Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Shutterstock/Cherries

Mathematicians present longest ever proof that would take 10 billion years to read

Boolean Pythagorean Triples is a long-unsolved enigma within a field called Ramsey Theory

AN ANGLO-AMERICAN trio presented the prize-winning solution to a 35-year old maths problem on Friday, but verifying it may be a problem in itself: reading it would take 10 billion years.

“Boolean Pythagorean Triples” is not a shameful contagious disease, but a long-unsolved enigma within a field called Ramsey Theory.

It was such a brain-teaser that nearly 30 years ago fabled American mathematician Ronald Graham offered a cash prize to anyone who could solve it.

It was only $100, but still.

The self-declared winners – Marijn Heule, Oliver Kullmann and Victor Marek, of the universities of Texas, Swansea and Kentucky, respectively – unveiled their proof at the international SAT 2016 conference in Bordeaux, France.

By their own account, they cracked the puzzle “using Cube-and-Conquer, a hybrid satisfiability testing (SAT) method for hard problems.”

As one would.

But colleagues, they acknowledged, needed to see the proof in the pudding, so to speak.

“Due to the general interest in this mathematical problem, our result requires a formal proof,” the numbers nutters explained in an abstract.

The resulting string of symbols is equivalent to “all the digitalised texts held by the US Library of Congress,” some 200 terabytes of data, according to the newsletter of France’s National Centre for Research.

That’s two hundred thousand billion octets, for those more comfortable thinking in the base unit for digital information.

The problem itself is (almost) understandable.

It asks if it is possible to colour positive whole numbers (such as 1, 2 or 3) either red or blue such that no sequence of numbers that satisfy Pythagoras’s famous equation – a² + b² = c2² - are the same colour.

If a and b are red, for example, then c could be blue. But all three could not be blue or red.

The proof shows that such a colouring scheme is, in fact, possible – up to the number 7,824. Beyond that, however, it doesn’t hold.

Crunching the numbers took two days of computer time on the Stampede supercomputer at the Texas Advanced Computing Center.

- © AFP, 2016

Read: Take a break and try to figure out this frog riddle

Read: Leaving Cert tales: ‘I failed maths, dropped out of college and everything is OK’

Author
View 33 comments
Close
33 Comments
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.
    JournalTv
    News in 60 seconds