Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.
You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.
If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.
THE ST VINCENT’S HOSPITAL Group (SVHG) has said that a shareholding in SVHG held by the Religious Sisters of Charity has been transferred to a new charity.
The development is part of years of debate about the ownership of the site of the new National Maternity Hospital (NMH) and its governance.
The hospital is currently located at Holles Street in Dublin city centre, but is set to move to Elm Park, where it will be co-located with St Vincent’s Hospital.
Advertisement
Religious group Sisters of Charity owned the land on which the NMH is to be built and it had been proposed that the proposed deal would see the religious order owning the facility because it was providing the lands at no cost to the State.
Following the increasing opposition to the plans, the Sisters of Charity announced an end to their involvement with the SVHG in 2017 said they would therefore not be involved in the ownership or management of the new NMH.
The transfer of their shareholding of the SVHG has been beset with delays, however, and it had even been suggested that a location for the hospital may be needed to resolve the ongoing issues.
In a statement today, however, chair of SVHG James Menton said that the transfer had been completed.
“Today is very significant for St. Vincent’s Healthcare Group and for Ireland’s healthcare sector,” he said.
The Sisters’ role in the development of modern healthcare for Irish people from all walks of life cannot be underestimated and we thank them sincerely for their commitment, dedication and service.Moreover we are very grateful to them for vesting substantial and valued healthcare facilities in the St. Vincent’s Healthcare Group (as represented by shareholders’ funds in SVHG of €204 million as at 31 December 2020). We wish them well in their ongoing charitable work both in Ireland and abroad.
Sister Patricia Lenihan, superior general in the Religious Sisters of Charity, said in the same statement that they “will have no role in the future of the new independent charity, the St. Vincent’s Healthcare Group, St. Vincent’s Holding CLG or the new National Maternity Hospital.”
Related Reads
Dr Rachael Walsh: There is legal room for CPO of the National Maternity Hospital site by the government
Explainer: How an ownership row is still holding back Ireland's new National Maternity Hospital
“We will continue to care for people who are sick and/or poor, those nearing the end of life, people who are homeless, refugees and those who are victims of human trafficking as well as carrying on our work to develop and deliver education programmes,” she said.
The proposed connection between the religious group and the new Maternity Hospital has sparked intense political debate as well as demonstrations and activism in recent years.
Opposition to the plans for the ownership structure included various political parties and former master of the NMH Dr Peter Boylan.
Protests were held today during a Fianna Fail Women’s Health Conference where Health Minister Stephen Donnelly was speaking.
Speaking at the protest, activist Layla Wade told the PA news agency that a full range of health services should be provided at the new maternity hospital, including abortion, sterilisation, and IVF.
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
Close
40 Comments
This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic.
Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy
here
before taking part.
@Declan Gaffney: yep. Take them off to talk to people or use their phone. I think this is why the health authorities were reluctant to advise using them in the beginning. It seems to make people touch their faces more often
@sjr: And some will see wearing a mask as protection, so go lax on the hand-washing and distancing.
Masks for me are like bicycle helmets – a distraction from the real issue.
@Hector Son: Have you seen all the eejits that are not wearing them properly. Most now seem to think they don’t need to 2m social distance. Also don’t seem to be able to read with them or know their left from their right. Using entry instead of exit and vice versa and keep left seems to baffle them.
@Hector Son: I’m one of those eejits you speak of.
Could you please explain why our cases and deaths bottomed long before masks were introduced?
Could you also explain why the Netherlands have ever decreasing numbers after abolishing masks except on public transport. Sweden still has a population and working economy despite no masks.
Could you also explain why the virus doesn’t spread in 9 euro pubs where masks are not required?
@Vladimir Macro: Don’t look to the Netherlands . The population there are terrible obeying rules . My Dutch friend is 39 and jogs every day. Got Covid and still went shopping and to work . When I asked her why she told me everyone is doing it. Plus they don’t do 2 meters distancing its less at 1.5 and no one obeys it apparently . Huge death rate for a small country. Btw my friend ended up very ill and was sick for a total of 10 weeks . She still suffers extreme fatigue and lung problems
@Irene Mc Hugh: Its not mandatory to wear a mask. Also all this mask shaming is disgusting its just bullying. Cases started dropping long before the advice on masks. It would serve better if people keep adhering to social distancing and hand washing they are the most important.
