Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Former CMO Tony Holohan Alamy Stock Photo

Tony Holohan critical of Government's 'meaningful Christmas' Covid lockdown lift in new memoir

Holohan defends the general policy of imposing lockdowns during the pandemic, saying that ICU capacity was not a decisive factor.

FORMER CHIEF MEDICAL Officer Tony Holohan has criticised the Government’s decision to reopen pubs and restaurants during the so-called “meaningful Christmas” of 2020, according to excerpts from his new book published by the Irish Independent

Holohan’s new memoir, We Need to Talk, details the already well-known tensions between the coalition Goverment and NPHET, the National Public Health Emergency Team, that existed at the time. 

The period between December 2020 and January 2021 is one focus of the then CMO’s criticism of Government policy, when the decision was made to open up pubs and restaurants despite NPHET advising against it.  

According to Holohan’s book, this likely led to preventable deaths. 

“There were more than 1,500 Covid deaths in January 2021. It was the single worst month for deaths over the entire course of the pandemic,” Holohan writes. 

“This was at a time when we knew how to control the spread of the virus, but we failed to do so as a country. Many of the people who died were probably not far away from the point at which they could have been offered the protection of vaccination.”

“I cannot say that all of the deaths in January 2021 could have been prevented. But I think we should have prevented a lot more of them.”

Holohan also has strong words for Leo Varadkar’s comments at the time that criticised NPHET members for making decisions that would not bring consequences on them personally. 

“That wasn’t true or fair,” writes Holohan, who points to his late wife’s last months in isolation as a consequence.  

“We lived in the real world. We were impacted. Our families were impacted, financially and emotionally. Emer was slowly dying and would be cut off from all her friends and family in her last few months of life.”

Holohan defends the general policy of imposing lockdowns during the pandemic, saying that ICU capacity was not a decisive factor when deciding on that approach. 

“We would still have done everything we could to prevent people ending up in ICU in the first place.”

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Close
145 Comments
This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic. Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy here before taking part.
Leave a Comment
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.

    Leave a commentcancel

     
    JournalTv
    News in 60 seconds