Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Rescue team members work at the site of the plane crash at Muan International Airport in Muan, South Korea. Alamy Stock Photo

What caused the deadly plane crash in South Korea - and why was there a wall where it landed?

Everyone aboard Jeju Air Flight 2216 was killed except for two flight attendants who were rescued from the wreckage.

LAST UPDATE | 30 Dec 2024

SOUTH KOREA HAS ordered a “comprehensive inspection” of all Boeing 737-800 aircraft operated by the country’s carriers, after a Jeju Air plane crash-landed and burst into flames, killing 179 people on board.

The plane was carrying 181 people from Thailand to South Korea when it made a mayday call and belly-landing before crashing into a barrier and bursting into flames.

Everyone aboard Jeju Air Flight 2216 was killed except for two flight attendants who were rescued from the wreckage.

Acting President Choi Sang-mok, who has only been in office since Friday, said the government was making “every effort” to identify victims and support bereaved families.

Choi, an unelected bureaucrat who became acting president after his two predecessors were impeached, said a “thorough investigation into the cause of the accident” would be conducted.

As the investigation commences, here’s what we know so far about what happened and why.

What happened when the plane crashed?

The flight from Bangkok to southwestern Muan International Airport in South Korea was warned of a bird strike by the control tower as it came in to land.

Minutes later, the pilot issued a mayday call before attempting an emergency landing — with video showing the plane coming down on the runway without its landing gear engaged.

Bird strikes can cause fires inside the plane’s engines, damaging critical systems which can render the landing gear inoperable — meaning the wheels don’t come out to facilitate a smooth landing, said former pilot Kim Kwang-il.

A “belly landing” is an emergency procedure for precisely this scenario and planes are designed to withstand this in emergencies, Kim, also a professor at Silla University Aeronautical Science, told AFP.

“In this particular case, the pilot executed the belly landing exceptionally well,” he said, saying the plane came in “like a swan gracefully landing on a lake, slightly tilted backward for a smooth descent.”

“Considering the emergency, the landing was remarkably well-executed.”

What went wrong?

Video shows the plane hitting a barrier, prompting it to burst into flames. Only two people were rescued, both airline crew plucked from the tail of the plane.

Kim said he was “quite upset” to see the collision with the wall, saying there should not have been any solid structures in the area, to allow for emergency landings — and if the wall had not been there, lives could have been saved, he said.

“Most of the passengers died because of this obstruction, which is devastating,” he said.

“While the bird strike, or ‘act of God,’ was the root cause of the accident and unavoidable, the presence of this structure turned it into a tragedy,” he said, as without it, the plane could have skidded to a safe stop.

Why was the barrier there?

Deputy minister for Civil Aviation Joo Jong-wan said the barrier was a so-called localiser, which is a ” type of navigational aid.”

“The specific foundation on which these devices are placed varies depending on the airport,” he said, with no “standardised or uniform design.”

At Muan, like several other airports in South Korea, the localisers were on “piled-up soil, and concrete structures have been installed within these soil layers,” he said.

“The connection between these localisers and the accident will be thoroughly examined during the investigation process,” Joo added.

What about the birds?

Muan is in a wetland area, popular with migratory birds, and deputy minister Joo said that the airport had long taken measures to minimise bird intrusions affecting flights.

“These measures include the use of bird repellents, activities to deter birds, removal of habitats, blocking drainage channels to prevent attraction within the airport,” Joo said.

It was likely ducks, common in the area, played a key role in the accident, said Choi Chang-yong, professor at Seoul National University’s forest sciences department.

“Because planes move much faster than birds can perceive or evade, they likely couldn’t react in time,” he said, adding that birds also often collide with cars for this reason.

In winter, Muan attracts “ducks and geese, such as northern pintails and other species,” in significant numbers, he said.

Muan has the highest bird strike rate of all South Korea’s 14 airports, except for the country’s largest airport Incheon, according to statistics from the land ministry and the Korea Airports Corporation.

Its strike rate from 2019 to August 2024 was 0.09 percent — nine bird strikes for every 10,000 flights, five times more than Seoul’s second airport Gimpo.

Experts claim Muan’s Bird Strike Prevention Committee is not well staffed and doesn’t function effectively. Only one person was working to prevent bird strikes on the day of the accident, local media Herald Corporation reported.

Was it the plane?

Immediately after the crash, some online speculation focused on the aircraft, a Boeing 737-800, and whether it could be at fault.

Jeju Air said that 39 out of its 41 aircraft are Boeing B737-800s — making it the largest South Korean operator of this model.

South Korea said Monday it was launching a “comprehensive inspection” of all 101 Boeing 737-800 aircraft operated by the country’s carriers.

Boeing was under fire after Maneuvering Characteristics Augmentation System (MCAS), a flight stabilising feature, was implicated in a series of crashes involving its 737 MAX jetliners, which killed hundreds of people.

After two 737 MAX crashes — a 2019 Ethiopian Airlines crash and 2018 Lion Air crash — the entire 737 MAX fleet were grounded for more than 20 months for authorities to investigate.

 © AFP 2024 

Author
View 33 comments
Close
33 Comments
This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic. Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy here before taking part.
Leave a Comment
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.

    Leave a commentcancel

     
    JournalTv
    News in 60 seconds