Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

John Stillwell/PA

'Devastating': 74-year-old woman loses symphysiotomy case

Campaigners for survivors of the procedure say this is “symptomatic of the ongoing absence of effective remedies” for other women in her situation.

A 74-YEAR-old woman has today lost her High Court action over a symphysiotomy procedure that was performed on her in 1963.

The woman had claimed that she suffered life-long pain after the controversial procedure, which involved breaking woman’s pelvis in order to aid the delivery a baby.

RTÉ reports the judge said that, at the time, treating doctors had reason to believe that the procedure did not generally have adverse effects.

In a statement after the judgement today, Survivors of Symphysiotomy and the Irish Council for Civil Liberties (ICCL) accused the State Claims Agency of fighting the woman “tooth and nail in an attempt to justify the breaking of her pelvis 12 days before the birth of her baby”.

Spokesperson Marie O’Connor said the government’s payment scheme for victims of the painful procedure “places little or no value on survivor testimony and refuses to accept reports from independent medical reports unless these reports are supported by 50 year old medical records generated by doctors, many of whom are now deceased”.

Mark Kelly, Executive Director of the Irish Council for Civil Liberties said the outcome of today’s case is “devastating” for the woman at the centre of it, but also symptomatic of the ongoing absence of effective remedies for other women in her situation.

“The onus remains on the State to ensure that, in all cases in which women allege that they have been subjected to degrading treatment of this nature, an effective investigation takes place and a remedy is provided.”

Read: “I am a symphysiotomy survivor. I am glad it’s all over”>

Read: ‘If mammy coughed or sneezed or took a fit of laughing she would wet herself’>

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Close
38 Comments
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Brian Hunt
    Favourite Brian Hunt
    Report
    Jul 14th 2020, 1:26 PM

    Well fair play to the guards. Good work

    33
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Richard Ahern
    Favourite Richard Ahern
    Report
    Jul 14th 2020, 1:22 PM

    And when he appears before Judge T O’Donnell it will all have been a complete waste of police time! He’ll be sentenced to 2 years’ jail, suspended for 2 years. Ridiculous but true.

    48
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Adrian O'Donnell
    Favourite Adrian O'Donnell
    Report
    Jul 14th 2020, 3:11 PM

    @Richard Ahern: He has plenty form in that regard. A detached attitude to societal duty. Its not it his job description to declutter the prison system.

    7
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Handsome McWonderful
    Favourite Handsome McWonderful
    Report
    Jul 14th 2020, 2:00 PM

    At least he wore a face mask.

    16
Submit a report
Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
Thank you for the feedback
Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.
JournalTv
News in 60 seconds