@Frances Casey: You forgot the other thing that reduced the numbers….lock down. So as I said to Vlad, here are your choices as the country opens….wear a mask….or stay indoors (lockdown)
@Irene Mc Hugh: you’re so right, I was in a supervalu and a centra yesterday and lots of men of mixed ages not wearing masks, I don’t care if they believe they won’t get sick but they could so easily be spreading it.
@Frances Casey: cases dropped because most places were closed and almost everyone stayed at home, when the country started reopening the infection rate climbed, mainly because people didn’t abide by the rules.
@Joe_X: No these are not the choices just your opinion. Masks are not mandatory. They are more of a hindrance than a help. Majority are not fit for purpose and should be changed/disposed of after 4 hours. People are not using them properly.
Down of nose, up over chin, touching them, pulling them down to speak or even worse smoke. Social distancing seems to have gone out the window with mask wearers. The most important aspect is 2m social distancing and hand washing.
@John Mulligan: For a country reopening our case rate is low. The infection rate didnt rise and most people abide by the rules. But don’t let the facts get in the way.
@Ellen Day: yes Ellen you are 100% correct.. they are playing fast and loose with Covid… reckless to say the least. No strict rules there and are most likely heading towards another lockdown, a stricter one this time.
@Frances Casey: yes, it is my opinion. These are all our opinions, but your statement was that CoViD-19 numbers started dropping before masks were introduced but you never stated that most of the country’s population were in lockdown. It was not just social distance and hand washing that made this happen. I do concur with what you have said about people wearing masks incorrectly but the fact that people not wearing them correctly is a matter of educating them and there are other forms of face covering that can be used. If people do not start using them we could see lockdowns again. Not a national one, but regional lock downs. So if people do not have a medical reason that prevents them from wearing a mask….put it on or we will be back where we started.
@Joe_X: what happened to be 15 minutes in the close company of an infected person or is that an inconvenient fact regarding wearing filth gathering masks
@Sean Salmon: as with the rest of it, the 15 minutes is a guideline, not a law. The virus, or any virus for that matter, does not know whether you are in someones company, 1 minute or half an hour.
Having been in Blanchardstown Shopping Centre today doesn’t surprise me. At most half the people were wearing masks. Needs to become mandatory and shoppers refused entry if not wearing one
@seangolden1978: agreed. Was in Liffey Valley today and the vast majority of people were wearing masks thankfully and some shops were refusing entry if you didn’t have one.
@seangolden1978: I think shops are afraid to confront customers who do not wear masks especially bigger shops. It’s like the people who don’t wear masks feel the are immune to the virus. They look oblivious to what is happening around them
@Karen Ryan: This is exactly it. I work in retail and management won’t refuse entry to a customer until it becomes 100% mandatory via law and fines are issued for non compliance. They don’t want to deal with accusations of “discrimination”.
@Mairead Jenkins: factory in Kildare and a DP centre where workers lived. Pubs definitely won’t be opening and the cynic in me questions the release of these numbers. Anything to do with keeping us in over the bank holiday weekend?
@Ciaran Lehane: Never be too sure about that. An open mind on pretty much everything is a safer place to live. I ask myself the same Qs as Anne Marie and feel the safer for it.
@Paul Mcnevin: and the 14 last night, the 40 the night before, the 11 the night before that and so on….that’s 150 cases there in just the last 4 nights….out of 5 million as you put it!
@Joe_X: and that’s just the guys that are showing symptoms, bothered to get tested, and got the results yesterday. Each of those 80 are predicted to currently infect more than 1 person. If you don’t know how quickly this becomes a problem, try to put a grain of rice on the first square on a chessboard, and double it for every square. That’s your 5 million infected by the third row!
@Virus-free Turkey: no problem having an open mind but questioning why they are releasing the numbers today when the numbers are released every day is ridiculous
Now before anyone goes panicking.
Every time we’ve seen big numbers on a daily – it’s been backdated numbers or an isolated cluster like a meat factory.
