Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.
You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.
If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.
THE DUBLIN WEB Summit, or The Summit as it’s now known, is hiring 40 new staff ahead of its November event but it’s not giving equal credit to degrees from different third-level institutions.
The Summit says that, for people who have graduated since 2010, they will only consider applicants who achieved 1st class honours degrees from UCD, UCC, NUIG, DCU, UL or NUI Maynooth.
Graduates at Trinity College Dublin however will be considered if they achieved the lower 2.1 grade.
Furthermore, for graduates of Institutes of Technology who achieved a BA, BSc or similar, they are required to have gone on to also secure a Masters to be considered.
Advertisement
Founder and CEO of The Summit Paddy Cosgrave says that they have been required to implement the requirements because they are seeking “high-quality graduates” and receive too many applications:
For every position we advertise at a graduate level, we get hundreds and hundreds of applications. It’s been extremely difficult as our head of recruitment to try to reduce 400 CVs down to 10 to call for interview.
Cosgrave also sits on the board of the Higher Education Authority and founded the Undergraduate Awards.
The Summit’s website lists a number of past speakers including the founder of Twitter Jack Dorsey who dropped out of university and Tumblr founder David Karp who never graduated from high school.
The Summit was founded in 2010 and has become one of the most in influential gatherings on the international tech landscape with tickets selling out months in advance. Tickets for November’s event will first become available later this month.
The organisers are to next week hold their their first major US conference, Collision, in Las Vegas.
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
Thing is I’m not so sure it’s an “IT” event .. from the perspective of an IT professional myself it seems to be more of an elitist techno-hipster parade. Like, I think it does garner a certain critical mass of professional “digital creatives” but as far as I could make out, from the coverage of last years event it seemed to be more about promoting Irish tourism, food exports, Dublin pubs etc … all good in my opinion, but I wouldn’t describe it with the broader “IT” term …
In fairness, if you were as smart as Zuckerburg, Jobs, Gates et al, you wouldn’t be applying for an intern position at a business and technology conference regardless of your credentials.
It is really annoying, as a Trinity graduate to constantly be the subject of what can only be described as inverse snobbery. It’s OK for people here and from “less highly ranked institutions” to sit and question your qualifications and say that theirs are better.
Oh and you know, TCD only THINKS it’s good, and TCD don’t have fun at all, and they’re all hipsters (insert tired insult here) and now by my accounts there are at least 3 ITs in the country better than it. NO. If I sat here and slandered your colleges I’d be slaughtered and called a snob. But sure, the opposite is totally legitimate.
Having just achieved an amazing scholarship I DEFINITELY can thank TCD for both it’s international reputation and teaching. It was certainly a major factor in my appointment.
@ThomasFrancisMeagher You say the ITs are as good if not better than the universities. I’m not gonna hit back with an “oh no, they’re not” but what facts or stats do you have to substantiate your comments?
There are a lot of companies that do focus solely on the universities – not just in Ireland. I’m not saying that’s right or anything but are they all wrong?
Now you predictable people. If I had substituted TCD with sat WIT, what do you want to bet I’d have over a hundred green arrows? I do.
You IT people need a dose of reality. This place is just an echo chamber for your incorrect impressions of the quality of certain Unis. Personally, all this poll serves as is a general indicator where people went to college. IT or Uni. If anyone wants to know the general reader education graphic of the journal. Please refer to the heroic nature of the IT grads and the lack of social skills, intelligence and technical ability referred to throughout the comments.
Yes, definitely should. I definitely agree that not everyone getting 500+ points is a genius or that anyone getting getting less is conclusively a fool but I think it would be silly to suggest there is absolutely NO correlation what-so-ever between LC points and intelligence. I mean, come on. Just because it doesn’t explicitly show you are intelligent, it’s not useless. So, if there are 2 courses in 2 institutions, one 520 and one 250 points with equal numbers of available places, if I was the Professor or Co-ordinator why WOULDN’T I challenge my (at least seeming and assumed) high achieving students as best as possible? It’s clearly inaccurate to presume therefore all degrees in same courses could be equal as that would suggest the intelligence of all students in a level 8 course is somehow set to default when they enter. Obviously not.
Secondly, the percentage of students achieving a 1.1 is fairly universal in various courses in various institutions (around 10%) so if 10 percent of the 520 group achieve a first and the same percentage in the 250 course achieve a first, is the course as difficult. That is clearly very unlikely. Statistically, very unlikely. That completely implies people attain some spontaneously occurring intelligence and motivation upon entering the level 8 course.
But of course, those who believe there is no intelligence required for the LC will tell me my whole argument is wrong.
