Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.
You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.
If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.
“PAPA RINGING.” THE words flash on Matilda’s* phone.
Inside their home built of hollow blocks, in between rice fields in a province just north of Manila – the capital of the Philippines, she calls her husband, Rene*, a fisherman turned carer in Ireland. They haven’t seen each other in five years.
“My sons and I are used to not seeing him. Because of video calls at least we feel he’s here, even though he is not.”
Rene hasn’t been home for several years, due to the exploitative working conditions he faced in Ireland which left him undocumented. His working permission elapsed once he “ran away from the boat”.
It wasn’t his first time working abroad. Rene has travelled across the Pacific Ocean working in different roles on boats since the 1990s. His experience in Ireland was very different.
“I was sleeping in the boat the whole time, even [though] my contract said that my employer should be providing a flat. They didn’t even give us an allowance for food. We had to eat leftover meat and fish on the boat.
“Sometimes, we’d even ask other boats for food, and our rest time was only when there were storms.”
“Parang nandyan, pero wala.” [Like being there, but not] - Matilda* chats to husband Rene* in her home Geela Garcia in the Philippines
Geela Garcia in the Philippines
Noteworthy interviewed a number of migrant fishers in Rene’s position; who left vessels due to working conditions they found exploitative. In some cases the vessel owners were subsequently ordered to pay thousands in monies owed.
Yet this process can take years with many finding themselves undocumented during it, often resorting to fighting in the courts to make their status legal once more.
Modern slavery – which includes human trafficking and forced labour – is the illegal exploitation of people for personal or commercial gain. The International Labour Organisation (ILO) states that “a string of recent reports indicate that forced labour and human trafficking in the fisheries sector are a severe problem”.
Over the past six months, Noteworthy teamed up with journalists in the Philippines and Ireland to investigate modern slavery in the Irish fishing industry, with a focus on Filipino workers – the biggest group of fishers from from outside the European Economic Area (EEA) in the sector.
By combing through almost 100 inspection reports and numerous other documents obtained through freedom of information (FOI) requests, press requests to government departments and agencies, as well as speaking to fishers, advocates and those working in the fishing industry, we can now reveal:
Proposed changes for government to improve conditions for migrant workers are excluding those who have become undocumented
WRC inspectors investigating vessels with non-EEA workers detected almost 400 contraventions of employment legislation since 2016, of which at least 60 occurred since 2021
Fishers working legally as part of the fishers working scheme for over four years were not able to obtain legal residence like their undocumented colleagues in this year’s regularisation scheme
Inspection reports reveal potential trafficking and deficiencies relating to hours of work and rest
This investigation was supported by Journalismfund.eu’s Modern Slavery Unveiled grant programme. Yesterday, we investigated trafficking in the fishing industry and reported how the Irish justice system is ‘failing’ migrant fishers who report exploitation.
—
Extract of migrant fisher's submission to AWS review (2022)
Extract of migrant fisher's submission to AWS review (2022)
‘The worst’ in Ireland
NGOs and migrant advocates told our investigative team that migrant fishers are becoming undocumented due to the conditions attached to a specific visa – the Atypical Working Scheme (AWS) for non-EEA crew in the Irish fishing fleet.
Bill Abom, deputy director of the Migrant Rights Centre Ireland (MRCI), said that employment permits are problematic but this scheme is “the worst version of the employment permit system” when it comes to people’s rights and the risk of exploitation.
This sentiment was echoed by every expert advocating for migrant fishers that Noteworthy spoke to across the NGO, trade union, academic and justice sectors.
At least 4% of non-EEA fishers in this controversial scheme have been formally recognised as victims of trafficking, with more fighting for unpaid wages through the Workplace Relations Commission (WRC) and Labour Court.
This Atypical Scheme was introduced following an investigation by The Guardian in 2015 which exposed how trafficked migrant workers were being abused in the Irish fishing industry. At the time, almost all non-Europeans working in the sector were undocumented, according to Michael O’Brien, fisheries campaign lead at the International Transport Workers’ Federation (ITF).
