Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Nicky Kehoe arriving at the Four Courts today. Leah Farrell/Rollingnews.ie

Former Sinn Féin councillor awarded €3,500 in RTÉ defamation case

The case related to comments made during a live radio broadcast in 2015.

Updated at 10.45pm

A FORMER SINN Féin councillor has won a defamation case against RTÉ over comments made during a live radio debate.

Nicky Kehoe, a former IRA member, was awarded €3,500 in the High Court today, RTÉ reported.

Currently a political manager in Dublin, Kehoe took the action due to comments made about him during a live radio debate in October 2015.

RTÉ has said its lawyers are considering an appeal.

The jury found that the broadcaster was responsible for 35% of the defamation, while former Labour TD Joe Costello was responsible for the other 65%.

The jury also found that the contents of the broadcast meant that Kehoe was not a fit person to be involved in the democratic process.

Speaking to reports outside the court today, Kehoe said: “First of all, I came here to vindicate my name.

A jury of my peers vindicated my name, and I am really happy with that. My name means a lot to me. It means a lot to my community. It means a lot to the people who voted for me in two elections that I topped the poll that I am a good person. I’ve worked really, really hard for that.

In a statement released this evening, Costello responded to the outcome of the case to in an attempt to clarify the jury’s findings.

“I would like to express my disappointment that a specific level of responsibility has been apportioned to me. I am at loss to understand why I have been referred to in the judgement,” he said.

I was not a party to the case; I was not called as a witness in the case; I didn’t name the plaintiff on the broadcast concerned; I was given no hearing in the case and no action was taken against me.
In fact, I wasn’t aware that the case was taking place until I read the media reports.

“I am advised that the finding of the jury in relation to me has no legal significance or consequences,” he added.

- with reporting from Gráinne Ní Aodha

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Close
JournalTv
News in 60 seconds