Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.
You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.
If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.
THE MOST SENIOR civil servant in the Department of Health has rejected any suggestion that there is a “vast conspiracy” to block the introduction of universal healthcare in Ireland.
During an Oireachtas committee appearance today, the Health Minister also insisted that no frustrations had been raised with him before the Sláintecare programme was hit with recent resignations.
Robert Watt, the secretary-general of the Department of Health, appeared before the Health Committee alongside Health Minister Stephen Donnelly.
Questions have been asked about the future of the initiative aimed at introducing universal healthcare in Ireland following a number of high-profile resignations.
Gastroenterologist Professor Anthony O’Connor confirmed he had left the Sláintecare Implementation Advisory Council (SIAC) last week, following in the footsteps of chairman Dr Tom Keane and executive director Laura Magahy.
During an at-times testy appearance, both Donnelly and Watt pushed back against the idea that the Government is not committed to Sláintecare.
Responding to a question from Gino Kenny TD, Watt asked for evidence that progress on the major reform is being blocked by “institutional resistance”.
Watt described such suggestions as “nonsense” and “vast conspiracies”.
The recent resignations dominated questions from parliamentarians.
Donnelly told the committee he regrets the resignations but said he was not aware of any concerns among those who quit.
“Neither Tom or Laura raised any frustrations with me,” Donnelly told the committee.
“Neither raised the issues with me or sought a meeting with me.
“I would very much have liked if the issues had been flagged earlier.”
Health Minister Stephen Donnelly Sam Boal
Sam Boal
Asked by Fine Gael TD whether department officials might have been aware of the frustrations, Donnelly said: “I can’t speak for what other people may know.”
Watt insisted there had not been policy disagreements between officials and those who resigned.
He said there is “no settled view” in the Department of Health on the particularly controversial issue of regionalisation, which would see the creation of new regional health areas in the health service.
Sinn Fein health spokesman and committee member David Cullinane expressed incredulity at such a claim.
“It’s hard to comprehend there was no sense of disagreement that would have led to their resignations,” he said.
He accused Donnelly and Watt of having a “nothing to see here” attitude.
Watt said he believes Magahy resigned because the Sláintecare office had not been set up properly.
Advertisement
“I think, ultimately, Laura felt that the office wasn’t set up properly and that it wasn’t going to be delivered properly unless we actually embedded the philosophy, the culture and the projects across the department,” he said.
“That’s the key lesson for me, in terms of what happened, that we need to look at our delivery structure and learn from it.”
He said the Department of Health is undergoing a process of restructuring.
Donnelly said in his opening statement to the committee that a new board will be formed that will be co-chaired by Mr Watt and HSE chief Paul Reid.
The motives behind this reform were questioned by several committee members.
Social Democrats co-leader Roisin Shortall said it looks like a “hostile takeover”.
Donnelly told the committee that accountability “will be shared across the department”.
Shortall told the minister: “It sounds like a continuation of this concern about attempts to suffocate Sláintecare.”
She said making the HSE and the department responsible for their own reforms clashes with the “democratic decision” of the Dail.
In a back-and-forth with Green Party TD Neasa Hourigan, Watt also said that he and Reid are “accountable to the minister, the Government and this committee”.
He said there had been “healthy debate” in the department about the timeline of the project and that one of the major barriers, since the start of the Covid-19 pandemic, had been the “bandwidth of the senior team”.
As Ireland emerges from the pandemic, Watt said that is now changing and regionalisation will still be delivered.
Donnelly also said a group will be created to advise on the next steps in the process.
He backed up his official, while acknowledging the worry that a “conflict” exists.
“We are tasking the centre with reducing its authority or executive bandwidth,” the Health Minister said.
“The only people who can lead it are the senior leadership teams in the organisations.”
“There is evidence of that in large-scale change all over the world.”
Acknowledging the resignations have damaged the perception of Sláintecare, Donnelly insisted progress is being made.
He told the committee: “That commitment is absolute and unwavering. Universal healthcare has never been achieved in Ireland and we are still far from it today. Changing that, making universal healthcare a reality, is one of the defining projects of our time.”
He also said tackling long waiting lists is a “number one priority”.
He added: “They were terrible before Covid and have worsened since. People are living in pain. The long waits that many of our citizens face in order to access care are causing immense distress.”
He said a taskforce will now try to address the pressing issue and will be modelled on the vaccine taskforce that planned and delivered the jabs programme.
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
Close
69 Comments
This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic.
Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy
here
before taking part.
@Odd Socks: who else would you put in charge of a healthcare project though? If they hired in external consultants there would be complaints about the cost of hiring in external consultants?
