Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Michaelangelo's David via Shutterstock

Arrested over 30 times: Scotland's 'Naked Rambler' told being naked is 'not freedom of expression'

He has been arrested. A lot.

A EUROPEAN COURT has told a British man that his repeated arrests for being naked in public are not a freedom of his expression.

Stephen Gough of Eastleigh was arrested a number of times in Scotland after walking naked from Land’s End in England to John O’Groats in Scotland.

In 2003, Gough decided to walk naked from Land’s End in England to John O’Groats in Scotland, earning the nickname “the naked rambler”. Between 2003 and 2012 he was arrested over thirty times in Scotland for being naked in public. He was convicted on a number of occasions of breach of the peace. He was also convicted of contempt of court for refusing to dress for his court appearances.

Although he was at first admonished or received relatively short custodial sentences, the sentences increased with his repeat offending.

In total, between 2006 and 2012 he had just seven days of freedom.

He took the UK to European Court of Human Rights, claiming that his right to a private life and his right to free expression had been impinged upon.

In their ruling, the court found that while his nudity was a form of expression of opinion and the punishments were severe, his rights had not been infringed.

“[T]he Court emphasised Mr Gough’s own responsibility for his convictions and the sentences imposed because of his wilful refusal to obey the law over a number of years. It also referred to his duty to show tolerance and sensibility to the views of members of the public, who were likely to be alarmed and offended by his nakedness.

“It pointed out that there were other avenues open to Mr Gough to express his views on nudity. It concluded that Mr Gough’s lengthy imprisonment had been the consequence of his repeated violation of the criminal law, in full knowledge of the consequences, through conduct which went against the standards of accepted public behaviour in any modern democratic society.”

Read: 11 plus-size Irish models posed nude for a #stopbodyshaming campaign

Read: Nude on the beach: Ireland to host International Naturist Congress

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Close
19 Comments
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.
    JournalTv
    News in 60 seconds