Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
BY 12 MARCH it had become clear that the annual flight of a small coterie of Irish musicians to Austin, Texas for the SXSW Festival had become mired in geopolitics.
One by one, the Irish acts took their stands and decided against making the trip. It should be noted that this was not an easy decision for them. It’s a costly journey for a gigging band to make to the Texas music festival, but the knowledge that SXSW has strong links to the US military with the US Army as the main sponsor was enough to push these bands to pull out.
As Gaza has become unbearable for thousands of Palestinians and the global geopolitical atmosphere has become so tense, Irish musicians felt they had no choice but to step to the right side of history. By now, the dust is settling on another SXSW, but the international ripples may still develop into a small wave of permanent repercussions for the festival organisers.
Tonight, the Irish acts who have boycotted performing at SXSW including @Newdad, @chalk_band, @gurriersband, Enola Gay & Cardinals stood together in solidarity and released a joint statement at the Ireland House Showcase at SXSW Festival ✊🏻 pic.twitter.com/3m6Sl1HD48
— The Rock Revival (@TheRockRevival_) March 15, 2024
SXSW is a well-renowned annual event over 35 years in existence. It began as a music industry showcase where a mix of US and international music acts travelled to perform in front of a number of music industry types. We’re talking record and publishing labels, management companies, live agents and of course public audiences in the hope of furthering the careers of these bands.
The festival still works that way mostly, except the digital world has infiltrated it such that it is now an event where tech, film and multimedia wings converge. It has now morphed into a much more expansive industry get-together. That expansion has meant more sponsors have joined, and this year, the horrors in Palestine have brought those sponsorship links into sharper focus.
The first indication that something odd was afoot at this long-established event was on 2 March when word came out that a minor Chicago-based singer Ella Williams [aka Squirrel Flower] had announced her refusal to play.
To be honest, it didn’t really register until within hours small, largely unheard-of acts from NYC, LA and North Carolina had also posted notice of withdrawal. It’s important to note, in light of the subsequent total Irish delegation boycott that American acts such as Ella, Proper, Mamalarkey and Eliza McWilliams [to credit their original principled stand] had been first to respond.
An internet posting by ‘Austin for Palestine Coalition’ had alerted these independent acts to a problem and a trickle quickly became a flood with Brighton’s Lambrini Girls [UK] and Belfast’s hip hop trio Kneecap almost immediately coming on board and in turn the domino effect of artist withdrawals culminating in the complete SXSW contingent from Ireland cancelling their appearances.
As things stand, between 80 acts have decided to boycott the event as we now know, the reasoning being, the ‘super sponsorship’ of the festival by both the US army and various US defence contractors. The dots were now fairly easy to connect considering the current horrendous military activity and bombing taking place in Gaza, the day after day slaughter of thousands of largely defenceless women and children and obvious US military culpability in what looks like massive war crimes being carried out by the Israeli occupation forces.
The marriage of activism and popular music is widely acknowledged and recorded in times of war, strife and injustice so this article doesn’t need to delve into social history and the power of song as a subject.
Even the most casual of music fans will have heard of Bob Dylan, Billie Holiday, Bob Marley, Nina Simone, Marvin Gaye and more and would be aware of punk rock, folk, soul, hip-hop and rap as cornerstones of revolutionary change. In Ireland, both Moving Hearts, the late Sinéad O’Connor and even, current, Dublin 4-piece folk miscreants Lankum have aired grievances and voiced political opinions to mirror societal upheaval. So it should come as no surprise that the current generation of musical peers would hold strongly held views.
What is surprising is the shock at the withdrawal of the acts in the first place. Once musicians became aware that the event was being overtly funded by the armaments wing it probably doesn’t take a musicologist or behavioural expert to deduce that quite a number of those same musicians, in general, would baulk at their art being subsidised by proponents of military technology.
From an Irish perspective, and quite possibly in other European countries this issue will have reverberated amongst the arts funding bodies that subsidise trips like these to music industry events. Both Music From Ireland, a consultancy body that administers the logistics of these trips and Culture Ireland, a funding wing of the Dept of Arts & Culture that often covers travel expenses will have experienced some turmoil these past few days, particularly as the SXSW event had begun as this fissure opened.
They have navigated this role quite successfully for decades – I myself travelled to SXSW whilst managing an act in the late 90′s and we were grateful to be helped by Culture Ireland – but this controversy will no doubt lead to some introspection. A knowledgeable friend suggested that events like this and probably standard music festivals will now need investigative research to allay controversial hidden partners/sponsors in future.
While I agree that not only state bodies but acts, managers and music agents may have more research to do of the fine print, or, in this case, as it transpired, quite bold print, contained in events or festivals I’m certain there are not too many music gatherings that will be extolling publicly the armaments’ industry! The apparent oversight of many at SXSW to recognise this potentially sensitive link will be seen as a serious faux pas.
