Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Shutterstock/Snow At Night

Emilie Pine 'I've been asked to be the 'token woman'. I don't like it but I say yes'

Until we achieve real cultural diversity – which is a lot bigger than heterosexual, cisgender white women getting on panels – we can’t rest, writes Emilie Pine.

FROM ALL-MALE CONFERENCE conference panels (‘manels’) to male-dominated culture events, the message is clear: women are still marginal.

Though increasingly there is push-back on this message, via social media, and activist campaigns like Waking the Feminists (#WTF), we are still far from equality, and even further from diversity, in academic and cultural line-ups.

I have been asked in the past to be the “token woman” on a panel or in a photoshoot (and yes, in one case, the request actually used the words ‘token woman’). I don’t like it, but I generally say yes, just to make sure there’s actually a woman involved.

At least in this instance, women and men sit on the same panel. Because the other option, and a response that programmers often take, is to try to create ‘balance’ by introducing a female-only strand to the programme.

Theatres seem to do this a lot. I recently saw a play at the Abbey with an all-female cast. I was sceptical. ‘Well, that’s their gender quota taken care of for the year,’ I said to my friend. ‘Are you never happy?’ he jokingly responded.

Well, no.

A bad feminist?

Maybe I’m a bad feminist. I don’t like International Women’s Day either. I get that it’s meant as a corrective; I get that the day is used to raise public consciousness about gender equality; I get that, as one senior male colleague put it, ‘I’m missing the point’.

But he’s also missing my point. Because after all the nice purple ‘Happy International Women’s Day’ balloons are gone, and all the ‘aren’t women great’ posters have come down, I just don’t know how transformative this kind of consciousness-raising is.

In June, I was invited to be part of an all-female panel on ‘New Women’s Writing’ at the UCD Festival. The panel’s conversation focussed on the stylistic diversity of women’s writing, the number of both debut and high-profile women writers currently being published, and the success stories of small presses bringing new voices to new readers. We did not talk about scarcity, but about abundance.

We also talked about inequalities in the sector – as Anne Enright’s gauntlet-throwing article last year in the London Review of Books illustrated, we are still faced with the wearyingly persistent view of women as writers of small domestic narratives, and men as writers of big social themes.

Gender imbalance

Not only that, but women also contend with the gender imbalance of the books review pages of major newspapers and other ways in which – from festivals to prizes – our writing is still struggling for equal recognition.

The panel talked about the social media hashtags that draw attention to women’s writing (#readwomen), and we praised Dublin City Council for choosing The Long Gaze Back as its One City One Book this year. We all know the importance of these kinds of choices – because you cannot be what you cannot see. But being seen, while important, is not a guarantor of anything. After all, to quote the theatre critic Peggy Phelan, if ‘visibility equals power then almost naked young white women should be running Western society’.

This paradox is one of the reasons that, though I am very grateful to be included in any literary event, given my ‘new’ status, and though I appreciate that there are issues specific to women writers that benefit from being discussed within dedicated spaces, I am still ambivalent about the ‘women’s panel’.

Internal resistance

My contradictory reaction to events labelled ‘women’ takes three forms. First, I have an internal resistance to the idea that all females, in Judith Butler’s words, ‘belong to that seamless category … women’. There is much to be said for solidarity (not least collective bargaining power), but we also need to recognise difference and diversity.

And so I chafe under the label ‘woman’ because it seems to put me in an exclusive gender-category, which is assumed to be more definitive than all the other aspects of my life and work.

Second, it’s about how a single focus can highlight issues, but also create ghettos. This thought was with me as I was deciding what to read that day at the UCD Festival.

I have an essay, ‘Notes on Bleeding’, on the social rules that restrict women from revealing the truths about their bodies, from menstruation to body hair. It’s an essay I’m particularly proud of. But I decided I couldn’t read it. I couldn’t read it, because I could not bring myself to be a woman writer on a panel entitled ‘New Women’s Writing’ doing a reading about my period.

Easier to talk about someone else

Instead, I read from an essay about my father’s alcoholism and liver failure, because at the end of the day it’s always easier to talk about someone else’s body than your own. And after the reading, two people came up to me to say that they could identify with what I’d written. In that moment, I felt that I had made the right choice in deciding to read a ‘gender-neutral’ piece.

My third reason for demurring over panels on ‘women’s writing’ is that they are so often populated exclusively by women, for an audience predominantly made up of women. Through our participation in these events, women get to hear and enjoy discussions of the kinds of writers who so often don’t get space at ‘mainstream’ events. But that’s not all we’re doing.

Because we’re also performing an extra task – the labour of fixing sexism. As Audre Lorde puts it, women ‘are still being called upon to stretch across the gap of … ignorance … as to our existence and our needs’.

