Skip to content
Support Us

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

A portrait of James Joyce Creative Commons

Ulysses 100 years on A story of love, lust, anger, jealousy and all human feeling

It’s 100 years this week since the publication of Joyce’s classic tale of a day in the life of the Irish capital.

EDNA O’BRIEN WAS a young pharmaceutical student in the Dublin of the 1950s who instead craved to be a writer.

Dismissing her own ability, she later wrote: “I did not know how I would achieve this and I safely say that my ambition outdistanced my talent.”

The catalyst for change came when she stumbled on Introducing James Joyce, a fourpence well-thumbed book in one of the many dusty secondhand bookshops that then dotted the city.

Accessible

On reading it, she remembered how “I saw that literature was not mysterious lofty stuff but the rough and tumble of everyday life.” Going one better than that, Anthony Burgess of A Clockwork Orange would maintain that “if ever there was a writer for the people, Joyce was that writer.”

Ulysses, Joyce’s story of one day in the life of the Irish capital, is about everyday life and the people of a city. Love, lust, anger, jealousy, pride and all human feeling are contained within a book written in a rambling flow of consciousness, in which the city of Dublin itself emerges as a central figure. 

Traditional narrative plot is lost, as are chapters as readers were accustomed to them. Instead, we are treated to a series of episodes that play out in private and public across the city of Dublin on 16 June 1904. 

It is a book that divided opinion instantly, to one reviewer it was little more than “literary Bolshevism. It is experimental, anti-conventional, anti-Christian, chaotic, totally unmoral.”

The reviewer was at least half right, in that it is experimental and anti-conventional by design and not by accident. To the reviewer of one British publication, it was a work “that appears to have been written by a perverted lunatic”.

Other reviews were glowing; to T.S Elliot, “it is a book to which we are all indebted, and from which none of us can escape.” 

His father’s son

Joyce, born at 41 Brighton Square in Rathgar in 1882, was deeply shaped by his father John Stanislaus Joyce, a proud and uncompromising Parnellite (today buried near to Charles Stewart Parnell in Glasnevin Cemetery).

John was somewhat chaotic, struggling financially and with alcoholism. It is a testament to the difficulty of Joyce’s childhood financially that so many plaques dot Dublin on both sides of the Liffey marking family homes, as John and his family endured “flits by moonlight as they moved house again and again to avoid landlord and bailiff.” 

There is undoubtedly much of Joyce writing about his own father in the words of his character Stephen Dedalus, who tells us in A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man that his father was “a medical student, an oarsman, a tenor, an amateur actor, a shouting politician, a small landlord, a small investor, a drinker, a good fellow, a storyteller, somebody’s secretary, something in a distillery, a tax-gatherer, a bankrupt, and at present a praiser of his own past.”

In spite of his father’s failures, he retained a tremendous and deep affection for him, recalling that “hundreds of pages and scores of characters in my books came from him”, and that “the humour of Ulysses is his; its people are his friends. The book is his spittin’ image.”

A writer in exile

At 22 and 20, Joyce and his beloved, Nora Barnacle, left Dublin behind them in the winter of 1904. They had, in the words of her biographer Brenda Maddox, “tremendous courage.  But so had 37,413 other people from Ireland that year.”

Still, this exile was different. While Joyce was gone from the island of Ireland, Irish society would remain his fixation as a writer. Perhaps he needed the comfort of distance to grapple with it.

Joyce began writing Ulysses in 1914. Over the next seven years, life would bring him from Trieste to Zurich and onwards to Paris.

In the latter, he would meet the American bookseller and publisher Sylvia Beach, who presided over the influential Shakespeare and Company at 12 Rue de l’Odéon, Paris VI. Ernest Hemingway remembered the bookshop fondly:

On a cold windswept street, this was a warm, cheerful place with a big stove in winter, tables and shelves of books, new books in the window, and photographs on the wall of famous writers both dead and living.

Beach encouraged, nurtured and financially supported writers. In a bookshop where the lending library was consistently busier than the till it reflected her own generosity of spirit.

Beach agreed to publish Ulysses, thus ensuring that the city of Paris – and her name – would forever be synonymous with the masterpiece. Before this, Joyce had serialised parts of the work in The Little Review, an American literary journal.

