We need your help now
Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.
You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.
If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.
Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
By continuing, you are indicating that you accept our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION of General Practitioners has criticised efforts to remove patients across the country from hospital waiting lists, saying there is no medical reason to do so.
Calls have been made for the government to reform the waiting list system after a surge in the number of appointments that have been cancelled in recent weeks.
The HSE has been contacting patients across the country by post to ask them to confirm whether they still require an appointment.
However, those who don’t reply in writing within 10 days are deemed to no longer require their appointment, and their doctor informed that they have been removed.
The move has been described as a “national disgrace” by the NAGP, who say it is an attempt to manipulate waiting lists to make them appear smaller.
Over 700,000 people were on hospital waiting lists at the end of June, but the NAGP says it has heard from a number of GPs whose patients have been removed after not replying to the HSE.
NAGP President, Dr Maitiu O’Tuathail told TheJournal.ie that some doctors were receiving up to 100 letters a week asking them to validate their patients’ appointment.
He said: ”Normally GPs receive one or two validation letters a week, so to receive over 100 in a week is incredible.
“Many patients are also coming in to us in a panic because they worry that the letter isn’t going to reach the hospital on time.”
Dr O’Tuathail added that the move was disproportionately affecting the most vulnerable in society, including the elderly, those with visual impairments, and homeless people.
He said: “It’s pretty clear what this is about. There’s been a clear increase in the number of validation letters sent since waiting list figures hit over 700,000 a few weeks ago.”
Amy Morgan / TwitterOh God it's really so sad that I have to write letters like this when I have a million other things to do but maybe I might get a response this way because traditional routes are failing right now! pic.twitter.com/auOEMlirOy
— Amy Morgan (@amymorgangp) July 11, 2018
Age Action also expressed concerns that older people would miss vital appointments because they cannot reply in writing in time, and urged the HSE to provide a dedicated phone number for older patients.
Meanwhile, the NAGP has called for a meeting with the HSE and the Department of Health to address the issue.
In a statement, the HSE said that validation exercises were carried out to help improve the overall use of resources and access times for patients.
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
Countries will just claim they didnt know they were going to be used to carry out crimes
There is too much money involved, business wont let this get off the ground
Sadly you are probably right:-(
Its a shame its taken this long to actually happen.. Endless lives lost that could have been somewhat prevented a long time ago.
Do u really believe that Arms tRading will stop -
— it would ruIn – or atleast badly affect many economies – notably USA/UK/France .
Stop sales of Arms to Israel or SA – well of course if push came to shove they could send them as a gift .
Too much world trade on all sides ihas to do with weapons industry .
Its just more junk from UN
It still won’t make a blind bit of difference , the un is a toothless animal as we have seen in the past
Agreed, I would describe them as “impotent “
So they’ll sell to an intermediary instead….
Like in that Nicholas Cage movie… Where he was an arms dealer… What was it called again?? He was some kind of War Lord…. Oh yeah, City of Angels, that’s the one….
You’re right Brian. Hopefully they’ll have that covered.
Thats called the Lord of War…And the best line in it was ” One in eleven people are unarmed on this planet.How do we arm the other ten?”
Well ,watch plenty more genocide and massacres happen because of this stupidity on a global scale from the One world Govt.This has given dictatorships and tyrants a charter to massacre unarmed pouplations as they know now the unarmed will never be able to get enough defensive weaponry to defend themselves.When it does happen the UN will be in talking mode and call for restraint on both sides..Nice,if you are trying to counter a helicopter gunship with a muzzle loading shotgun.
The UN ,the worst organisation that was ever dreamed up by mankind! It has more blood on its collective hands thru inaction in the last 60 years than some countries.
Iran, North Korea and Syria are the only countries that voted No.
Not surprising.
It’s amazing how people actually make North Korea (referring to the government/military of course) out to be as the victims of American/South Korean “bullying”. America and South Korea don’t put their own people in concentration camps. No one should even recognize North Korea as a legitimate state as the North Korean people have absolutely no rights. There goals of a United Korea are absolutely delusional.
Preaching to the choir here Kevin.
North Korea is only a buffer zone between the US and China and in some messed up way has to be legitimate to act as such. Just crazy. When power remains in the hands of the few the many will continue to suffer.
