We need your help now
Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.
You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.
If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.
Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
By continuing, you are indicating that you accept our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
EUROPE IS IN the midst of the worst refugee crisis in decades, with over four million Syrian refugees fleeing their country’s civil war and many coming to Europe for shelter.
Countries have been taking a differing approach to the crisis — Germany has been praised for welcoming refugees while Hungary is getting slammed for its handling of the influx of people.
The Dutch have been among the most welcoming in Europe, with public projects to support refugees, and now three Netherlands-based entrepreneurs have set up an “Airbnb for refugees.”
Germaine Statia, 23, Jamal Oulel, 25, and Ayoub Aouragh, 24, have set up Refugeehero.com, a website that lets people advertise spare rooms for refugees to stay in.
“We want to give back humanity to mankind,” says Germaine Statia in a statement sent to Business Insider.
The website is not for profit, social startup. Refugeehero.com plans to get funding from municipalities in the Netherlands. Jamal Oulel says:
“Government institutions in the Netherlands alone spent €495 million in 2014 to accommodate refugees.”
The website operates pretty much like Airbnb. People, called “heroes”, offer up spare rooms in their homes for refugees to temporarily stay in:
The mobile-friendly website includes private residential listings, as well as organisations opening up their facilities, such as churches, mosques, schools and universities.
Refugees can check where is available, when, and who has space:
The three founders say they hope Refugee Hero will become much more than just a platform for refugees to find shelter on.
“We want the heroes to help the refugees find their way in a new, strange country,” says Ayoub Aouragh.
“This means Refugee Hero will grow to become a platform facilitating all important aspects linked to migration. This varies from helping refugees find a new school for their children or even arranging social security and applying for a passport.”
Volunteers recently set up a similar “Airbnb for refugees”-style website in Germany.
Ireland has committed to take in up to 4,000 people.
The US and Australia said last week that they would accept more tens of thousands more refugees.
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
About time too.
@Honeybadger197: imagine rights based issues and unaccountable corruption are holding up governance for everybody.
@Mr Phil Officer: ‘Politics is the art of the possible, the attainable—the art of the next best’ (Otto von Bismarck).
@Brendan O’Brien: equal rights are possible and attainable and non-negotiable.
Should have been done long ago.
Literally the only thing that SF and DUP agreed on – full pay, full snouts in the trough.
About time they stopped getting paid for jobs they’re not doing.
And before the usuals start whining about “constituency work”, that is the secondary aspect of their job – they’re primary purpose is to govern and legislate.
Refuse to do that and you shouldn’t get paid.
@Brinster:
“Literally the only thing that SF and DUP agreed on – full pay”
Wasn’t there a draft paper which showed they had reached agreement on essentially everything? Remember? It fell apart because the unionist grassroots would not tolerate compromise?
@Tír Eoghain Gael: You’re kind of a forlorn voice now that SF has given away its power and its relevance.
Someone better put a loaf on their head to get it back in the media spotlight.
@Brendan O’Brien: What part of my comment was inaccurate? Or is petty abuse the only form of discussion you are capable of engaging in?
Is ‘forlorn’ a term of abuse now? I’ll make a note of it.
@Brendan O’Brien: I’ll try asking again. How about you discuss the content of my initial post? What part of my comment was inaccurate?
Alternatively, if your debating abilities don’t extend beyond making personal jibes and sarcastic remarks, then go and troll someone else, like a good man.
@Tír Eoghain Gael: The content of your initial post has been discussed ad nauseam. The dogs bark but the caravan moves on.
@Brendan O’Brien: You don’t want to discuss what has bee discussed ad nauseum, yet you bring up the Barry McElduff story? Drop the BS. If you are not prepared to reference and debate absolutely any point in my initial post, then don’t bother replying to it.
@Tír Eoghain Gael: Duly noted and filed in the bin.
@Tír Eoghain Gael: as bad as each other
@Gus Sheridan: Who?
@Tír Eoghain Gael: By “unionist grass roots” I assume you mean the UDA/UVF who scuppered the deal when Arlene ran it past them….
@Vigo the Carpathian: And the Orange Order
@Vigo the Carpathian:The DUP have no links to the UDA and the UVF. However intransigent, stubborn or neanderthal they are or have been, they never sunk to the lows of Provisional Sinn Fein / IRA.
@Tír Eoghain Gael: SF and DUP try and keep up
@Gus Sheridan: You are claiming that SF and the DUP are as bad as eachother, yet telling me that I’m the one that needs to keep up??!