First, they actually started companies and aren’t looking for employment.
Second, I’m sure if they were “off the scale” at any IT they’d still get a job.
Third, they did both get in to Harvard. I’m sure they’re priorities were as skewed as the irish people choosing NUIG, TCD, UCD or UCC.
Intelligent people will seek out other intelligent people from a young age.
Mary let me tell you something: education has nothing at all to do with intelligence. Studying more for an exam than the next person doesn’t mean you are more intelligent it means that you will more than likely achieve an education in the higher points universities or colleges. The person who opted to enjoy their time when they were younger rather than studying chose their path. If a company want to hire someone for studying like mad when they were young over someone who probably has better social interaction well so be it.
Yeah, that MIGHT be a useful observation if in addition to natural intelligence you didn’t need an acquired skill set to do a job ultimately. And I strongly believe skill sets and critical thinking are superior in certain Irish universities.
Here’s a little anecdote for ya. For my leaving cert I took honours physics, chemistry and biology amongst the usual subjects and others could verify my study consisted of the hours proceeding the exam. Long story short, I got in to TCD. Without the money and grinds label people love to assign to people who got in to TCD. So I went to college in what was an extremely tough course and once in 2nd year, 101 of 234 students failed one of around 15, 1.5 hour exams on VERY diverse areas of science you have to take in TCD meaning they had to take repeats. It is EXTREMELY tough and an intellectual marathon and every exam requires scientific essays. In third year TCD if you fail one exam, you are gone. No repeats. Nowhere else has that pressure. So eventually my finals arrived, I graduated top 5. Then I finished college and applied (somewhat ambitiously) for a generous, highly competitive PhD in the UK in you guessed it, another great institution. My point is, intelligent people don’t actually have to do all the cramming and grinds all of you refer to. They just are. And then they appear in TCD and UCD etc where I met them. Every intelligent person I know, myself included know that it is just no fun being a big fish in a small pond. And even if TCD students were just extremely motivated; a very famous experiment on German children demonstrated that that will surpass those who are simply intelligent anyway. And I, for the record, would still want those immensely motivated individuals.
Education does not define intelligence, but intelligence seeks out ultimate challenges and wants to better itself and that happens to occur within education.
Having intelligence but being uneducated or not to the fullest is like the old question “If a tree falls in a forest and no-one hears it, does it make a sound?” Technically no, for what is it’s relevance except to the beholder. And it is my opinion that since many gifted children need more challenging work to refrain from boredom, teenagers in education need the same. And young adults in research. And adults in a job.
See people hate this version of intelligent because they think its a useless, sci-fi construct. Well it isn’t. They think their “streets smarts” are so superior to my “technical jargon” and find the kind of intelligence so common place in universities highly unpalatable. As if their witty joke in the pub or interesting piece of DIY was a neat and clinical way to demonstrate their smarts. Now, if you do not like my and my friends manifestation of intelligence what would you like me to demonstrate? My perfect pitch, my all-Ireland sport medals, speak Spanish to you, partake in a quiz? Done.
I have met some incredible intelligence in my time in TCD and I do not appreciate it being denounced and seemed unimportant. Not everybody can get a medal on sports day. Its just the way life is.
Long by comparison, admittedly. Boring is probably largely subjective, though maybe the guy I was actually responding to has more interest than you, who’s to say? Either way, he isn’t obliged to read either.
I felt a little sorry for you if you were actually looking at my comments on a smart phone, but since you’re actually on a laptop…
Seriously. Scroll down.
tl;dr – but in any case your tree in the woods metaphor has been made irrelevant by modern technology, since sound is now understood as a series of compression waves which may be captured and replayed later – so where recorded sound of said tree falling is later heard by somebody then yes it will be heard. Conclusively. That’s the kind of lateral thinking that the technology industry is based on, and precisely the kind that you won’t get from scholastic, “classical” training, and rote learning.
Aha, and I think you’re being perhaps a bit literal. If you understand that the undertone of the entire tree dilemma is “when is something considered relevant?” then you understand that untrained intelligence is about as useful as a picture of air. It’s just locked in someone’s head in today’s world of degrees.
By the way, that philosophical notion was proposed by George Berkeley. I for one am not so self assured as to upset the meaning of a brilliant thought in metaphysics when you clearly know what it means.
If they invent a way to extract intelligence from someone with technology the way technology can now hear then you might have had a point.
