Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Graham Hughes via RollingNews.ie

Former teacher and priest accused of sex abuse charges wants trial stopped

The man’s lawyers argue he cannot get a fair trial because he suffers from age-related dementia.

A PRIEST AND former teacher has brought a High Court action aimed at stopping his trial on child sex abuse charges of one of his pupils in the mid 1970s.

The man who is aged in his eighties, and is facing charges of gross indecency and indecent assault against a male pupil at the private fee-paying school he worked in during the mid-1970s, claims he cannot get a fair trial on ground of ill health.

The alleged abuse is said to have occurred after the complainant was called to the accused office on three separate occasions.

Today, the man’s lawyers argued before the High Court that he cannot get a fair trial because he suffers from age-related dementia and cogntative impairment, which means he cannot properly defend himself at trial.

The man, who is due to be tried before the Circuit Criminal Court, was the subject of a complaint made to gardai in late 2016. However, he was not required to attend at a Garda station in connection with the complaint until April 2018. 

Represented in court by Hugh Hartnett SC the man has brought High Court judicial review proceedings against the DPP where he seeks orders and declarations including an order preventing his trial from proceeding.

Counsel said that as well as the man’s ill health he was also claiming that there was a delay over more than 45 years in the time when the alleged offences are said to have occurred and the man’s proposed trial date.

In all the circumstances it would be wholly unfair and a breach of the accused man’s constitutional rights and rights under the European Convention on Human Rights if his trial was to proceed, counsel added.

Permission to bring the challenge was granted on an ex-parte basis by Mr Justice Charles Meenan at the High Court today.

The judge, who put a stay on the man’s trial proceeding pending further order of the court, made the matter returnable to a date in April.

Comments are closed for legal reasons.

Close
JournalTv
News in 60 seconds