Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.
You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.
If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.
SENIOR SINN FÉIN TD Matt Carthy has said that his party would not “at any stage” in the next Government consider rerunning the family and care referendums if they form the next Government.
His comments seemingly signal a u-turn for Sinn Féin on the matter, as back in February leader Mary Lou McDonald said that in the event that both referendums on changing the constitution failed – which turned out to be the case – Sinn Féin would rerun them with different wording.
Speaking on Newstalk’s The Hard Shoulder this evening, Sinn Féin spokesperson on Foreign Affairs and Defence Matt Carthy said that rerunning the referendums will not be on Sinn Féin’s priorities list “at all”.
Carthy said that Sinn Féin would focus on issues such as “housing, and the need to reform our health services” if it was in power in the next Government.
Distancing the party from its ‘Yes, yes’ stance during the referendum campaigns, Carthy said that Sinn Féin came to an “on balance” position, but always maintained that it would have run the referendum with different proposed wording.
He said that Senator Tom Clonan and people with disabilities put forward “very strong arguments” for a No vote in the care referendum, and that the Government failed to “rebuke” those arguments.
Advertisement
“It wasn’t our campaign,” Carthy said.
Carthy said that although his party advocated for a ‘Yes, yes’ vote in the referendums, it has always said that it would have opted for the wording recommended by the Citizens’ Assembly on Gender Equality.
The Citizens’ Assembly in 2021 notably recommended that the Government should propose to delete the ‘Woman in the home’ article of the constitution and replace it with non-gender specific language, that obliges the State to take measures to support care within the home and wider community.
The Government’s proposed wording would have seen the State only having to “strive” to support the provision of care within the home, which critics said did not go far enough to support carers.
Mary Lou McDonald setting out Sinn Féin's position back in February.
Back in February, when setting out Sinn Féin’s position, Mary Lou McDonald said: “Should this fail, well then yes, the question we would put would be the wording as per the Citizens’ Assembly,” she said.
McDonald at the time said Sinn Fein would rerun the referendums, with different wording, “early” in their term of Government.
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
Close
76 Comments
This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic.
Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy
here
before taking part.
@Gerry Kelly: this referendum needs to be rerun. Not to appease what you consider to be woke reasons. But to enshrine the rights of people who need to be cared for into the constitution. If, God forbid, you have a stroke one day and need your nappy changed five times a day, I hope you’ve got loving relatives who are willing to the job, because the state certainly doesn’t want to, nor does it consider it the state’s responsibility. This is about something much more important than outdated language. It’s about how we look after the most vulnerable in our society. The original wording the citizens assembly proposed acknowledged that.
@Patrick Cadogan: He speaks for the majority of the electorate…. Every political party backed a Yes/Yes vote including SF…. Except for PBP and a few independents…
SF have spun around again and did a complete U-turn… How could anyone support/trust or vote for any of them ???
The flip-flop party doing a u-turn. That is hardly news. They must be getting dizzy with all the flip flopping and u-turns they have done over the years.
WOW…. Another BIG U-turn for SF…. Running with the hares and hunting with the hounds….. Maybe now they will put their hands up and admit to all the atrocities they have been involved in…. Yes/Yes ????
The naivety and hunger to get into power is coming through now and that makes me fairly uncomfortable.
I was already sceptical about a SF government going back to the time that Pearse Doherty whipped up a frenzy about that Roscommon eviction which resulted in SF supporters burning banks.
I thought they moved to distance themselves from this over the past few years but now with the about turns on things, I don’t know if I could trust them to make the harder more unpopular decisions that are sometimes needed from government.
For me, it’s a genuine pity as I desperately want rid of FF, FG and the Greens – all that’s left really is the Soc Dems – I’m not an ‘anti-woke/vax/immigrant/climate/LGBTQ/etc etc nutbag so all the nutty ‘parties’ are out.
Simple question preparation for politicians seeking votes at my door: define ‘woman’. Inability to define a woman as an adult, female human who is or was capable of having a baby, means I will strategically, to the best of my ability, vote against that politician. The respondent is entitled to think a man can be a woman and I’m just as entitled to vote against him/her/it.
It’s the one question that most likely identifies those people who I believe are radically opposed to the freedoms I enjoy.
Up the Republic and goodbye Mary Lou
They could have changed “Strive” to “obliged”.
