Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
RYAN TUBRIDY HAS described the day he was due to appear before two Oireachtas committees as “Christmas morning – flipped” in a new interview.
Speaking with fellow-broadcaster Doireann Garrihy – on her podcast ‘The Laughs of Your Life’ – Tubridy details that he too would have gone to watch the hearings if he weren’t the one being questioned.
“If I wasn’t me,” he said. “I’d probably be going, ‘The poor devil, the poor devil’.”
Tubridy added that he would’ve watched the entire seven-hour event with a “whole bag of cans”.
Tubridy is due to start a new show London-based radio station Virgin Radio UK in the new year.
Opening the programme, Garrihy says she has a number of things to ask Tubridy as “so much has happened” since the last time the two broadcasters spoke on the podcast.
Tubridy quickly quips: “Since 2019 or six months ago?”
While Tubridy didn’t directly address the scandal he did reference the day before and the morning he was due to appear in front of two Oireachtas committees with his agent.
In June, it was announced that RTÉ had overpaid Tubridy by over €345,000 and had falsely reported his earnings to the public since 2017.
Later, in August, it was confirmed that RTÉ had also underreported Tubridy’s earnings from his previous contract, by €120,000, between 2017 and 2019.
The report, conducted by Grant Thornton, found it is “very plausible” that Tubridy’s salary was publicly understated in order to allow for “revised earnings” to show a figure below €500,000 in each year.
Seeking answers to how public funds may have potentially been misappropriated, the Oireachtas’ Public Accounts Committee and the Joint-Committee for media called on Tubridy and Noel Kelly to appear before politicians to account for their actions.
Tubridy explains that the day before, he recieved a call from his mother who had asked if he wanted her to come with him to the Oireachtas hearings.
Tubridy said: “She rang me the day before and she said ‘Are you alright?’. I said ‘Yep, I’m great. I’m doing fine, of course, everything is fine.’.
“She said, ‘Now listen, do you want me to come into the Oireachtas with you?’.”
“I said ‘No, thanks a million, you’re grand.’ – Could you imagine Kildare Street?”
Tubridy described the morning of the hearing as “Christmas morning, flipped” before saying “something serious” about the day.
“I got a taxi in [...] I was driving along, in the back of the taxi, and we were coming along by Vincent’s Hospital and then the next stop on your left, along the Embassy belt, was St Michael’s College, the school.
“And there were bunches of flowers outside the gate, because two boys died in Ios, in Greece.”
“I looked at those, they were eighteen year old boys. And I thought to myself in the back of that car, having spend a few hours feeling sorry for myself, and I thought ‘My life is interrupted and those families lives destroyed. Now cop yourself on. You’re going in to tell the story, you’re going in to tell them everything you know and then you’re going home. Think about that’.”
Tubridy described the emotion as “humbling, in the extreme” and one that “really put manners on me”.
Both hearings became some of the most viewed Oireachtas hearings ever, with pubs streaming the questioning on large screens for public viewings.
Since, the public record of Tubridy’s earnings has been amended but the fallout within the public broadcaster has immensely highlighted mismanagement, poor finances and governance and later led to the public-funded station needing to receive a government bailout to keep afloat.
Last month, it was announced that the veteran broadcaster would be hosting a new show on Virgin Radio UK in London. It was also announced that the show would be simulcast live on Dublin-based radio station Q102.
Speaking on the show, which he is due to begin on 4 January, Tubridy said he is excited to start his new venture and detailed the initial talks between him and the station.
Tubridy says that fellow-presenter on Virgin Radio UK, Chris Evans, had invited him for a coffee. While in a taxi on route to the station, Tubridy says he heard Evans announce that he would be a guest on the show later that morning.
“I was like ‘What?’. I hadn’t been on the radio for ages. I was kind of like ‘Did he say I was coming on? He said this would be a cup of coffee.’ Because my confidence had been a bit shook,” he said.
After appearing on the programme, the manager of the station brought him into an office and began the process of asking Tubridy to appear on his own programme.
On living in London, he said: “I can’t tell you how joyful it is to sit on a Tube like a ghost. That’s what makes London so attractive.”
He added that while he will be living in London, he will miss Ireland.
“The country need a lot of guiding and a lot of minding. Things could get a little tricky and I hope Ireland continues to fall into the right hands.”
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
“AROUND 3,000 PEOPLE rallied in Glasgow today” that’s a pitiful size for a march, you’d need a protest about 20 times bigger than that to carry any weight.
All the Celtic fans were in Dublin.
Why don’t they just march for independence?
They had their chance and they blew it!
If you’re talking about the ScotNats, yes they blew it. The majority who voted NO are being ignored time and time again by Saint Nicola and her single-issue party.
Harry – you do seem fine however with Saint Nigel and his single issue party ;-)
Bottlers
It would not be in Ireland’s interest for there to be an Independent Scotland. With the removal of the UK from the EU, the one plus point is the transfer of some UK based business to other parts of the EU, including Dublin. The last thing we want is Glasgow and Edinburgh vying for that business too! An Independent Scotland would also compete with Ireland for future foreign direct investment. From a competitive perspective, a unified UK is the best option for Ireland.
Exactly right George. A weakened UK outside the single market is in Irelands best interest. Sounds harsh but let’s not fool ourselves – the Brits were happy to impose economic sanctions on us from the 1930′s to the 1950′s during the so called “economic war” with the UK so we need to look out for ourselves.
Fred – please highlight, copy and paste any post I’ve made either in this article or in any others where I’ve made even the remotest indication of support for Farage, Boris, UKIP, Brexit or English nationalism. In your own time.
It was lack if Scotts who came out and voted in EU ref which is why the No side one.
Jusr over 60% turned out, if it has been 75-85% they would still be in the EU. The same with NI under 59% turnout.