James_Joyce_plaque_-_71_rue_de_Cardinal_Lemoine,_Paris_5 Creative Commons Creative Commons

Outrage at depictions of sexual acts had led to the publishers of that journal being fined $50 each for giving space to “indecent matter.” The decision of Beach to publish the full work was a brave one.

A moment in time

It seems remarkable that a book so detailed in his descriptions of a city – from funeral homes to public houses, and from pharmacies to the printing rooms of newspapers – should have been written so far from home. 

Ulysses, Joyce scholar David Pierce noted, “furnishes us with so much information that Joyce believed, somewhat fancifully, if Dublin were ever destroyed, it could be rebuilt using the information contained in his novel.” His attention to detail in recreating the city can seem even obsessive, from street characters to trams and the lingo of the locals.

He joked that he had “the mind of a grocer’s assistant” for recalling detail, but more than anything it reflects the labour of love and attention to detail of years of study.

Our protagonists are not particularly important people in the life of the city, nor are they perfect people if such a thing exists.

Instead, they are everyday people concerned with work, relationships, how others see them and how they see themselves. We are brought into the minds of these people as they traverse the city Joyce called the “Hibernian Metropolis.”  To Edna O’Brien, “no other writer so effulgently and so ravenously recreated a city.”

A banned book?

None could deny that Ulysses was explicit. George Bernard Shaw, who was no prude, wrote to Sylvia Beach having read pieces of it that:

I should like to put a cordon round Dublin; round up every male person in it between the ages of 15 and 30 and force them to read it, and ask them whether on reflection they could see anything amusing in all that foul mouthed, foul minded derision and obscenity.

He nonetheless acknowledged it was accurate, telling her “I have walked those streets and know those shops and have heard and taken part in those conversations.”

The book encountered real opposition internationally, leading to the courtrooms and the United States v. One Book Called Ulysses, where Judge John M. Woolsey concluded that Ulysses could be admitted to the United States.

Unlike most critics of the book, he had taken the time to read it. Some Irish eyebrows were perhaps raised by his observation that “in respect of the recurrent emergence of the theme of sex in the minds of [Joyce's] characters, it must always be remembered that his locale was Celtic and his season spring.”

The book was never banned in Ireland, despite the presence of an incredibly active Censorship of Publications Board, who banned literature with such zeal that critics wondered if they could possibly be reading everything put before them.

Despite this, the book was not widely available in the country until the second half of the twentieth century, Charles Eason, of the famous Dublin bookshop, would inform the writer George Russell in 1926 that “as to James Joyce, I need not tell you we have not got his Ulysses, nor have we got any other work of his.”

Today, monuments adorn the real buildings that Joyce’s characters passed through in his mind on that June day in 1904. A house on Clanbrassil Street, where the character Leopold Bloom was supposedly born, carries a plaque which tells us “Here, in Joyce’s imagination, was born in May 1866 Leopold Bloom.”

Fact and fiction meet, just as in the book.

Dublin has embraced Joyce and is increasingly grateful that he gave the Liffeyside city its place in literary history. It is a book that has encouraged others to write, and a book that reminds us that everyday life is a story worth telling.

Donal Fallon is a historian and the presenter of the Three Castles Burning podcast.

VOICES

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Close
22 Comments
This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic. Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy here before taking part.
Leave a Comment
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Diarmaid Twomey
    Favourite Diarmaid Twomey
    Report
    Mar 7th 2020, 7:54 PM

    Fabulous, if not dystopian piece Simon. I have to say, the increasing grip private corporations have on everything from our newsfeeds, to our diets, to our medical data is truly frightening. What’s even more frightening though is people’s lack of interest; I give you Alexa, Google Home etc.

    263
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Sean Fahey
    Favourite Sean Fahey
    Report
    Mar 8th 2020, 7:06 PM

    @Diarmaid Twomey: Corporations control governments when it’s supposed to be the other way around. Ireland was probably targeted for its light touch regulation.

    I mean in the U.S. the corporations literally author the vast majority of bills passed in Washington and the people voting on them have little clue about their contents and it takes a couple of business days to get the 10,000 page document into law.

    Welcome to late stage capitalism ladies and gentlemen.

