We need your help now
Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.
You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.
If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.
Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
By continuing, you are indicating that you accept our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
TWO YEARS AFTER a planned return to RTÉ was cancelled in the wake of the Golfgate controversy, broadcaster Sean O’Rourke has been confirmed as the host of a new show on the national broadcaster.
O’Rourke is to present a new programme entitled Two Tribes, which RTÉ says “follows the diverging paths taken by Fianna Fáil and Fine Gael in the post-civil war landscape”.
The programme is part of a range of content RTÉ has announced as in its new season about the Irish Civil War.
O’Rourke narrated a radio documentary last weekend as part of the RTE’s Documentary on One series but today’s announcement is the first time he has fronted a return to TV.
The veteran journalist was a long-time RTÉ employee but retired in May 2020.
He was understood to be in talks to return to the station in the following months when it was revealed that he attended the controversial Oireachtas Golf Society dinner held at a hotel in Clifden, Co Galway in August 2020 amid strict Covid-19 restrictions.
Then-agriculture minister Dara Calleary, who was also at the dinner, resigned from his position in the aftermath and RTÉ subsequently confirmed that it would not be proceeding with future projects with O’Rourke.
O’Rourke was quoted in the RTÉ statement at the time and said it was the “right course” of action as he wanted to “call myself to account”.
Last October, O’Rourke made a return to public life when he interviewed Taoiseach Micheál Martin at the high-profile MacGill Summer School.
Earlier this year two politicians and two hoteliers went on trial for organising the Golfgate dinner and their charges were dismissed in Galway District Court.
In the wake of that decision, the Taoiseach suggested there may be “a way back” for Calleary and he has now been tipped to return to Cabinet following the resignation of Robert Troy.
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
Theres a lot of people out there keeping up appearances..they may be working,they may appear to have good jobs..but they work long hours with no job security and bring very little money home….many employers including the state took advantage of the bust to force wages and conditions down.
Spot on
I’m kind of surprised that over 600,000 people were living in poverty before the recession during the supposedly good times. Goes to show that this country never was very good at looking after the vulnerable.
We are all vulnerable.
Relative poverty Callum. The dole here is twice that of the UK.
The relative poverty line is assumed to be a household or individual bringing in less than 60% of the median income. It’s a figure applied across a number of countries, and doesn’t necessarily mean people below it are living deprived lives.
A family on 80K in Dublin could be struggling really badly with high rent and a child with a disability, whereas someone down the country in an inherited house on 20 hours a week might be quite comfortable. But some cases will sway it one way, others another way, the 60% figure is just established best practice internationally.
So it’s more correct to say that before the boom 600,000 people were ‘at risk of poverty’, and the number of people ‘at risk of poverty’ is now higher.
The country wasn’t good at booting them out to work you mean.
what do you expect from a state who’s go to plan for poverty was let thousands emigrate per year
the UK is an awful example, but generally people get a bunch of other supports via welfare in the UK
And look at what’s happening in the UK!
Keep the recovery going…………and other such nonsense.
Not to worry Tommy aka Dane will along soon to tell us what a wonderful caring government we have.
Tell me something I don’t know after paying for rent,travel costs, car insurance, etc,I’m left with about €90 a week to live on!
Yet still, still, the tone of some comments on here is that it’s not ‘real poverty.’
When the cost of living (rent, energy bills, healthy food, clothing, childcare) is so high, then it is poverty.
Sure, we are not a third world country; the days of tenements are long gone; but there are still thousands sleeping on our streets, or families with young children being housed in hotels because they can’t afford a rise in their rent.
Still the unemployed are described as spongers and ‘having it good.’ I won’t deny that there are people who screw the benefits system in this country. Also, those at the top of the financial ladder over the years have also been shown to be screwing the system and the people of this state yet there is no ‘sponger’ or ‘scam-artist’ stereotype attached to them.
Jay …to be fair nobody,or at least very few…see politicians,CEO’s,Charity executives,Councillors as anything other than scam artists to some degree or other…..
Fraud of the social welfare system is reckoned to cost the state €20 million a year.
The cost of white collar crime is reckoned to cost the state €2.5 billion a year.
Considering the above….where would you invest resources to give the best return for the taxpayer?
Keep the recovery going Enda well done hold your head up high.
Throw on a water charge there, maybe a broadcasting charge after that.
Dont forget the hike in electricity on the way.
The true cost of the bailout.