The scheme applies to specific fishing boats over 15 metres in length. This currently accounts for just over 170 vessels – 9% of the Irish fishing fleet, but may reduce to under 130 in the near future as many are poised to take part in the Brexit voluntary decommissioning scheme.
Of the 337 holders of valid AWS permissions at the end of last year, the majority (48%) were from the Philippines. Fishers from Ghana, Indonesia and Egypt are also commonly employed on Irish vessels.
In 2016, the scheme was to provide a legal framework for vessel owners to regularise undocumented workers and provide “a legal path to recruit new people thereafter,” O’Brien explained.
Yet, experts state it has now become a vehicle to exploit the same workers it was introduced to protect.
Problems due to ‘specific policies and laws’
MRCI’s Abom said “there is no doubt from our side – whether they [the government] will openly admit it or not – that clear mistakes were made in the design and implementation of the Atypical Working Scheme. And it created significant problems for fishers, many of whom became undocumented as a result.”
Five years ago – shortly after the commencement of the scheme – the MRCI published a report that was highly critical of the scheme following interviews with 30 migrant fishers. It found that over 80% were working more than 60 hours per week, with average hourly wages of just €2.82.
It is evident that little has changed in the subsequent years with similar findings reported in the Maynooth study last year – research funded by the ITF.
Lead researcher of this study Dr Clíodhna Murphy, associate professor of law in Maynooth University, said that “labour exploitation and poor working conditions are rife in the fishing industry”.
“Migrant workers are used and exploited within the fishing industry all over the world. This is a worldwide problem but the problems in Ireland can be traced to very specific policies and laws here.”
Extract of migrant fisher's submission to AWS review (2022)
Extract of migrant fisher's submission to AWS review (2022)
According to O’Brien the experience since the scheme’s introduction “has been a large element of non-compliance”.
For fishers “enrolled in the scheme and recruited in the subsequent years”, almost all that O’Brien has encountered were “not paid as per the requirement of their contract… or they are paid the absolute minimum”. This, he said, often results in “a significant underpayment” compared to hours worked.
Patrick Murphy, chief executive officer at Irish South and West Fish Producers Organisation (IS&WPO), which represents vessel owners, said that the government knew there was a problem with the Atypical Scheme for years and it was “causing chaos in the industry”.
“They [the government] have as much of a responsibility for anything going on with these fellas as anybody else because they knew it was a problem. The scheme was not fit for purpose and instead of fixing the scheme, they let it drag on.”
In regards to the alleged exploitation by vessel owners, he said: “In every single occupation, nobody’s perfect and there are other fellas mistreating fellas. We don’t stand by those people.
“If you treat these lads badly and they leave, you’re out of business. You can’t take your boat out without a full complement of crew.”
Advertisement
The Atypical Scheme was "causing chaos in the industry", according to Patrick Murphy of the IS&WFPO Maria Delaney
Maria Delaney
This scheme was set up to be different from the general working permit which can be issued for two years and then renewed for three years. In contrast, the AWS fisher permissions have to be renewed annually.
Crucially, after five years with a general working permit, workers can apply for a ‘Stamp 4’ visa. This is shortened to two years for those with a critical skills permit. Stamp 4s allow people to work or set up their own business without being tied to a specific employer. Holders can also apply for their families to join them here in Ireland.
Fishers with AWS permissions do not have this entitlement, though a number of cases are being brought to the High Court in the coming weeks contesting this.
It also has very specific stipulations that tie fishers to employers and set contracts, working hours and pay. Both NGOs and vessel owner representatives told Noteworthy these contracts have led to lower pay compared to other crew members who are generally paid with a share of the catch.
The ITF and MRCI are looking for fishers to have a similar permission to the critical skills permit, where they would get a two-year permission, followed by the opportunity to obtain a Stamp 4.
The IS&WPO want a three-year initial period, with a stipulation that if fishers want to leave their employer, the new vessel owner must compensate the previous employer for any costs incurred in recruitment or transport.
‘If you don’t like it, go the f*** home’
The fact that AWS permissions tie fishers to one employer is one of its major underlying problems according to MRCI’s Abom. Though there is an option to move, all of those involved in this sector have highlighted the difficulties involved in moving, with around 15% of fishers doing this since the scheme’s inception.