The first lockdown we were barely testing and seeing these numbers so knew there were loads more. Now we’re tracking everything so 85 is not a huge number either way. MOST cases now are asymptomatic anyway.
So how bout – just for once – everybody not start panicking?
@Colm Malone: Wouldnt the fact that most cases are asymptomatic be more concerning since they’ve been going around not knowing they have it. Testing positive while asymptomatic may just be luck that it was discovered in the first place. Someone with symptoms would, i assume, seek medical attention and isolate.
@Colm Malone: agree Colm, it’s just sad that the scare tactic seems to be to just announce a figure and give absolutely no information as to the precise and accurate reason for the numbers. This needs to be the case for 1 or 101
@Dave Phelan: plenty of information given broken down by county, by age groups, transmission type, nursing home information, healthcare workers affected, etc.
@Colm Malone: no need to panic .. already you can see the rush to blame anyone not wearing a mask for the rise .. always a target .. Joggers, Bulgarians, Texans . People should remember that mask wearing in shops only started for real a week ago and cases have been very low for 2 months now.. so it ain’t lack of mask wearing that’s causing any rise.
@Lesley Kane: saying they are backdated cases when they clearly for not . That’s a voice of reason …. More like delusional. But whatever floats your boat.
@Colm Malone: Not going to happen. I think some thrive on these scenarios and are actually disappointed if the news is good. Common sense is wasted on them.
@Michael Waldron: Better start checking your dates. They were suggested when the numbers started rising 4 weeks ago then made mandatory but not enforced which means many still not wearing them. BTW….those figures reported today were infected over a week ago!
@Colm Malone:THANK YOU. Some sense. Meat plant cluster is far from ideal but at least it’s identifiable and can be worked with from a tracing and quarantine point of view. Take that number out, and yes we still see an increase, it let’s be honest, in the grand scheme of things, it’s still minuscule numbers. The level of panic in here is astonishing … then again ….
@Joe_X: Thankfully there is a wealth of verified data available out there which negates people who come out with anecdotal doom stuff like yourself ( eg saw a man with no mask on in Tesco Dundrum = the spike in cases is due to people not wearing masks).
Mask use in supermarkets was less than 10% for April May June and most of July and the number of cases declined continually every week during that timeframe so how you can now blame lack of masks has no basis.
Here’s the graph showing the continuous drop in cases since April .. I think most people would go with the WHO data over your own anecdotal stories.
@Colm Malone: we have to take a very serious attitude to the numbers..whatever the origin of clusters etc. We must remember It all started with 1 unaware, infected person and snowballed. Each cluster and contacts need immediate testing and lockdown.
@Munster1: and I doubt we’d be seeing all this now if they waited a little longer in stepping out of lockdown. We were almost there, but everytime the government announces another phase of reopening people just let loose.
@John brett: there is still a significant noticibale number not wearing face masks – mostly men I would say. Also not many wearing masks while outside, that could be brought in.
@Dónal Mac Cormaic: Masks outside? Ah will you give over. It’s been proven that you’re at least 19 times less likely to contract the virus in an outdoor setting so if you just keep your distance it’s nearly impossible to catch it outdoors. But you want to actually deprive yourself of fresh air? Unbelievable
@Dónal Mac Cormaic: It should be required outdoors, especially if the numbers continue to climb and people want to avoid lockdown. Especially where social distancing is not possible. Eg. busy bus stops, city centres etc. Just because you are outside, does not mean that you cannot catch it.
That was a shock. RIP the person who sadly passed away. 85 cases in one day is massive and I’d like to know what the cause was e.g. travel, clusters in workplaces, community?
@Shelley Keary: fairly detailed breakdown given with these cases, factory cluster connected to a direct provision cluster, many family/extended family clusters too
@John Waters: Amazing, first day in god knows how long that another county has higher newly confirmed than Dublin, and they are already shouting to close the rest of the country down! Does Kildare not border Dublin? I wonder how many commute from Kildare and Laois. Maybe the cases in those counties could have been avoided if we shut down Dublin years ago
@Diarmuid Hehir: How so? Do people generally have a few pints and then go to work in the factory? 18 in a cluster from a factory in Kildare, were they all on the beer before work?