    11
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Honeybee
    Favourite Honeybee
    Report
    Mar 7th 2020, 8:00 PM

    We should all be concerned at such a proposal, your DNA is unique to you , why should a private company acquire your genetic code and use it for profit or God knows what purpose in the future. Be careful if you are asked to sign any documents in this regard and if you are not comfortable with this, just say no.

    172
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Fachtna Roe
    Favourite Fachtna Roe
    Report
    Mar 7th 2020, 9:11 PM

    @Honeybee: Ní féidir sclábhaíocht ar Éire. But, yes, read and say Nó if you don’t comprehend..

    20
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Mick McGuinness
    Favourite Mick McGuinness
    Report
    Mar 7th 2020, 7:29 PM

    Let the government make it illegal, is it not already??

    87
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Eddie O'Neill
    Favourite Eddie O'Neill
    Report
    Mar 7th 2020, 7:42 PM

    @Mick McGuinness: “. . . The State has pumped approximately €73.5 million into GMI . . .”

    99
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Fachtna Roe
    Favourite Fachtna Roe
    Report
    Mar 7th 2020, 9:06 PM

    @Mick McGuinness: I’d like to know whether the Taoiseach, Tánaiste, any Minister, or any other office-holder has a beneficial interest. Why else would the State be pumping money into a secretive private concern?

    94
    See 1 more reply ▾
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Chin Feeyin
    Favourite Chin Feeyin
    Report
    Mar 7th 2020, 10:49 PM

    @Fachtna Roe: look it up. Not that difficult.

    7
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Lydia McLoughlin
    Favourite Lydia McLoughlin
    Report
    Mar 7th 2020, 8:38 PM

    Whats the point of GDPR if things like this are happening???

    69
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Fachtna Roe
    Favourite Fachtna Roe
    Report
    Mar 7th 2020, 9:27 PM

    @Lydia McLoughlin: GDPR is a smokescreen to prevent you finding out these things are happening. Data Protection is worthwhile, but GDPR seems to be used to tilt the scales in such way as to balance Freedom of Information.

    47
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Dave Hammond
    Favourite Dave Hammond
    Report
    Mar 8th 2020, 9:08 AM

    @Fachtna Roe: this is a complex area of data protection , your ill informed comment about GDPR does not help as it is completely inaccurate and just plain wrong. GDPR is no smokescreen , it is a large global regulation that required a lot of work and is designed to deter organisations from misusing data collected with some very heavy financial penalties (eg 4% of global turnover is a lot of money just for abusing somebody email data ) – it is not a ‘smokescreen’ – as for the GMI issue in the piece – the author makes a very good case as to why we should not allow privatisation of our genetic data – I would go a step further and point out the risks that this genetic data can be used by private companies in the future ( especially insurance companies ) if they remain unregulated – to risk profile and refuse health cover and life cover or else more likely ‘charge more’ money for individuals they claim are riskier to cover due to their ‘genetic history’ – that level of data abuse really will need the governments to legislate and protect citizens from.

    21
    See 1 more reply ▾
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Fachtna Roe
    Favourite Fachtna Roe
    Report
    Mar 8th 2020, 10:13 AM

    @Dave Hammond: Waffle. Plus, GDPR is an EU regulation.

    2
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Gerard Carthy
    Favourite Gerard Carthy
    Report
    Mar 7th 2020, 8:02 PM

    Neither the author nor his employer are medical professionals. This is a medical project and yet the legal profession feel emboldened to make judgements in the collection of anonymous data that may prove beneficial for future medical research.
    This is an ongoing issue, where the pursuit of narrow legal interests out ways the public good. This occurs regularly in medical negligence cases where impossible legal standards are imposed on imperfect medical practices and the outcome deemed negligent and therefore cash generating.
    Not all areas of life should be subject to the whims of lawyers, their legal arguments or the interests that employ them to do so.
    This incessant creep of legal interference in areas they are not qualified to make judgements in does a disservice to us all.
    Any possible leak of data, possibly trivial, from this study should not be considered important enough to interfere with initiatives which may have beneficial outcomes for public health.
    Not all data is created equal, and the current fetishisation of the protection of innocuous information is pointless and almost certainly negative for future research.