I wonder who the 23 abstentions were ? Anyway, positive move forward.
Full breakdown of the vote here, Mark – http://twitdoc.com/upload/marcellehopkins/voting-record-of-the-att-reso.pdf Most notable are China, Russia and Egypt.
Cheers
To Little To Late as the UK has sold most of these arms the the worst regimes in the Middle East and India.
Quite amazing that states have to be told not to sell to these places!
it means nothing there still going to be sold under the table out of site out of mind .
You know what will really stick in the throat of B. Lowe and the rest of his cronies is that they can’t even point at America or the Western Allies and say “Look they abstained”.
Where’s petr tarasov these days? Thinking up a new identity?
Banged up in either Russia or the US I belive.
Took years to formulate, no doubt will take days for states to find a way around it. The permanent members of the security council all happen to be the largest arms exporters in the world.
Long time coming – has the potential to make a real difference once it enters into force.
Quite amazing that states have to be told this!
Lol.
Any comment on the fact that Syria, Iran and NK are the only countries that voted no, and Russia and China both abstained? Does that tell you anything about which states commonly carry out human rights abuses and who might arm them?
Remember there is nothing in this treaty to prevent arms sales for legitimate use…
We both know he is running for cover on this one.
BLowe bashes American/Western media constantly while worshipping RT (the Russian station not RTE), Al Jazeera, and any other anti-American media group. While pointing out the bias/bigotry of any news organizations is good; its hard to take someone seriously when they apply different standards depending on the country that media is from. I can say one thing Russia and Qatar would never allow FOX to set up a Russian or Qatari version of their station in their countries. Meanwhile RT and Al Jazeera have US versions of their channels and constantly spout anti-American rhetoric.
Yes, b Lowe can you explain why your 3 favorite regimes have said no?
B Lowe, did Venezuela abstain as well?
Have you been to Venezuela Declan ?
John, it’s looks to me that Venezuela abstained. Correct me if I’m wrong. Venezuela is another of b lowes fave places.
”Does that tell you anything about which states commonly carry out human rights abuses and who might arm them”
No – it just tells us who are the most clever at hiding what they do . The US cant do without its Arms trade – which in the end may be a seriuos Achiiles heel – and the idea od US/UK not supplying their proxy countriees for self defence is not on .
Remember the US claims the right to a Pre-emtive strike – and this follows thro to its ”Allies” .
This is the get out cluase – as if it was needed
”from selling arms to countries when they know those weapons will be used to carry out genocide, crimes against humanity or war crimes”
this bit of paper – well the best that can be said for it – it gave Employment to some for a few days / weeks .
Jim, the best Defence is to have a better offence. That’s what preemptive strike is all about.
The US learnt that lesson at pearl harbour.
After WW2 and during the Cold War and beyond the US has stuck to that strategy.
It’s not about attacking a defenceless country. It’s about being on guard against a country that wants to harm you.
Hit them before they hit you.
Simple.
I do hope that North Korea, Iran and Syria are exempt from this. … you know with them being such shining examples of responsible thinking and out standing members of the global family we should, rightly so, cut them some slack
Is there a use for arms that’s not criminal? They should go a step further and retract and recycle the lot!
To stop criminals……..
To defend yourself from criminals wether petty theives or genocidal Govts.
Imagine if six million Jews each had in the 1930s a single shot .22 pistol. Nazism wouldnt never have happened, or 26 million Russians had had the same…Stalin would have never massacred them either.
Thats one of the benefits of gun control and arms control in the 20th century , over 100 MILLION civillian DEAD! That were either disarmed and massacred by invaders or by their own Govts before hand.
Why o why , a man needs his arms…..
Come on Declan , Australia warned the US of the pearl harbour attack , it’s a well known fact so maybe the best defence would have been to get their men out of there before it happened , don’t you think
Actually Britan knew about it but on Churchills orders kept very sthumm as Churchill needed the US iin the war with the UK as an ally.But there was alot more to it too, Washington was hardly going to belive the UK ,a nation at war with Japan that an attack was iminent,despite plenty of Japanese provacation for at least five years before hand in the Pacific .The complete secrecy and surprise that the Japanese carrier fleet operated under on the Pearl Harbour strike.The “Aw shucks nuthin will happen here in Hawaii.”Attitude shown by the top brass in Hawaii,even when the radar picked the entire Japanese air fleet on the way in on n attack a half hour out,and ships could have brought to general quaters,planes got in the air,and guns manned.It was “dont worry about it,they are proably ours coming in from California!!!”