@JedBartlett: maybe they maintained social distance at work, and went for a bite to eat afterwards, few pints and the rest is history….you mean to tell me none of you go for a few pints after work with your workmates? Ok maybe not if you work in a meat processing plant, but plenty others do.
@Mark O’Donohoe: information is too vague to be of any use at all. Community transmission? Where exactly, specific family group, wedding party , sporting training, markets, shops. Too vague
@Dave Phelan: you can takeca look at the covid dashboard by electoral area or the interactive map on rte.ie. I just take a note of the previous total for my area and check every so often.
@Marie McG: and these articles when first published have ALWAYS had minimal info until further updated, and have ALWAYS been tagged with the line “More to follow” in italics every single day since March. People have no patience and no intelligence.
@Jonny: so long as the hospitalisation numbers remain low, that’s the main thing, positives are bound to rise with reopening, as you say. And we need an economy, so no more calls for a hard lockdown.
@Lynne: they will need to start providing that information & do regional lockdowns to prevent a 2nd wave.
Though I feel we will inevitably get a 2nd wave of sorts during the winter, and we should enjoy our low covid19 status now while it lasts.
@Lynne: We will not be told this information, we are kept in the dark as to useful and informative facts which might inform us or lead to individuals discussing covid policy , no better to just throw out the numbers, fear factor.
@Hot Rod Hearse: we would need more accurate information than county level. But in reality we should all be using the covid app so we wouldn’t need to know the finer details in order to know our exposure risk.
@Veronica: people not wearing masks, shops reopening, pubs(yes, they are operating as pubs with a small requirement of buying a meal. Haven’t seen any kick anyone out after 90 minutes in Dublin) reopening, people getting complacent and the government not enforcing/encouraging work from home for people who can.
@Veronica: we are not being told! Let’s start poking fingers and blaming everyone. That seems to be the policy being adopted. Scared the population and have them looking over their shoulders . Why?
@Chris Linehan: no because I’ve friends who are posting about it because they’re also breaking the rules. Plenty of spots in Dublin with no restrictions. I’ve to take quarantine seriously due to having a family member recently out of ICU due to non covid health issues.
@Sean: They were in factory environs direct provision centres which are linked. A building site and close contacts to a family who had a member test positive a few weeks ago. Its not Armageddon yet.
@Chris Linehan: You seem delighted you sad person.
Highlight of your week.
Its a mere recalculation of unreported cases.
Staying at home is easy for you I’d say, being a lo8er with no friends.
Blame the government
@Sean: nothing whatsoever to do with this. Cluster in a pet food factory in Kildare and in direct provision centre both are linked. Cluster in a building site and another within a family group.
@Richard Doherty: going to go out on a limb here Richard and suggest that they know a lot more than you and aren’t as reliant on speculation as you appear to be.
@LadyBMW: ah, thanks for letting me know. I somehow thought now that, since they have had the coronavirus spike structure mapped since February, and are therefore able to identify it pretty readily, that that would mean they actually knew. Grateful for the clarification.
@Richard Doherty: yeah, I was sort of more likely to trust the NPHET seeing as they have, you know, the actual data about cases etc. But I’m changing my mind. I think you seem to know a lot more. I’ll probably just follow your advice then. Screw health professionals, what would they know.
@Dermot Quinn: the article says half of the cases are associated with two outbreaks so 42/43 people.
What it doesn’t say directly is that the two outbreaks were in a pet food factory in Naas and a Direct Provision centre where some of the factory workers lived.
It also says approx 40% of the positives are because of contact with a confirmed case so that’s 34 of the cases.
Altogether then that is 76 (42 + 34) of the cases that are a indirect result of the outbreak in the meat factory.
Nothing to do with the lack of masks in shops that some is banging on about above.
@Anna: Wrong again. It does have something to do with masks in shops, when any of those factory / direct provision infected, decide to go to a shop. You are living in lala land as usual.
Still only 6 people in hospital. 26 cases in a factory cluster in Kildare. Very localised restrictions should be enough to deal with these sort of figures if they continue to increase.
