immigrants been given housing.
About time we got out house in order I’m Ireland boot out those denied immigration, tackle the lawless elements who get away with it by the cry of cultural heritage
@Marlowemallow: My experience in the ME goes back to the early ’60′s and that pre-dates any of the conflicts that are being blamed for the Islamic hatred for the West, in fact this problem started 1400 years ago and has been really festering since the Crusaders drove them out of Europe and back to the desert.
@Turlough Conway: No our laws don’t derive from the EU. They derive from the common law and our constitution and the EU. The ECHR is not the social justice movement. The social justice movement has been pushing specific policies involving multiculturalism and open borders and islamophobia, among other things. That is why it is dying. Human rights are fortunately not reducible to a movement of pampered middle class westerners and that concept will survive just fine.
This comment thread makes me depressed. No sympathetic comments for victims of abuse. Everyone simply justifying these attacks as a inevitable result of our immigration policy.
I have grown up seeing Ireland change and become multicultural. Does that make me want to lash out in the way people have above? Of course not because I am a rational person.
@Cillian Lynch: You could just emote bout it or you could engage with what people are saying. Emoting has not worked too well so far as an anti-racism strategy. ‘Everyone’ is not justifying racist attacks – that’s incorrect and irrational.
@Cillian Lynch: I’ve noticed whenever there’s an article on the Journal about racism the vast majority of upvoted comments will be either downplaying the reports or thinly-veiled “if we’re so racist then go home” type sentiments.
@Carl Nolan: I agree completely. I am normally not one to comment on these threads but felt compelled to do so in this instance. In my office I am currently surrounded by two Dutch people, two French, one Swedish and one Greek. They are all white. Do you think they have ever received any abuse for immigrating to Ireland and “taking our jobs”?
You’ve seen parts of Ireland turn into a United Nations Convention centre. You may see that as a good thing. I don’t. I see Ireland as the homeland of the Irish people.
As of 2011, 17% of our population were immigrants. It will be even higher today. It’s far too high and this level of immigration cannot continue.
“You’ve seen parts of Ireland turn into a United Nations Convention centre”
I have to facepalm at sensationalist rubbish like this. You really have no idea what large scale immigration looks like.
I’m not surprised to see the sorts of stuff you follow and re-tweet on your Twitter.
The National Party (led by a man who hangs out with neo-nazis)
Irish Alt-Right
Marion Le Pen
Ireland First!
Bretbart London
Personally I don’t subscribe to your insular “oireland for de oirish” rubbish and think Ireland is a far more interesting place when it welcomes people from all over the world.
You really are a relic of the past, borders will no longer exist in the future when there are no jobs because of technological advancements. Nationalism is dead, those that seek to purport the myth are those that will create a new ideology that leads to the deaths of millions, until we reset again, just like after the industrial revolution’s Luddites layed the groundwork of Communism, or the market crash of 1929, combined with the Bernaysian rise of public relations led to the rise of Fascism. It is always those that seek to deny others the same privilege they have based on illogical, uneducated arguments that bring calamity on society, blaming people over institutions for what they perceive to be attacks on this false notion of their identity.
While you have an ability to write English correctly you have no substance to your argument. And that is the problem for this generation, their voice is empty and hollow, lacking any semblance of interest in actual knowledge of how the structures of political economies work, how society and culture mesh and how historical analysis is paramount to understanding the future.
Also, Islamophobia is a fear of Islam, nowhere does that infer Islam is a race, much in the same as being pogonophobic does not mean you see beards as a race.
@MackPilon: Yes, Islam has a history of its own and a militant thread dating to its foundation, but the supposed anti-racists insist on treating Muslims as unthinking reactors to the actions of the west.
It is in the best interests of all parties to integrate and build relations. Calling out the minority for not integrating is scapegoating. I know of many foreigners who have gone out of their way to integrate into society but still experience racial prejudices
Radicalisation comes from militarised foreign policy, nothing else. Religion is the banner under which they fight, but politics is the reason. Oppress people and they will take to violence, this is an ageless fact. You can’t destroy Iraq, cause the deaths of at least 600,000 people and leave it to fester and expect no consequence. But much like the world doesn’t blame citizens of a powerful country for the actions of the hawks in government, the vast majority of Muslims do not blame citizens either.