@Odd Socks: if they could not do the job now one might agree, but actually, by in large, the HSE has kept lots of people alive during the pandemic with their public health advice. Only in Ireland do we knock success and the more success the more knocking. I note you have proposed no one? But anti establishment should stop and we need people,, all people, to support good projects such as this and stop moaning from the sidelines and, I guess, making wild assertions without access to full information or facts. Sounds like a political agenda to me. Are you so tiny minded that you cannot congratulate the appointees and wish them success instead of playing the 19th century gutter game of knocking everyone’s success
@D. Memery: I don’t think there would be any complaints to be honest with you. We have a man who only 11 years ago was cable joiner technician for Eircom in charge of a 20+ BILLION EURO health budget.
Before that, we had a health minister who only has a leaving cert and was a college dropout.
I think we need to seriously look at bringing in external experts before thing get worse.
@D. Memery: its nothing to do with costs. It’s putting someone in charge that is able to manage people and a budget and have accountability and consequences if the fail. So someone from a newsagents might do. Not the people from the HSE that have proven time and time again that they can’t do the job.. And just get moved on to another department to hide their failings.
@Niall Ó Cofaigh: The medical side of the HSE is not the main problem it is the management and civil service part of it that causes all the problems.
Spend some time relying on the HSE and you soon find out how bad it is.
@Niall Ó Cofaigh: Why congratulate a man who can’t, and hasn’t done, the job he is grossly overpaid for since he took over from his predecessor. Kept lots alive..remember the poor elderly. The many who died from other illnesses during and pre covid who never managed to see a consultant. The many who are still waiting. The many cases that have been settled because of negligence 18illion yesterday. Lack of beds, staff, lack of services. No he decides not need or deserve another job he is ill equipped to do.
@Niall Ó Cofaigh:. All the top management in the HSE wanted to do in the pandemic save the HSE by hiding the mismanagement of a budget and staff. They keep say we have to protect the HSE. Nothing to do with saving life’s.. The volunteers in the vaxcine centres the local GPS, the doctors and nurses, shop assistant, did a great job. Not the HSE management. What about the people that couldn’t get appointments for Hart disease. Cancer, mental health. That couldn’t get appointments. And maybe to late for them now. Just so the mismanagement could be covered up…. So no the HSE management didn’t do a great job.. And now their failings have been seen so they are getting moved on to another department. To avoid consequences.
@Niall Ó Cofaigh: you do realise this is the same HSE that sent people back to nursing homes in March 2020 without COVID tests. The HSE as an entity didn’t save those lives during COVID. Doctors and nurses. Why should we congratulate the appointees? I will congratulate then when the achieve something in the role. Sláintecare was supposed to be run outside the HSE because there is so much resistance within the HSE for it. That’s the problem.
@Stephen Kearon: it’s the same HSE that has nearly 1 million people on waiting lists. Just because the people they outsourced the logistics of the vaccine rollout to did a great job, doesn’t mean the HSE is a success.
So the people who are at the top of the failed entity which is the HSE are now going to spearhead the saviour of the Irish healthcare system which is Slaintecare, Is it just me that thinks this project is already doomed?
@Derek Lyster: To HSE or Not HSE. So who here believes Slaintecare as originally presented and laid out as an aspiration/proposal, or at least as we were all led to believe, we were going to have delivered to us in the coming years, is now going to materialise?
This new Slaintecare vision of a free health service for every citizen, was amongst other things, going to be used to encourage our sisters and brothers in the neighbouring state on this island, to join us in peace and prosperity in one new state. Hard to believe there’s not more than one conspiracy at work in trying to wreck what started out as a very genuine and worthwhile project.
I shudder to think of what kind of Mickey Mouse Slaintecare service we’ll now eventually end up with in the end?
@Michael Dikie Foran: Think you’ll find the government are yes men to Paul Reid. He’s managed to make our healthcare system one of the best financed healthcare systems in the world but not make it any better in terms of service. Government can’t sack him because the of the HSE management system and union.
@Ajax Penumbra: no denying they throw loads of money at the health system. Problem is that a large portion is squandered or used inefficiently. Money isn’t the problem, incompetence is more often than not.
@Roy Dowling: Dont blame the unions on this. They have fought against the lowering of standards and the privatisation of so much of the ancillary work.
@Adam J: Those figures are for Government and Private Health Care combined. If you only consider Government funding the health care service is even more well-financed, around 5th or 6th best funded per capita worldwide.
Apparently the plan is to split the HSE into regions… hmmm.. I seem to remember the health board was regions and we were told it would be better to have a single entity…. indeed.. looks like they know what they are doing…..
@⚡ Seánie ⚡: when first created the HSE was a single non-regionalised entity, it was then regionalised as a political move to try and getcit back towards the model of the regional health boards without actually admitting a single entity model was a bad idea
It’s difficult to comprehend the thought process that led to these appointments but one thing is now certain, Slaintecare is dead in the water. It’s going to take decades to undo the damage caused by this government.