Well actually the funny thing is, I actually wasn’t trying to be a troll and though I so strongly disagreed with Phil’s point, may have accidentally fallen in to that category! This is the first topic I’ve ever posted on because I believe all we ever hear is “ITs are just as good etc. etc.” and while I think it’s absolutely great that anyone who wants to educate and further themselves at any level on any topic is brilliant and that’s really admirable, that still doesn’t mean we’re all the same. Caertain ITs being perceived as being as difficult as certain Uni’s is wrong and has practical implications, like needing to achieve a 2.1 to enter medicine. I had friends who got 2.2s and if they had gone to an IT would have got their 2.1 for grad medicine. I am very average at tennis. I will always be average at tennis. No matter how much I train I will never be the best and I am just at peace with that. But when the same extends to intelligence people get SO defensive. I’ve met people SO much smarter than me and from universities far superior to me and I concede that entirely.
So sorry for appearing to troll though! Just playing Devil’s advocate.
My point was that many people can now perceive the tree falling, again and again, at removal in both time and space, without ever being nearby. I’d never say Berkeley is irrelevant, just like I’d never say Charles Babbage is irrelevant, but I wouldn’t use his analytical engine to do my taxes.
But my point is…
Technology can now “hear” sounds as well as the ear which has essentially extended the scope of how things can be “relevant”, so to speak.
BUT, there is no such piece of technology that can utilise someone’s untapped potential and turn it in to something bar them themselves. And these days (in most cases) education is the way to do that or you get crack pots like Chris Langan with high IQs but who is in essence, useless to progression.
Didn’t Babbage technically conceive the first calculator? If so, I’d say a lot of people use him when doing their taxes.
Yeah but not that they’re actually using his methods but that there would be no calculator otherwise.
The same way people might not be doing population genetics without Mendel or PCR without Watson and Crick.
Mr. Paddy Cosgrave should not be on the board of the HEA for holding such biased views. No wonder the IT sector is crippled for funding when such views are openly held and expressed.
This isn’t an instance of disregarding ‘equal opportunities’. I’m certainly not saying being this brazenly callous about ITs is welcome but potential employees are always judged on the standard of their qualifications.
My problem with this is the obvious disjunction that exists between The Summit and what Paddy Cosgrave is saying. The Summit heralds start ups but there is no archetype start up employee, from what I can see.
Ultimately, start ups are entrepreneurs moving from project to project until they find the one that will be a success. The Indo featured Trustev’s CEO yesterday – butcher to billionaire, a perfect example.
By limiting his application process in this way, The Summit misses this start up spirit and lacks vision.
Good to see the summit’s organisers thinking outside the box, wonder how many delegates will drop out on account of this , seeing as lots of them have no masters degrees or degrees for that matter,
I’ve come across some people with masters in computer science who haven’t a breeze about practical skills in it. Any one can get a masters in a subject if they can read a book,study and tackle exams well. It’s a completely different thing to be talented at a job
very true, testing ones ability to retain new information and write it out for examiners to say “oh they studied it and remembered it”. putting words into action and be talented in applying it is the deciding factor. not writing theory and other scholars opinion. granted one needs to understand certain rules that work but application is key. it’s actually hilarious to see the competitive fighting for paper and grades, many couldn’t apply their knowledge when put to the test. you either have it or you don’t, talent is talent, you won’t find it in an exam paper.
Total lack of imagination in terms of filtering applications, how’s about “you must have developed a web-site (attach link)” or “worked on an open source project” – this for an industry that is founded on egalitarianism & creativity – shows DWS for the elitist institution that it is!
Plenty of people with 1st class degrees honours from these colleges with no social skills or relevant experience and they prob wouldn’t have a clue about the complexities of event management. Ridiculous logic from this crowd.!!!
To be honest I’d say this is just a case of overworked techies getting in vanilla recruitment consultants to help with the workload, who then go ahead and roll out standard practice – perhaps an organisational brain-fart – I’m sure once the main guys catch up with it all it’ll probably be re-evaluated.
My thoughts exactly Louise. There is too many errors in there to be using the Tip/Correction button.
They could do with using some punctuation, in the articles, as well!!
Attend a conference with nothing but Trinity grads…. I can’t imagine a more horrifying experience.
Wondering which of the 20 genders they fit into while pretending to comprehend latin and rubbing up against Topman’s finest impossibly skinny jeans, obscurely mothballed/patched up tux jackets and hair moose…. They’ve started walking round Dublin city with CANES now… Honest to god CANES! Faking a limp is the ultimate hipster statement du jour. It’s just so…pastiche.
This is just bullshit. If you had recited the same cliched insults about gay people I’d have called you homophobic. Luckily this just makes you look like you have a major chip on your shoulder. Take it you got second choice on the CAO then.