    36
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Diarmaid Twomey
    Favourite Diarmaid Twomey
    Report
    Mar 7th 2020, 8:11 PM

    @Gerard Carthy: Well done for missing the entire point Gerard. In case you forgot the legal profession exist to protect citizens through the use of laws. Just cause you’re a medic doesn’t give you a licence to obtain and process people’s most private data because you say it will be of use for private ends.

    166
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Nick Caffrey
    Favourite Nick Caffrey
    Report
    Mar 7th 2020, 8:21 PM

    @Diarmaid Twomey: Exactly right.

    60
    See 8 more replies ▾
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Gerard Carthy
    Favourite Gerard Carthy
    Report
    Mar 7th 2020, 8:29 PM

    @Diarmaid Twomey: I feel so protected every time I have to answer stupid data protection questions to pay my own bills. Or try to interact with a bank. Or move electricity supplier. Or prove I’m the same person to my own bank. Or hear that the legal profession are going to make swings hazardous implements that need supervision at al times from now on in the pursuit of a narrow and depressingly idiotic argument.
    And you thin I’m missing the point and should be grateful to be treated like a child?

    16
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Gerard Carthy
    Favourite Gerard Carthy
    Report
    Mar 7th 2020, 8:30 PM

    @Diarmaid Twomey: it’s the state that exists to protect citizens, not the legal profession per se.

    11
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Diarmaid Twomey
    Favourite Diarmaid Twomey
    Report
    Mar 7th 2020, 8:54 PM

    @Gerard Carthy: Gerard if you feel private corporations being made tell you when and if they are processing your information is akin to you being treated like a child, fair enough. That’s your prerogative. However, don’t insinuate that a legal professional, or anyone else for that matter, who expresses concern about private corporations profiting from the processing of private medical data is being pedantic or some sort of pain in the *asre! Feel free to join MAGA rallies and eat chlorinated chicken, if the medical professional (who obviously are above us all) tell you to, but I’ll stick to wanting my data and rights protected and vindicated, thanks very much.

    47
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Fachtna Roe
    Favourite Fachtna Roe
    Report
    Mar 7th 2020, 9:19 PM

    @Gerard Carthy: You absolutely do not have a clue.

    22
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Dave Hammond
    Favourite Dave Hammond
    Report
    Mar 8th 2020, 9:17 AM

    @Gerard Carthy: ‘the protection of innocuous information is pointless’ – hmm this is very valuable data ( not innocuous information ) – one example is the risk profiling that a private company will be able to use this data to ‘monetise’ such as health insurance – life assurance – corporations and big pharma will be able to target profiles that are more vulnerable based on genetic data – the author is correct to point out the slippery slope that ‘privatising’ this field is going down – I think you are quite incorrect and missing the point to lump this in as potential innocuous data – it is not about a possible leak or the consequences of such a leak that it the concern – it is that the unique genetic data of individuals can be monetized by private companies – that is the risk that the author correctly identifies as very real and very wrong. There is nothing innocuous about the motivations of large private companies wanting to access important private data.

    9
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Gerard Carthy
    Favourite Gerard Carthy
    Report
    Mar 8th 2020, 7:50 PM

    @Dave Hammond: The database in question has no personal identifiers, is accessible on a read only basis and the amount of information that can be accessed at a time is limited. It would be impossible for an insurance company for example to make any commercial use of it. Since we have a community rated private insurance and pre existing conditions are non exclusionary it’s not even an issue.
    It amazes me how often access to fairly useless insurance is a reason why data projects should be cancelled. Weird.

    1
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Nicholas Grubb
    Favourite Nicholas Grubb
    Report
    Mar 9th 2020, 7:30 AM

    @Gerard Carthy: Excellent comment. I would add that in this whole zone of research, a tremendous new vista is opening. The most popular gift now given in some countries, is an ancestry DNA test, which shows those participating, really interesting information on where one came from back the millennia. What it could also show is the presence of problem recessives. A simple App will then allow prospective parents to do a pre check. This will inform them of the chance of their potential offspring exhibiting some life effecting syndrome, hemophilia, CF or the like. This information will allow them to go for I.V. and pre implantation selection, thus leaving the horror story behind. Who could say no to that, but meddling lawyers could greatly obstruct it.

    2
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Fachtna Roe
    Favourite Fachtna Roe
    Report
    Mar 9th 2020, 9:16 AM

    @Nicholas Grubb: That reads like an advert, or a paid comment.