The bigger headache now may be all SXSW’s, although it’s arguable that 80 or so acts cancelling from a total of 1400 might not really affect this large player. The negative publicity will sting though, as any search for news on this week’s activities centres on this boycott. In some ways, this story could be construed as the festival being a victim of its own successful expansion into the ‘tech bro’ world.
The monetary help of its nation’s army and its first cousins, the defence manufacturers will be discussed post this week’s event but will any change be initiated?
Certainly regarding its original jewel in the crown, live music, perhaps some clear demarcation concerning its commercial partnerships may need to be addressed.
The music industry has changed and contracted in the past 25 years as, ironically, technology has eaten it up but for Austin, as a beautiful musical city with great bars and venues the cry will rise as to how this event, supposed to help new music and young musicians grab opportunities, addresses this undoubted contentious oversight.
SXSW does not agree with Governor Abbott. https://t.co/fOHHn9r5BG
— SXSW (@sxsw) March 12, 2024
Already, Texan politicians of a particular hue are causing embarrassment with machismo utterances and the response from the event’s spokespeople so far, has been insipid, unclear and frankly confusing, befitting an organisation under a little pressure.
Finally, a word of praise to all 12 Irish acts who have chosen to make a huge statement at a probable massive sacrifice to their professional growth. They have nailed their colours to the mast in favour of a people suffering an horrendous assault.
Bualadh bos to the bands:
Led by the Belfast boys, Kneecap and swiftly followed by Soda Blonde, Sprints and then an economically curt statement, in keeping with his modest aura, by Mick Flannery.
— Mick Flannery (@MickFlannery) March 11, 2024
For the less well-known acts, an even greater element of praise should be acknowledged. Musicians are not some amorphous generic blob, all of similar mindset. No doubt there are some as apolitical as anyone and they did not expect to be giving up their stab at performing and impressing a new American audience.
Here’s hoping this stance gives their careers a shot for the right reasons. They should be commended for unifying in the face of a true moral dilemma. As some of the musicians explained, their stance was nothing compared to the suffering of both the displaced Palestinian people in Gaza and the hostages and prisoners on both sides of the conflict as bombs and bullets rain down in the Middle East.
From an Irish musician’s viewpoint and the players involved, the bands’ meagre funds will have taken a hit, which is why their decision is so selfless and to be admired.
This controversy has overshadowed another issue regarding fees for performers which still seems to rear its head at so many festivals, but that subject is for another day.
For now, for the 80 or so musical acts that made a stand in Austin, it’s a clear message. Ceasefire now, the show can wait.
Pat Neary is an occasional music producer, recordist, booker, manager and promoter.
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
The state of all them candidates. No competition to Michael D
@Ciarān: Mickey D is the real deal. Couldn’t think of anyone better.
@Ciarān: if president Higgins was in that group you could equally say the state of him ,I can’t say I know of anything outstanding that he’s done ,he praised some men at a funeral that I would have had little respect for in the recent past
@FlopFlipU: What more would you have asked him to do? He is an intelligent, eloquent speaker who represents us well abroad and at home and is always visibly proud to do so.
@Ciarān: Michael D isn’t a patch on McAleese, and is too old for another 7 year term. Joan Freeman will have my vote assuming her candidacy isn’t blocked. Fantastic woman, and without wishing to be sexist I think the women elected to that office have far outperformed any of the men that went before them (although gender is not why I’ll vote for Freeman, but worthy of note all the same)
@Ciarān: I thought the agenda of the last election was to eliminate Labour, let’s complete the job and give higgins the boot too.
@B-Tech Roadman: What per cent of the population actually voted for his party in the last election?
@FlopFlipU: He established TG4 for one thing, and struck the perfect balance in marking the 1916 centenary.
@Trevor Hayden: eh yeah right whatever
@Ciarān: He is a hypocrite and a champagne socialist.
Duffy. A great defender of bloodsports and hunts. No thanks
@Good Early: No joe duffy. ring him at 2 everyday.
@Sean Conway: tbh I’m in shock Duffy isn’t running. Bet he’d run under FG. If mims o Callaghan had ran ,wouldn’t she effectively have been a FF candidate ?
So Joan couldn’t answer the question in Irish. Why doesn’t it mention whether the other two could?
@Joe Lennon:
Maybe no one cared? The fact she hasn’t in the past wasted her time and energy on a useless language is the first good thing I have heard about her.
@Joe Lennon: No idea. Maybe she was the only person asked a question in Irish? They only gave Feeney a token mention, suggesting our impartial press have wrote him off already.
@P.J. Nolan: the first good thing you’ve heard about her? You know she started Pieta House right? Or were you just being facetious?
@ObsidianShine:
I was well aware of Pieta house, I’ve been there as a visitor! I should have said it was the first good thing since the start of this campaign.
@ObsidianShine: and then put god in charge of the finances. That’s a no from me
@P.J. Nolan: Gligín
Democracy means we have a contest. The issue of cost of an election should not come into it. There is no price for Democracy.