Mary now you are not making any sense. What the commenter said above pasted the correct image if what’s happening. The cane walking geriatrics floating around with absolutely no ability to socially engage with their surroundings. A new type of educational system is required, maybe even an entrance exam into the top institutions followed by interviews and aptitude tests. That will get the best students from both walks of life, the socially challenged well educated and the naturally intelligent people who chose a path of life fulfilment over head in book bad eyesight childhood
I’m not making sense by calling bullshit on a stereotype?I graduated from TCD last year and only ever saw one guy with a cane… who had what looked to be a similar style to what was mentioned but the killing joke: seemed to have a degenerating genetic illness that required him to use a cane. So that one is possibly down-right offensive. That is the only cane I’ve ever seen in 5 years.
You perpetuate the head in a book thing a lot. This to me is just an attempt to justify your position as someone who sees past the bullshit of wasting your life away studying because, what is education in the grand scheme of things, right? It’s not like you’ll take it to your bed or it will keep you warm at night. We’re all just over-achievers with esteem issues sure. (I’ve literally been told that out of the blue)
I’ve news for you, you attend any uni you want if you are bona fide above average intelligence. And you can go to Oxford or Cambridge and STILL have evreything else. It’s not either or.
don’t worry, you can’t buy talent, masters is not talent. the sheep follow the sheep, paying to get a job mindset. a good degree is sufficient, after that its up to you to apply it outside academia. i’d only do a masters if i wanted to teach and many do just that for that sole reason of job security and high pay at 3rd level – to teach. in fact, many failed practitioners go that route very early in their career, they’re not talented enough to last out in the real world for the high pay they wish for, its a backup plan. i know, i’ve seen their ‘real world’ work, not exactly talented, sufficient perhaps.
Pure irish degree snobbery. Graduates of IoTs are regularly discriminated against in job opportunities dispite having equivalent or better qualifications as those who went to irish “ivy league” universities.
It’s funny as well because it assumes that the person who went to an IT couldn’t have gone to a university. Circumstances dictate Alot of the time and not all can move away to college despite having the points and/or intelligence to back in up.
Are we pretending all qualifications are equal? I think the Simpson have covered this:
Vicki [Lisa’s dance teacher and WWII child-star, addressing the class before a performance]: Okay, kids, tonight’s the big night! Now remember: the important thing is to just dance flawlessly.
Lisa: Excuse me, why isn’t my name in the program?
Vicki: It is, silly. You’ve got the most important part of all. [Flicks through the pamphlet]
Lisa: Curtain puller!?!
Vicki: No one can see the show if the curtain isn’t open.
Lisa: Bu– my parents are counting on seeing me dance! And I’ve worked ever so hard.
Vicki: I’m sorry, Lisa, but giving everyone an equal part when they’re clearly not equal is called what, again, class?
Class: Communism!
Vicki: That’s right. And I didn’t tap all those Morse code messages to the Allies ’til my shoes filled with blood to just roll out the welcome mat for the Reds.
Actually louis all qualifications of the same grade are equal. A grade 8 qualification ( honours degree) is of an equal standard no matter what educational institution it was achieved at.
That’s just not true, I’ve seen exam papers from school friends studying the same subjects in several different institutions and the standard between them varies wildly.
It’s like saying all teams in the Premiership are of an equal standard because they are all in the same league.
Embarrassing stuff from Paddy, Out of my diploma class of only 26, 10 of them went onto degrees, 1 of them is in IT, the others didn’t survive when it came to putting it into practice.
Of the remaining 16 who achieved Diploma, 3 of us are involved in IT and I am the only one who pursued a career in software development, the other 2 are IT support. Our Diploma was in Software Development.
If you can swallow a book and push it out on the day of the exam, great, doesn’t mean you will be any good.
Pure elitism from Paddy Cosgrave in fairness, from a great event when it first started he seems to be disappearing up his own bottom now with this sort of elitism.
He reported on radio this morning that 1st class honours degrees had increased massively without any apparent increase in the quality of graduates. Maynooth for example increased its rate of 1st class honours graduates by 900%. They undertake random testing of papers which are anonymous in terms of college/university and they found that the best results (overwhelmingly -78% I think was the figure) came from Trinity graduates. So there’s no elitism here – TCD is simply producing a better standard of graduate – but Trinity is not doling out 1st class degrees willy nilly. The I.Ts did not fare well in their analyses.
