Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
TURKISH POLICE HAVE detained more than 1,100 people, including journalists, since the arrest of President Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s main rival sparked the country’s worst unrest in years, a minister said today.
The demonstrations began in Istanbul after Ekrem Imamoglu’s arrest last week and have since spread to more than 55 of Turkey’s 81 provinces, sparking clashes with riot police and drawing international condemnation.
The popular 53-year-old has been widely seen as the only politician who could defeat Turkey’s longtime leader Erdogan at the ballot box.
In just four days he went from being the mayor of Istanbul – a post that launched Erdogan’s political rise decades earlier – to being arrested, interrogated, jailed and stripped of the mayorship as a result of a graft and terror probe.
Yesterday, he was overwhelmingly voted in as the main opposition CHP’s candidate for the 2028 presidential run, with some 15 million people casting their ballots in a show of support for Imamoglu.
Observers said it was the looming primary that triggered the move against Imamoglu, the main political rival of Erdogan who has dominated Turkey’s politics since 2003, first as prime minister and then as president.
His jailing drew sharp condemnation from Germany, which called it “totally unacceptable” as Greece said moves to undermine civil liberties “cannot be tolerated”.
A spokesperson for the Greek government said the “situation remains fluid and worrying”.
“As for Imamoglu, our position remains firm,” added the spokesperson.
“Concessions on the rule of law and political freedoms cannot be tolerated. And convincing answers are needed for any concessions.”
And the EU warned Ankara it needed to demonstrate “a clear commitment to democratic norms”.
“We want Turkey to remain anchored to Europe, but this requires a clear commitment to democratic norms and practices,” EU Commission spokesperson Guillaume Mercier told reporters.
Overnight, France’s foreign ministry said it was a “serious attack on democracy”.
Today, students at the main universities in Istanbul and Ankara called for a boycott of lectures.
Young protesters were also preparing to hold a rally at 2pm Irish time by Besiktas port on the Bosphorus, ahead of the main nightly rally outside City Hall at 5.30pm Irish time.
Sunday night’s gathering descended into fierce clashes with riot police kicking and beating people in Istanbul, AFP correspondents said.
Before dawn today, police detained 10 Turkish journalists at home, including an AFP photographer, “for covering the protests”, the MLSA rights group said.
Most of them were covering the mass demonstrations outside City Hall, it said, in a move denounced by Imamoglu’s wife.
“What is being done to members of the press and journalists is a matter of freedom. None of us can remain silent about this,” wrote Dilek Kaya Imamoglu on X.
Since Wednesday, police had detained more than 1,133 people for “illegal activities”, Interior Minister Ali Yerlikaya said on Monday.
Among them were two lawyers who were defending protesters detained by the police, the Bar Association in the western coastal city of Izmir said.
Imamoglu – who has denounced the judicial moves against him as a political “execution without trial” – sent a defiant message from jail via his lawyers.
“I wear a white shirt that you cannot stain. I have a strong arm that you cannot twist. I won’t budge an inch. I will win this war,” he said.
Throughout Sunday, millions voted in the CHP’s highly symbolic primary, which was opened to voters beyond the party’s 1.7 million members.
“Out of a total of 15 million votes, 13,211,000 are solidarity votes,” City Hall said, referring to the number of ballots cast by those who were not CHP members.
Faced with the massive protests, Turkey’s authorities sought to shut down more than 700 accounts on X, the online platform said yesterday.
Parental alienation, fathers rights and some form tax relief for unmarried fathers paying maintenance should also be enforced, still I don’t know how some parents can sleep at night not paying their share.
@Dean Burroughs: why should anyone get tax relief on paying maintenance?
@Louise Tracey: what’s your objection to tax relief on maintenance payments… That’s a strange one..
@Dean Burroughs: don’t think it’s strange at all. Parents who do support their kids and are still in the relationship (married or not) don’t get tax relief on their financial input. Why should ones who pay maintenance???
It’s that mother’s who don’t work get a tax credit for the child but don’t use it as they get paid off the social while the dad that pays maintenance doesn’t get to use the credit. If Ur a married couple u can claim your husband or wifes tax credits if they aren’t working so y can’t dad use the credit as Well
@Laura Crawford: He can use the credit. The credit can be signed over to him. The stipulations for this are on the revenue website.
@Alan Leahy: I know a girl whose holding her ex to ransom over the credit refusing to sign it over unless he pays more maintenance. She’s minding kids from her house cash in hand. She shouldn’t have a choice if she’s not working the credit should automatically transfer to the other parent
@Dean Burroughs: dean, can I get tax relief on the money I pay out for my kids or must I be separate first?