Let the Candidates declare themselves, let’s hear the debate and let’s vote. Long live the Republic.
@Gavin O’Brien: ‘Democracy means we have a contest.’ Are you sure you aren’t confusing democracy with a game show, the needs of the citizens with the needs of TV viewers and the media who profit from endless ‘polls’? We have democratically elected a man who does the job well. Even these ‘candidates’ admit this. Which begs the question: if this is the case, why are they running?
@alan: You obviously have not a clue what a democracy is or how it works if you think we have a man democratically elected. He stated he would take the job for seven years not fourteen.
Fourteen years is too long a time for one of the most powerful positions in the state in my opinion. We need to have an election to hold Michael D accountable for his actions during his term as president whether you agree with them or not you get to chose at the ballot.
@brian boru: ‘to hold Michael D accountable for his actions during his term as President’. What actions would they be?
@sean o’dhubhghaill: that’s up to everyone to find out and make a decision on. Just because some people just see the veneer and the position is powerless, doesn’t mean others don’t think he may not be the best candidate for the job of president.
@brian boru: You do not know what the job is if you think it is so powerful. There are powers but they are clearly defined and limited with various backstops.
@brian boru: Okay, you think a fourteen year term limit is too long. What’s that got to do with having an election for the role? Completely different topic that we can and will vote on if we have to. That’s like saying that you buy Smarties to send a message. No one knows what your message is, and that’s not even why we’re here in the first place.
Joan Freeman best of this bunch , by a long shot , she’s far more in touch with the what’s going in peoples lives on than others , she sees it every day .
@Margaret: yet I couldn’t possibly vote for someone who admittedly deprived citizens of equal rights.
@sequoia: Who did that as the President does not make the laws they sign off on them if they do not break the constitution. Learn about the actual powers of the job before you blame somebody for something that was not their fault
@Gary Kearney: she voted no in the 8th amendment referendum is what i think sequoia is referring to. it is also the reason that i wouldn’t vote for her.
…..President Freeman, great name for a free Republic.
@Brian McDonnell: Freeperson surely
I thought the object of the last election was to eliminate Labour, let’s give higgins the boot too.
His state funeral will cost us a fortune, lets not add to the expense.
@Trevor Hayden: How will it “add to the expense” to pay the same amount to a different person for the sake of it? What difference would it make to the main political parties? Have you noticed taxes being reduced due to savings made, or something?
Great. We’re seriously being asked to consider the likes of Duffy, who doesn’t understand the Presidency and really only wants this on his CV? Or Freeman, an uber-catholic President? Would she refuse to sign the legislation to give effect to the wishes of the people in the referendum? How does she feel about the proposed blasphemy changes? Michael D will brush the likes of them aside, and in the process they’ll have their secrets outed and reputations tattered, just like what happened Sean Gallagher.
I agree, there’s not much to offer voters. Also, internationally, who on earth cares if Duffy is a good pal of Sean Gallagher’s? He’s running for President, not trying to get into a nightclub, for Pete’s sake.
Can anyone nominate themselves , my god a sorry bunch . Spare us from iona . keep going michael d…
Has Michael d achieved anything of note personally outside of the culture of our disgraceful gombeen politics, like Freeman and Duffy? I can’t think of anything!
Duffy is clearly a champion of the patriarchy – it’s easy to imagine him beating his chest and roaring like Tarzan in celebration of his own mediocrity. Freeman is a queen of the matriarchy and if elected will suffocate the country with touchy feely mammy meetings and whinging. Higgins is wise, caring, and eloquent. His dogs would make better presidents that the other two.
@Martello Mulligan:
What do u mean that we have no other options ? Michael D couldn’t give a fiddlers about what u mentioned, he totally backed millions of state ( as in our taxes) money being poured into a vanity project in Galway. Also where did he get his accent ? Limerick, North Cork or Galway ? Hardly indigenous to any of those regions. I remain to be convinced that he’s the best on offer.
In the land of the blind, the man with one eye is king.
The only way any of those massive egos is above Michael D is in height. How they can carry their self importance has me baffled. No worries there Michael D. Slainte.
What a waste of money. Michael D will destroy them on every level there is
@Tommy C: Have people forgotten which party mickey is a member of. Yes liebour who along with ffg screwed the country up. He has been paid 200,000 a year for the last 7 years and now wants another 7. He is a traitor to everything the old labour party stood for.
@Derek Poutch: He was old Labour real Labour and has never changed.
The promises are all out already for these candidate, do they not realise its just a figurehead position.
Powerless county councils are enjoying a few weeks of presidential summer glory. Then it’s back to waste collection, street lights and the administration of grants for construction and repair of footpaths.
Is Bono on the list of candidates
as he still hasn’t found what he’s looking for ?
Well this is gonna be a right sh*t show from start to finish.
Sad to not see Bosco running this year
Pieta House is one of finest initiatives in the country, but I think we need people involved in mental health so positively to stay in that field as there are few enough batting for it.
have your say