Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
DOMINIQUE STRAUSS-KAHN broke his silence four months after a New York hotel maid accused him of sexual assault, calling his encounter with the woman a “moral failing” he deeply regrets, but insisting in an interview on French television Sunday that no violence was involved.
Strauss-Kahn, the former head of the International Monetary Fund and a one-time top presidential contender in his native France, also denied using violence against a French writer who claims he tried to rape her in a separate 2003 incident.
Throughout what appeared to be a heavily scripted 20-minute-long interview with French broadcaster TF1, Strauss-Kahn managed to come off as contrite even as the Socialist politician insisted he hadn’t forced himself on either of the women.
He said his May 14 sexual encounter with Nafissatou Diallo, an African immigrant who claimed that he attacked her when she entered his room in Manhattan’s Sofitel hotel to clean it, “did not involve violence, constraint or aggression.”
Still, he acknowledged, it “was a moral failing and I am not proud of it. I regret it infinitely. I have regretted it everyday for the past four months and I think I’m not done regretting it.”
It “was not only an inappropriate relationship, but more than that, it was a failing … a failing vis-a-vis my wife, my children and my friends but also a failing vis-a-vis the French people, who had vested their hopes for change in me.”
Strauss-Kahn resigned from the IMF’s top job in the wake of the scandal. Though he didn’t rule out a future return to politics, the man once widely regarded as the Socialist party’s best hope at beating France’s incumbent conservative President Nicolas Sarkozy said he needed to take time to think about his future.
Strauss-Kahn, who had a long-standing reputation as a man with a weakness for sex and women, said the Diallo imbroglio had profoundly changed him.
“I’ve seen the pain that I caused around me and I thought, I thought a lot,” he said. “That lightness, I’ve lost it for good.”
The interview was more than an extended mea culpa, though. Strauss-Kahn said that the New York prosecutor — who dropped all criminal charges against him in the Diallo case last month — had concluded the maid “lied about everything.
“Not only about her past, that’s of no importance, but also about what happened. The (prosecutor’s) report says, it’s written there, that ‘she presented so many different versions of what happened that I can’t believe a word,’” he said.
He added he suspected financial motives might have been behind Diallo’s accusations. He also proclaimed his innocence in a separate legal battle pitting him against a young French writer and journalist who alleges he tried to rape her during a 2003 interview for a book she was writing.
The writer, Tristane Banon, has maintained she and Strauss-Kahn ended up tussling on the floor during an interview in an empty apartment, with the politician trying to open her jeans and bra and putting his fingers in her mouth and underwear.
“The version that was presented (by Banon) is an imaginary version, a slanderous version,” Strauss-Kahn said, adding that “no act of aggression, no violence” had taken place between the two.
A small group of demonstrators gathered outside of TF1′s Paris headquarters Sunday to denounce Strauss-Kahn. The protest was called by two feminist groups.
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
Good! Should never have come to this.
@Adrian O’Donnell: nothing good about abortion
@Adrian O’Donnell: yep..whatever about the delicate nature of this subject and you will get extreme views on both sides of the argument.. the Texas state was happy with the possibility of a man abusing his daughter and that little girl would be forced to have his baby…thats pretty perverted stuff.. not acceptable in a civil society..
I see the Irish Taliban are out already this morning, let women choose what they want for their own bodies.
@Pat Casey: and the other body involved?
@Seamus Mac: rinse, repeat
@Seamus Mac: at what point do you think a human body becomes sentient?
@Seamus Mac: The one that produced the sperm?
@OnlyHereForTheComments: Ya that describes abortion fairly well.
Will these Christian busy bodies be suing the executioners on death row, or the people who transport the lethal injections to prisons in order to get their $10,000 reward? Oh sorry, they’re not ‘unborn’.
@Rebecca BarrettNp: Couldn’t have said it better, its sums that lot up exactly.
Love that it’s all men on here screaming about “killing little babies”.
Let women have their bodily autonomy please. Women are not incubators.
@Accord Moan Eye: yes, I would never force someone to endure something that is happening within their own bodies
You can see where this is going. It will be appealed through the different levels right up to the US Supreme Court in Washington DC which consists of a majority of very conservative justices, thanks to Trump and McConnell. They will almost certainly ratify the ban but it will also open up the opportunity for other states to do the same. #RIP Roe v Wade
Wouldn’t it be ironic if the people who oppose abortions were the same anti-vaxxers,with their”my body,my choice”slogans??
It will be interesting if this makes it all the way to the supreme Court. The fact that its a majority Conservative panel would suggest that row v wade could be overturned however as far as I’m aware the supreme Court have never voted to remove a right that was already given to the people. It would be a major moment if this happened for the first time.
have your say