Let’s just keep calm. Hopefully, it may just be a daily spike. There were a few spikes even when we were getting the single figures/ low teens a few weeks back. Just keep going as we were all along, keeping our hands clean, keep the masks on as needed and keep up the social distancing as much as we can, and we will see what rest of the week brings.
@Lisa Quinn: as I said, we will see what rest of the week brings. Might come back down tomorrow, but it may shut up the anti-maskers and the people who call those of us being cautious “doom n gloomers” and “scared” for a bit.
@Joe_X: ugh! Dopes. They are coming out of factories and building sites too.40% are close contacts. so it does also mean people are coming forward to b tested.
@Lisa Quinn: True, but I’m wondering, how many these newly confirmed cases got notifications via the app. Just wondering if it is doing it’s job. The only notification I’ve had from it is that it had done a digital handshake with 29 other phones in the last 14 days
@anything anything: True. Also worrying is that the low end and high end figures is rising over time. But it was such a big jump from yesterday that I’m hoping that this is just a proper spike,. We have gotten used to low Sundays and Mondays and spikey Tuesdays…a trend that we have gotten used to. To me the only proper figures are Wednesday to Saturday so I’m hoping that it is only a proper spike, if we get simaler tomorrow…well that’s a different story.
@Joe_X: Hopefully you are right, but the trend is going in the wrong direction. Just because we have less than 85 tomorrow but more than, say 30, is not a good thing either.
Sorry now you can’t give a figure of that high spike without explanation are there some from a few dsys back has there been an outbreak cluster somewhere can we localise a lovkdown to contain it. Or is it simply the fact they are looking for reasons to extend moving into phase 5. A sweeping statement with no clarity smells of scare mongering by a gov that has no idea how to handle the reopening of the country
@Michael Fleming: they did give a breakdown factory in Kildare, direct provision centers, small number in construction industry and 4 clusters in private house holds
@ruairi: no I haven’t whatsoever were you not actually listening to the briefing, a reduction in cases linked to travel.. So yeah completely nonsense from the merchants of doom
@Jonny: “the government are drip feeding you what they want you to hear and are lying to you” – Jonny a few days ago.
You also admitted the situation in some destination countries was getting bad, but you’ve now discarded that I see.
@Jonny: I don’t know about everyone else but I don’t even read the articles anymore jonny.. I scroll straight to you telling me and the rest of us not to panic.. The relief is unreal.. God knows the day you comment saying “here comes the second wave” we’ll truly be fkt…
Most cases are from a meat processing factory . This is happening all over Europe and it’s not because people are not careful . It happens due to whatever circumstances are ideal for the virus to spread more , low temperatures and possibly using the same toilets are possible factors . The numbers are small and contained . Hopefully all will recover quickly & fully . Many are probably asymptomatic judging by the trend elsewhere.
This is what virus do, it’s nobody’s fault . The virus is contained and clusters identified and that’s all we can do. They’ll go up to higher numbers and come down . Trends show hospitalisation & deaths are not proportional to high cases this summer. That’s good.
I really wish the acting medical officer , nphet politicians & us stopped blaming people.
@Isabel Oliveira: why on earth are you on here making rational, factual and informative statements? That won’t do. You have to spread fear/misinformation and play the blame game instead.
Ironically if we averaged these numbers over the next 14 days, our cases/100,000 would go up to approximately 24/100,000, so our green list would open up to the UK, Italy, Germany, France, Netherlands, Poland, Austria, Denmark, Norway, Finland, Croatia, Hungry, Greece, Slovakia, Slovenia, Lithuania, Estonia, Iceland, Estonia, Cyprus, Malta, Liechtenstein.
Yet it still wouldn’t include the Canary Islands, one of the most covid free places in Europe right.
I’m not suggesting that it would be a good thing to see an increase in cases, but it yet again shows how farcical the green list currently is.
@Corinne Wilson Muller: it is actually clusters in factories and construction sites… But don’t bother reading the article, just go wagging your finger and blaming your fellow citizens
@Corinne Wilson Muller: Here come the mask shamers. Its tantamount to bullying should be ashamed of yourself. Cases started coming long before people were asked to wear masks no correlation between the two.
