RISHI SUNAK HAS suggested it would have been “politically expedient” to sack Nadhim Zahawi but insisted that “due process” means the investigation into his tax affairs should be allowed to reach its conclusion.
The British Prime Minister acknowledged that he had not been given the full picture about the Tory chairman’s financial matters when he told MPs last week that Zahawi had given a “full” account.
But he insisted that when he entered No 10 and gave Zahawi the job of Minister Without Portfolio “no issues were raised with me”.
At Prime Minister’s Questions, Sunak was challenged over Zahawi’s tax affairs for the second week running.
Sunak said: “Of course, the politically expedient thing to do would be for me to have said that this matter must be resolved by Wednesday at noon.
“But I believe in proper due process.”
Sunak has ordered an investigation by Laurie Magnus, his independent adviser on ministers’ interests, into whether Zahawi broke ministerial rules over the estimated £4.8 million bill he settled with HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) while he was chancellor.
In response to questions from Labour leader Keir Starmer, Sunak said: “I obviously can’t prejudge the outcome of that but it is right that we fully investigate this matter and establish all the facts.”
A week ago, Sunak told MPs that Zahawi had “already addressed the matter in full” – but Downing Street subsequently revealed the British Prime Minister had not been aware that the Conservative Party chairman had paid a penalty to HMRC as part of the settlement.
Sunak said: “Since I commented on this matter last week more information, including a statement from the Minister Without Portfolio, has entered the public domain which is why it’s right that we do establish the facts.”
Starmer told MPs: “I think anybody watching would think it’s fairly obvious that someone who seeks to avoid tax can’t also be in charge of tax. Yet for some reason the Prime Minister can’t bring himself to say that or even acknowledge the question.”
He also made a veiled reference to Sunak’s wife Akshata Murty, who has held non-domiciled status.
Suggesting that the job in No 10 was “too big” for Sunak, Starmer said: “We all know why the Prime Minister was reluctant to ask his party chair questions about family finances and tax avoidance.
“But his failure to sack him when the whole country can see what’s going on shows how hopelessly weak he is – a prime minister overseeing chaos, overwhelmed at every turn.”
Sunak responded that: “I stand by my values and my principles even when it is difficult.”
Zahawi turned up for work at Conservative Campaign Headquarters (CCHQ) today as usual ahead of Sunak’s Commons appearance.
Senior Conservative MP Caroline Nokes has called on Zahawi to “stand aside until this matter is all cleared up”, but Sunak has so far stood by him.
Commons Defence Committee chairman Tobias Ellwood said the situation is “a distraction”.
But the Tory MP said that now Sunak had asked Laurie Magnus to examine the case, “it makes absolute sense for the ethics adviser to report” before any further action is taken.
“These are tax matters, nobody knows the full picture of that, by the way, except Nadhim Zahawi and of course HMRC, so let’s allow that report to land and then we have to take things from there,” he told the BBC.
The row centres on a tax bill over the sale of shares in YouGov, the polling firm Zahawi founded, worth an estimated £27 million which were held by Balshore Investments, a company registered offshore in Gibraltar linked to Zahawi’s family.
Zahawi said HMRC concluded there had been a “careless and not deliberate” error in the way the founders’ shares, which he had allocated to his father, had been treated.
Downing Street subsequently revealed did not know last week that Zahawi had paid a reported 30% penalty to HMRC.
Zahawi has insisted he is “confident” he has “acted properly throughout”.
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
have your say