Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.
You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.
If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.
THE TAOISEACH’S COMMENTS to his parliamentary party in January this year where he said he was eating less red meat for the environment kicked up a flurry of meat-eating stances.
Irish farmers in particular were incensed over the remarks; Varadkar had already been seen as out of touch with rural farmers’ concerns – now he’s seen as making a personal decision against their livelihoods.
Rural TDs quizzed Varadkar about his comments in his Dáil appearance the next day, where he was asked to explain his comments: “I said that I was trying to eat less red meat, not giving it up – I had a very nice Hereford steak last night.”
I was trying to eat less red meat for two reasons – one health, the other climate change. And it’s not flippant, it is a fact that red meat increases instances of cancer, and also contributes more to climate change. But I can reassure Deputies that I’ve not become a vegan or anything like that.
In the months that followed, during a farmers’ protest about the measures taken to protect farmers with the threat of a no-deal Brexit looming large, one fervent activist shouted: “Where’s the beef, ya vegan?!”
The level of disappointment from the representative groups was the strongest.
The Irish Cattle and Sheep Association’s Patrick Kent wrote to the Taoiseach to say that his comments were “reckless in the extreme”, and called on him to clarify that he wasn’t suggesting people eat less sustainably produced Irish beef and lamb.
“As one of the most important beef exporters in the northern hemisphere, it is very unfortunate indeed that our Taoiseach should be calling into question the sustainability of Irish beef production.”
But many more wrote to the Taoiseach in the aftermath of his comments to show their support, as correspondence released under a Freedom of Information request show:
“Well done for announcing that you are cutting down on red meat… A hearty congratulations, you are setting an excellent example for the Irish people. Red meat is known as a probable cause of cancer and so this is an excellent step towards health.”
Well done for announcing that you have cut down on red meat, this is a great example to set. As you know, red meat is a cause of cancer, so that will help everyone… as well as climate change of course.
“I am not a Fine Gael supporter but I would like to commend your recent comments relating to climate change, meat and health,” an environmental scientist wrote. “Climate change represents a far greater challenge than Brexit (while I appreciate the immediate threat it poses) and if we fail to act now to adapt and mitigate climate change impacts, our society will be drastically changed.”
Does eating red meat give you cancer?
But in that batch of correspondence, one person wrote: “While I agree that sugar consumption and processed foods should be reduced.
A well-balanced diet should include protein foods like quality meat, dairy and eggs. If anything, we can make a difference with replacing some beef systems with rabbit production…
“I hope our government defends all that is good about our irish foods, while supporting new farming systems.”
So – does eating less red meat reduce your risk of cancer? It’s a lot more complicated than it first seems.
“There’s a lot of misinformation on both sides of that argument,” says Dr Robert O’Connor of the Irish Cancer Society.
Where we see the most challenge is where people form very fixed beliefs on these things – like, ‘Because I don’t eat meat I won’t get cancer,’ that’s absolutely not true. Some people say that meat is the new tobacco, and that’s absolutely not true either.
“For processed meats, eating large amounts result in a small increase in getting certain types of cancer, in particular bowel cancer. The research is reasonably black-and-white around that as much as it can be.”
Advertisement
Shutterstock / Susan Schmitz
Shutterstock / Susan Schmitz / Susan Schmitz
He says that the combination of the type of treatment that’s done to make bacon, sausages, pudding, and salamis, includes a chemical, salting, or drying process that reduces the risk of bacteria growing.
Some of these processes and chemicals may interact with different processes in our body, and in turn, may result in a slight mutation in the bowel.
But the actual risk from it, the chance of it giving you cancer is proportionally small. When studies looked at around 10,000 people eating red and processed meat over their lifetime, around 40 of them were diagnosed with bowel cancer, and if they eat a lot more of it, it results in an extra 8 cases of bowel cancer for those 10,000 people.
O’Connor says that many daily activities carry a certain amount of risk with them – driving your car or cycling your bike could be riskier on that macro-scientific level than walking. But many people choose to do it, because the chances of their health being affected solely because of that is relatively small.