Was over 70% in England and Wales. It was 85% in Scot Ind ref in 2014
That’s a piss poor turn out !!
They should have put the polling booths in off licences and chippers.
When Scotland eventually do decide to go it alone, it will be on their terms. Westminster will have no more say in how things shall be done! They definitely won’t be making the mistakes that the Irish did
Well you have to consider the fact that some supporters of the SNP did not come out precisely because they wanted a ‘No’ vote to win in order to force a second referendum on independence. Indeed, there were some SNP supporters who admitted to supporting Brexit for this very reason.
A mistake to break away in the first place
@rodrigo detriano:
Yes. WE made mistakes….but we are in clear water now and doing better than Scotland or Wales..and most of England.
the Scots will reject it again because they like being controlled by their masters in London.
The Scots rejected it the last time because they saw straight through the Yes Campaign for what it was: hot air, snake oil and flag waving. It was like watching the Brexit team in tartan.
Well, as I remember, the English living in Scotland were allowed to vote in the independence referendum. Wonder what would the result be if English excluded?
@Jindrich Marz
Interestingly, there were English people in Scotland who were in favour of Scottish independence.
As I remember, the 800,000+ Scots living outside Scotland in the rest of the UK (and therefore more likely to have positive views of Unionism) were excluded from IndyRef. Wonder what the result would have been had they been allowed to vote…? See how that argument cuts both ways?
Harry, you’re getting a lot of red thumbs but I agree with your comments.
Most Scots voted “no” because the figures didn’t stack up. It was an economic decision.
And that was when the tax haul from oil revenues looked healthy. The North Sea is likely never to recover to it’s recent heights with an unprecedented downturn in exploration and production.
Couple this with the fact that previously, the voters were voting for separation within the EU. i.e free trade with England. Given the fact that this is now no longer the case, and Scotland do 65% of their trade with England, then independence is going to be costly.
At the time of the first referendum an indecent financial analysis by a respected body concluded that the best case scenario on the Scottish governments anticipations would result in a 9% increase in income tax and a VAT rate of 28%. It can only be assumed that these figures would be worse in the current circumstances.
A vote for independence would be to cut off your nose, despite your face in the most spectacular fashion.
A recent yougov poll says that the vast majority of Scottish people still don’t want independence.
Yes that is because they like being controlled by the masters in London.
@Just Some Guy
The Scots are not controlled by anyone. They have the same rights as the English, the Welsh and the people of Northern Ireland.
Scotland would last about a week on there own.
Especially with the price of Brent down by 50%.
“their own” even. Bloody scousers.
Coming from someone who can’t distinguish the difference between their and there, I think I’ll avoid taking economic predictions from you. Scotland would do just fine as an independent state.
Scotland has natural resources and politicians who care about issues rather than themselves and their high powered friends! A far better example of a country than the banana republican kip they call Ireland!!!!!!!!
Not with Clan Sturgeon at the helm. Nationalist parties as a rule can’t be trusted to piss without someone else holding their todger for them.
@james, I suspect the same was said about Ireland when we got independence from the UK
You lost guys, now grow up and get over it.
Clan Sturgeon will never get over it. Maybe in thus respect they ARE more European – hold a referendum again and again and again until they get the ‘right’ result. Mind you, once they do get the result they want watch how fast Nicola and co. will pull a Brexit and say “nothing to do with us, let someone else sort out the chaos”
I would bet my house that Northern Ireland uniting with an independent Scotland is more likely than a United Ireland in the next 50 years.
Bet it, so
I would because the Nationalists in the North would unite with the Scots far more readily than the Loyalists in the North would unite with us.
So basically…Scotland gets to unilaterally decide whether to break up the UK, but the rest of the UK isn’t allowed to take Scotland out of the EU. Gotta love Nationalist exceptionalism.
Harry – Brexit was the biggest expression of English nationalism ever. Are you ok with that particular nationalism, but not so much with other regions of the UK?
No Fred – I voted Remain. Unlike Kippers and SNP cultists I’m consistent in my distaste for nationalism.
OK they will vote for independence and get ruled by Germany sounds familiar
Stuart Kaufman’s Seven Rules of Nationalism: 1. If an area was ours for 500 years and yours for 50 years, it should belong to us – your are merely occupiers. 2. If an area was yours for 500 years and ours for 50 years, it should belong to us – borders must not be changed. 3. If an area belonged to us 500 years ago but never since then, it should belong to us – it is the Cradle of our Nation. 4. If a majority of our people live there, it must belong to us – they must enjoy the right of self-determination. 5. If a minority of our people live there, it must belong to us – they must be protected against your oppression. 6. All of the above rules apply to us but not to you. 7. Our dream of greatness is Historical Necessity, yours is Fascism.
It was not a Scottish Referendum. It was a Referendum of the United Kingdom.
Scotland has traditionally been more European in outlook than England and Wales. It is nit surprising that it voted in favour of Reamin but Scotland’s result has no legal standing.
It is not unlikely that the exit deal finally negotiated will mean that the UK will retain most p, if not all, of the current obligations but will have no say in future policy making and legislation. The U.K. will end up just having an inferior position in Europe unless the UK can collapse the E.U. , which is what many of the pro Brexit want.
I wouldn’t even say they’re ‘more European in outlook’. Most social attitudes surveys (rather than the misleading political allegiance surveys) indicate that Scots hold very similar views to their English and Welsh counterparts as far as issues like taxes, welfare and immigration are concerned. A load of SNP supporters simply backed Remain because their party backed it; Clan Sturgeon simply looked for any excuse to say ‘look, we’re different from those nasty Southerners’.
Interesting to see what happens……
The SNP are left of centre, not left wing
Our day will come!! (For the west Brits)!!!!!
have your say