Consider the reasons for Stormont’s collapse? Did both parties have a leader who overseen a botched energy scheme costing the taxpayer c. £500,000,000 and then refuse to take responsibility for the mess? Did both parties block marriage equality? Did both sides block a Bill of Rights as agreed 20 years ago in the GFA? Did both sides block minority language legislation as was agreed at St Andrews? Did both parites block legacy funding? The answer to all those questions, is ‘no, that was just the DUP’. So how on earth are they as bad as each other?
Martin McGuinness told the story of how before the Euros in France, he approached the then First Minister Arlene Foster, that a suggestion that they should make a symbolic gesture of going to one of the north’s games and one of the south’s games together. Arlene refused and only went to one of the north’s games. Martin went to one of each. That, Gus, is the difference. SF have bent over backwards to make such gestures. The DUP have not reciprocated. They regard compromise as defeat. ABout time you copped yourself on and dropped the grossly stupid and simplistic “both as bad as eachother” waffle.
@Tír Eoghain Gael: It would have been more of a gesture on McGuinness’ part had he gone to one of the North’s games and one of England’s.
That would have been more equivalent to Foster going to one of the North’s games and one of the Republic’s.
@CrabaRev: Really ? No links? https://www.irishnews.com/news/northernirelandnews/2018/03/06/news/dup-briefed-senior-loyalists-on-irish-language-deal-before-collapse-of-talks-1270698/ or http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/dup-conservatives-northern-ireland-coalition-ulster-defence-association-paramilitaries-peace-process-a7782631.html?amp
@CrabaRev:
“The DUP have no links to the UDA and the UVF”
Really? You I assume have forgotten about:
- The fact that a large chunk of the UDA’s arms were brought to shore in a shipment shared out with Ulster Resistance – a group co-formed by senior DUP figures Ian Paisley & Peter Robinson.
- The infamous “graduated response” in 2014, when a coalition of unionist politicians, including the DUP leader, took to a stage alongside UDA leaders to announce their resistance to the banning of a loyalist parade?
- The meeting between Arlene Foster with a senior UDA leader during last years election campaign, just 48 hours after his organisation murdered a man in front of his son, last summer? (Yet years the DUP wouldn’t speak to SF because they perceived it as a terrorist group!)
- The fact that the DUP’s Wesley Irvine last year attended a UDA meeting in order to hand out electoral registration forms.
- The fact that the UDA publicly endorsed the DUP last year ““strongly urging” loyalists to vote for them in the General Election. The DUP spent weeks refusing to distance itself from this endorsement.
- That only last month the DUP was contacting figures in the UDA to brief them on the talks.
- The fact that Arlene Foster steadfastly refused to call for the resignation of UDA commander Dee Stit from a Stormont paid role in a Belfast community Group, after he was secretly filmed speaking making threats in his capacity as a UDA ‘commander’.
- The fact that the DUP MLA Christopher Stalford rents his office from the UDA
- The fact that a former DUP Mayor of Ballymoneyu celebrated the recent ‘confidence and supply’ arrangement with the tories by tweting a photoshopped image of No. 10 with a UVF flag handing from the front window.
- The fact that Stormont Speaker Robin Newton was exposed in a BBC investigation as being directly involved in UDA leader Dee Stit’s ‘community group’ which was in receipt of public funds. Because he didn’t declare his involvement, he was ble to sit on an Assembly steering group which directed several million pounds to the organisation.
- The fact that the same BBC investigation last year reported a whislteblower from within the UDA state that the group was building an “increasingly close relationship with the DUP”
- The fact that last Feb, the DUP’s West Belfast facebook page attacked the TUV for having a personal vendetta “not only with the DUP but now loyalist paramilitaries”.
Shall I keep going?
@Brendan O’Brien: So Martin McGuinness suggested they both go to one of the north’s and south’s games, but has to go to the south on his own because Arlene wouldn’t go – and it’s McGuinness rather than Foster that you criticise? The mind boggles.
And what do England have to do with it? The idea behind McGuinness’s suggestion of them going to the games of the two Irish teams is because they are the two teams that the divided population here give their loyalties to. It boils down to the fact that McGuinness was prepared to go to a game of a team representing a state he had no allegiance to as a goodwill gesture. The DUP leader could not bring herself to do likewise.
@Tír Eoghain Gael:
You really are grasping at straws. The first example is tenuous to say the least. The others just show that two Unionist organisations, have crossed paths over the last number of years. Every organisation has bad apple’s and I am sure there have been some members of the DUP who been supportive of the UDA. But to say they are linked is untrue and disingenuous.
Provisional Sinn Fein / IRA were the same organisation working a political and terrorist strategy side by side. The terrorist strategy is suspended, for the moment.
There is a huge difference.