I am a single income earner, I work 39 hours a week and come out with €308. Not by my choice I’ve to stay at home as there is nowhere affordable to live. My money basically goes on my car and food. I’m trying to save but can’t afford to put much away each week
You would make more on the dole, you need to be taxed less.
I was on the dole before and was only getting €40, I did a jobbridge internship which meant I got €90 a week for 35 hours
Anita, seems like a good deal for a young person living at home. And why do you think you should move out until you earn enough to do so? I imagine you’re still very young cos for 39 hours at €9.15 you would come out with more than €310 after tax. When I was your age, earning some cash, going out and enjoying myself were given – rent a flat? Why?
Fiona…surely someone working 39 hours a week should be able to……..not live with their parents.
People who accept that this situation as being fine or OK are helping to create a world where people are exploited and will find it difficult to live life as independent adults. A country with large poverty traps is being created before you very eyes….and you think it’s OK.
I’m just about to turn 24 and I don’t want feel dependant on my parents which I feel at the moment. I think they’ve done enough for me and now I’m just a burden as I don’t see anytime soon I can move out.
Exactly Anita…in the 1970′s most got married and started a family, usually only one worked and they had their own house by their mid 20′s.
Now, we have people not starting a family until their 30′s, both must work and most likely will be renting as they cannot afford to get a house of their own.
I feel really bad for young people trying to get a life of their own…our system is broken and yet we have people on here who think this is normal and berate anyone who disagrees with government policy and labeling many as layabouts or wasters or telling them the key to their problems is to upskill…no matter what their qualifications are….the system is FUBAR and it’s cheerleaders are braindead.
Lifechoices play a very large part in someone’s relative wealth and potential for wealth creation. This is too often overlooked and never considered. Bad advice, lack of advice or guidance and ignorance also plays a vital role. It would be great to ‘give’ everyone what is assumed needed, but the aforementioned traits will bring many back to square one unfortunately. Needs comes a distant second to Wants in this age.
Anyone remember Fianna Fáil and their flippant response ‘well, we all partied’. Some might forgive and forget, but not all of us. We’ll remember what Fianna Fáil did to this country and to the hundreds of thousands still suffering
I remember when FF lowered the minimum wage by a euro an hour. I’ll never forget that extra kick in the teeth while I was down.
Does that figure include the self employed people who would rather scratch a living somehow than go on benefits? That’s if they could actually get any. I know a good few of them and they live on much less than that figure but have their dignity.
Too true.
yes it does, and what’s undignified about being unemployed?
I’m sorry. Yes, that’s not a lot of money. But people in Ireland just don’t understand what actual poverty is.
Absulutely. It’s all relative. The poorest 50 years ago were still in tenaments with communal toilets.
Rosie it’s also twice the dole in the UK. Yet there are people here who think they “deserve” more.
No its not at all..
Yeah according to this, I live in poverty. BS I do. I can pay my rent and feed and clothe myself. It’s not great, I’m looking for better work, but it’s not poverty ffs.
Dont get me wrong here i was on the dole myself but for a single person with no children 218 a week is not bad at all. Obviously with children it is a different story. If you have shelter and can eat everyday you are not in poverty , relative poverty yes.
@ Johnnathan – the report is saying that the poverty line is €215
dole for a single person is €30 below that @ €188 PW
*poverty line is €218
That is wrong the dole is not 218 a week at all for anybody…
And if your under 25 it’s only €100 and if your 25, it’s €144 a week. You only get €188 26 and over.
Who gets 218 a week? Definitely not those you just described… Single, no children. I only get 188 a week of which I have to pay 450 rent a month plus other utility bills and food….just about leaves me enough money to get bus in and out of town twice a week.
I don’t think pensions paid by the govt are sustainable at current taxation rates. Education about the tax benefits of saving for your own pension (through employer or independently) needs to be taught.
Pensions are losing money rapidly got my statement the other day 1k down since last year be better off just setting up a rainy day retirement fund at this stage
If you earn 10% return every year and your pension fund manager loses 10% every year, he will still make more money than you (assuming you have equal amounts) such are the tax benefits. Perhaps the system should be changed to allow people to save for their own pensions and claim back taxes but can you trust most people not to touch it? Unlike in a fund where they have no choice?
57% of the people in poverty are unemployed. Self inflicted really. What’s upsetting is the other 43% who are working but still stuck in the poverty trap. something needs to be done for them.