There are lots of things we can do to impact our risk of cancer – we can reduce our sun exposure, or stop smoking and drinking, which has a much bigger impact on our cancer risk. But it’s up to you then as to what you want to do. Everything has a risk.
The figures could also be correlation rather than causation: if people are eating a lot of red meat, it may mean they’re not doing as much of other things like exercising.
And while studies on those who eat fish would be indicate that it’s a slightly protected food, those who mostly eat fish would be more engaged in other healthy lifestyle activities, says O’Connor.
Processed meats are classed as carcinogenic, in Category 1 – the same one as smoking.
Red meat is in Category 2 – a confusing catch-all jumble of activities where scientists can’t rule out one way or another whether it’s carcinogenic or not. Night shift work is also in this category.
Category 3 is items for which there is no scientific evidence that prove these activities cause cancer; this classification system is based on evidence, and not on the level of risk each activity poses to an individual, which makes it confusing for the layperson to decide what they should be avoiding and what is just scientific knowledge.
“To not smoke for any great length of time or to give up smoking, or stopping smoking at any stage results in obvious health benefits, O’Connor says emphatically. “People who live the longest throughout the world, almost all of them do not smoke.”
Alcohol consumption is also associated with 8 different types of cancer, and drinking in moderation has shown to reduce the risk of cancer.
O’Connor says that because meat was expensive, it formed a less central role in the Irish family’s diet than it does now, when all food is cheaper. So people should think more critically about what’s in their diet and on trying to make it as varied as possible, he says.
“When we get older we need more nutrients: different stages of life bring so many different stages of health – red meat is a good opportunity to get iron into the diet, especially for those with diseases like anemia and so on,” O’Connor says.
So was it a good message for Varadkar to give to citizens, after all?
“Yes, the evidence does support what he is doing in terms of there’s a small chance it will reduce a risk of cancer,” he says, but it’s the other activities that are more important.
I don’t think he smokes and I’ve seen him exercise, and he’s not anaemic, so he’s relatively fit already. We’re not saying give up meat, but they might consider how much meat is in their diet; consider the amount of vegetables; have fish every now and again and not have meat with every meal, but the chances of it having an effect is proportionally small.
The EU has a 12-step code to reducing your risk of getting cancer, which is a much more black-and-white things of what people can do, he says.
“It’s like betting on a racing horse – there’s no guarantee you’ll win, but there are certain things you can look at – if your horse is overweight, it’s going to reduce its chances. But if it’s a healthy weight, it doesn’t mean it isn’t going to win.”
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
Close
45 Comments
This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic.
Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy
here
before taking part.
The science shows little or no connection between red meat consumption and cancer. Processed meat does carry a relatively tiny risk. I think the key issue is a balanced diet and exercise. Modern humans in industrialised societies tend to be poor at both of these. In addition most humans in industrialised societies suffer from a sleep deficit and the science shows that this is very damaging for health. Reducing good health or saving the environment to issues like how much red meat one consumes is an exercise in stupidity and virtue signalling at its worst.
@John R: what science are you referring to John? There is indeed actual research that shows a direct link to reoccurring cancer cells that appear after therapy and animal proteins. Dr John Kelly wrote about it in his book, Stop Feeding your Cancer. A good read.
@John R: I’m betting your a farmer or connected to the meat or food production business. It is in black and white scientific evidence to prove your comment as bull S h 1 t
@John R: Read the article. The above article states that there is a minor link with cancer and processed foods but that the causality is not proven. There is no proven causality with red meat consumption and there is no science demonstrating that there is. None. Originally red meat was heavily linked to cholesterol and everyone was encouraged to go low fat. We were also told to stop eating butter. Fat was bad. It was junk science and the focus on low fat led to a massive rise in obesity and an over focus on carbohydrates including simple carbohydrates.
If people think that cutting down red meat consumption is going to reduce cancer and save the planet then off you go. The point I was making was about the need for a balanced diet combined with exercise. Fadism won’t achieve this.