“You can’t challenge an employer when you’re tied to them and you have no other choice,” he said, adding that he’d be a rich man if he had a euro for every time a worker came back to him and said: “We complained but they [the employer] said – ‘If you don’t like it, go the f*** home’”.
Workplace Relations Commission (WRC) findings back up Abom’s assertion about these employers – over 75% of vessel owners who employ non-EEA workers have been issued with contravention notices since the scheme’s launch near the start of 2016. These included working without permission, issues with hours or work and rest and not providing wages due or leave entitlements.
Now, following pressure from the recent national and international reports, a review of the Atypical Scheme – completed in March but published last month – recommended that the scheme be replaced by a general working permit. It also calls for those currently availing of the scheme to be allowed apply for a Stamp 4 permission after two years or shorter.
Both the ITF and MRCI told Noteworthy that all current AWS permission holders should have immediate access to a Stamp 4 visa. “We’re not talking about huge numbers here,” Abom said.
Murphy of the IS&WPO said that “to solve this problem”, anybody here for over five years has “to be given a Stamp 4 straight away. No question. They’ve earned it.” He added that “anybody that is in the country that’s not working, or whatever, should be allowed to go home and sent home to their families”.
Following the review, the Department of Justice announced on their immigration website that the permission system for fishers would “close for new online applications” at the end of the year to “provide for the transition from the AWS system to the Employment Permit system”.
This news has been welcomed by migrant representatives and vessel owners alike though all advocates and representatives told Noteworthy it is crucial that the details of any changes are agreed with their involvement.
Problem solved? Not for Rene who has been left undocumented because of his treatment within the scheme. The cross-departmental review doesn’t make any recommendations in relation to undocumented workers. And he is not alone.
‘We couldn’t buy food’
Rene, who is in his 50s, worked long hours at sea, with little rest – sometimes at sea, sleeping for just one to two hours each night. Crucially for him and his family, he wasn’t paid for three months after he started his job.
“We had no salary. That is very hard. We didn’t even get any money to spend for us or to send back home. My wife was really angry about that.”
Matilda barely had enough money to feed her family because of what happened to Rene in Ireland Geela Garcia in the Philippines
Geela Garcia in the Philippines
Back in the Philippines, Matilda’s call is answered by Rene. He tells his family he is doing fine “taking care of an older lady”.
He says he is trying to get permission to be allowed to work but his papers haven’t been settled yet. Until then, he has been shifting from different jobs including a painter, dishwasher, gardener and construction worker, just to survive.
“There was a time we couldn’t buy food, we couldn’t buy rice because there was really nothing coming from him. We had a hard time eating three times a day,” Matilda said.
Both their sons, one in senior high school and one in his last year in college, had to stop studying for two years because of their situation. The eldest took a porter job which paid Php 250 (€4.20) per day.
“Sometimes he [Rene] would send us Php 1,700 (€29) to Php 3,000 (€51) a month just so we could survive,” Matilda recalled.
Their financial situation got so bad that at one point four moneylenders would come to their house “almost every day”. Matilda would tell them that she didn’t know when she would receive money from Rene.
His youngest son said: “I was so stressed because of what happened to my father, to the point that my hair was falling out. I had to accept that I will be delayed in my studies because there was no choice for me.”
Matilda shows the investigative team cash deposits made to the lending company Geela Garcia in the Philippines
Geela Garcia in the Philippines
Inequity in the system
“My experience of undocumented [fishers] is of people who got sick with serious illnesses, ended up in hospital and were abandoned by their employers,” Sr Jo McCarthy who set up the Cork Migrant Centre told Noteworthy. She is highly critical of the Atypical Scheme, calling it a “form of indentured slavery”.
She also told our team about the inequality experienced by fishers currently enrolled in the scheme or undocumented because of it. Two Egyptians she worked with – one undocumented and one employed through the AWS scheme for over five years – have had very different experiences.
The undocumented fisher “has applied and got his Stamp 4 because he was here for four years,” she explained. This was part of the scheme by the government earlier this year to regularise long-term undocumented workers.