I think I read some time back how this works… The maintenance payment is split by the court into an allocation for the child and some for the parent (mother in the following example). So, if 75% of a monthly payment of 400 is allocated to the child then the father pays income tax on that 300, but not the remaining 25% which goes to the mother. That 100 is treated as income for the mother and is subject to normal income tax rules for her.
@Ana Nonymous: the maximum a court will give as maintenance is €400 per month. Ever try raring a child on €400 per month? That’s if you even get it. No one is interested in helping you if the father doesn’t pay. You live in a country where women are forced to give birth and then criticize them for trying to earn as much money to raise their kids!
A parent who literally abandons their child (children) should be held totally responsible by the state.
@TheBluffmaster2: in Germany unless the fathers name and pops number is stated on the birth cert a mother can not get children’s allowance from the state.
This allows the state to recoup the cost of raising the child from the father.
A simple thing to do can’t understand why we don’t do it here.
@Theunpopularpopulist: It’s a legal requirement to have the fathers name on the birth certificate here so we do it already.
@Catherine Sims: you can refuse here and you’re not penalised for doing so. Tie it to social welfare then they’ll list the name.
But what’s the penalty for parents that don’t pay? Where both parents are living, both should pay. No excuses.
@john Appleseed: but no one will implement it. I know someone who had a judgement for child support against a guy and he refused. She went back to court and he didn’t appear. A warrant was issued and even though she reported to the Guards when he was in his mothers to go and arrest him they said they were too busy. Eventually she went down to the station and insisted and they arrested him. He was sentenced to a month in Mountjoy and released after three hours due to overcrowding. He still hasn’t paid a penny.
@john Appleseed: +1
And what about parents who don’t pay for children under the age of 7 who chose not to work etc….
Is there anything for those in that category. Or is it just a case of there no real ramifications for not supporting your child?
Is there a penalty to stop one parent to not allow the other parent see their children too?
@gjpb: Yes, go to court and get an order for visitation. If the parent with custody breaks this order then bring them back to court. The penalty is a fine and/or prison.
@gjpb: of course there is.
@gjpb: it’s not fit for purpose. Anyone denying a child it’s father should have custody removed in my opinion
@Alan Leahy: It’s never enforced, the mother of my child broke court agreed access 100% and admitted it to the judge and laughed…..the judge did nothing.
There;s a growing industry in Ireland in keeping kids alienated from their parents.
I’m paying maintenance and I don’t see my children anybody who don’t see there children should not pay maintenance FF would want to look at the judge’s and the family court it’s a joke sending a father to jail because they don’t have the money to pay it father’s have no rights FF would want to look at the rights of father’s first before looking for money every mother and FATHER have a right to see there kids
@Fran O’Keeffe: how come you don’t see your kids? Why don’t you go back to court? It’s a child’s right to know BOTH their parents.
@Deborah ….the courts refuse to penalize mothers who break court ordered access, its a joke!
I’m paying maintenance and I don’t see my children FF would want to look at the judges and father’s rights first family court is a joke
@Fran O’Keeffe: Why don’t you see your children.
@Alan Leahy: It’s called parental alienation and it’s growing. There are no laws in this country that recognise it unlike the UK.
@Fran O’Keeffe: It isn’t the childs fault that parents split up, however it is right for the father to want to give that child a decent upbringing rather than just walk away.
@Alan Leahy: because my xwife told lies instead of bringing the children into court and asking them what they would like
@Fran O’Keeffe: Family court was always a joke, my granny and father looked after me and my sibling as they always did without any contact from my mother but she always had the child allowance book and kept that money for herself. Then when we were teens my mother then wanted visiting rights and she got them with a payment of 25 pounds a week to cover expenses from my father. She was the one earning more than my father and it was my father who looked after us without a single look or penny from her. All she wanted visiting rights for was to show us off to her friends to back up her lies as she was a bitter woman. The judges are eejits and they haven’t a clue about sly parents or how dysfunctional families behave…
@Fran O’Keeffe: sounds like a pile of poo to me, no judge is gonna deny a father seeing their kids (or vice verse) without genuine reason…. You need to keep talking here and explain… And yes you should explain as you brought it up.
@Alan Madden: Yes they will, they might make orders granting access and use scary words to try to get mothers to give access but they never enforce the rulings no jail or fines on mothers, its common knowledge fathers have no rights in Ireland.
Pay up or get out of the bed.
A Wedding to follow once a child turns 7 years, may be the norm…
Always laws to chase maintenance, but of course in Ireland they’d never dream of tackling Parental Alienation Syndrome ….they never enforce access arrangements.
Abusing children is worth too much money to them
And again it will be a mess when they get round to sorting it out as everything becomes a mess when these people try to fix anything?
God I wish Willy would shave off that moustache.
He reminds of someone. You know you’re man from Germany! I think he’s dead now though.
@gerry fallon: I thought it was a hairy Mary lol.
have your say