Through ‘women-focussed’ events, productions and anthologies, women undertake extra labour in order to address gender inequality. There are a significant number of feminist men involved too,  but in the main it is women who perform this work. (Lorde said that in 1979 by the way, a salutary reminder that this is not a new conversation.)

Irony of my critique

The irony of my critique here is not lost on me – I dislike and criticise the women’s panel, even as I benefit from it. This irony demonstrates how, as women writers and critics, we inhabit our own, as well as others’, contradictions.

And here’s another contradiction. My assumption that I should not read about my body publicly because it is somehow too female has been complicated since my essays have been published.

It is, against my expectations, often men who have talked to me about ‘Notes on Bleeding’, about the emotions they feel about menstruation from their admiration of the capabilities of women’s bodies to the respect and sorrow they have for women who are severely affected by their periods. I was afraid that bleeding wasn’t relevant to men, but I was wrong.

I was wrong because I had bought into the false binary of women/men which conditions us to believe that the bodies, lives and cultural outputs of women and men are not just separate, but oppositional or mutually exclusive.

In this, we have a lot to learn from the Trans movement, and the recognition that gender identity exists and is performed on a spectrum. I fell into the binary trap, because while I can see some forms of inequality, it is hard to escape other kinds of conditioning.

Women bearing responsibility

I can sometimes be dismayed by the women-only panel. But most of all, I am dismayed that it is still so necessary. I am tired of all the gender inequality in society and culture, and I am tired of the idea that women should bear the responsibility for fixing it.

I am tired, and I am sure you are tired too. But until the time that we achieve real cultural diversity – which is a lot bigger than heterosexual, cisgender white women getting on panels – we can’t rest.

We have to keep working, we have to keep critiquing, we have to keep counting.

Emilie Pine is associate professor of drama at the School of English, Drama and Film, UCD. Her collection of personal essays, Notes to Self, is out now with Tramp Press.

‘She was living in a derelict building dripping with damp under a tin roof. The year was 1998′>

Opinion: ‘The housing bubble will burst and create another credit crunch’>

original

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

View 88 comments
Close
88 Comments
This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic. Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy here before taking part.
Leave a Comment
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Dawn Harvey
    Favourite Dawn Harvey
    Report
    Mar 10th 2022, 8:29 AM

    Anyone, absolutely anyone who still tries to tell me this isn’t the kremlins fault, whatever the catalysts, reasons or defensive objectives, is a not just naive but dangerously so. They’ve admitted to bombing the hospital because of ‘nationalist battalions’ having set up there.. And yet I see pregnant women on stretchers and injured. Its a hospital, a mater hospital. The lower level of hell is reserved for people who attack the most vulnerable.

    246
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Pete Gilmartin
    Favourite Pete Gilmartin
    Report
    Mar 10th 2022, 10:50 AM

    @Dawn Harvey: Could not had put it better myself.

    70
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Keith O'Reilly
    Favourite Keith O'Reilly
    Report
    Mar 10th 2022, 11:13 AM

    @Dawn Harvey: That line about the nationalists controlling the hospital was sickening, right out of the Israel ‘Hamas is everywhere’ playbook :(

    80
    See 5 more replies ▾
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute GrumpyAulFella
    Favourite GrumpyAulFella
    Report
    Mar 10th 2022, 12:04 PM

    @Roy Dowling: you’re right Roy that was a terrible decision by the US chain of command and MSF should pursue their calls for an independent enquiry. It’s probably a slightly different scenario though as the Afghans called in that strike because they were under fire from Taliban forces in that building, 15 of them who were firing from within apparently. But absolutely a terrible act. Not sure what the dictator’s excuse will be for flattening a hospital full of babies and pregnant women will be though.

    38
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute E.J. Murray
    Favourite E.J. Murray
    Report
    Mar 10th 2022, 12:23 PM

    @Roy Dowling: — The Kunduz hospital incident was an American screw up, they attacked the wrong building. The Russians knew which building they were attacking, or Lavrov wouldn’t have said that that the hospital was a base for nationalists. The Russians were either acting on bad intelligence or Lavrov was lying through his teeth. Given his previous performances I’m inclined to believe the latter.

    41
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute John Black
    Favourite John Black
    Report
    Mar 10th 2022, 12:36 PM

    @Dawn Harvey: You can always depend on Roy to try to change the subject to the U.S.