Ok so everyone at each other’s throats here but I’d like to give some food for thought to the people commenting. I’m a mum who has busted her ass to go back and get an honours BSc from an IT. I’ve spent €28 in Aldi every week since September for myself and my child so that I can pay back what it costs. It’s coming up to exam weeks now. My hair has thinned, I have nightmares about 5 times a night as the stress and the fear of not passing and the alternative ie. being on social welfare forever (as an income from one person with no qualification is not sustainable) is an even more terrifying thought… So with all of this, you guys that are commenting here are saying that it doesn’t mean what it says it does? Please be mindful of all the people your insulting when writing your ill thought out comments.. Or didn’t they educate about etiquette and common courtesy in these university’s??! Everyone who got an education is entitled to their reward of accomplishment no need to put anyone down for your own sense of superiority – WE ALL KNOW WHAT’S WHAT …although to you, we’re only mere mortals who are inadequately educated to understand such complex matters…. Grow up there’s a lot more to life than the name of the school you attended and tbh I wouldn’t want to work for ANYONE who had such a ridiculous view in regards to their recruitment strategy! Thank god the world is full of sensible people (that’s common sense btw, which can’t be bought!!)
How is this surprising? It does matter where you get your degree. It always has.
A degree from TCD, Oxbridge, Harvard, etc are valued more highly than from other colleges. This is because they are among the best universities in the world. It makes sense.
This is absolute rubbish. Elitism at its most pretentious and disgusting. A recent survey of American colleges proved that attending an Ivy League University has absolutely no impact on your grades or quality of life, you may get a job just because you went there but ultimately attending a top tier college will not produce a better student or even person for that matter. Inspirational professors are the key to good results and you can find those in any college at any level.
It patently is not rubbish. As this article proves. My point was that degrees from certain universities are REGARDED as being of higher value than from others. This is fact. Whether you agree with that or not.
The fact is some universities are seen as being better than others and, if you are a TCD graduate, your degree will be viewed as being more valuable than from any other Irish university.
Now, you may not like that but that is just the way it is.
Oh that’s funny, this ‘article’ proves absolutely nothing. I never denied the reality of some colleges being regarded as better than others, however that supposition is wholly erroneous, as these so-called elite colleges gained their reputations, largely, when they were the only colleges around.
Now, you may not like that but that is just the way it is.
That is incorrect. The world’s universities are routinely rated on their current status as an centre for further education, not on their past achievements.
Most of the CEOs of large multinationals didn’t go to ‘ivy league’ colleges and some of the top professionals in the world have standard education. Going to a top uni doesn’t in any way make you a better candidate to an IT student. I won’t be going to this web summit, not just because of this article but I’d say it would be boring listening to how rich jack Dorsey is.
A lot of IT companies actually do that. Much better way of gauging a potential employee’s ability to perform in the role than relying on a qualification from a certain university.
“Now that it’s illegal to discriminate in employment by race, ethnicity, gender, religion or sexual orientation, judging people by where and how much they went to school is just about the only acceptable form of prejudice left.”
The IT courses can be just as good as the University courses but what about the student. Generally speaking University courses have higher entry than IT courses. So the student (generally speaking) should be at a higher level. What goes in is what comes out…
Aiden O’Brien is the best trainer in the world but he won’t make a derby winner out of Piebald. We expect O’Brien to get the best so he produces the best…
So the question from an employer here is if you are this good why didn’t you go to University…
Why didn’t I got to Uni, well the IT was commutable from my parents house and that helped the decision. The IT was in my town, the IT was 180km round trip, I got free rent at home.
All that aside the content of the IT course was much more hands on than the Uni equivalent and smaller classes.
I worked with 2 people here that have degrees from NUIG, they are both out of there with degrees in their area, they both have 5 years more in the workforce than I do, but I am their boss…. so they are still the best???………..
Never been asked in any of the work that I have done if I have a degree, they check my CV, do a technical interview and a technical test and ring references.
“High quality applicants”, so you are not hight quality if you studied in any other college…. That’s brazen ignorance and insulting to most people in the country.
OK this is something I come across time and time again. I am a TCD grad and really proud of that fact because as anyone who’s been knows it can be seriously tough. I’m kind of tired of people here and elsewhere constantly bad mouthing TCD and doubting the degrees awarded there as nothing but hype. If I sat here, said I was a tcd grad, rhymed of random facts about the PROVEN excellence of TCD I’d be slaughtered. If I said it in comparison to various ITs, good God. Ultimately I’d be called a snob. The inverse snobbery I have encountered from some non-TCD grads has been ridiculous. TCD is the only place in Ireland you can go where if someone says your college is “not all that” you basically have to sit and smile because to argue is to then end up looking like a snob. So far from these comments I’ve gathered there are apparently 3 ITs in Ireland who are far superior to TCD. I would find this possibly but highly, HIGHLY unlikely. Having recently acheived an international academic scholarship I can attest forst hand how well regarded TCD is around the world and how rewarding and challenging I found studying there.