@John Mc Donagh: Obviously didn’t read the article with all the farmers and culchy td’s using the term “vegan” as an insult. “militant veggies” give me a break
@Gerry Hannan: You’d never think that there used to be enormous herds of animals roaming the earth not too long ago. Bison are one species that spring to mind. And yet the earth thrived. I wonder why people tend to believe so easily that getting rid of large animals is one of the solutions to climate change? Methane, while a potent greenhouse gas, last about 12 years in the atmosphere. Carbon dioxide lasts for thousands of years. Large roaming ruminant animals have evolved over a long period of time. They have a function in the ecosystem and their activities are important.
@John R: what utter nonesence are you talking. Very different a herd of wild animals and intensive farming. Back to the IFA and protest for more grants with you.
@John R: a far bigger issue than cow farts is the carbon footprint on production of feed for animals. Granted it’s not as bad in Ireland as elsewhere due to grass fed beef. But the amount of feed required to feed cattle would feed 7 times as many people.
Plus eating too much red meat is not good for the digestive system.
My lack of respect for and loathing of Varadakar as a politician knows no bounds but even I disagree with this scrutiny of his diet and the demonization of the man for cutting back on meat.
His diet is entirely his business, he’s not claiming that a vegetarian diet cures cancer.
This article whilsy it does have accurate information comes across as ensationalist nonsense due to some bizzare sweeping statements: consumption of red meat in particular processed meat *does* increase one’s relative risk of cancer. The overall risk is still quite low and other lifestyle factors contribute more but it’s not untrue that reducing red meat intake could theoretically reduce risk.
Furthermore the claim that people believe if they don’t eat meat “they won’t get cancer” is such a ridiculous statement that I can’t believe someone was actually quoted saying that (I refuse to believe “most people” or even “many people” believe that)
A healthy, balanced diet be it vegan, vegetarian or omnivorous is going to have benefits and the idea that humans need huge amounts of meat is a myth, the average person (ie not an Olympic athlete) needs about 20-40g of animal protein to fulfill their daily dietary requirements- so about half a skinless chicken breast- despite what people seem to claim homo sapiens evolved on a hunter gatherer diet which was primarily plants, fruit, berries, nuts and comparably small amounts of meat -we’re not big cats-
Also on a final note rabbit is a horrific alternative, look up “protein poisoning” for anyone interested, in general it requires more vitamins to consume rabbit than one will get from it to the point that US military guidelines recommend abstaining from eating altogether if rabbit is the only available food source.
@SJF: If his diet is his business then he shouldn’t have stood in the dàil and pontificate on public record about his diet. He shouldn’t have participated in a prime slot TV programme about loosing weight. His is a walking ego, and if he was an ice cream he’d like himself.
You don’t address the climate change aspect of beef production anywhere in this article. Varadkar first made that comment when asked what he’s doing to combat climate change. The comment about his dual reasons for eating less meat (health + climate change) came later. Beef production is a huge factor affecting the environment but most studies reference US beef farming methods (cattle are fed with water-intensive alfalfa). I’d be interested to see an article on the environmental impact of Irish beef production; things like grass- vs. grain-fed cattle, the environmental benefits of purchasing locally produced meat, whether the impact would be less if we ate less meat but chose organic/grass-fed. To me, the Taoiseach’s comment about health was secondary and you’re missing the point here.
You don’t need Science to prove that eating Meat and Dairy is certainly bad for the animals. There is no nutrition that we can’t get from better plant sources. So why hurt them when you don’t have too?
Moving to a plant based diet is of great importance for many health benefits… unfortunately there is misinformation regarding what is good and what is bad… Meat companies and farming have a massive lobby influencing government polices permeating all levels of society… from television adds, programs! Then education… similar to fossil fuels and drug companies its massive multi billion euro enterprise… that does not take kindly to any evidence that is contrary to their propoganda machine… But if one researches into the area properly you will find many people have healed their bodies through plant based diet… i.e. juicing, fresh fruits, herbal medicine that is natural, chemical free and inline with our biology..