    44
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute John Black
    Favourite John Black
    Report
    Mar 10th 2022, 1:38 PM

    @Dawn Harvey: Im not sure what you expect Roy.
    Two million women and children refugees fleeing Russian bombs right now, and your comment is : ‘What about Obama- hes going to hell’

    36
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute E.J. Murray
    Favourite E.J. Murray
    Report
    Mar 10th 2022, 2:31 PM

    @Roy Dowling — Do you think the Russians have excuses, because it’s the Russian attack on a hospital that the article refers to?

    16
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Ian James Burgess
    Favourite Ian James Burgess
    Report
    Mar 10th 2022, 9:36 AM

    UK adds Abramovich after he’s had time to move his assets

    97
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Tommy Roche
    Favourite Tommy Roche
    Report
    Mar 10th 2022, 5:48 PM

    @Ian James Burgess: What assets did he move ? Genuine question. They got his properties and the club before he could sell them. Had he other interests ?

    10
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Michael Rossney
    Favourite Michael Rossney
    Report
    Mar 10th 2022, 8:22 AM

    We can help

    Offer Accommodation https://registerofpledges.redcross.ie/#/pledging/room

    Volunteering sort Donations etc iamukrainian dot ie

    Facebook Groups to offer Support for people arriving https://www.facebook.com/groups/379406900679082/?ref=share

    Donate power banks, mobile phones and medical supplies

    Have 2 pin (round pins) into Irish plug adaptors for people arriving

    Offer a job – even something casual a solo parent can do like doing a bag of ironing.

    Offer child support so people can work remotely or go to work a job

    Support Ukrainian owned businesses like The Art of Coffee (I’m not affiliated. Please share others if you know of any)

    30
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute John Quinn
    Favourite John Quinn
    Report
    Mar 10th 2022, 12:00 PM

    Am I hearing that right that Russia said it did not attack Ukraine ???

    29
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Mike Dunne
    Favourite Mike Dunne
    Report
    Mar 10th 2022, 4:30 PM

    I’m afraid WW3 has already started. Anyone who thinks otherwise is very naive.

    21
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Mike Dunne
    Favourite Mike Dunne
    Report
    Mar 10th 2022, 5:56 PM

    @Roy Dowling: It started the moment Putin invaded the Ukraine, leading to a series of events that will ultimately culminate in nuclear annihilation. From what I have seen since the war started, there is absolutely nothing to suggest that the genie can be put back in the bottle.

    11
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Genera L Consensus
    Favourite Genera L Consensus
    Report
    Mar 10th 2022, 8:36 PM

    @Mike Dunne: high quality video circulating of Putins youths claiming they will take back Alaska and willing to die for it. ISIS style propaganda

    5
    See 1 more reply ▾
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Roy Dowling
    Favourite Roy Dowling
    Report
    Mar 10th 2022, 8:48 PM

    @Genera L Consensus: You think Putin will try take on the US when he cant even take Ukraine? His air force still hasn’t got air superiority over Ukrainian skies despite massively outnumbering the Ukrainian air force. He’s mechanised division are is suffering from several mechanical breakdown that it’s basically crawling across Ukraine. His soldiers don’t seem interested in fighting. You really think Putin is looking at his militaries performance in Ukraine so far and is thinking he’ll take on the US next?. Seriously this invasion has shown us that the only power Russia holds over the world is the thousands of nukes has. Ww3 isn’t going to happen anytime soon.

    13
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Derek
    Favourite Derek
    Report
    Mar 10th 2022, 2:36 PM

    @John Quinn: correct, https://v.redd.it/e4unlembgjm81 here he is bold face lying that Russia hasn’t invaded Ukraine.

    13
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Peter Willekens
    Favourite Peter Willekens
    Report
    Mar 10th 2022, 6:20 PM

    Thank god they listen to our powerful teashogg

    8
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Genera L Consensus
    Favourite Genera L Consensus
    Report
    Mar 10th 2022, 8:17 PM

    Some more standing ovations and lighting up tourist attractions

    6
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Rory
    Favourite Rory
    Report
    Mar 10th 2022, 10:30 PM

    And SF a few years ago: Truth matters

    Elaine Byrne: Sinn Féin has accepted the Kremlin view of the world
    The party’s dysfunctional relationship with the EU has been apparent for years. In 2019, its MEPs voted against a European Parliament resolution condemning Russia’s annexation of Crimea and its interference in European elections

    4
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Pat Barry
    Favourite Pat Barry
    Report
    Mar 11th 2022, 8:25 AM

    @Rory: How is it the most popular party knowing this?

    3
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Peter Willekens
    Favourite Peter Willekens
    Report
    Mar 10th 2022, 4:37 PM

    The censorship thanx to some bollix is high on this one paduan…

    2
Submit a report
Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
Thank you for the feedback
Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.

Leave a commentcancel

 
JournalTv
News in 60 seconds