It’s not a sweeping statement. The article actually provides a very good breakdown of exactly where the clusters emerged. Factories, construction sites are mentioned. But 95% of people who commented on here didn’t actually bother to read the article. The real pandemic is misinformation and people not bothering to read things properly.
@Marie McG: marie I wish this was a tinfoil hat thing but it’s not. Tbh the fact that you jump on the opportunity to attack me – rather than deeply considering the points I have made and attempting to determine if they’re wrong – says it all. I am one of the people who deeply researched the topic of mask wearing. And the science points to it not working. It’s not my opinion Marie, it’s science. Luke O’Neill and Tony Fauci have both been recorded claiming masks do not work, then both changed their tune. The fact that I have decided to research the topic to decide for myself probably says a lot about your willingness to employ your mental faculties. Anyway, enjoy the fear you live in. I am enjoying the benefits of perspective. I am not saying SARS-Cov-2 doesn’t exist, I’m saying that through the lens of perspective it is not something that requires the public health measures that have been imposed. Tbh, even calling them public health measures is insulting to the Irish people.
@Marie McG: You know, there’s a multitude of reasons both physical health and mental health for someone not wearing a mask, maybe consider that before accusing people of being selfish, also masks in shops are only required if there isn’t a protective screen between the customer and staff member on the till
@Marie McG: Put a sock in it about masks. Cases went really low without them. They spread more germs than do good. The majority wear them and use them very poorly and could increase the spread.
Need to enforce face masks for workers more so than shoppers. People are just going about their business when shopping and not spending time in close contact with anyone. Most of these cases are coming from workplaces where people are spending a long time in close contact with others. People need to stop going on so much about wearing masks in shops.
@Carryyourowncanou: Exactly the majority of people go to the shop for two minutes and are gone out with no close contact. You have to be in the vicinity of an infected person for 15 minutes and within 2 metres to be at high risk. That does not happen in a shop.
@Dylan C: that can’t happen again. There’s no way that the country can go into a second lockdown, the economy couldn’t take it, nor the the people of Ireland! We’ll just have to manage as best we can if numbers continue to go up, and we are more prepared for it this time around.
@Freda Hanratty: Exactly we are going to have to live along side it. Keep social distancing and hand washing. Economy can’t be closed down again the country would implode. We have more of an understanding of it now
I’m Irish and living in Greece.
We have over double the population of Ireland and 65 cases today. It’s simply down to attitudes and compliance..end of!
I was in M and S in Dundrum last week, the first time in months. I was wearing a mask so was astonished to see three people behind me in the foodhall checkout not wearing one. I asked them where their masks were and I got in response ‘I dont have one and we were not stopped coming into the store’ so I asked to talk to the manager. He explained that they cannot enforce mask wearing. I was just dumbfounded.
@Linda Oreilly: Are you actually for real. People have a choice. You think masks are going to stop this virus lol. People just re-use masks that aren’t even clean while touching there face even more. It will spread germs more not help. So people can choose so its absolutely none of your business!
”With numbers diminishing very quickly in Sweden, we see no point in wearing a face mask in Sweden, not even on public transport.”
- Anders Tegnell, State Epidemiologist.
“From a medical point of view, there is no evidence of a medical effect of wearing face masks, so we decided not to impose a national obligation,” said Dutch Medical Care Minister Tamara van Ark late Wednesday, after a meeting with health experts and mayors.
@Dr Pablo Rojas Coppari: 2 cases denotified does not mean there are 2 less today. It means that since the last denotification, they have found 2 more cases of 1 person 2 tests, but it can be from anytime since this all started. I put this down to hospital transfers.
@Joe_X: in this case it relates to death. It means the cause of death was wrongly attributed to Covid. It happens more often than we are told. When it comes to cases denotification it is important they are communicated. It is part of the bigger picture. Media should report on number of new cases, number of deaths and number of denotifications. Systematically.
@Dr Pablo Rojas Coppari: the government site does show the denotifcation numbers as does worldometer, but people think that they can just subtract the numbers of denotifications from the daily figure and that then is the true figure, of both deaths and newly confirmed, which is not the case.