    1
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Karla Doran
    Favourite Karla Doran
    Report
    Mar 7th 2020, 10:52 PM

    Informative article

    19
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute brendan fitzsimons
    Favourite brendan fitzsimons
    Report
    Mar 8th 2020, 12:22 AM

    Like any economic or military advantage, genetic engeering is unstoppable. Sadly.

    If we (the West) ban it others will get an advantage – and like how we destroyed aborigines in the Americas, Australia and Asia with more advanced technology – they will do unto us.

    Humanity didn’t decide to move from hunting to farming 10,000 years ago; it had no choice.

    8
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Marianne
    Favourite Marianne
    Report
    Mar 8th 2020, 7:20 AM

    Frightening

    7
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute This Guy
    Favourite This Guy
    Report
    Mar 7th 2020, 9:29 PM

    Isn’t this the second time in a couple of weeks this article (or a slightly different version of it) has been posted on the Journal?

    6
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Fachtna Roe
    Favourite Fachtna Roe
    Report
    Mar 7th 2020, 9:49 PM

    @This Guy: Were you hoping it would be kept a secret?

    26
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Alan Dignam
    Favourite Alan Dignam
    Report
    Mar 7th 2020, 8:47 PM

    I have a problem understanding this whole thing. I can understand How a company can profit from this, by selling the information or an old man I.e. me. A sixty year old man, three major health issues identify unknown but how does it affect me with regard to data protection

    5
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Markonline
    Favourite Markonline
    Report
    Mar 7th 2020, 9:23 PM

    @Alan Dignam: A situation might arise where health insurance companies would be able to pick and choose who to insure based on risks associated with your genetic makeup. Not a good situation, essentially removing risk for them.

    64
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Fachtna Roe
    Favourite Fachtna Roe
    Report
    Mar 7th 2020, 9:47 PM

    @Alan Dignam: Your DNA is the most unique and valuable thing you received from your parents, and the most unique and valuable thing you give to your children.

    It is also the most complicated thing most of us know of, and printed would be a stack of paper 130m high.

    You get that complexity free, and pass it on free for the natural purpose.

    A corporation is legally a person, but non-living. Think “Corpse” and “Oration”. This is the type of entity that may end up ‘owning’ the code for living people.

    The effect on our planet of these dead-people-speaking is hardly positive. Why trust them with the codes for life?

    In that corporations are themselves non-living, but require us living people to survive and propagate, they are functionally the same as a virus.

    40
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Aaron92utd
    Favourite Aaron92utd
    Report
    Mar 7th 2020, 7:46 PM

    They can sell mine their defective lol

    4
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Gordon Comstock
    Favourite Gordon Comstock
    Report
    Mar 7th 2020, 8:26 PM

    @Aaron92utd: evidently!

    26
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Martha Smyth
    Favourite Martha Smyth
    Report
    Mar 8th 2020, 8:11 AM

    @Aaron92utd: so you can pay higher health insurance premiums, or maybe be deprived of obtaining life insurance for that mortgage you applied for? And you won’t know why unless you pay for the results….

    12
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Davis Payne
    Favourite Davis Payne
    Report
    Mar 8th 2020, 1:45 PM

    If think we should get a % every time our data is sold whether dna or online usage. We should have the right to have it deleted and to block further sales.
    It’s our data about us we should have complete control, but also if someone is profiting from the sale of our data we show also profit.

    1
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Fachtna Roe
    Favourite Fachtna Roe
    Report
    Mar 8th 2020, 6:51 PM

    @Davis Payne: Your DNA also contains information about your relatives, and theirs about you; that’s worth a lot more than the few cent you’d be lucky to get from a corporation.

    1
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Gazza Lazza
    Favourite Gazza Lazza
    Report
    Mar 10th 2020, 1:26 PM

    Data is the new oil……

    Very interesting series of documentaries about the oil industry.

    Part 3 is called “Data is the new oil”

    A fairly comprehensive explanation of how data has become a commodity.

    https://youtu.be/b7E9ZsrYnU0

    1
Submit a report
Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
Thank you for the feedback
Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.

Leave a comment

 
cancel reply
JournalTv
News in 60 seconds