Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

A screengrab from the Roseanne reboot (ABC)

Hundreds put out of work as a result of Roseanne's racist tweet - and some workers unlikely to get paid

The cancellation came on the first day of meetings for the newly assembled writers..

THE UNPRECEDENTED SUDDEN cancellation of one of US television’s top comedies has left a wave of unemployment and uncertainty in its wake.

Roseanne Barr’s racist tweet and the swift axing of her rebooted show put hundreds of people out of work, with some wondering whether they would be paid, most knowing they wouldn’t be, and few with any legal recourse.

“A lot of people there are just middle class Americans making a living and now they’re out of work, especially at a time when we’re ramping up into production for the fall season,” Rebecca Sun of the industry trade publication The Hollywood Reporter said in an interview with The Associated Press.

It is pretty devastating for all of the people who worked on that show who are now collateral damage as a result of their star’s racist beliefs.

Contractual details for those involved with the show, including Barr, were not immediately clear, and would play out in the coming months.

Experts say high-profile figures in the television industry typically have contractual clauses that give them significant severance for shows that are not produced.

Lower-level workers are generally out of luck at an unfortunate time. Though Roseanne and many shows just had their season finales, jobs for next season are mostly taken.

Ben Sherwood, president of Disney-ABC Television Group, apologised in a memo to “the many men and women who poured their hearts and lives into the show and were just getting started on next season. We’re so sorry they were swept up in all of this and we give thanks for their remarkable talents, wish them well, and hope to find another way to work together down the road.”

The cancellation came on the first day of meetings for the newly assembled writers for the autumn season of Roseanne.

They arrived after Barr’s tweet, but before ABC President Channing Dungey’s announcement that the show was finished, leading to what executive producer and writer Dave Caplan said were “a lot of bittersweet hellos — and a couple hours later, a lot of very difficult goodbyes”.

“Everybody is still in shock at how quickly this all went down,” Caplan told The Hollywood Reporter.

It’s unfortunate because the writers did pass on other jobs to take this job and nobody really knows yet what kind of compensation they’re going to get.

For cast and crew members that did have longer-term contracts, Barr’s show-sinking tweet could be deemed, strange as it sounds, an “act of God”. A “force majeure” or “act of God,” legally, is some unpredictable event such as an earthquake or a riot that changes the underlying circumstances.

“It means something outside of the control of the parties. Roseanne’s speech wasn’t in the control of ABC,” said F Jay Dougherty, a professor who specialises in entertainment and media law at Loyola Law School in Los Angeles.

It wouldn’t surprise me if this was treated by the studio like that kind of event, giving the studio a right to terminate contracts.

Barr herself suggested on Twitter later that she may try to take some action.

“You guys make me feel like fighting back,” Barr tweeted to her followers.

I will examine all of my options carefully and get back to U.

Her contract may have a “morals clause,” however, which are often included in the contracts of television stars, athletes and other prominent figures, demanding a standard of behaviour as the face of an enterprise.

“We can’t predict whether there will be lawsuits or not,” Dougherty said, “but I don’t think there will be successful lawsuits.”

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Close
38 Comments
This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic. Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy here before taking part.
Leave a Comment
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.

    Leave a commentcancel

     
    JournalTv
    News in 60 seconds