@UltraToons -Kingsley-: if catch influenza still is bad , how many people die in all world from Covid??? But real number not what is media put real number i want. Strong your immunity and that’s it. What you think if every year we put on public how many people is effected with season influenzas this is hundred million and never have in paper have many people is die, we never know we are destroyed all economies in world , politican want make new world order with mainstream media. Every day people in Africa die because children don’t have put nothing in mouth, that is real virus not Covid.
Can we have a metric for no. of new cases that are visitors/returnees to the country ….and broken down say by >2 weeks, 2-4 weeks,<4 weeks in country as categories?
Hopefully this is a once off spike but I have a feeling it isn’t, the people doubting the impact of this virus need to take notice, especially in the pubs, we do not want to end up like the USA
@Bain triail aisti: yesterday we had 14, and 1 denotification. That does not mean we had 13 yesterday. It means that we had 1 case of 1 person, 2 positive tests that could have been from any time since this started. Yesterday’s 14 still stands.
@Dónal Mac Cormaic: I don’t understand how meat processing plants and animal food factories have such susceptibility to the virus – I would have thought that the wearing of PPE would have been mandatory for the employees safety even before the virus. Feels like there’s an underlying cause that hasn’t been explained – possibly low wage forcing staff to live in cramped conditions with many people all travelling to different jobs, possibly in different counties.
@Gordon Walsh: they work elbow to elbow. The line only stops at break times 15min and 30min they all go on break at the same. All in changing rooms at same time. Impossible to keep workers apart
@Gordon Walsh: the living conditions of many of the workers are most likely a big contributor but meat factories operate at low temperatures which suits the virus and plenty of water splashed around as well.
There’s a certain radio “show” host who’s an absolute disgrace with the things he’s promoting on face masks etc at the moment.
Im all for free speech but he is pushing into encouraging prole to take serious chances with their health. (all for ratings)
Sort out the hoards of tourists and US soldiers passing through our airports. As well as folk from NI. And non EU citizens. We def should follow the P rime minister of New Zealand.. . Shes got it sussed. Hard borders protect Irish citizens.
A nation gripped by fear. Does anyone look at the science? 99.97% of don’t have anything to worry about. Although, people wearing masks are destroying their immune systems and making themselves more susceptible.
Its coming back quicker than the rain in July ~~ May the greedy little f@ckers who want to open things up for pure profit ~ Think again ~ A healthy nation is a wealthy nation !
Two dead following major earthquake in Myanmar as dozens trapped in skyscraper collapse in Bangkok
Updated
49 mins ago
9.6k
Good Morning
The 9 at 9: Friday
Updated
1 hr ago
1.9k
Courts
Three men jailed for 'cruel and depraved' rape of woman they encountered in Dublin nightclub
20 hrs ago
48.3k
Your Cookies. Your Choice.
Cookies help provide our news service while also enabling the advertising needed to fund this work.
We categorise cookies as Necessary, Performance (used to analyse the site performance) and Targeting (used to target advertising which helps us keep this service free).
We and our 161 partners store and access personal data, like browsing data or unique identifiers, on your device. Selecting Accept All enables tracking technologies to support the purposes shown under we and our partners process data to provide. If trackers are disabled, some content and ads you see may not be as relevant to you. You can resurface this menu to change your choices or withdraw consent at any time by clicking the Cookie Preferences link on the bottom of the webpage .Your choices will have effect within our Website. For more details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
We and our vendors process data for the following purposes:
Use precise geolocation data. Actively scan device characteristics for identification. Store and/or access information on a device. Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development.
Cookies Preference Centre
We process your data to deliver content or advertisements and measure the delivery of such content or advertisements to extract insights about our website. We share this information with our partners on the basis of consent. You may exercise your right to consent, based on a specific purpose below or at a partner level in the link under each purpose. Some vendors may process your data based on their legitimate interests, which does not require your consent. You cannot object to tracking technologies placed to ensure security, prevent fraud, fix errors, or deliver and present advertising and content, and precise geolocation data and active scanning of device characteristics for identification may be used to support this purpose. This exception does not apply to targeted advertising. These choices will be signaled to our vendors participating in the Transparency and Consent Framework.
Manage Consent Preferences
Necessary Cookies
Always Active
These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work.
Targeting Cookies
These cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.
Functional Cookies
These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and personalisation. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we have added to our pages. If you do not allow these cookies then these services may not function properly.