@Tír Eoghain Gael: I pointed out that McGuinness was making no worthwhile gesture, as he regarded Ireland as all one thing. If he had no allegiance to Northern Ireland, he had no allegiance to the Republic either. (As we know, the Republican Movement has traditionally seen the two jurisdictions as equally illegitimate, and the IRA ‘Army Council’ as the legitimate government of the whole island.)
@Brendan O’Brien:
“: I pointed out that McGuinness was making no worthwhile gesture, as he regarded Ireland as all one thing.”
Which is precisely why he had no allegiance to the north’s team, which is precisely why it was a goodwill gesture to unionism to attend one of their games with Foster. Meanwhile, Foster refused to make a goodwill gesture of going to a game involving the south with him.
It genuinely says it all that you find the fault with Martin McGuinness in this scenario, rather than with Foster (not to mention even finding a way to shoehorn the “IRA army council” into the debate ffs. Warped.
@CrabaRev: Rather than just making a blanket dismissal of my examples in their entirety, exactly of my examples are you refuting?
@Tír Eoghain Gael: No: McGuinness believed in an all-Ireland polity, so he could logically have supported both teams; Foster believes in partition so logically would support only Northern Ireland in football.
McGuinness helped to run Northern Ireland within the UK for a decade, which seems more of a commitment to acknowledging/accepting its existence than going to a football match would be.
As I said, SF has no more ‘allegiance’ to our 26-county Republic than to NI. It is tied up in doublethink
@Tír Eoghain Gael:
I think that my reply above clearly covers all of your points.
If you have evidence of links between members of the DUP and Loyalist Terrorists, I would advise you to visit your local PSNI station and share that information with them.
@Brendan O’Brien:
Would McGuinness have been perfectly comfortable at one of the north’s games and stading for GSTW? Quite clearly not. It is a team that republicans, no matter your twisted logic, do not tend to support.
Did he, and most nationalist and republicans support the south’s team? Quite evidently yes.
The exact flip side is the case for Arlene Foster and wider Unionism.
Martin McGuinness went beyond his comfort zone to make a gesture of that he understood would be well received within unionism (which was his fundamental reason for doing so). Arlene Foster would not go beyond her comfort zone to make a goodwill gesture that would be well received within nationalism.
Again, it takes a particularly warped mind to see McGuinness as the problem in that.
@CrabaRev:
“I think that my reply above clearly covers all of your points.”
Except that it didn’t specifically address a single one of them.
In your own time.
‘twsted’, ‘warped’, etc.: always with the hyperbole. I’ll leave you to your sad little tribalist wallowings.
@Brendan O’Brien: So I praise a politician for making a gesture towards the unionist community and that makes me a “sad little tribalist”? That sounds like the same sort of warped thinking that in your mind makes Martin McGuinness the villain for making the gesture of goodwill and Foster’s point blank refusal to make a similar gesture seemingly not a problem.
I suspect the reason you are running away is because you are afraid of digging yourself into any deeper into that big hole you’re created.
no harm, might make them cop themselfs on
Great idea
Why are they being paid at all?….
No assembly. .no work…no pay!
They get 3 weeks off for easter (paid of course).
So hit them quickly..
STOP paying them all. See how quick they can work together.
Its time to Give Northern Ireland to the Eu .
That’ll teach em both ! !
@Pl O’neill: They are so thick skinned up there that they probably wouldn’t even notice as long as the money keeps rollong in.
Yes it’s about time someone took the trough from under the pigs snout. This is the only thing that will concentrate the minds. The public there deserve better than this contemptible bunch of misfits
It’ll never happen with the DUP having the tories by the short & curlies.
Is Arlene really Rory Best with a wig?
@George Costanza: I thought she was Paul Merton’s evil twin.
@George Costanza: Rory Best is probably Arlene in disguise
@Gus Sheridan: I honestly had my back turned to the TV and heard the accent and wondered why Arlene was talking so softly for once.
Jeeze, what next – cutting the salaries of TD’s who can’t be ars#d sitting in the Dail.
@wattsed: No cutting their salaries for promising one at elections then doing the opposite.
Dithering,clueless, with no knowledge of the 6 counties… maybe it’s time for Karen Bradley to seek a reduction in her own pay level.
The completely useless post of NI Secretary of State requires a unique set of skills, mainly the ability to do absolutely nothing while being held in equal contempt by both sides. A complete lack of personality helps too.
It’s a special needs statelet. Tedious identity politics holding the place back. Churchill’s ‘dreary steeples’ and the intractibility of the division between orange and green still apt a century later and the British taxpayer funds this lunacy and division just to stop republicans from commiting acts of terror in England.