Peter the other 43% are probably elderly retired living solely off the state pension.
You’re confusing the statistics or ignoring the reason why these 57% do not have jobs. The 57% you mention are not connected to the labour market as: “they are people who are retired, students, people in caring roles or people who are ill or people with a disability.”
Is that all self-inflicted?
18% of those living under the poverty line are employed, leaving 25% who are unemployed (for reasons we do not know).
Apologies. I misread the article.
Keep the recovery going… For the upper tier of society..
‘If the government wants to close the divide, future policy “must prioritise those at the bottom of the income distribution”, said Michelle Murphy.’ The problem is that the government doesn’t seem to want to close the divide.
How many of these poor people drink and smoke?
If we want to nit pick Fred how many shop at tesco instead of lidle? How many working poor drive to and from work instead of spending 2 hours getting two buses plus a half hour walking to and from work? How many bought Christmas and birthday presents for their kids?
Darren…well said.
Well said Darren. The arrogance of some commentators here is unbelievable. Anyone e reading so e of the comments would think there was a workforce shortage, young people in rural Ireland are just sitting around on their butts with loads of posts unfilled…..
Spot on Darren
A shameful indictment of of Capitalist policies endorsed by Government. But the fools – they’re incubating massive Social unrest for the future with eyes wide open…
Peter Higgins are you forgetting taht Capatilism is the only reason so few people exist in poverty, The free market is the gretest lift out of poverty.
Thats jsut reality.
So essentialy what your saying is if you get a job and actually work hard teh chances of being poverty stricken are quite low.
Dont work and you have a 1 in 5 chance of being poor.
i’m WORKING my way out of poverty with my day job and another more profitable evening business
what about the people on 100 euro a week
Single person living at home with parents, on €188 a week. Why?
So just 100,000 more since start of recession, thats rathwr low dispite all the cuts.
This is RELATIVE poverty not actual poverty. Ireland is a rich country with lots of high earners. We can’t expect everyone, including people who refuse to work to get over 60% of the average wage. Why did the EU pick 60% anyway? Why not 40%? Elsewhere in the world poverty is understood as living on less than $2 a day. If you take that understanding then no one in Ireland is living in poverty, not by a long way.
poverty is based on the balance between income and cost of living, in a country like Ireland with a high cost of living 218 would mean you have little or no disposable income, in a third world country with a low cost of living $2 a day is a ok amount of money. It’s basic economics
A Kilo of rice or sugar or maize costs the same in a third world country as it does in Ireland if you know where to shop.
Getting your car NCTed costs more. Paying for services costs more.
750000 and rising we are all doomed the FG plan is working
And what’s the government going to do about it? Nothing.
188 a week living at home with parents is all disposable income. Happy days.working 5 1/2 day week,60 hrs or so and don’t have anything near that in a fortnight
assuming your parents aren’t poor that is
Unemployment is higher than in 2007, but it’s falling fast
There are also probably more retired people as the population lives longer.
There is certainly not a “crisis” as these agencies looking for funding are quick to claim.
Then we have Ted O Sullivan who is more interested in the seagull than the tax payer who pays his wages.
Strange one that with 96 billion in savings in the country great to live in an equal society thanks to FG and their cronies
We need to have a top tax rate of 80% for income over €100k, that won’t bring in enough so we need a rate of 60% for income over €80k that won’t bring in enough either, so we then have to get to Vincent Browne territory with a 50% rate on income over €50k.
Alternatively, or in tandem we can chase down the corporation tax or even increase it. That might be difficult with our neighbours in Brexland thinking of cutting theirs.
We already pay close to 50% on anything over 34k. The state should not take more than half in direct taxes at any income point.
Sure why not take a pint of blood each week while you are at. As if we don’t pay enough tax in this country as it is like. Your suggestion would not only drive Foreign companies out of the country and deter future investment, put 100′s of thousands out of work, bring the economy to its knees it would also increase our overall public spend and put us back in recession. Fancy another bailout do we, so we are forever under the control of the IMF vultures. We need to focus on creating higher paid jobs, not creating endless welfare state schemes that go nowhere to eradicate poverty and just hurt the working people. The constant wealth distribution in this country just seems to take more money out of the hard working people who earn it and give it to Bankers, spongers and quangos and the genuinely poor actually don’t ever seem to benefit. All the extra taxes, USC this and that since the recession and 100,000 more in poverty proves it.The only way to fully eradicate poverty is through full employment and incentive working over benefits with lower taxes, allow people spend the money within the real economy as opposed to being state managed money pits.
