Skip to content
Support Us

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Business Insider

How the CIA tried to raise a lost Soviet submarine with a giant crane — and sort of succeeded

The sunken Soviet submarine sank in the Pacific Ocean some 1,500 miles northwest of Hawaii.

IN AUGUST 1974, the United States undertook a top-secret mission that one CIA document disclosed in 2010 “ranks in the forefront of imaginative and bold operations undertaken in the long history of intelligence collection.”

As the declassified article in the internal CIA journal Studies in Intelligence explains, Project AZORIAN was a collaboration among the CIA and private marine firms to recover a sunken Soviet submarine from the depths of the Pacific Ocean some 1,500 miles northwest of Hawaii.

Sunk

The Soviet G-II class ballistic missile submarine had sunk years before, killing all aboard in March 1968. It was diesel-powered, but US intelligence suspected the vessel was armed with nuclear weaponry.

If true, the US stood to learn much about its Cold War rival if it recovered the sub. It would give the US a look at Soviet weapons design, on top of other potential intelligence treasures. Fortunately for the Americans, Moscow was in the dark regarding its lost submarine’s location.

Business Insider Business Insider

Of course, the US first had to figure out how to even retrieve a 1,750-ton vessel that sat more than three miles below the ocean surface and under tremendous water pressure.

The CIA’s solution: a purpose-specific ship, the Hughes Glomar Explorer, which would lug the submarine upward with a giant eight-fingered claw in the style of a claw crane grabbing a plush toy.

Global Marine and other companies agreed to conceal the ship’s true function behind a cover story: The Hughes Glomar Explorer was an experimental deep-sea mining vessel, and its inauguration came complete with a champagne christening ceremony and speeches from the enterprising seafarers.

Partial success

The story of the US’s partial success in this long endeavor — which spanned the tenure of two presidents and three Directors of Central Intelligence — is not newly surfaced.

LA Times columnist Jack Anderson broke the news as early as February 1975, and the public radio program Radiolab dedicated a half-hour program to this curious Cold War footnote (In the episode, Julia Barton reported that one of the legacies of project AZORIAN was the birth of the now-typical “neither confirm nor deny” response by government officials faced with inquiring reporters).

But what the CIA’s latest disclosure does offer is several stranger-than-fiction anecdotes on the many times the Hughes Glomar Explorer’s mission could have gone awry.

Business Insider Business Insider

Faith in the technical viability of the project was shaky to begin with. In 1972, Admiral Moorer, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, wrote a memo that recommended dropping the mission “because of decreased intelligence value of the target with the passage of time” and mounting costs. Deputy Secretary of Defense Kenneth Rush only estimated the project’s chance of success at 20 to 30 percent.

But Director of Central Intelligence Richard Helms, the paper discloses, was worried about the long-term consequences of backing out, feeling that “a termination now would appear capricious to contractors and jeopardise future cooperative efforts.”

Nixon

President Nixon finally gave the project a green-light after a “long series of high-level program reviews.”

After jumping these bureaucratic hurdles, the mission also had a close encounter with a major political flare-up. Too broad for the Panama Canal, the Glomar had to sail around the southern tip of South America to get the Pacific Ocean. The crew then docked in the port city of Valparaiso, Chile, only to find themselves in the midst of August Pinochet’s violent coup on September 11th, 1973.

Seven technicians had traveled to Chile to join the mission. “After checking in to their hotel, early on 11 September, the Global Marine personnel were awakened by the sounds of the revolution in the streets.” The Americans were under virtual house-arrest for a few days before eventually leaving safely — though not without stoking suspicions that the United States had a hand in socialist president Salvador Allende’s ouster.

The Glomar would nearly find itself bogged down on home soil as well. Docked in Long Beach, California in November 1973, the ship landed on the bad side of about a hundred union picketers  — “including strong-arm types” — voicing their dissatisfaction with Global Marine.”The resulting tense situation continued for the next week to ten days,” the Studies in Intelligence article states. “During this time, the ship’s crew and shipboard workers were harassed, delivery trucks stopped, and special security measures had to be put into effect.”

Special mission 

Though they were ignorant of the vessel’s special mission, the protesters delayed the HGE’s departure by a few uncomfortable weeks. And docked just a few hundred yards away were Soviet ships that didn’t suspect the Glomar’s true purpose.Once at its target location above the submarine, the Glomar was still pressured by the Soviet navy.

One military ship dispatched a helicopter on two occasions, to snap photos of the idling ship. Its unarmed crew put crates on the Glomar’s helipad to thwart a potential landing, and even made preparations to destroy their ship’s clearly intelligence-related equipment.

Even friendly ships threatened to blow the Glomar’s cover. One of them was a British merchant vessel that had approached the HGE for help treating a sick crew member.

