Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Eamonn Farrell via RollingNews.ie

Suspect in homicide avoided prosecution eight times for violent crimes under juvenile protection scheme

Gardaí believe the teenager, who can’t be identified for legal reasons, was responsible for the death of a man.

A TEENAGER WHO has avoided potential criminal prosecution at least eight times due to the juvenile diversion programme is the chief suspect in the violent death of a man, TheJournal.ie has learned. 

Gardaí have said that they believe the teenager, who can’t be identified for legal reasons, was likely to have been responsible for the death of a man in the Leinster region. 

It is understood that the minor had received the benefit of eight different juvenile liaison officers and had another two cases pending under the scheme when the incident occurred.

The minor received the orders after allegedly committing offences such as drug possession, aggravated burglary, assault causing harm and car theft. 

The aim of the juvenile diversion programme is to help prevent young offenders in Ireland from entering into the full criminal justice system.

Instead of a criminal conviction, the young person is given the chance to admit to their crime as part of the scheme and is offered one of a range of options to make amends.

Specially-trained garda Juvenile Liaison Officers (JLOs) are assigned to work with them.

Once the young person admits responsibility for their actions, an action plan is created – this can include apologising to the victim of their crimes, offering money to them, imposing curfews on the offender or ensuring they participate in sporting or other recreational activities.

However, sources have said that this young person had shown little sign of remorse and his behaviour had been worsening. The source also said that this young person was not a suitable candidate for a JLO after he committed a third alleged offence and should instead have been tried for his alleged offences.

Sources have described how the teenager had been on a “rampage” across his hometown in the weeks prior to the homicide. There had been multiple complaints to the local garda station about his behaviour at the time. 

System slowdown

The JLO system is in the spotlight after it emerged that a major audit of 22,000 of its cases are now being carried out after it emerged that a significant number of young people may have wrongly escaped prosecution.

The internal review has seen a number of sergeants and inspectors removed from the frontline to deal with this latest crisis.

The lack of frontline sergeants is already at crisis point, meanwhile, according to garda representative body AGSI.

In the past, these young people were placed on a centralised list which gave gardaí blanket approval to proceed with their prosecution.

However, that system was then changed so that individual JLOs had to contact the original arresting garda informing them that the scheme was not working out and that they should go ahead with prosecution.

The way the system was created meant that a referral had to be done for each offence, for each offender – effectively creating a substantial workload for officers.

Sources say that the system became unworkable and ground to a halt. The offenders’ cases lingered until a point where their offences could no longer be prosecuted as they exceeded the statute of limitation.

The full report into the non-prosecutions is scheduled to be released to the public in October.

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Close
39 Comments
This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic. Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy here before taking part.
Leave a Comment
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Alan mulvey
    Favourite Alan mulvey
    Report
    Jan 14th 2015, 7:09 AM

    Have they not being talking about this since the boom?

    106
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Mick Kenny
    Favourite Mick Kenny
    Report
    Jan 14th 2015, 3:57 PM

    It smells like political posturing to me. The info in the paper during was in direct contradiction of what the minister said before Christmas – ruling out tax credits because as he said in a parliamentary question a system of tax allowances would not benefit parents working in the home and could be seen as discriminatory. In addition, tax reliefs would favour the high paid while those on the minimum wage or in part-time work would not benefit to the same extent. Secondly he ruled out the second ECCE year now it back on the table. He’s doing a political cha cha because of the growing momentum for the Association of Childhood Professionals petition and 17th February rally which is even more reason to keep the pressure going. These hollow promises are just to attempt to quieten voices but I for one was raging when I read the article. This committee too is just a stalling tactic too, it will take several months for the committee to be formed, compile the data, launch it, then it will gather dust for a bit and hay presto it’s election time and they’re gone. Surly there is enough reports done of the years that can be dusted off and acted on. I for one will be at the Dail on 17th Feb with the ACP using my voice and looking for positive change. #oneunitedvoice (rant over)

    4
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Mick Kenny
    Favourite Mick Kenny
    Report
    Jan 14th 2015, 3:59 PM

    Here’s the link for the petition for the government to invest in our children early years education, please support, sign and share https://www.change.org/p/enda-kenny-respect-value-and-resource-all-areas-of-early-childhood-education-and-care

    2
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Michael cunnane
    Favourite Michael cunnane
    Report
    Jan 14th 2015, 8:10 AM

    Childcare costs….like paying two mortgages.

    87
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Eugene Doyle
    Favourite Eugene Doyle
    Report
    Jan 14th 2015, 7:36 AM

    The problem is…..it is election spin!!!

    77
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Stuart Keogh
    Favourite Stuart Keogh
    Report
    Jan 14th 2015, 10:02 AM

    Course it is, it’s the same government that threatened to cut child benefit if we didn’t sign up to IW, “but childcare services are important to them” pffffft

    12
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Nobby Donnelly
    Favourite Nobby Donnelly
    Report
    Jan 14th 2015, 7:17 AM

    Still early – i thought the headline was about making irish children more adorable..