@GrumpyAulFella: Slaintecare has cross party support but it is being implemented by the government. The government decided these latest appointments and the government is ultimately responsible for its success or failure. As of now they’re responsible for its failure which isn’t a shock given their consistent failures on pretty much every initiative across the board.
@Declan Doherty: it was a cross party plan drawn up by a committee chaired by Roisin Shortall though. It sounds as though the plan was not viable or there are individuals or groups blocking progress perhaps.
I thought the original point was to have an independent group from the HSE not of the HSE and the government. This fell nicely into FG hands. Lovely, they will come up with stuff the HSE and the government are comfortable with. Just what the people need.
@John Long: the man from DPER who oversaw the NCH money pit farce. “We thought we knew the final cost but that wasn’t the case” and then promoted to Sec Gen of the DoH. Sure it’s only money.
With four major resignations from Slaintecare, the top man that stands accused of hindering it, has now been put in charge of it by the Dail Mafia. Says it all!
Universal healthcare was the brain fart of former FG health minister James Reilly. Millions spent until Leo as health minister dismiss the idea.
Universal healthcare and Sláintecare are two different approaches. James Reilly commitment was also absolute and unwavering in dealing with waiting lists.
What we need is a dail sub committee. Nothing more or less. Let those we elect honour their election promises. Not unelected health officials with no experience in health. It was HSE management that derailed Sláintecare to protect themselves and vested interests.
Now the same management is going to co-chaired their own hand picked stool pigeons. Away
Sláintecare like Universal healthcare has lost to vested interested and waiting lists will only get longer.
@leartius: Slaintecare i.e. public sector quangos have been so successful at the providing health care that we’re going to give them more money + more control over the system without any real reform – what could go wrong
Why are there so many “I think”s and “maybe”s? Surely these high ranking and very well paid officials were subjected to exit interviews and interrogated to within an inch of their lives as to what they perceived as being the problems that were so immense that these issues forced their resignations. Why are Watt and Donnelly pretending that they don’t know what these issues are? Is it plausible that nobody has ever raised any concerns over these issues before these 3 resigned? Surely that’s not the case. It’s hard to believe a word of this. Putting Reid and Watt in charge sounds like a move to stifle internal HSE unrest and obstruction by hiding it from he public eye or at least filtering it through these 2.
Ridiculous appointing a HSE official to oversee the set up of slainte care. The govt have no appetite to introduce it as it will affect the private insurance health system. Its just more window dressing over a doomed project.
@Matt: just to add there are plenty of cronies already getting huge amounts of money sitting around, including tds consultants advisors and the likes. While paul reid is occupied with slainte care who is doing his hse work.
@Matt: When in fairness did Paul Reid ever do his H.S.E work!! If he is preoccupied with Slaintecare maybe, if we are lucky, someone with actual ability and experience might take over.
@Matt Yes indeed. Its like the Dublin government appointing the DUP leader to write up a white paper on the replacement of N.I. with a new United Ireland, and with the remaining panel member made up of Orange Order members.
@Adam J: Uses PPP, they believe things are cheaper in Ireland so inflate the figure.
The real public health spend ( Pandemic excluded) is €16 billion divided by 5 million , or €3200 .
I listened into the debate. Thought Minister & Watt defended The progress on Slaintecare. We definitely are lucky to have Watt & Reid leading the Change! If the deliver they are worth every penny of salary.
Pastors, protests and claims of persecution: The Burke family's ties with conservative America
Stephen McDermott
50 mins ago
1.1k
Taoiseach in DC
Jewish groups discuss Irish "attacks on Israel" and Occupied Territories Bill with Taoiseach
Updated
1 hr ago
6.9k
Ireland Funds gala
Members of Enoch Burke's family forcibly removed from gala dinner in Washington DC after disrupting speech
Jane Matthews
Reports from Washington DC
22 hrs ago
97.2k
Your Cookies. Your Choice.
Cookies help provide our news service while also enabling the advertising needed to fund this work.
We categorise cookies as Necessary, Performance (used to analyse the site performance) and Targeting (used to target advertising which helps us keep this service free).
We and our 157 partners store and access personal data, like browsing data or unique identifiers, on your device. Selecting Accept All enables tracking technologies to support the purposes shown under we and our partners process data to provide. If trackers are disabled, some content and ads you see may not be as relevant to you. You can resurface this menu to change your choices or withdraw consent at any time by clicking the Cookie Preferences link on the bottom of the webpage .Your choices will have effect within our Website. For more details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
We and our vendors process data for the following purposes:
Use precise geolocation data. Actively scan device characteristics for identification. Store and/or access information on a device. Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development.