Yet his colleague – who worked in Ireland for over five years with permissions under the AWS scheme – “has got a deportation order” because of a gap in his work permit. Like Rene, the review of the scheme does not help this fisher.
When Noteworthy asked the Department of Justice what it was doing to help fishers who became undocumented due to flaws in the AWS scheme, a spokesperson said:
Undocumented workers remain outside of the recommendations of this report. However, it is open to any person who is undocumented in the State to apply to the Minister to regularise their residence.
It is unclear how many undocumented fishers that previously had AWS fisher permissions are currently working on Irish vessels, but WRC inspection reports from 2021 and 2022 – obtained by the investigative team through FOI request – reveal that 40% of cases involved undocumented workers.
At least three of these 10 cases involved fishers who had an AWS permission which had expired, with four cases of alleged trafficking also found. One report stated: “During that inspection it became apparent that a fisher engaged on that vessel, a Ghanaian national… had no documentation on board and that his passport was being held by the leasing company.”
The WRC has “no function or responsibility in relation to the investigation and prosecution of human trafficking”, according to a spokesperson for the Department of Enterprise, Trade and Employment (DETE) that oversees the WRC.
These cases were referred by the WRC to the gardaí, according to the inspection reports. We reported yesterday that there have been no prosecutions by the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) to date in relation to trafficking in the fishing industry.
Just three of the 10 vessel owners were successfully prosecuted by the WRC for employing these undocumented fishers, with three unsuccessful prosecutions also reported. The prosecutions resulted in convictions for vessel owners and fines ranging from €1,000 to €3,000.
‘More persistence needed’
O’Brien from the ITF said that “the non-compliances with the WRC are not the full story”. He said that if a migrant worker raises issues, they risk not only losing their job but also their legal status “as he is left to try and find another vessel owner to hire him under the terms of the scheme”.
MRCI’s Abom said that “workers have to know that if they do make a complaint that there’s somewhere else for them to go to continue their income.” He added that “if they don’t have a pathway or they don’t know what they can do, they’re not going to speak up.”
Related Reads
The Explainer x Noteworthy: Are migrant fishers exploited in Ireland?
Navy boardings find 10 fishing vessels almost fully crewed by migrant fishers
Irish justice system 'failing' migrant fishing workers who report exploitation
A review of the WRC’s outreach and use of interpretation for the fisheries sector published in February 2022 stated that, out of 25 non-EEA fishers contacted by the WRC for interviews in November 2021, just two responses were received.
We obtained a similar finding in our analysis of 2021 and 2022 WRC inspection reports, as when inspectors attempted to follow-up with non-EEA fishers for a “confidential interview” or information, no response was received in at least two thirds of the cases.
In one case, when an AWS permission holder was interviewed during an unannounced inspection, he said that “he was not paid for all hours worked” and “did not receive holiday pay or public holiday entitlements”.
The report continued: “However, he requested that his name was not mentioned to the employer and did not want to raise any grievances or make any complaints.” The inspector gave his business card to the migrant fisher but wrote that none of the AWS permission holders were in contact.
O’Brien said that the inspectors “don’t routinely use interpreters during the course of the day” and that they “need to be a bit more persistent”.
Interpretation was mentioned in one of the reports we obtained when the inspector wrote that interpretation for an interview in April 2021 was provided by the worker’s friend.
When the ITF’s criticism of interpreter services was put to the Department of Enterprise, Trade and Employment (DETE), a spokesperson said that the WRC “does avail of interpretation services, where appropriate”.
“Interpretation, translation services and interactive technologies are available to the WRC and are deployed by inspectors as required. The WRC takes every reasonable step to contact employees for investigation purposes.”
The DETE spokesperson stated that measures and initiatives from their review earlier this year were currently being progressed.
On a related note, for the cross-departmental review of the AWS fishers, it stated: “Google translate was used to get a basis of understanding of the content of the foreign language submissions”.
Extracts from a number of these submissions are included throughout this article. These were obtained through an FOI request to the Department of Justice.
Extract of migrant fisher's submission to AWS review (2022)
Extract of migrant fisher's submission to AWS review (2022)
Working hours not logged
A large proportion of WRC cases we analysed were in relation to the granting of annual leave and public holiday entitlements, as well as unpaid wages, unlawful deductions and issues with payslips and statements of wages.