Very unfair on all the MLAs from parties who have been excluded from the Assembly by SFDUP
Why are they being paid at all? They’re not working .
@Michael Daly: They are not legislating. They are still working, running full time constituency services.
Stop paying them altogether. Docking them a mere 15000 isn’t going to get Stormont back up and running. Spongers the lot of them.
@Johnnie Sexton: Stop the pay in full and the constituency service currently still available to the people comes to a complete halt.
DUP don’t care once their is on UK General Election…
That means they will be docked about 260stg a week !! backdate it now to the day the ass-embly collapsed, that’ll soften their cough for them!
Women should stick to cooking (although all the best chefs are men).
Zero Hours contract might be the way to go.. Time and motions audit on politicians… payment by results ..
one thing is certain a fat salary plus unvouched expenses has been proved demonstrably not to work, as they are a slippery evil bunch to start with.
Why are they getting paid at all?
Normal people who don’t show up for work don’t get paid.
Use precise geolocation data. Actively scan device characteristics for identification. Store and/or access information on a device. Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development.
These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work.
These cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.
These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and personalisation. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we have added to our pages. If you do not allow these cookies then these services may not function properly.
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not be able to monitor our performance.
Cookies, device or similar online identifiers (e.g. login-based identifiers, randomly assigned identifiers, network based identifiers) together with other information (e.g. browser type and information, language, screen size, supported technologies etc.) can be stored or read on your device to recognise it each time it connects to an app or to a website, for one or several of the purposes presented here.
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times an ad is presented to you).
Information about your activity on this service (such as forms you submit, content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (for example, information from your previous activity on this service and other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (that might include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present advertising that appears more relevant based on your possible interests by this and other entities.
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on your advertising profiles, which can reflect your activity on this service or other websites or apps (like the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects.
Information about your activity on this service (for instance, forms you submit, non-advertising content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (such as your previous activity on this service or other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (which might for example include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present content that appears more relevant based on your possible interests, such as by adapting the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find content that matches your interests.
Content presented to you on this service can be based on your content personalisation profiles, which can reflect your activity on this or other services (for instance, the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects. This can for example be used to adapt the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find (non-advertising) content that matches your interests.
Information regarding which advertising is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine how well an advert has worked for you or other users and whether the goals of the advertising were reached. For instance, whether you saw an ad, whether you clicked on it, whether it led you to buy a product or visit a website, etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of advertising campaigns.
Information regarding which content is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine whether the (non-advertising) content e.g. reached its intended audience and matched your interests. For instance, whether you read an article, watch a video, listen to a podcast or look at a product description, how long you spent on this service and the web pages you visit etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of (non-advertising) content that is shown to you.
Reports can be generated based on the combination of data sets (like user profiles, statistics, market research, analytics data) regarding your interactions and those of other users with advertising or (non-advertising) content to identify common characteristics (for instance, to determine which target audiences are more receptive to an ad campaign or to certain contents).
Information about your activity on this service, such as your interaction with ads or content, can be very helpful to improve products and services and to build new products and services based on user interactions, the type of audience, etc. This specific purpose does not include the development or improvement of user profiles and identifiers.
Content presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type, or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times a video or an article is presented to you).
With your acceptance, your precise location (within a radius of less than 500 metres) may be used in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
With your acceptance, certain characteristics specific to your device might be requested and used to distinguish it from other devices (such as the installed fonts or plugins, the resolution of your screen) in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Your data can be used to monitor for and prevent unusual and possibly fraudulent activity (for example, regarding advertising, ad clicks by bots), and ensure systems and processes work properly and securely. It can also be used to correct any problems you, the publisher or the advertiser may encounter in the delivery of content and ads and in your interaction with them.
Certain information (like an IP address or device capabilities) is used to ensure the technical compatibility of the content or advertising, and to facilitate the transmission of the content or ad to your device.
Information about your activity on this service may be matched and combined with other information relating to you and originating from various sources (for instance your activity on a separate online service, your use of a loyalty card in-store, or your answers to a survey), in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
In support of the purposes explained in this notice, your device might be considered as likely linked to other devices that belong to you or your household (for instance because you are logged in to the same service on both your phone and your computer, or because you may use the same Internet connection on both devices).
Your device might be distinguished from other devices based on information it automatically sends when accessing the Internet (for instance, the IP address of your Internet connection or the type of browser you are using) in support of the purposes exposed in this notice.
The choices you make regarding the purposes and entities listed in this notice are saved and made available to those entities in the form of digital signals (such as a string of characters). This is necessary in order to enable both this service and those entities to respect such choices.
have your say