Funnily the same attitude prevailed that Wed in the US on 9/11.Same warnings,same indifference.
Use precise geolocation data. Actively scan device characteristics for identification. Store and/or access information on a device. Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development.
These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work.
These cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.
These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and personalisation. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we have added to our pages. If you do not allow these cookies then these services may not function properly.
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not be able to monitor our performance.
Cookies, device or similar online identifiers (e.g. login-based identifiers, randomly assigned identifiers, network based identifiers) together with other information (e.g. browser type and information, language, screen size, supported technologies etc.) can be stored or read on your device to recognise it each time it connects to an app or to a website, for one or several of the purposes presented here.
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times an ad is presented to you).
Information about your activity on this service (such as forms you submit, content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (for example, information from your previous activity on this service and other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (that might include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present advertising that appears more relevant based on your possible interests by this and other entities.
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on your advertising profiles, which can reflect your activity on this service or other websites or apps (like the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects.
Information about your activity on this service (for instance, forms you submit, non-advertising content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (such as your previous activity on this service or other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (which might for example include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present content that appears more relevant based on your possible interests, such as by adapting the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find content that matches your interests.
Content presented to you on this service can be based on your content personalisation profiles, which can reflect your activity on this or other services (for instance, the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects. This can for example be used to adapt the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find (non-advertising) content that matches your interests.
Information regarding which advertising is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine how well an advert has worked for you or other users and whether the goals of the advertising were reached. For instance, whether you saw an ad, whether you clicked on it, whether it led you to buy a product or visit a website, etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of advertising campaigns.
Information regarding which content is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine whether the (non-advertising) content e.g. reached its intended audience and matched your interests. For instance, whether you read an article, watch a video, listen to a podcast or look at a product description, how long you spent on this service and the web pages you visit etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of (non-advertising) content that is shown to you.
Reports can be generated based on the combination of data sets (like user profiles, statistics, market research, analytics data) regarding your interactions and those of other users with advertising or (non-advertising) content to identify common characteristics (for instance, to determine which target audiences are more receptive to an ad campaign or to certain contents).
Information about your activity on this service, such as your interaction with ads or content, can be very helpful to improve products and services and to build new products and services based on user interactions, the type of audience, etc. This specific purpose does not include the development or improvement of user profiles and identifiers.
Content presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type, or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times a video or an article is presented to you).
With your acceptance, your precise location (within a radius of less than 500 metres) may be used in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
With your acceptance, certain characteristics specific to your device might be requested and used to distinguish it from other devices (such as the installed fonts or plugins, the resolution of your screen) in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Your data can be used to monitor for and prevent unusual and possibly fraudulent activity (for example, regarding advertising, ad clicks by bots), and ensure systems and processes work properly and securely. It can also be used to correct any problems you, the publisher or the advertiser may encounter in the delivery of content and ads and in your interaction with them.
Certain information (like an IP address or device capabilities) is used to ensure the technical compatibility of the content or advertising, and to facilitate the transmission of the content or ad to your device.
Information about your activity on this service may be matched and combined with other information relating to you and originating from various sources (for instance your activity on a separate online service, your use of a loyalty card in-store, or your answers to a survey), in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
In support of the purposes explained in this notice, your device might be considered as likely linked to other devices that belong to you or your household (for instance because you are logged in to the same service on both your phone and your computer, or because you may use the same Internet connection on both devices).
Your device might be distinguished from other devices based on information it automatically sends when accessing the Internet (for instance, the IP address of your Internet connection or the type of browser you are using) in support of the purposes exposed in this notice.
The choices you make regarding the purposes and entities listed in this notice are saved and made available to those entities in the form of digital signals (such as a string of characters). This is necessary in order to enable both this service and those entities to respect such choices.
have your say