Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
David Connolly / Vimeo
IN APRIL 1982 a Clogherhead fishing boat, the Sheralga, was trawling for prawns in the Irish Sea.
Raymond McEvoy was skippering the 70ft vessel about 30 miles off the Dublin coast when near disaster struck.
Other vessels in the area reported seeing the boat suddenly lurching back before being dragged backwards at high-speed, an estimated 10 knots. A significant pace with the Sheralga’s engines powering in the opposite direction.
The five man crew at first didn’t know what was happening but the seriousness of the situation soon became apparent when the boat started to go under.
The Sheralga was dragged for about two miles before it sunk and all five crew leapt overboard. They were rescued by number of other trawlers with Paul Connolly, captain of the main rescue vessel The Supreme, describing what happened.
“Next thing I seen him go full astern, he was flying astern about 6, 7, 10 knots astern. Then the boat listed over on her side.”
The crew men were taken to shore at Clogherhead by The Supreme and were in no doubt that they’d been sunk by a submarine which had left the scene rather than assist the rescue.
“She was dragged over, definitely, by a submarine, definitely,” said crewman Noel Kirwan in the hours after the sinking. “What was going to pull her back, 600 horsepower, something had to pull her back.”
At first, Britain denied any involvement in what happened but a number of weeks later admitted that the sinking had been caused by one of their subs.
The incident happened at the height of the Falklands War and it later transpired that the the Sheralga’s nets had been caught by HMS Porpoise which was looking for Soviet submarine activity in the Irish Sea.
‘No intention’
The sinking caused a major diplomatic incident between Ireland and the UK with demands that submarine activity be stopped in the Irish Sea.
The crewmen wanted compensation, both for the loss of the boat and their livelihoods and also for what they saw as the risk to their lives. The Irish Government meanwhile pushed for Irish fishing grounds to be made submarine-free.
But a confidential Government document published under the 30-year rule demonstrates that there was no Government appetite to “become party to the dispute” between the men and the United Kingdom.
The March 1984 briefing note for Minster for Foreign Affairs Peter Barry ahead of a UK visit contained the following extract:
We have no intention of acting as a party to the dispute and we have involved ourselves only to the extent of keeping ourselves informed of the views of both sides.
“We strongly hope that a court case may be avoided and that the matter may yet be settled by mutual agreement of loss adjusters,” it adds.
In the end, the men did go the legal route and four years later the crew received compensation in a Belfast court according to submarine blog Sundodgers.com.
The blog added that the compensation as Raymond McAvoy puts it “didn’t even match half of what he paid for the boat”.
The 1984 Government documents also outline how the Sheralga was far from the last of the “allegations of submarine interference with fishing vessels”.
The memo outlines to the Foreign Minster that he may wish to mention:
So the police investigate this allegation from 2004 and they decide to take no further action?, cue the guilty verdict by social media 15 years later then.
@Uncle Montys oaf: welcome to the Real World. You should have chosen the red pill
Come to think of it, he is fond of boxes…
Shazam! You’re pregnant
FFS another one
@DavidOReilly: no great loss
I wouldn’t worry.. He won’t be long making them disappear
Least his Not one of the few famous people who are dead and unable to fight for their good name and reputation to be restored after sexual assault allegations
@liam ward60: ya, poor Jimmy Saville getting his name dragged through the dirt. Disgrace!
@Bruce van der Gutschmitzer: i think he means more like wako jako, nobody defending Sicko Savile!!!
@Brian Kelleher: i know. Takin the pish. Although…id actually be in the aul anti wacko camp tbh. Sick puppy!
@Brian Kelleher: are you seriously defending Jackson? You think the abusers are lying? If they are they deserve an Oscar. And look at culkin, he turned out great
@Bruce van der Gutschmitzer: you’re in the whacko camp? You realise you’ve other yourself I presume?
@andyearley: *outted… damn
@5hbeZh0I: there is a story breaking that the director of Leaving Neverland agrees that one of the victims’ alleged assaults couldn’t have happened as the place where it happened hadn’t been built until 2 years after he claimed the abuse stopped.
@Jackie Carvill Caruana: yeah, it sounds like he got the year of when the abuse stopped wrong. He was 10 years old, easy mistake to make
I’ll only believe it if he perpetrated these assaults while tied up, wrapped in transparent plastic, and suspended from a crane.
@Gerry Quinn: it’s not abuse if you’re submerged in ice cold water in a straight jacket and have an anvil tied to your laces?
I came for the comments
@David Malone: dirty fecker
Get out of that one
have your say