Add father alongside Mother.
Change “Durable” to “a recognised Family consistent “to that” of a family based on marriage”.
I’m not in any way trying to come across as an expert, but I would’ve accepted wording similar to the above.
The proposal they put on us was a disgrace and a sure sign if it was needed that they are totally incompetent and out of touch with reality
@Philip Gallagher: I think you’re on the right track. They didn’t need to have any word though. “The government will support…” would have been fine. I think “durable relationships” is a little trickier to clean up but yes, those are the same details that turned me off it too. They seem small hit the gulf in meaning is huge.
It’s good to hear Sinn Fein/ira coming out with this statement. Ffg were very quick in coming out saying the public did not know what they were doing in voting no. Groundhog day Niece and Maastrict treaties we did not what we were voting for. What a shame of a government we have.
In fairness to Goebbels Carthy, its not his decision. Its supposed to be the members of SF decision at Ard Fheis but as the years go by the members become less empowered.
I think Mary Lou’s comments straight after the referendum saying she “would address the Sexist Language in the Constitution if SF were in the next Government” was a mistake so soon after a sizeable majority had just rejected both. Doesn’t bode well on Mary Lou and SF’s opinion on Democracy.
Seems to me sinn fein have one agenda now and that is to get on the gravy train of ministerial pensions,they are loosing there vote base by the week with all their double tongue
When SF will go in power, and hopefully without alliances, the money of many corporations will be transferred abroad and many will start stop employing people blaming SF as an excuse. With no money in the coffers, there will have to be an agreement… Like for Mitterrand and the socialists in 1981. Look it up
Now they probably won’t be able to do what they want that easily.
Lookit. They are not the ones *in* Government (yet?). They are free to change their minds, if they wish. It’s not like they are inside the window of “election promises” just yet. And it’s fair to say and accept that they are responsive to the will of the electorate on this issue, at least. And were responsive to the fact of Law too, before the Referendum *when* it was passing through the Oireachtas. Although, in fairness, before the Referendum and despite them knowing better, they did just Conform to Social Pressures and ‘go with the flow, and in a small way they also did ‘jump on the bandwagon’ like – but not with the same Zealotry as – the Socialist Workers Party/People B4 Profit frequently do (like when they tried to hijack and seize the Water Charges protest movement for themselves, as though it were their movement initiated by their Party).
They should have taken their lead from Catherine Connolly.
Because, evidently, Sinn Féin have become completely rudderless.
Even with Palestine, they blindly and fecklessly whine on and on about expelling the Ambassador – just like a politically immature Socialist. Rather than realising it is USA that should be targeted (as is the Irish way of fighting a cause), because it is due to USA’s neo-anti-Semitism towards all Muslims and all Arabs, a sentiment they fostered and encouraged Internationally in order to enable, via presenting false cause for, their ***ILLEGAL*** invasion of Iraq, in addition to which they fully got away with it with it with Zero Prosecutions for War Crimes and Crimes Against Humanity laid against them or their “WMD” partners in Britain.
It is because USA got away with it, that Israel gets away with it.
It is because USA incited anti-Muslim neo-anti-Semitic Fascistic rhetoric, that Israel can so easily dehumanise Palestinians via the neo-anti-Semitic false assumption that “all Arabs are Muslim”.
It is because of USA’s and UK’s rhetoric against Muslims as a whole, that China feels free and righteous in committing genocide against Uyghur Muslims; that Myanmar felt free and righteous to commit genocide against Rhohinga Muslims; and why Russia felt empowered and free to commit genocide in Chechnya (long before Putin created Kadyrov from the ashes).
It is because USA failed to prosecute the Extra-Judicial Assassination of the Free Press [embodied in US Citizen Shireen Abu Akleh] that Israel knows it is free to target and murder all Arab Journalists and their families; and International Civilians and their families.
It is because USA and UK have gotten away with imprisoning Journalist Julian Assange, that Israel knows “The Free Press” is no longer a protected institution.
It is because USA got away with obliterating the legitimacy United Nations, by barging through International Law and International Resolution and Vetoes of their illegal Wars, that Israel is so profoundly comfortable with defaming, dehumanisating and SLAUGHTERING employees of the United Nations and The Red Cross Red Crescent.