Most of these people who refuse to eat red meat for environmental reasons think nothing of boarding a Boeing 777 to fly to some far off place on their holidays every year, these planes when fully fueled carry about 48,000 US gallons of fuel enough to fuel at least 100 family cars for a year yet they fail to see the irony in this. Time to get their priorities right I think.
@Sal Paradise:
Its not a question of all or nothing but let’s get our priorities right here, cattle have been around and man has eaten red meat for thousands of years without having to worry about climate change, why all of a sudden have they become the problem ?
Today when a politician makes a comment such as the the one Varadkar made, he should expect it to be decisive. Even if he said he doesn’t want to eat broccoli because he disliked it, he can expect a a backlash.
Suppose he suggested all of Ireland should go on a diet of potatoes only?
If we all go vegan, we’ll be swapping intensive beef and dairy production for intensive tillage farming. People will then be complaining about all the emissions from farm machinery.
This article has too much emphasis on the individual health benefits of eating less red meat, when the climate change aspect is by far the most important bit.
Cattle farming is one of the biggest contributers to climate change, as cows fart methane gas thats known to be 5 times as bad a pollutant as Co2. Were also producing cattle at anexponential rate, with America now consuming the same amount of meat in a single day, than it did in an entire year, 100 years ago.
All the while, cattle farm land takes up a serious amount of space (were running out of it) causing us to cut down more forests to make room for it when we desperately need more trees and forestry.
And even more still, the amount of water it takes to grow a cow from calf to butchers is massive.
What is with all these extreme comments?? Obviously cutting back on red meat is likely good for you, same as everything in moderation is better than copious amounts of any one source of protein. I would hate to be vegan but I would equally not want to have sausages, steak or burgers on a daily basis. Wouldn’t have thought I’m unusual!
So is there a possibilty to see warning messages on the meat bags like we see on the cigarettes?
It’s unhealthy maybe but any industry defends the profit it makes.
US and Russian officials begin talks in Saudi Arabia on resetting relations and Ukraine war
3 hrs ago
7.4k
91
Catholic Church
Vatican cancels Pope Francis's weekend events as he continues to receive hospital treatment
47 mins ago
678
3
DWTS
Viewers call for change in Dancing with the Stars voting format after Kevin Dundon remains on show
17 hrs ago
67.6k
33
Your Cookies. Your Choice.
Cookies help provide our news service while also enabling the advertising needed to fund this work.
We categorise cookies as Necessary, Performance (used to analyse the site performance) and Targeting (used to target advertising which helps us keep this service free).
We and our 148 partners store and access personal data, like browsing data or unique identifiers, on your device. Selecting Accept All enables tracking technologies to support the purposes shown under we and our partners process data to provide. If trackers are disabled, some content and ads you see may not be as relevant to you. You can resurface this menu to change your choices or withdraw consent at any time by clicking the Cookie Preferences link on the bottom of the webpage .Your choices will have effect within our Website. For more details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
We and our vendors process data for the following purposes:
Use precise geolocation data. Actively scan device characteristics for identification. Store and/or access information on a device. Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development.
Cookies Preference Centre
We process your data to deliver content or advertisements and measure the delivery of such content or advertisements to extract insights about our website. We share this information with our partners on the basis of consent. You may exercise your right to consent, based on a specific purpose below or at a partner level in the link under each purpose. Some vendors may process your data based on their legitimate interests, which does not require your consent. You cannot object to tracking technologies placed to ensure security, prevent fraud, fix errors, or deliver and present advertising and content, and precise geolocation data and active scanning of device characteristics for identification may be used to support this purpose. This exception does not apply to targeted advertising. These choices will be signaled to our vendors participating in the Transparency and Consent Framework.
Manage Consent Preferences
Necessary Cookies
Always Active
These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work.
Targeting Cookies
These cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.
Functional Cookies
These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and personalisation. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we have added to our pages. If you do not allow these cookies then these services may not function properly.
Performance Cookies
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not be able to monitor our performance.