    71
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Jennie
    Favourite Jennie
    Report
    Jan 14th 2015, 9:08 AM

    That made me smile this morning. Thank you

    7
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute selita
    Favourite selita
    Report
    Jan 14th 2015, 9:36 AM

    The first thing they need to do is look at the childcare subvention scheme and community childcare.

    Why oh why are the government subsidising childcare for those who choose not to work.
    Yes I know there will be do-gooders who will say the child needs it, that maybe these parents are looking for work etc. there is millions wasted, I work in the community sector and as a working parent there is nothing that drives me mad than meeting parents (who choose NOT to work) leaving their kids off at crèche a few mornings a week, so that they get ‘a break’ and pay between €20-€30(and complain having to pay this) for the privilege as the government subsidises this. Yet I have to pay full crèche fees of a grand and pay tax. While there are numerous families struggling to pay bills and childcare, there are huge numbers of subsidised crèche places being taking up by parents who do not work or train and do not want to!!

    65
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Rakel
    Favourite Rakel
    Report
    Jan 14th 2015, 10:57 AM

    Selita, maybe the fact that some people ‘choose’ to stay at home and take responsibility for the majority of their childs care should be praised and not criticised. Of course people who do this have less money and that is why they need subsidised fees, or are they simply not entitled to a ‘break’ because they don’t put their child in crèche for 8+ hours a day and subscribe to a societal norm that is about as anti-family as it gets!

    10
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Rakel
    Favourite Rakel
    Report
    Jan 14th 2015, 11:00 AM

    Caring for a child/family is very much work as you should know. So sick of people undervaluing the role of the parent in the home.

    14
    See 4 more replies ▾
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Henry Fleming
    Favourite Henry Fleming
    Report
    Jan 14th 2015, 11:15 AM

    Rakel, looks like you completely missed the point made!!

    25
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Rakel
    Favourite Rakel
    Report
    Jan 14th 2015, 12:12 PM

    No I see her point Henry, and have no problem with the cost of childcare coming down for working families, but I didn’t like her comments in relation to parents who don’t work!

    6
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute mammy
    Favourite mammy
    Report
    Jan 14th 2015, 1:54 PM

    But how are they going to go and buy their breakfast rolls and Johnny blues without having to share with the chizzlers?

    6
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute selita
    Favourite selita
    Report
    Jan 14th 2015, 4:35 PM

    I am not undervaluing the stay at home parent, it is something I would aspire to be!!! Rakel I am talking about parents (both) who CHOOSE NOT to work and have no intention of working, having numerous kids….claim social welfare benefits, social housing etc. Parents not wanting to work and putting there child into a crèche 20-25 hours per week is hardly looking after their children? if I didn’t have to work I wouldn’t have my kids in crèche, why would I? as a working mother when do I get a break, im up at 6am, kids feed and clothed, dropped off, in work run of my feet, work through lunch so I can get out early, pick up kids, spend time with them, make dinner, bed time routine, clean up and finally sit down at 10pm and off to bed at 10.30, woken at least once a night by my baby.
    I HAVE to work in order to keep a roof over my kids head, if I gave up work we would lose our home, I cant sell as we are in negative equity, I would love a large family, but that is not possible.

    9
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute martintim
    Favourite martintim
    Report
    Jan 14th 2015, 7:47 AM

    Anyone who believes them needs their head examined, they’ll make the price higher with some kind of creche tax if anything

    42
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Alison Kenny
    Favourite Alison Kenny
    Report
    Jan 14th 2015, 7:58 AM

    And it will only apply to crèches even if you have a childminder through the tax system. Seems fair, not!!!

    26
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Philip
    Favourite Philip
    Report
    Jan 14th 2015, 11:59 AM

    Those that choose to look after their own children rather than get some stranger to look after them.

    What help are they getting?

    9
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Snorre N Skalagrimmerson
    Favourite Snorre N Skalagrimmerson
    Report
    Jan 14th 2015, 9:58 AM

    Pure spin by the anti family anti people FG/LAB JUNTA

    7
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute deerhounddog
    Favourite deerhounddog
    Report
    Jan 14th 2015, 8:30 AM

    Pune spin.

    7
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute deerhounddog
    Favourite deerhounddog
    Report
    Jan 14th 2015, 8:34 AM

    Pure spin

    11
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Richie Rice
    Favourite Richie Rice
    Report
    Jan 14th 2015, 8:25 AM

    What else would it be, soak it up Pixies.

    6
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Live Long
    Favourite Live Long
    Report
    Jan 14th 2015, 10:14 AM

    Child care should be more affordable but not on the backs of the tax payer, we pay enough as it is to support other peoples children.

    4
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Sian O Sullivan
    Favourite Sian O Sullivan
    Report
    Jan 14th 2015, 10:47 AM

    So are you suggesting everyone should fill out a little form every month indicating what their tax should be spent on ???

    16
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Mick Kenny
    Favourite Mick Kenny
    Report
    Jan 14th 2015, 4:02 PM

    these are the future tax payers who will be paying into you pension and elderly care, try to see the big picture.

    3
Submit a report
Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
Thank you for the feedback
Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.

Leave a commentcancel

 
JournalTv
News in 60 seconds