Sinn Féin are behaving like a Party of simpleton automatons.
There is no substance to anything they do anymore. Not only are they untethered from their own Base, nor merely completely disconnected from the wider population, but they are also wholly an “unthinking” Party. It’s like they are driving down the road on autopilot. Their brain isn’t even engaged. NOBODIES brain seems to be engaged in any manner anymore.
They are in a bubble.
And I strongly suspect that just like the Fianna Fáil and Fine Gael Elected Representative **individuals** [since Pandemic. Eg: "there have been eighteen other coronaviruses"-Simon 'dingbat' Harris] – the bubble has been erected by manipulated Algorithms on Social Media framing the “feedback” to the Official Party’s accounts (as opposed to the individual Elected Reps, as seems to be the case with FF and FG, from Dáil to Local).
But Sinn Féin aside….
Evidently NONE of the Political Parties have learned a god damn thing from Mother and Baby Homes and Industrial/Reformatory School and the ‘Institutionalisation’ atrocities.
Not a god damn thing.
It is why they cannot grasp the profound problems of “Organisational Culture”. Be it in RTE, the HSE, or the Gardaí.
They have utterly failed to comprehend the power of culture, or indoctrination, or institutionalisation.
They have failed to grasp that what went on in Industrial Schools was not only a consequence of institutional cultures, but also a consequence of the “culture” imposed or fostered in society itself.
They have failed to realise that what went on in institutions, was not absent in the private homes of citizens who never went near any institutions.
And that Collective Psychological Culture of ignorant abusiveness continues to pervade throughout Irish Society and Social Culture, and passes down through the generations.
The State simply cannot, and should never, impose unprofessional, Familial-only, “Care” on the most vulnerable members of our Society.
But luckily the population do seem to have learned and understood the impact of historic social culture and the abuses of institutions enabled and empowered BY the toxic culture in Society from Grassroots to Gards to Government.
The majority seem to be aware of 1 core basic truth – for many in the society, the culture simply has not changed. And it will take decades, if not a Century, to change it. Especially without apt educational intervention.
You cannot, and should never, impose familial “Care” on anyone with a disability. Be it a permanent, or potentially transient/temporary disablement (such as closed brain injury).
The RSA (I believe it was?) had a perfectly Irish and perfectly accurate example of this in their overturned car, car crash simulation in which the parent/partner/familial individual is depicted as the “Carer” belittling and ignorantly talking about the wheelchair-bound survivor to a third person in earshot of the survivor.
The fact is, Irish Society is – quite frankly – unfit and far too ignorant to be entrusted with the care of persons with disabilities.
Profoundly especially in an unprofessional (familial) context.
Indeed it is *more professionals and professionalism* that is required in the provision of Care for Elderly or persons with Disability or Special Needs.
But Sinn Féin bent to the tokenistic trend of empty virtue signalling and *militant* liberalism that is and has consistently been an open attack on the Constitution of our Republic.
I say this, despite the fact that I am and have always been what these days is being described as a “liberal” or “leftie” (due to foreign political interference in National discourse!).
Except that there never was, nor is there now, any such thing in Irish or European (or non-Brit/non-Yankee/non-WASP) politics as a “liberal”.
We are, simply, pro-evolution, pro-development, pro-progress of our civilization and society. And Ireland has already been through this philosophical and identity politics struggle – what is Tradition and what is Progress, “Does progress mean dumping tradition?” and so on.
The emphatic answer was: No!
Traditions and Progress can proceed hand in hand for a Nation that is not insecure in it’s sense of “Self” and “Identity”, a Nation that isn’t weakened by being a wimpering “Nation of Immitators”.
We can (and should) progress Political Policies, while holding the line on Political Tradition (i.e. stop attacking, subverting and dismantling the Constitution through Deletion and Repeals in the name of “progress”. You wouldn’t catch the Yankees nor the French nor any post-Empire-era Nations with Sovereign non-Monarchic Nationhood, at it!! So why are WE at it!?).
We wouldn’t have had to “Repeal the 8th *amendment*” if the Politicians, and 1980s Population, had not been so feckless and careless with the Constitution in the first place.
Religiosity has no place whatsoever in Law, much less in Constitutions of legitimate Republics.