Just over €15,500 was paid to migrant fishers across nine WRC cases where money was owed.
These were among the almost 530 inspections of the 174 vessels in the scheme since its inception, according to a Department spokesperson. Since 2016, the WRC have “brought 22 prosecutions against fishing vessel owners,” they added.
Nathan*, who came to Ireland from the Philippines last year, experienced many of these issues before leaving his employer’s vessel in the past few months due to conditions he felt he could no longer endure.
On board he had “almost no sleep” which impacted his eyes, he said while pointing to a red mark near his iris. Crew members from Eastern Europe – whom, he said, were paid more than €5,000 per trip – were also “intimidating Filipinos”, he claimed.
In terms of his pay, his salary was “not even minimum wage”, he said, and that his working hours were not logged properly.
He had travelled to Ireland as his friends – who worked on different vessels – had a good experience on the Atypical Scheme, receiving bonuses. He thought this opportunity would enable him to finish building his house, which he said is still not finished.
He felt that fishers who are speaking up about these issues will hopefully improve conditions for other workers. Already, he has been told by friends that following a WRC inspection of their vessel their salary went from €450 to €500 per week.
Legislation blocking compensation
The WRC cannot recoup monies owed to fishers in relation to excessive hours worked or insufficient rest, including working through weekends and holidays. Instead, the only recourse is prosecution by the Marine Survey Office (MSI), which does not lead to any compensation for the migrant fishers.
There have been a number of WRC cases brought by AWS fishers in recent years, with thousands in compensation awarded. However, some of this has since been lost on appeal because of this issue.
In our final article of this series – out on Sunday – we examine cases brought by migrant workers against vessel owners and delve into the consequences of the lack of WRC jurisdiction over breaches in rest periods.
Rectifying this was part of a mediation agreement with the International Transport Workers’ Federation (ITF) in 2019, with Minister Damien English stating in a recent response to a parliamentary question that it “will be progressed as soon as is practicable in new legislation as part of a package we are working on”.
O’Brien said that “vessel owners – as employers – have to be held responsible for forcing them [migrant fishers] to work excessive hours and, consequently, having insufficient rest.”
Once fixed, this, alongside changes in the working permit, “may combine to force upward pressure to impose better conditions for fishers”, O’Brien explained.
‘No hours of rest records available’
Similar deficiencies to that found by the WRC were replicated in Marine Survey Office (MSO) unscheduled inspection reports from 2021 onwards – obtained by Noteworthy through an FOI request. These included vessels across the entire fishing fleet – not just vessels eligible to employ AWS holders.
A total of 45% of these inspections found deficiencies relating to hours of work or rest. One inspector of a vessel at Dingle, Co Kerry wrote: “The Master and 4x crew onboard cannot produce copies of records of rest / work.” Copies of the crew members’ work agreements could also not be produced.
Another vessel – with 27 deficiencies – had “no crew list on board” and “no hours of rest records available for any crew member”.
According to O’Brien, “the most serious responsibility” of the MSO on fishing vessels with non-EEA migrant labour “is the question of hours of work and hours of rest” – all the more, given these breaches can’t currently be brought to the WRC.
The 42 MSO inspection reports obtained by the investigation team detailed 350 deficiencies – ranging from one to 35 per report – but just four vessel inspections had “grounds for detention”. In the vast majority of cases, the master was “instructed to rectify” the deficiency “before departure” or “within 14 days”.
“The MSO has an effective enforcement regime and any deficiencies identified are given a corrective action and the owner and skippers of vessels are required to rectify deficiencies,” said a spokesperson for the Department of Transport – which oversees the MSO.
Undocumented fishers left struggling
“For an inherently hazardous sector”, O’Brien asked if a lack of public outcry given this volume of health and safety breaches, is because of the high intensity of migrants working in it. “Would it be tolerated in any other sector? We have to ask the question of ourselves as a society.”
Those left undocumented in Ireland by the current system told our team that though unions like SIPTU and the ITF were of help, they were often left struggling, with families badly impacted back home.