Performance Cookies
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not be able to monitor our performance.
Store and/or access information on a device 110 partners can use this purpose
Cookies, device or similar online identifiers (e.g. login-based identifiers, randomly assigned identifiers, network based identifiers) together with other information (e.g. browser type and information, language, screen size, supported technologies etc.) can be stored or read on your device to recognise it each time it connects to an app or to a website, for one or several of the purposes presented here.
Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development 143 partners can use this purpose
Use limited data to select advertising 113 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times an ad is presented to you).
Create profiles for personalised advertising 83 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (such as forms you submit, content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (for example, information from your previous activity on this service and other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (that might include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present advertising that appears more relevant based on your possible interests by this and other entities.
Use profiles to select personalised advertising 83 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on your advertising profiles, which can reflect your activity on this service or other websites or apps (like the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects.
Create profiles to personalise content 39 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (for instance, forms you submit, non-advertising content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (such as your previous activity on this service or other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (which might for example include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present content that appears more relevant based on your possible interests, such as by adapting the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find content that matches your interests.
Use profiles to select personalised content 35 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on your content personalisation profiles, which can reflect your activity on this or other services (for instance, the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects. This can for example be used to adapt the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find (non-advertising) content that matches your interests.
Measure advertising performance 134 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which advertising is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine how well an advert has worked for you or other users and whether the goals of the advertising were reached. For instance, whether you saw an ad, whether you clicked on it, whether it led you to buy a product or visit a website, etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of advertising campaigns.
Measure content performance 61 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which content is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine whether the (non-advertising) content e.g. reached its intended audience and matched your interests. For instance, whether you read an article, watch a video, listen to a podcast or look at a product description, how long you spent on this service and the web pages you visit etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of (non-advertising) content that is shown to you.
Understand audiences through statistics or combinations of data from different sources 74 partners can use this purpose
Reports can be generated based on the combination of data sets (like user profiles, statistics, market research, analytics data) regarding your interactions and those of other users with advertising or (non-advertising) content to identify common characteristics (for instance, to determine which target audiences are more receptive to an ad campaign or to certain contents).
Develop and improve services 83 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service, such as your interaction with ads or content, can be very helpful to improve products and services and to build new products and services based on user interactions, the type of audience, etc. This specific purpose does not include the development or improvement of user profiles and identifiers.
Use limited data to select content 37 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type, or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times a video or an article is presented to you).
Use precise geolocation data 46 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, your precise location (within a radius of less than 500 metres) may be used in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Actively scan device characteristics for identification 27 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, certain characteristics specific to your device might be requested and used to distinguish it from other devices (such as the installed fonts or plugins, the resolution of your screen) in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Ensure security, prevent and detect fraud, and fix errors 92 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Your data can be used to monitor for and prevent unusual and possibly fraudulent activity (for example, regarding advertising, ad clicks by bots), and ensure systems and processes work properly and securely. It can also be used to correct any problems you, the publisher or the advertiser may encounter in the delivery of content and ads and in your interaction with them.
Deliver and present advertising and content 99 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Certain information (like an IP address or device capabilities) is used to ensure the technical compatibility of the content or advertising, and to facilitate the transmission of the content or ad to your device.
Match and combine data from other data sources 72 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Information about your activity on this service may be matched and combined with other information relating to you and originating from various sources (for instance your activity on a separate online service, your use of a loyalty card in-store, or your answers to a survey), in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Link different devices 53 partners can use this feature
Always Active
In support of the purposes explained in this notice, your device might be considered as likely linked to other devices that belong to you or your household (for instance because you are logged in to the same service on both your phone and your computer, or because you may use the same Internet connection on both devices).
Identify devices based on information transmitted automatically 88 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Your device might be distinguished from other devices based on information it automatically sends when accessing the Internet (for instance, the IP address of your Internet connection or the type of browser you are using) in support of the purposes exposed in this notice.
Save and communicate privacy choices 69 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
The choices you make regarding the purposes and entities listed in this notice are saved and made available to those entities in the form of digital signals (such as a string of characters). This is necessary in order to enable both this service and those entities to respect such choices.
have your say