Ah, I new there’d be more red arrows than green. Now, substitute WIT or ITT everywhere you see TCD and see if I wouldn’t have got a plethora of Greens. Seemingly everyone on here who went to ITs are the good guys. It’s totally pathetic. Talk about an inferiority complex.
Yeah but if it’s true that research and academia drive economies and all around the world it is universities that carry that out and generate the most revenue from that (and MIT and CalTech are ITs only in name so don’t even go there) then I would be very concerned about the global perception of intel and would consider university discrimination patently anti-intellectual and very damaging. As far as I can tell here, Summit are essentially prioritising theory and the potential for idea generation over merely practical skills and I’m sorry, but if universities generate the most income from research as compared to ITs then surely it’s students too are much more adept at generating new information in addition to utilising the old. This can be demonstrated when a much greater number of university grads go on to PhDs by research, myself included.
I can see the point being made. The web today is made up more and more with people from different backgrounds, esp. with the rise in UX, analysts, and the study of human behaviour playing a large role. There are quite a few leaders in this industry who didn’t get anything close to a degree.
The blanket exclusion of IT’s can only be seen as an insult to non University Grads, and to the inclusive nature of the web. Or, like I said, as a way of promoting the event with a little bit of controversy (which is fine really).
The entire field of visual communication is based on research and idea generation, and not “mere practical skills”. By excluding IT’s you pretty much ignore that entire field. For example, who is supposed to fill the Junior Designer role? (granted this reads more like a production role than a design position)
Paddy’s idiotic point is based on the fact that TCD is 4 years versus 3 in NUI, XIT’s etc. What he unsurprisingly fails to realise is that whilst there are 3 year general degrees, there are also 4 year honours degrees of equal if not better standard than TCD, especially in the area of computer science.
Personally, I work in tech for a large multinational and hire talent predominately based on experience and downright intelligence rather than a qualification at 22 years of age.
This type of archaic infantile stupidity is a poor reflection on the Summits organisers and reflects badly on the international stage. If I had my way, Paddy would be fired! Arrogant idiot.
The 2 new Ministers went to UCD… It matters where you were educated; it’s naive to think an IT has the same status as a Uni with world ranking points. There’s a difference between a technical competency degree and a theoretical /academic degree that also includes technical competency.
I saw the word “Ministers” and that was enough, yes our ministers have done sooooo well running this country over the last 20 years, I would think hen educated in a hen house would have make a better job of it. Our minister for sport left school at 16, so tell me why he got the job?
Look. The Summit are creating *40* new jobs in Dublin. They can chose who they want to employ and if they feel that Trinity graduates are more educated than the likes of those from ITs, then so be it. It should also be noted that in Paddy’s interview on Newstalk he mentions that he would never hire anybody based solely on academic background. “They need to be creative, have initiative and be entrepreneurial. We have hired lots of people who don’t fit this criteria and also, after you have worked in the world for a year or two, I don’t care about your grades anymore. It’s about how you performed there.”
Congratulations and well done to Paddy and The Summit.
I’m not shocked that employers are choosey and elitist when it comes to choosing potential employees. But I am surprised at how shocked people are to find out how elitist Ireland is!…
Wake up folks, Ireland- like most of the rest of the world- is classist, elitist, unfair and corrupt!… and it’s been like that for a very long time…
Of course not, what is elitist is the hiring of people based on what college they attended, if you were given a job based solely on the fact that you attended NUI Maynooth your employer would be considered elitist, not you, though I’m sure you would not argue……. could you not figure that out by yourself?
Sorry Eanna but we’re not mates, but thank you for the compliment. I’m quite happy with my sarcasm too. I’m actually not from Ios but that’s not a bad suggestion.
Mate, dude, man, bud, comrade, acquaintance, buddy , friend, chum, pal, crony, randomer from the internet or homie. Many different ways of saying the same thing Achilles. Your proverbial heel is that you take everything literally no need to be an aspie about it.
TCD is 129th in The Times University Rankings. Not brill, admittedly, but higher placed than every other centre of higher education in the country. So yes, our degrees are better, our entry requirements are tougher, and our grading system is more rigorous. If you didn’t get in, you didn’t study hard enough.
There are plenty of software jobs to go around, no need to worry lads. Ireland has a graduate deficit in the IT industry. At the height of the bust, I found work in about two weeks. Everybody I graduated with who wanted work, found it. They’re crying out for good people elsewhere, who cares about the lousy summit?
