Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Infomatique via Flickr/Creative Commons

Poll: Should the Special Criminal Court be abolished?

The court has been criticised by the United Nation’s Commission on Human Rights – but its purpose is to ensure juries are not intimidated.

THE SPECIAL CRIMINAL Court, where John Dundon was convicted of the 2008 killing of rugby player Shane Geoghegan yesterday, has faced some criticism in the past due to its structure – it has a three-judge panel and no jury.

The UN Human Rights Committee has recommended it be abolished, while the Irish Human Rights Commission has also criticised the court.

The Irish Constitution guarantees a person the right to a trial by jury, but the SCC is used in extraordinary circumstances – such as terrorist and organised crime cases - to avoid issues such as intimidation of jury members.

What do you think: Should the Special Criminal Court be abolished?


Poll Results:

No (2609)
I don't know (2262)
Yes (336)

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Close
175 Comments
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.
    JournalTv
    News in 60 seconds