Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
Updated 3.28pm
EDUCATION MINISTER JAN O’Sullivan has said she will look at the issue of schools making use of the JobBridge scheme to fill essential roles.
It follows the publication of data from the Department of Social Protection, which oversees JobBridge, showing that primary schools are seeking to fill 56 Special Needs Assistant roles through the scheme.
The ads for the positions state that candidates will gain experience working with children with special educational needs, “feeding children at risk” and other areas.
“It’s certainly something I will be examining to see on what basis schools are hiring people through JobBridge,” O’Sullivan told reporters at an event in Dublin today.
She added:
I’m relatively new in this job and I haven’t had an opportunity as yet to see why schools are using JobBridge.
“In terms of the Department of Education, we can’t tell schools that they can’t hire in this way,” O’Sullivan said.
“It’s really a matter for individual schools to make these decisions.
“We do employ a huge number of SNAs in the school system directly through the Department as well.”
The Minister pointed out that the JobBridge scheme was closely monitored by the Department of Social Protection, and noted that ads for certain positions had been disallowed in the past.
The scheme should “not be about job replacement”, O’Sullivan said. “It should be about providing an opportunity to get some experience.”
Speaking to reporters in Dublin this afternoon, Tánaiste and Social Protection Minister Joan Burton, who set up JobBridge, said it was a matter for schools as to how they use the scheme.
“Schools obviously are governed by their boards and it’s a matter for each individual school how they would decide whether or not they want to use JobBridge,” she said.
However, Burton questioned whether schools employing cleaners on the scheme was “the best use” of it. She said any concerns about inappropriate use of JobBridge should be raised with its monitoring group.
- additional reporting from Hugh O’Connell
First published 1.23pm
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
Ireland has an extremely low rate for prosecution of rape cases, very few people come forward, less get sentenced and less again get a lenght sentence for what is considered to be the second most violent crime in Irish statute books. These stories whilst horrific only distract us from harrowing regular occurrence that take place on our shores. Read the SAVI report, see that
1 in 3 women are sexually assaulted in Ireland and 1 in 5 are raped and regularly these assaults are done by people they know. Worry about how your brother’s, fathers, nephews seek consent from women, rather than looking to a county far away that does messed up crap and point the finger while ignoring the nonsense in your own country, that you can help break down.
@Maggie Corrigan: Didn’t they also report 1 in 5 men have been sexually assaulted. If you consider rape a crime of violence you may also have to consider how men are often violently attacked. Not belittling rape just pointing out that men live with dangers often ignored with victim blaming a huge issue. Violence is a problem but putting extra emphasis on sexual violence may obscure and diminish the impact on all of society
@Maggie Corrigan: i agree with your sentiment, but 1 in 3, 1 in 5. Where did you pluck these numbers from? Exaggerating the problem is exactly why the #metoo is now just a pathetic fame seeking device which harms the real victims of abuse.
@Maggie Corrigan: making up statistics like 1 in 5 doesn’t help change the situation. It makes people doubt everything else you’re saying. Our justice system needs a compete overhaul as it’s not fit for purpose on prosecutions and sentences for all crimes, not just rape.
@Toomasu Sumitsu: I actually think the 1 in 3 is correct but it covers everything with sexual assault being any small interaction such as an unwanted touch on the arm.
@Maggie Corrigan: genuine question, how could it be 1 in 3 or 1 in 5 here but only 1 in 15 in Japan which the article states as an incredibly patriarchal society with near no support for victims? Trying to get my head around how incidence can be proportionally higher here if we are more supportive.
I thought Japan had moved on past that carry on to the same extent as the western world ,not near good enough but would look down on rapists
I’ve visited 5-6 times and found that women are extremely safe and very well treated. I worked with lots of women in powerful positions. However there are strict gender roles that may seem unusual to western society. Like at a business meeting in a bar it’s common for girls in the group to top up your beer if it’s getting low. At the same time everyone is very respectful to each other and having a great time. Japan is so far ahead of western society in so many ways. Maybe the gender subjects don’t fit western leftist ideals but there’s no argument that their culture is beautiful and their people unique among the worlds 1st works nations.
@René Laurent: Japan it’s still a fundamentally misogynist country where rapists are rarely prosecuted and at best settle out of court. Of course Japan is far more advanced in other ways. Japan still largly shuns the Comfort Women from the war and raped women are often thought and treated as tainted. A change is needed in this multilayered society and thats the point.
@René Laurent: rapes don’t take place at high level meetings ,I would imagine .If the article is a fact and the women who are affected are looked down on by their fellow women I don’t know where to go from there
@René Laurent: interesting perspective. However demanding equality for women is not “leftist”. Removing impunity for rape is not leftist either. The Japanese obsession with “face” is nothing to be admired. Embarrassment is to avoided at all costs. Shame appears to be a strong societal controlling factor. They need to evolve just like western society. Hopefully they can keep the best while losing the medieval shackles.
@René Laurent: still no chance of getting groped on a train then?
@J: Japan is 20 odd years behind the west. There is a quagmire of anomalies there re: women’s right to speak out and sexuality. I lived there for 15 years. There is very much a “ put up with it “ culture. It is so sad that there is no recognition of the scars that rape can leave. The women though have compounded the situation themselves by not speaking out against all gender inequalities within their society. They thought I was so strong ? I was normal but the strong bit may have been I voice my opinion. Love Japan fascinating place but advancement of women will never move like the west. ( I wish it would )
@John R: maybe they should be let evolve on their own though. Why must we impose western cultural values on them? It’s their culture, not ours. Leave them to get on with it on their own. The Me too people constantly portray western culture as a patriarchy that must be changed yet on the other hand say it’s soooo much better than other cultures. Maybe it’s all a smokescreen and just women jumping on a big bandwagon…and crying because their Japanese sisters aren’t joining in droves. Feminism and Me too doesn’t isn’t as pure as the driven snow you know…there is a lot of misandry wrapped up in it too…maybe many Japanese women don’t want to get wrapped up with it for just that reason.
@Kevin Tyrrell: Not ignoring the rest of your comment but the phrase “as pure as the driven snow” does not mean something is pure. It means the opposite in fact.
Very backward place in many ways. Woman are basically treated like dirt
have your say