Having worked in the IT industry for over 15 years, I cannot fathom this approach. University degrees are good indicators which allow employers to assess new personal entering workplace. After about 3-5 work experience their relevance drops dramatically and should be replaced by experience, expertise and suitability… To continue to filter on such is both lazy and in my opinion ignorant and can lead to business opportunities being lost (especially in the IT domain)
I’ve looked at the roles on offer here and apart for a few, none require what they are calling “High Quality Graduates” in fact a lot are looking for seasoned professionals…
Tbh – I would not be comfortable leaving my recruitment needs with this organisation as I could end up with “high Quality Graduates” without expertise in a role which they will not stay long due to pay scale and opportunity…
Paddy Cosgrave setup MiCandidate (BEBO for politcians….) and the web summit (Geek pissup…..) so he’s not exactly set the world on fire…..has he? If you want real genius the Collison bros or others are the real deal.
He’s no tech genius and this new company is essentialy an events management company for tech companies. Not exactly revolutionary is it? Can’t see it attracting anyone with such qualifications anyway.
Even better is that to run his events he’ll need the services of many people with no degrees whatsoever to work in Hotels, catering, security and setup.
So how many TCD heads does it take to change a lightbulb ?………… 1 to setup a website, 1 to host a bulb changing summit about it, 1 to do a phd on it and 1 to call the electrician…….
He may be right that grade inflation has occurred and I agree that some of the former RTC’s are awarding degrees that are not equal with may others. The term “degree” has been cheapened but I’m not sure how TCD is immune from the disease?
Interestingly up until 2003 all DIT engineering degrees were awarded by Trinity. It was good enough for them back then…….
So Paddy Cosgrave is the new self-appointed benchmarker for higher-education and third-level degrees. Well, what was FETAC for? You have demeaned many a fine university, institute and college as well as their many lecturers, many senior to you in your industry. Shame on you Paddy! Count us out of your summit. One finger points outward, but, three point inward. You’ve lost a lot of credibility and certain of your roles, responsibilities and appointments need to be questioned by relevant authorities with judgemental skills of more clarity, skill and impartial objectivity than your. You have been appointed to your level of incompetence. If you possess any self-dignity, admit your mistake with humility and resign your positions.
Have i missed something here? Everyone arguing about uni versus IT…
Having worked in the IT industry for over 15 years, I cannot fathom this approach. University degrees are good indicators which allow employers to assess new personal entering workplace. After about 3-5 work experience their relevance drops dramatically and should be replaced by experience, expertise and suitability… To continue to filter on such is both lazy and in my opinion ignorant and can lead to business opportunities being lost (especially in the IT domain)
I’ve looked at the roles on offer here and apart for a few, none require what they are calling “High Quality Graduates” in fact a lot are looking for seasoned professionals…
Tbh – I would not be comfortable leaving my recruitment needs with this organisation as I could end up with “high Quality Graduates” without expertise in a role which they will not stay long due to pay scale and opportunity…
What a pretentious toxxer, who would want to work for such a pretentious outfit ….the money must be great … Only reason anybody would decide to work with such pratts …..
Over half of low-income households made ‘risky’ financial changes due to cost-of-living crisis
6 mins ago
13
0
Tax Bands
Donohoe to seek Cabinet approval to amend Local Property Tax charging system
21 mins ago
517
0
mallow
Two women dead and two children injured following collision in Cork
Updated
22 hrs ago
58.3k
Your Cookies. Your Choice.
Cookies help provide our news service while also enabling the advertising needed to fund this work.
We categorise cookies as Necessary, Performance (used to analyse the site performance) and Targeting (used to target advertising which helps us keep this service free).
We and our 161 partners store and access personal data, like browsing data or unique identifiers, on your device. Selecting Accept All enables tracking technologies to support the purposes shown under we and our partners process data to provide. If trackers are disabled, some content and ads you see may not be as relevant to you. You can resurface this menu to change your choices or withdraw consent at any time by clicking the Cookie Preferences link on the bottom of the webpage .Your choices will have effect within our Website. For more details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
We and our vendors process data for the following purposes:
Use precise geolocation data. Actively scan device characteristics for identification. Store and/or access information on a device. Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development.
Cookies Preference Centre
We process your data to deliver content or advertisements and measure the delivery of such content or advertisements to extract insights about our website. We share this information with our partners on the basis of consent. You may exercise your right to consent, based on a specific purpose below or at a partner level in the link under each purpose. Some vendors may process your data based on their legitimate interests, which does not require your consent. You cannot object to tracking technologies placed to ensure security, prevent fraud, fix errors, or deliver and present advertising and content, and precise geolocation data and active scanning of device characteristics for identification may be used to support this purpose. This exception does not apply to targeted advertising. These choices will be signaled to our vendors participating in the Transparency and Consent Framework.