Mark*, a seafarer from the south of the Philippines, has been working in the sea since the mid-2000s. His father was also a fisherman and Mark travelled with him from a young age to help on the boat.
He told our team that he left the vessel after a number of months due improper wages for long working hours – of around 70-80 hours per week – which were often double the 39-hours in his contract. “European crews are paid better and get a share,” he explained.
Now undocumented, he is currently trying to obtain permission to be able to work legally in Ireland once more.
When we visited his family home, his wife Lucy* said that “sometimes what he sends is really not enough for us to survive, but what’s important is we’re able to buy rice at least… it’s still better than nothing”.
“His youngest daughter misses him so much. He left when she was just two – she’s now six… He’s been gone too long”, she said.
Sign up
The Journal Investigates is dedicated to lifting the lid on how Ireland works. Our newsletter gives you an inside look at how we do this. Sign up here...
You are now signed up
Mark has not seen his in person daughter (above) for a number of years Geela Garcia in the Philippines
Geela Garcia in the Philippines
Mark’s work on the boat in Ireland often began at midnight. “It’s a lot of work fishing for prawns, we get around 4 hours of sleep each day, but that’s only if there isn’t trouble with the nets,” he said.
In Maynooth’s study, a number of workers “described being asked to hide fish, in contravention of quota rules”. Mark and another migrant fisher who spoke to our investigative team described similar practices.
“There is even overfishing, we catch black sole but they hide it,” Mark said, and added that these fish were not added to the catch logbook.
“There are no jobs here, that’s why Mark went abroad,” his mother Cynthia* told our team. “We are always in touch with him. Every day he says that his life is hard, that he has to [move] from one job or another because his papers are not yet fixed.”
Nobody knows about Mark’s present situation. When neighbours ask why they borrow money, his family lies and says there was a delay in his pay.
Lucy, his wife added: “When he left, we were expecting that life would be easier, that he would be able to send his kids to school, but what happened was the opposite.
“At least we’re able to get by still. It’s just harder now because the kids are growing already, so that means the costs for raising them is higher as well.”
Cynthia, Mark’s mother, looks at a photo of her son at their home Geela Garcia in the Philippines
Geela Garcia in the Philippines
According to Dr Maruja Asis, Director of Research and Publications at the Scalabrini Migration Center in Manila, Filipino migrants leave the country for economic reasons.
“They want to improve their family’s lives, they dream for the welfare of the families. Of course, there are Filipinos who wish to see the world, but the biggest motivation is economic.”
Fr Paulo Prigol, Manila Port Chaplain of the international maritime charity Stella Maris said that migrant fishermen are a forgotten category of overseas workers in the Philippines. The sector has been very underreported and understudied.
Currently, there is a proposed Magna Carta for seafarers in the Senate, which hopes to advance their rights on the basis of the International Labour Organization’s Maritime Labour Convention (ILO-MLC) of 2006.
In addition, Fr Prigol said that “the government should craft a law specifically for migrant fishers, because usually when fishers are repatriated they just go home, and go abroad once another opportunity arises. But how best can we help them if fishers’ only choice is to leave home?” he said.
We asked the Department of Migrant Workers in the Philippines – who are “tasked to protect the rights and promote the welfare of overseas Filipino workers” – what it is doing to help people who are being exploited and prevent these practices, as well as a number of other questions. We did not receive a response in time for publication.
Workers in General Santos fishing port where a number of Filipino fishers travel from to work in Ireland Geela Garcia in the Philippines Geela Garcia in the Philippines
Geela Garcia in the Philippines Geela Garcia in the Philippines
‘Who is responsible?’
Back in Ireland, though change is afoot following the review of the scheme, both NGOs, unions and vessel owner representatives are hesitant to celebrate just yet.
This is not the first time that recommendations were made in regards to the Atypical Workers Scheme. In addition to the MRCI, Maynooth and US-Trafficking in Persons reports, the Joint Oireachtas Committee on Enterprise, Trade and Employment made 12 recommendations about the scheme in 2017.
One recommendation was that the scheme be amended to be linked to the worker only, and not specific to a vessel or owner – an issue with the current scheme that every advocate that we spoke to said leaves fishers at high risk of exploitation and forced labour.