The incident may have actually played to the American ship’s advantage. As the Glomar responded to a well-meaning question about its activity over the open radio circuit, “It was hoped the Soviets were monitoring this exchange”.

In the end, the Hughes Glomar Explorer overcame steep odds to finally attempt a raising of the doomed submarine. TV monitors were placed around the ship so that “sailors, cooks, divers, drill crew” and everyone else onboard could watch the fateful attempt to recover the submarine.

soviet submarine seaman photo 3 This print, released by the US Defense Department, was developed from film in a camera recovered from the sunken submarine in 1974. Business Insider Business Insider

But it only partially succeeded.

As recounted by David Sharp, a CIA officer aboard the Glomar, the greater part of the submarine broke off as the vessel was being hauled up to the surface and plummeted back to the ocean floor. In the fragment that was actually recovered, Sharp says the Glomar’s crew encountered three of the submarine crew’s dead.

“They were given the full respect that I think the Soviet navy would have conferred upon their own people under those conditions,” Sharp said. The LA Times later reported that 70 bodies were found and buried at sea.

After years of effort, numerous setbacks, and the construction of a purpose-built vessel, it’s understood that the CIA didn’t recover any useful material from the operation.

Read: Stolen livestock slaughtered in illegal abattoirs could make it back to Irish consumers>

Column: What is life like in a city hit by Ebola? An Irish voice from Sierra Leone>

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Published with permission from
View 11 comments
Close
11 Comments
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute ThomasFrancisMeagher
    Favourite ThomasFrancisMeagher
    Report
    Sep 21st 2013, 11:47 AM

    Napoleon was actually average height for a man of his height. It was British propaganda that falsly alleged he was short.

    67
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Elma Phudd
    Favourite Elma Phudd
    Report
    Sep 21st 2013, 11:54 AM

    He was probably an average age for a man of his age too!

    96
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Colm Harpur
    Favourite Colm Harpur
    Report
    Sep 21st 2013, 12:25 PM

    Heard that the other day when abusing a mate.. Really took the fun out of it.. Ha

    8
    See 2 more replies ▾
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Niall Griffin
    Favourite Niall Griffin
    Report
    Sep 21st 2013, 12:37 PM

    Lord Nelson was a short arse though.

    21
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute ThomasFrancisMeagher
    Favourite ThomasFrancisMeagher
    Report
    Sep 21st 2013, 12:54 PM

    *man of his time. Oops.

    10
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Derek Durkin
    Favourite Derek Durkin
    Report
    Sep 21st 2013, 11:52 AM

    How different would the world be if Napoleon had won and defeated the Rothschild dynasty.

    32
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Sexy Taoiseach
    Favourite Sexy Taoiseach
    Report
    Sep 21st 2013, 12:04 PM

    Rothschild still one of the biggest players in the world.

    11
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Declan Noonan
    Favourite Declan Noonan
    Report
    Sep 21st 2013, 3:40 PM

    Derek, blaming the worlds problems on one family?

    5
    See 1 more reply ▾
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Declan Noonan
    Favourite Declan Noonan
    Report
    Sep 21st 2013, 3:50 PM

    Over more than two centuries, the Rothschild family has frequently been the subject of conspiracy theories. These theories take differing forms, such as claiming that the family controls the world’s wealth and financial institutions, or encouraged or discouraged wars between governments. Discussing this and similar views, the historian Niall Ferguson wrote, “As we have seen, however, wars tended to hit the price of existing bonds by increasing the risk that a debtor state would fail to meet its interest payments in the event of defeat and losses of territory. By the middle of the 19th century, the Rothschilds had evolved from traders into fund managers, carefully tending to their own vast portfolio of government bonds. Now having made their money, they stood to lose more than they gained from conflict. The Rothschilds had decided the outcome of the Napoleonic Wars by putting their financial weight behind Britain. Now they would sit on the sidelines.”

    6
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Sexy Taoiseach
    Favourite Sexy Taoiseach
    Report
    Sep 21st 2013, 11:49 AM

    Napoleon Dynamite good film

    21
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Paddy Reid
    Favourite Paddy Reid
    Report
    Sep 21st 2013, 12:40 PM

    That hashtag is fantastic #smallmanswill

    10
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute vv7k7Z3c
    Favourite vv7k7Z3c
    Report
    Sep 23rd 2013, 9:50 AM

    Thank you Paddy – I was proud of that one :)

    1
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Adrian
    Favourite Adrian
    Report
    Sep 21st 2013, 5:00 PM

    A butcher, defeated by an Irishman.

    6
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Morticia
    Favourite Morticia
    Report
    Sep 21st 2013, 2:22 PM

    He unwillingly left his willy to a Corsican priest and it now belongs to a lady in New Jersey who wants over $100,000 for it.
    http://content.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,1988719_1988728_1988695,00.html

    5
Submit a report
Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
Thank you for the feedback
Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.
JournalTv
News in 60 seconds