Religiosity should have no place in Politics anywhere ever again (Nazism; Slavery; American Fascistic Evangelism; Hindutva Fascism; Zionism; British Monarchic presumption of entitlement to Ireland….and France…and Spain; subsequent Crown-instigated Fascistic Sectarianism in Scotland and Northern Ireland)
So with reference to “Militant Liberalism”, what I mean is the absolute feckless disregard for our Constitution with a zeal for Absolutism and Censorship of Debate, Discourse and Opposing View, as was the case with the Abortion Referendum.
Between Militant Liberalism (i.e. Left-wing Fascism [Censoring debate]) and Evangelistic Extremism (i.e. Right-wing Fascism, and often *Foreign* Evangelical Fascistic interference) – there is a massive expanse for and of diverse discourse.
Yes, people should have the Right to Choose (anything and everything).
But people also have the Right to a full and detailed arguement framed in facts of Law. A full and uncensored debate and discourse, free of Politicised Religiosity……and Militant imposition of Opinion or Censorship of discourse.
For example: should the Law have reflected that where a foetus is *wanted* by the mother carrying it, it should therefore be counted as a “Life” under the Law if/when an abusive partner punches and kicks that foetus to death? And/or if/when a partner covertly administers an abortifacient without consent!?
As it stands, the foetus killed in the Omagh Bomb, would no longer be counted as a “Life” subsequent to the amendment that ammended the amendment – in the absence of freedom for a full and uncensored discourse (due to Militant Liberalist Zealous Absolutism. Even those who were pro-Choice, had no freedom nor forum for debate or discourse).
Certainly, there is a tokenistic attack on the Constitution. There has been since and during the previous 2 Referendums. The Constitution has been treated with contemptuous fecklessness by sneaky-ass Fine Gael in particular. And it was only due to the profound, serious and frankly often life-threatening impact of the ‘Marriage’ and ‘Abortion’ Referendum on ‘the person’, that such contempt for the Constitution could be tolerated by the Electorate and assent given for the sake of many citizen’s safety and wellbeing.
But evidently such repeated politicised tokenistic contempt for the Constitution, and Law, has now breached the tolerance level of the Electorate.
Society can no longer accept an “on-balance, for the greater good, with the least harm” argument or consideration to give consent to the contempt for the Constitution and Constitutional Law.
Mary Lou was fairly certain on the day that there would be a SF referendum – so is this the new Sinn Fein policy or just Matt Carthy’s opinion? I am sure we all be given a chance to repent our sins against the establishment and vote according to the presumed “yes” in a few years time.
Yet another housing forecast says the government will miss its completion targets
57 mins ago
266
4
The Morning Lead
RTB writes to major landlord Ires Reit over attempts to impose monthly common area charges
Eoghan Dalton
1 hr ago
646
4
RIP
'True legend': Tributes paid to former F1 boss Eddie Jordan after his death aged 76
Updated
8 hrs ago
44.4k
62
Your Cookies. Your Choice.
Cookies help provide our news service while also enabling the advertising needed to fund this work.
We categorise cookies as Necessary, Performance (used to analyse the site performance) and Targeting (used to target advertising which helps us keep this service free).
We and our 157 partners store and access personal data, like browsing data or unique identifiers, on your device. Selecting Accept All enables tracking technologies to support the purposes shown under we and our partners process data to provide. If trackers are disabled, some content and ads you see may not be as relevant to you. You can resurface this menu to change your choices or withdraw consent at any time by clicking the Cookie Preferences link on the bottom of the webpage .Your choices will have effect within our Website. For more details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
We and our vendors process data for the following purposes:
Use precise geolocation data. Actively scan device characteristics for identification. Store and/or access information on a device. Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development.
Cookies Preference Centre
We process your data to deliver content or advertisements and measure the delivery of such content or advertisements to extract insights about our website. We share this information with our partners on the basis of consent. You may exercise your right to consent, based on a specific purpose below or at a partner level in the link under each purpose. Some vendors may process your data based on their legitimate interests, which does not require your consent. You cannot object to tracking technologies placed to ensure security, prevent fraud, fix errors, or deliver and present advertising and content, and precise geolocation data and active scanning of device characteristics for identification may be used to support this purpose. This exception does not apply to targeted advertising. These choices will be signaled to our vendors participating in the Transparency and Consent Framework.
Manage Consent Preferences
Necessary Cookies
Always Active
These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work.
