Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
THE RAPE CRISIS Network of Ireland (RCNI) has said that it will not be publishing statistics on the experience of survivors of sexual violence in 2016 because of “significant cuts” to its funding.
Since 2005, the RCNI has published annual national statistics recording the collective experience of survivors from rape crisis centres across the country.
This lack of funding resulted in a reduced capacity to safely analyse and publish data on sexual violence, the group said.
Its executive director, Clíona Saidléar said that the RCNI has “a duty to tell survivors’ stories safely, truthfully and accurately”.
She said that 70% of its funding was removed in 2015, and this immediately risked dismantling its database infrastructure.
“The funding cut has left a gap which we can no longer fund out of reserves and thus, the 2016 data is not of a standard that we feel would be ethical or safe to analyse and release collectively,” Saidléar said.
This is why we have taken the decision not to process or publish 2016 data, as inaccurate data undermines both survivors and our work.
She said that the funding costs could mean that the sector struggles to be compliant with EU directives.
Saidléar said: “At a time when we need to increase data governance standards and need to increase our knowledge, a decrease in resources in this sensitive area is unsustainable.”
She added that the RCNI was continuing to engage with Tusla in the hope that “some resolution can be found that will enable the continued collection and usability of high-quality data from survivors into the future”.
Responding to the Rape Crisis Centre’s comments, Tusla said that it’s ”committed to improving Ireland’s domestic, sexual and gender-based violence services in the interest of survivors across Ireland”.
Tusla gathers anonymised, summary data on an annual basis from funded services to allow insight into and understanding of the services delivered and the needs of survivors.
All data gathered undergoes an extensive process of cleaning and validation.Tusla is satisfied that its data collection methods and processes meet all required standards including compliance around data protection.
Tusla added that it is “fully cognisant” of its responsibilities in respect of data protection legislation and has “proactively engaged” a data protection specialist to assess Tusla’s data management activities.
Minister for Justice
The RCNI said that it will hold 2016 and 2017 data for a short while longer in anticipation of being able to bring it to an adequate standard in the near future.
According to its website, the organisation is mainly funded through statutory bodies including the Department of Justice.
Speaking at the launch of the Dublin Rape Crisis Centre annual report for 2016 earlier this month, Minister for Justice Charlie Flanagan said it provided “services and expertise that feeds into the government’s second national strategy against domestic, sexual and gender-based violence”.
On the Ray D’Arcy Show this afternoon, rape victim and survivor Niamh Ní Domhnaill who gave her reaction to the Justice Minister’s decision not to publish the report.
“What’s interesting this time, is every other excuse, and I’m not going to say reasons here, that’s been put forward before by the government before now has been financial issues, so it was a fiscal reason.
Referencing a report in the Times Ireland edition that quoted Charlie Flanagan as saying the report was unnecessary, Ní Domhnaill said:
“I’m not too sure what the definition of necessary or unnecessary is here, but it’s quite telling that this time it’s not about money, it’s about the Government saying that don’t feel there is any need.”
TheJournal.ie has asked the Department of Justice for comment.
This article was updated at 7.22pm to include a statement from Tusla
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
They want more money to publish them so, sorry will have to try something better…..
@Paul:
They are not actually saying they want more money to publish them. They are saying they need to have a statistician on the payroll to verify them and ensure the gathering of data and analysis is reliable. They are also adding to the importance of their argument by mentioning that they need to keep up with data protection
Rather than make a public statement to try and gain support would it not be better to look for an alternative solution. All organizations encounter challenges, good management find solutions to these challenges.
@Nick Allen: Unfortunately, as we are currently learning, sometimes there is no option but to go public.
@Philip Kavanagh:
There are always other avenues. If all they want is to have the quality of their analysis assessed and verified as reliable could they not ask a University for help, maybe the CSO for some help. Have they tried working with other similar organisations to look to benefit from some economies of scale for this type of work. Have they asked for volunteer statisticians to offer up some of their time for free. There are many avenues which could be explored which I would be very surprised if one of them didn’t result in a solution to the problem.
You may see my cynicism as this sounds like a PR drive to get more funding rather than actually trying to fix the problem they have
@Nick Allen: Maybe they could set up a communication team to assist them what wouldn’t be a waste of money at all.
Considering the service they provide cutting their funding is a joke especially with Leo throwing 5 million into a team to make him sound good.
Colleges and universities don’t work for free. Students on work placement are looking for wages too.
@Nick Allen: How do you know that they have not already tried other measures to secure the resources they need?
Few organisations could survive a 70% funding cut. Terrible
Other than maintain buildings the money is going into salaries. they have a lot of offices, I realize rape is a serious a disgusting offence to happen to anyone but would not have thought its that prevalent to need all these buildings.
@Dáithí Ó Raghallaigh: I would assume in Dublin they would need a couple of office due to the size of the city and of obviously they need centers in all the major cities.
Some of the comments on here are truly vile and stomach churning. Cutting any funding by 70% for Rape Crisis Centres in a so-called civilised country is outrageous. I can think of other issues you could take up if the issues are just costs in your minds: the Apple tax money, tackling white-collar crime and taking on the banks for charging fees for electronic transactions. It isn’t a monetary issue and never was, it’s a message from the government about where their priorities are. Shame on all of us for letting it happen but the mainstream parties in particular.
So the Government that is spending millions on trying to bring abortion into Ireland hasn’t enough money to support rape victims and have cutting funds to the rape crisis centre!
Maybe George Soros money could be redirected for this very worthy organisation’s work.
have your say