Store and/or access information on a device 102 partners can use this purpose
Cookies, device or similar online identifiers (e.g. login-based identifiers, randomly assigned identifiers, network based identifiers) together with other information (e.g. browser type and information, language, screen size, supported technologies etc.) can be stored or read on your device to recognise it each time it connects to an app or to a website, for one or several of the purposes presented here.
Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development 133 partners can use this purpose
Use limited data to select advertising 103 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times an ad is presented to you).
Create profiles for personalised advertising 75 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (such as forms you submit, content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (for example, information from your previous activity on this service and other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (that might include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present advertising that appears more relevant based on your possible interests by this and other entities.
Use profiles to select personalised advertising 74 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on your advertising profiles, which can reflect your activity on this service or other websites or apps (like the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects.
Create profiles to personalise content 36 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (for instance, forms you submit, non-advertising content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (such as your previous activity on this service or other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (which might for example include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present content that appears more relevant based on your possible interests, such as by adapting the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find content that matches your interests.
Use profiles to select personalised content 32 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on your content personalisation profiles, which can reflect your activity on this or other services (for instance, the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects. This can for example be used to adapt the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find (non-advertising) content that matches your interests.
Measure advertising performance 124 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which advertising is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine how well an advert has worked for you or other users and whether the goals of the advertising were reached. For instance, whether you saw an ad, whether you clicked on it, whether it led you to buy a product or visit a website, etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of advertising campaigns.
Measure content performance 59 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which content is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine whether the (non-advertising) content e.g. reached its intended audience and matched your interests. For instance, whether you read an article, watch a video, listen to a podcast or look at a product description, how long you spent on this service and the web pages you visit etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of (non-advertising) content that is shown to you.
Understand audiences through statistics or combinations of data from different sources 72 partners can use this purpose
Reports can be generated based on the combination of data sets (like user profiles, statistics, market research, analytics data) regarding your interactions and those of other users with advertising or (non-advertising) content to identify common characteristics (for instance, to determine which target audiences are more receptive to an ad campaign or to certain contents).
Develop and improve services 79 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service, such as your interaction with ads or content, can be very helpful to improve products and services and to build new products and services based on user interactions, the type of audience, etc. This specific purpose does not include the development or improvement of user profiles and identifiers.
Use limited data to select content 37 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type, or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times a video or an article is presented to you).
Use precise geolocation data 42 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, your precise location (within a radius of less than 500 metres) may be used in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Actively scan device characteristics for identification 24 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, certain characteristics specific to your device might be requested and used to distinguish it from other devices (such as the installed fonts or plugins, the resolution of your screen) in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Ensure security, prevent and detect fraud, and fix errors 82 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Your data can be used to monitor for and prevent unusual and possibly fraudulent activity (for example, regarding advertising, ad clicks by bots), and ensure systems and processes work properly and securely. It can also be used to correct any problems you, the publisher or the advertiser may encounter in the delivery of content and ads and in your interaction with them.
Deliver and present advertising and content 92 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Certain information (like an IP address or device capabilities) is used to ensure the technical compatibility of the content or advertising, and to facilitate the transmission of the content or ad to your device.
Match and combine data from other data sources 65 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Information about your activity on this service may be matched and combined with other information relating to you and originating from various sources (for instance your activity on a separate online service, your use of a loyalty card in-store, or your answers to a survey), in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Link different devices 48 partners can use this feature
Always Active
In support of the purposes explained in this notice, your device might be considered as likely linked to other devices that belong to you or your household (for instance because you are logged in to the same service on both your phone and your computer, or because you may use the same Internet connection on both devices).
Identify devices based on information transmitted automatically 81 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Your device might be distinguished from other devices based on information it automatically sends when accessing the Internet (for instance, the IP address of your Internet connection or the type of browser you are using) in support of the purposes exposed in this notice.
Save and communicate privacy choices 60 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
The choices you make regarding the purposes and entities listed in this notice are saved and made available to those entities in the form of digital signals (such as a string of characters). This is necessary in order to enable both this service and those entities to respect such choices.
have your say