The construct of borders in a non-argument, we are past that in the main. The real issues are climate change and technological advances, in 50 years borders will be the last of humanities woes. A tide is coming that no one sees because they are too busy arguing about who should be in what country and what should people say.
If you think it will be hundreds of years before all jobs are gone you are probably right, more like half of jobs will be gone in the next 20 to 40 years. This in itself will cause capitalism to implode, without buyers you can’t sell. Unless we accept a basic living wage, become more socialist and remove the notion of work being the sole driver of humans we are doomed, no question.
All your other points are to difficult for me to understand, turnout for the holidays? What? Canada or Sweden? What again? Star Trek? You calling other people arrogant after being arrogant?
If you knew anything of what your final points mean you would know that we have been through exactly the same thing as now between the 60′s and the 80′s. It is cyclical, generations fail to learn from their parents. We move two steps forward and one step back, over and over, because people like yourself enjoy the status quo. I have news for you buddy, any killed campaigns are only dormant, they always come back, taking another two steps forward.
Not at all. In Ireland our laws derive from the EU. There has been a concerted attempt to associate the inequalities of globalisation with social justice in an last ditched attempt by traditionalists to renew their regressive Christian past. Not going to happen. We will abide by the ECHR.
I think there needs to be space for Irish people to have a respectful dialogue about the impact of having so many non native Irish people living here. Closing down all debate and calling it racist may only force resentment and anger underground. At the same time I am extremely uncomfortable with the tone of some of the comments. On this article. As for the racist abuse being anonymous, my guess is that the victims may be too scared to report. I have witnessed a Black bus driver being demeaned and harassed by a group of young men. I reported it to Dublin bus afterwards and it must have been captured on CCTV. No one stood up for the driver including myself. This was probably because we all felt a bit scared of this group, afraid of provoking violence. There was that sense of threat there.
What Trump's order mean for vanilla prices, after Madagascar gets hit with 47% tariff
27 mins ago
2.8k
5
Duke of York
Prince Andrew’s reputation ‘irrecoverable’ after Newsnight interview, senior aide told tribunal
1 hr ago
6.9k
20
trade war
China slaps extra 34% tariffs on US imports as Trump vows his 'policies will never change'
Updated
4 hrs ago
55.3k
171
Your Cookies. Your Choice.
Cookies help provide our news service while also enabling the advertising needed to fund this work.
We categorise cookies as Necessary, Performance (used to analyse the site performance) and Targeting (used to target advertising which helps us keep this service free).
We and our 161 partners store and access personal data, like browsing data or unique identifiers, on your device. Selecting Accept All enables tracking technologies to support the purposes shown under we and our partners process data to provide. If trackers are disabled, some content and ads you see may not be as relevant to you. You can resurface this menu to change your choices or withdraw consent at any time by clicking the Cookie Preferences link on the bottom of the webpage .Your choices will have effect within our Website. For more details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
We and our vendors process data for the following purposes:
Use precise geolocation data. Actively scan device characteristics for identification. Store and/or access information on a device. Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development.
Cookies Preference Centre
We process your data to deliver content or advertisements and measure the delivery of such content or advertisements to extract insights about our website. We share this information with our partners on the basis of consent. You may exercise your right to consent, based on a specific purpose below or at a partner level in the link under each purpose. Some vendors may process your data based on their legitimate interests, which does not require your consent. You cannot object to tracking technologies placed to ensure security, prevent fraud, fix errors, or deliver and present advertising and content, and precise geolocation data and active scanning of device characteristics for identification may be used to support this purpose. This exception does not apply to targeted advertising. These choices will be signaled to our vendors participating in the Transparency and Consent Framework.
Manage Consent Preferences
Necessary Cookies
Always Active
These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work.
Targeting Cookies
These cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.
Functional Cookies
These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and personalisation. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we have added to our pages. If you do not allow these cookies then these services may not function properly.
Performance Cookies
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not be able to monitor our performance.