Theres already a 51% tax & it starts well below €50k.
You really should know what taxes you’re paying if you are employed. It sounds like you aren’t or never have been.
I don’t see any of the ‘Unions’ fighting for our cause. They only fight for the people earning from €30,000-€100,000 per annum,i.e. €600.00 – €2,000.00 per week. That’s what’s wrong with this country – GRABBERS’ , and the ‘Unions’ head the list. For instance, the Gardai got €100 per week rise, the OAP’s got €5.00 per week rise. That’s 20 times more that the OAP’s. Is that justice?
Use precise geolocation data. Actively scan device characteristics for identification. Store and/or access information on a device. Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development.
These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work.
These cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.
These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and personalisation. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we have added to our pages. If you do not allow these cookies then these services may not function properly.
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not be able to monitor our performance.
Cookies, device or similar online identifiers (e.g. login-based identifiers, randomly assigned identifiers, network based identifiers) together with other information (e.g. browser type and information, language, screen size, supported technologies etc.) can be stored or read on your device to recognise it each time it connects to an app or to a website, for one or several of the purposes presented here.
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times an ad is presented to you).
Information about your activity on this service (such as forms you submit, content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (for example, information from your previous activity on this service and other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (that might include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present advertising that appears more relevant based on your possible interests by this and other entities.
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on your advertising profiles, which can reflect your activity on this service or other websites or apps (like the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects.
Information about your activity on this service (for instance, forms you submit, non-advertising content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (such as your previous activity on this service or other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (which might for example include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present content that appears more relevant based on your possible interests, such as by adapting the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find content that matches your interests.
Content presented to you on this service can be based on your content personalisation profiles, which can reflect your activity on this or other services (for instance, the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects. This can for example be used to adapt the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find (non-advertising) content that matches your interests.
Information regarding which advertising is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine how well an advert has worked for you or other users and whether the goals of the advertising were reached. For instance, whether you saw an ad, whether you clicked on it, whether it led you to buy a product or visit a website, etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of advertising campaigns.
Information regarding which content is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine whether the (non-advertising) content e.g. reached its intended audience and matched your interests. For instance, whether you read an article, watch a video, listen to a podcast or look at a product description, how long you spent on this service and the web pages you visit etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of (non-advertising) content that is shown to you.
Reports can be generated based on the combination of data sets (like user profiles, statistics, market research, analytics data) regarding your interactions and those of other users with advertising or (non-advertising) content to identify common characteristics (for instance, to determine which target audiences are more receptive to an ad campaign or to certain contents).
Information about your activity on this service, such as your interaction with ads or content, can be very helpful to improve products and services and to build new products and services based on user interactions, the type of audience, etc. This specific purpose does not include the development or improvement of user profiles and identifiers.
Content presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type, or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times a video or an article is presented to you).
With your acceptance, your precise location (within a radius of less than 500 metres) may be used in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
With your acceptance, certain characteristics specific to your device might be requested and used to distinguish it from other devices (such as the installed fonts or plugins, the resolution of your screen) in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Your data can be used to monitor for and prevent unusual and possibly fraudulent activity (for example, regarding advertising, ad clicks by bots), and ensure systems and processes work properly and securely. It can also be used to correct any problems you, the publisher or the advertiser may encounter in the delivery of content and ads and in your interaction with them.
Certain information (like an IP address or device capabilities) is used to ensure the technical compatibility of the content or advertising, and to facilitate the transmission of the content or ad to your device.
Information about your activity on this service may be matched and combined with other information relating to you and originating from various sources (for instance your activity on a separate online service, your use of a loyalty card in-store, or your answers to a survey), in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
In support of the purposes explained in this notice, your device might be considered as likely linked to other devices that belong to you or your household (for instance because you are logged in to the same service on both your phone and your computer, or because you may use the same Internet connection on both devices).
Your device might be distinguished from other devices based on information it automatically sends when accessing the Internet (for instance, the IP address of your Internet connection or the type of browser you are using) in support of the purposes exposed in this notice.
The choices you make regarding the purposes and entities listed in this notice are saved and made available to those entities in the form of digital signals (such as a string of characters). This is necessary in order to enable both this service and those entities to respect such choices.
have your say