Cookies Preference Centre
We process your data to deliver content or advertisements and measure the delivery of such content or advertisements to extract insights about our website. We share this information with our partners on the basis of consent. You may exercise your right to consent, based on a specific purpose below or at a partner level in the link under each purpose. Some vendors may process your data based on their legitimate interests, which does not require your consent. You cannot object to tracking technologies placed to ensure security, prevent fraud, fix errors, or deliver and present advertising and content, and precise geolocation data and active scanning of device characteristics for identification may be used to support this purpose. This exception does not apply to targeted advertising. These choices will be signaled to our vendors participating in the Transparency and Consent Framework.
Manage Consent Preferences
Necessary Cookies
Always Active
These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work.
Targeting Cookies
These cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.
Functional Cookies
These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and personalisation. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we have added to our pages. If you do not allow these cookies then these services may not function properly.
Performance Cookies
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not be able to monitor our performance.
Store and/or access information on a device 109 partners can use this purpose
Cookies, device or similar online identifiers (e.g. login-based identifiers, randomly assigned identifiers, network based identifiers) together with other information (e.g. browser type and information, language, screen size, supported technologies etc.) can be stored or read on your device to recognise it each time it connects to an app or to a website, for one or several of the purposes presented here.
Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development 141 partners can use this purpose
Use limited data to select advertising 111 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times an ad is presented to you).
Create profiles for personalised advertising 83 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (such as forms you submit, content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (for example, information from your previous activity on this service and other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (that might include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present advertising that appears more relevant based on your possible interests by this and other entities.
Use profiles to select personalised advertising 83 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on your advertising profiles, which can reflect your activity on this service or other websites or apps (like the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects.
Create profiles to personalise content 38 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (for instance, forms you submit, non-advertising content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (such as your previous activity on this service or other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (which might for example include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present content that appears more relevant based on your possible interests, such as by adapting the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find content that matches your interests.
Use profiles to select personalised content 34 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on your content personalisation profiles, which can reflect your activity on this or other services (for instance, the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects. This can for example be used to adapt the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find (non-advertising) content that matches your interests.
Measure advertising performance 132 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which advertising is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine how well an advert has worked for you or other users and whether the goals of the advertising were reached. For instance, whether you saw an ad, whether you clicked on it, whether it led you to buy a product or visit a website, etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of advertising campaigns.
Measure content performance 60 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which content is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine whether the (non-advertising) content e.g. reached its intended audience and matched your interests. For instance, whether you read an article, watch a video, listen to a podcast or look at a product description, how long you spent on this service and the web pages you visit etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of (non-advertising) content that is shown to you.
Understand audiences through statistics or combinations of data from different sources 74 partners can use this purpose
Reports can be generated based on the combination of data sets (like user profiles, statistics, market research, analytics data) regarding your interactions and those of other users with advertising or (non-advertising) content to identify common characteristics (for instance, to determine which target audiences are more receptive to an ad campaign or to certain contents).
Develop and improve services 83 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service, such as your interaction with ads or content, can be very helpful to improve products and services and to build new products and services based on user interactions, the type of audience, etc. This specific purpose does not include the development or improvement of user profiles and identifiers.
Use limited data to select content 38 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type, or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times a video or an article is presented to you).
Use precise geolocation data 46 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, your precise location (within a radius of less than 500 metres) may be used in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Actively scan device characteristics for identification 27 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, certain characteristics specific to your device might be requested and used to distinguish it from other devices (such as the installed fonts or plugins, the resolution of your screen) in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Ensure security, prevent and detect fraud, and fix errors 90 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Your data can be used to monitor for and prevent unusual and possibly fraudulent activity (for example, regarding advertising, ad clicks by bots), and ensure systems and processes work properly and securely. It can also be used to correct any problems you, the publisher or the advertiser may encounter in the delivery of content and ads and in your interaction with them.
Deliver and present advertising and content 97 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Certain information (like an IP address or device capabilities) is used to ensure the technical compatibility of the content or advertising, and to facilitate the transmission of the content or ad to your device.
Match and combine data from other data sources 72 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Information about your activity on this service may be matched and combined with other information relating to you and originating from various sources (for instance your activity on a separate online service, your use of a loyalty card in-store, or your answers to a survey), in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Link different devices 53 partners can use this feature
Always Active
In support of the purposes explained in this notice, your device might be considered as likely linked to other devices that belong to you or your household (for instance because you are logged in to the same service on both your phone and your computer, or because you may use the same Internet connection on both devices).
Identify devices based on information transmitted automatically 86 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Your device might be distinguished from other devices based on information it automatically sends when accessing the Internet (for instance, the IP address of your Internet connection or the type of browser you are using) in support of the purposes exposed in this notice.
Save and communicate privacy choices 68 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
The choices you make regarding the purposes and entities listed in this notice are saved and made available to those entities in the form of digital signals (such as a string of characters). This is necessary in order to enable both this service and those entities to respect such choices.
have your say