Manage Consent Preferences
Necessary Cookies
Always Active
These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work.
Targeting Cookies
These cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.
Functional Cookies
These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and personalisation. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we have added to our pages. If you do not allow these cookies then these services may not function properly.
Performance Cookies
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not be able to monitor our performance.
Store and/or access information on a device 110 partners can use this purpose
Cookies, device or similar online identifiers (e.g. login-based identifiers, randomly assigned identifiers, network based identifiers) together with other information (e.g. browser type and information, language, screen size, supported technologies etc.) can be stored or read on your device to recognise it each time it connects to an app or to a website, for one or several of the purposes presented here.
Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development 143 partners can use this purpose
Use limited data to select advertising 113 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times an ad is presented to you).
Create profiles for personalised advertising 83 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (such as forms you submit, content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (for example, information from your previous activity on this service and other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (that might include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present advertising that appears more relevant based on your possible interests by this and other entities.
Use profiles to select personalised advertising 83 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on your advertising profiles, which can reflect your activity on this service or other websites or apps (like the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects.
Create profiles to personalise content 39 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (for instance, forms you submit, non-advertising content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (such as your previous activity on this service or other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (which might for example include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present content that appears more relevant based on your possible interests, such as by adapting the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find content that matches your interests.
Use profiles to select personalised content 35 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on your content personalisation profiles, which can reflect your activity on this or other services (for instance, the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects. This can for example be used to adapt the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find (non-advertising) content that matches your interests.
Measure advertising performance 134 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which advertising is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine how well an advert has worked for you or other users and whether the goals of the advertising were reached. For instance, whether you saw an ad, whether you clicked on it, whether it led you to buy a product or visit a website, etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of advertising campaigns.
Measure content performance 61 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which content is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine whether the (non-advertising) content e.g. reached its intended audience and matched your interests. For instance, whether you read an article, watch a video, listen to a podcast or look at a product description, how long you spent on this service and the web pages you visit etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of (non-advertising) content that is shown to you.
Understand audiences through statistics or combinations of data from different sources 74 partners can use this purpose
Reports can be generated based on the combination of data sets (like user profiles, statistics, market research, analytics data) regarding your interactions and those of other users with advertising or (non-advertising) content to identify common characteristics (for instance, to determine which target audiences are more receptive to an ad campaign or to certain contents).
Develop and improve services 83 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service, such as your interaction with ads or content, can be very helpful to improve products and services and to build new products and services based on user interactions, the type of audience, etc. This specific purpose does not include the development or improvement of user profiles and identifiers.
Use limited data to select content 37 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type, or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times a video or an article is presented to you).
Use precise geolocation data 46 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, your precise location (within a radius of less than 500 metres) may be used in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Actively scan device characteristics for identification 27 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, certain characteristics specific to your device might be requested and used to distinguish it from other devices (such as the installed fonts or plugins, the resolution of your screen) in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Ensure security, prevent and detect fraud, and fix errors 92 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Your data can be used to monitor for and prevent unusual and possibly fraudulent activity (for example, regarding advertising, ad clicks by bots), and ensure systems and processes work properly and securely. It can also be used to correct any problems you, the publisher or the advertiser may encounter in the delivery of content and ads and in your interaction with them.
Deliver and present advertising and content 99 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Certain information (like an IP address or device capabilities) is used to ensure the technical compatibility of the content or advertising, and to facilitate the transmission of the content or ad to your device.
Match and combine data from other data sources 72 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Information about your activity on this service may be matched and combined with other information relating to you and originating from various sources (for instance your activity on a separate online service, your use of a loyalty card in-store, or your answers to a survey), in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Link different devices 53 partners can use this feature
Always Active
In support of the purposes explained in this notice, your device might be considered as likely linked to other devices that belong to you or your household (for instance because you are logged in to the same service on both your phone and your computer, or because you may use the same Internet connection on both devices).
Identify devices based on information transmitted automatically 88 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Your device might be distinguished from other devices based on information it automatically sends when accessing the Internet (for instance, the IP address of your Internet connection or the type of browser you are using) in support of the purposes exposed in this notice.
Save and communicate privacy choices 69 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
The choices you make regarding the purposes and entities listed in this notice are saved and made available to those entities in the form of digital signals (such as a string of characters). This is necessary in order to enable both this service and those entities to respect such choices.
have your say