Targeting Cookies
These cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.
Functional Cookies
These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and personalisation. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we have added to our pages. If you do not allow these cookies then these services may not function properly.
Performance Cookies
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not be able to monitor our performance.
Store and/or access information on a device 109 partners can use this purpose
Cookies, device or similar online identifiers (e.g. login-based identifiers, randomly assigned identifiers, network based identifiers) together with other information (e.g. browser type and information, language, screen size, supported technologies etc.) can be stored or read on your device to recognise it each time it connects to an app or to a website, for one or several of the purposes presented here.
Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development 141 partners can use this purpose
Use limited data to select advertising 111 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times an ad is presented to you).
Create profiles for personalised advertising 83 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (such as forms you submit, content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (for example, information from your previous activity on this service and other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (that might include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present advertising that appears more relevant based on your possible interests by this and other entities.
Use profiles to select personalised advertising 83 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on your advertising profiles, which can reflect your activity on this service or other websites or apps (like the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects.
Create profiles to personalise content 38 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (for instance, forms you submit, non-advertising content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (such as your previous activity on this service or other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (which might for example include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present content that appears more relevant based on your possible interests, such as by adapting the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find content that matches your interests.
Use profiles to select personalised content 34 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on your content personalisation profiles, which can reflect your activity on this or other services (for instance, the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects. This can for example be used to adapt the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find (non-advertising) content that matches your interests.
Measure advertising performance 132 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which advertising is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine how well an advert has worked for you or other users and whether the goals of the advertising were reached. For instance, whether you saw an ad, whether you clicked on it, whether it led you to buy a product or visit a website, etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of advertising campaigns.
Measure content performance 60 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which content is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine whether the (non-advertising) content e.g. reached its intended audience and matched your interests. For instance, whether you read an article, watch a video, listen to a podcast or look at a product description, how long you spent on this service and the web pages you visit etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of (non-advertising) content that is shown to you.
Understand audiences through statistics or combinations of data from different sources 74 partners can use this purpose
Reports can be generated based on the combination of data sets (like user profiles, statistics, market research, analytics data) regarding your interactions and those of other users with advertising or (non-advertising) content to identify common characteristics (for instance, to determine which target audiences are more receptive to an ad campaign or to certain contents).
Develop and improve services 83 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service, such as your interaction with ads or content, can be very helpful to improve products and services and to build new products and services based on user interactions, the type of audience, etc. This specific purpose does not include the development or improvement of user profiles and identifiers.
Use limited data to select content 38 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type, or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times a video or an article is presented to you).
Use precise geolocation data 46 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, your precise location (within a radius of less than 500 metres) may be used in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Actively scan device characteristics for identification 27 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, certain characteristics specific to your device might be requested and used to distinguish it from other devices (such as the installed fonts or plugins, the resolution of your screen) in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Ensure security, prevent and detect fraud, and fix errors 90 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Your data can be used to monitor for and prevent unusual and possibly fraudulent activity (for example, regarding advertising, ad clicks by bots), and ensure systems and processes work properly and securely. It can also be used to correct any problems you, the publisher or the advertiser may encounter in the delivery of content and ads and in your interaction with them.
Deliver and present advertising and content 97 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Certain information (like an IP address or device capabilities) is used to ensure the technical compatibility of the content or advertising, and to facilitate the transmission of the content or ad to your device.
Match and combine data from other data sources 72 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Information about your activity on this service may be matched and combined with other information relating to you and originating from various sources (for instance your activity on a separate online service, your use of a loyalty card in-store, or your answers to a survey), in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Link different devices 53 partners can use this feature
Always Active
In support of the purposes explained in this notice, your device might be considered as likely linked to other devices that belong to you or your household (for instance because you are logged in to the same service on both your phone and your computer, or because you may use the same Internet connection on both devices).
Identify devices based on information transmitted automatically 86 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Your device might be distinguished from other devices based on information it automatically sends when accessing the Internet (for instance, the IP address of your Internet connection or the type of browser you are using) in support of the purposes exposed in this notice.
Save and communicate privacy choices 68 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
The choices you make regarding the purposes and entities listed in this notice are saved and made available to those entities in the form of digital signals (such as a string of characters). This is necessary in order to enable both this service and those entities to respect such choices.
have your say