Store and/or access information on a device 110 partners can use this purpose
Cookies, device or similar online identifiers (e.g. login-based identifiers, randomly assigned identifiers, network based identifiers) together with other information (e.g. browser type and information, language, screen size, supported technologies etc.) can be stored or read on your device to recognise it each time it connects to an app or to a website, for one or several of the purposes presented here.
Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development 143 partners can use this purpose
Use limited data to select advertising 113 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times an ad is presented to you).
Create profiles for personalised advertising 83 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (such as forms you submit, content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (for example, information from your previous activity on this service and other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (that might include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present advertising that appears more relevant based on your possible interests by this and other entities.
Use profiles to select personalised advertising 83 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on your advertising profiles, which can reflect your activity on this service or other websites or apps (like the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects.
Create profiles to personalise content 39 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (for instance, forms you submit, non-advertising content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (such as your previous activity on this service or other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (which might for example include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present content that appears more relevant based on your possible interests, such as by adapting the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find content that matches your interests.
Use profiles to select personalised content 35 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on your content personalisation profiles, which can reflect your activity on this or other services (for instance, the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects. This can for example be used to adapt the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find (non-advertising) content that matches your interests.
Measure advertising performance 134 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which advertising is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine how well an advert has worked for you or other users and whether the goals of the advertising were reached. For instance, whether you saw an ad, whether you clicked on it, whether it led you to buy a product or visit a website, etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of advertising campaigns.
Measure content performance 61 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which content is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine whether the (non-advertising) content e.g. reached its intended audience and matched your interests. For instance, whether you read an article, watch a video, listen to a podcast or look at a product description, how long you spent on this service and the web pages you visit etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of (non-advertising) content that is shown to you.
Understand audiences through statistics or combinations of data from different sources 74 partners can use this purpose
Reports can be generated based on the combination of data sets (like user profiles, statistics, market research, analytics data) regarding your interactions and those of other users with advertising or (non-advertising) content to identify common characteristics (for instance, to determine which target audiences are more receptive to an ad campaign or to certain contents).
Develop and improve services 83 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service, such as your interaction with ads or content, can be very helpful to improve products and services and to build new products and services based on user interactions, the type of audience, etc. This specific purpose does not include the development or improvement of user profiles and identifiers.
Use limited data to select content 37 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type, or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times a video or an article is presented to you).
Use precise geolocation data 46 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, your precise location (within a radius of less than 500 metres) may be used in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Actively scan device characteristics for identification 27 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, certain characteristics specific to your device might be requested and used to distinguish it from other devices (such as the installed fonts or plugins, the resolution of your screen) in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Ensure security, prevent and detect fraud, and fix errors 92 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Your data can be used to monitor for and prevent unusual and possibly fraudulent activity (for example, regarding advertising, ad clicks by bots), and ensure systems and processes work properly and securely. It can also be used to correct any problems you, the publisher or the advertiser may encounter in the delivery of content and ads and in your interaction with them.
Deliver and present advertising and content 99 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Certain information (like an IP address or device capabilities) is used to ensure the technical compatibility of the content or advertising, and to facilitate the transmission of the content or ad to your device.
Match and combine data from other data sources 72 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Information about your activity on this service may be matched and combined with other information relating to you and originating from various sources (for instance your activity on a separate online service, your use of a loyalty card in-store, or your answers to a survey), in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Link different devices 53 partners can use this feature
Always Active
In support of the purposes explained in this notice, your device might be considered as likely linked to other devices that belong to you or your household (for instance because you are logged in to the same service on both your phone and your computer, or because you may use the same Internet connection on both devices).
Identify devices based on information transmitted automatically 88 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Your device might be distinguished from other devices based on information it automatically sends when accessing the Internet (for instance, the IP address of your Internet connection or the type of browser you are using) in support of the purposes exposed in this notice.
Save and communicate privacy choices 69 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
The choices you make regarding the purposes and entities listed in this notice are saved and made available to those entities in the form of digital signals (such as a string of characters). This is necessary in order to enable both this service and those entities to respect such choices.
have your say