It also recommended that “a single Minister/Government Department be given overall responsibility for the fishing industry”.
There are currently four departments – Justice; Enterprise, Trade and Employment; Agriculture, Food and the Marine as well as Transport involved. In addition, the navy, WRC and MSO undertake inspections, with other agencies including BIM and the Sea Fisheries Protection Authority involved.
This is key, according to Patrick Murphy of the IS&WPO who said there is currently “collective responsibility” which he said has been “frustrating” when trying to get answers from various departments. “Who is responsible? Who is the one where the buck stops?”
The AWS review group stated that it “understands that none of the recommendations of the Committee were acted upon at the time or subsequently”.
And that is the worry.
For MRCI’s Bill Abom, their “concern now and going forward is to try to fix the past”. He said “the best way to do that is to give workers immediate access to apply for a Stamp 4” – including both those who still have valid AWS permissions and fishers who are now undocumented.
Now, they’re ignoring the undocumented fishers completely – and there’s a good pool of them… so there needs to be a solution there.
That includes Rene, Nathan and Mark as well as the impact it is having on their parents, wives and children.
Being undocumented, Rene worries about whether he will ever get a break from work and afford to retire.
Currently, his work as a carer is stable enough to send his children back to school. Yet, he fears future instability. This concern was echoed by his eldest son when we visited their family home near Manila.
“If the person he’s caring for dies, then what would happen to us?”
Reporter Louise Lawless was also part of our cross-border team. The investigation was supported by Journalismfund.eu’s Modern Slavery Unveiled grant programme.
This was originally published by Noteworthy, the investigative unit of The Journal, now known as The Journal Investigates.
Investigations like this don’t happen without your support...
Impactful investigative reporting is powered by people like you. Over 5,000 readers have already supported our mission with a monthly or one-off payment. Join them here:
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
Close
12 Comments
This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic.
Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy
here
before taking part.
@Becky Blight: another make it up as they go Job in regards to regulations! Quick enough to set up checkpoints and annoy decent people, but not those oxygen thieves
@Becky Blight: maybe it was 10 gatherings of 10 people or simply 100 people who happen to be in the one place (being facetious). Unless a gathering has been specifically defined as a legal term, it will be hard to enforce. Like in restaurants. You can’t have a function, but you can book 6 separate tables of 6 which are adjacent to each other
@Shinners Abú: it’s like this the Garda,s hands are tied .If you appeal to some people to lower the tone and do the right thing and they tell you to F. O and it’s not actually law well what can you do
@Becky Blight: The 15 people limit is set in law in S.I 326 of 2020 if I remember correctly. However, this is an S.I taken by the minister for health under the Health Act of 2020, and it is not related to the Government’s Plan. Which itself is advice and therefore not enforceable. So bottom line is, 15 people is enforceable under S.I 326, not under the health plan. But as usual they’re spoofing and probably have no idea what they can or can’t enforce. Sure half the government couldn’t tell you what’s law and what isn’t.
@Ths Fer: Sorry everyone. My bad. S.I 352 of 2020 replaces S.I 326 and specifically sets out restrictions for Dublin. The Gards can in fact actually enforce restricting Dubliners from leaving Dublin and people from other counties from coming to Dublin (Par 13). This S.I expires on 10/10/2020. In this S.I if you read it, “relevant county” means Dublin and “relevant person” means Dubliner. Turns out it’s not just advice, it’s actual law or should be presumed to be unless reading the latest statutory instrument tells you otherwise.
@Becky Blight: it’s not a breach to attend. It’s a breach to organise an event which doesnt comply with the guidelines.That’s why the Gardai are looking for the organisers.
I wouldn’t be fond of the drink now but when I do go at it I do go at it very hard I do have 45 pints and then I will have a packet of crisps or a packet of peanuts and then I’d be half dead anyway so I’d absolutely engulf the toilet bowl with the full power of my bowls. Anyway the next days Maureen would have the fry on and I’d have 15 or 20 sausages, and then I’d go at the drink again. Thered be no shtopping me at all.
If a gathering like this is not considered a breach. Then we are all in deep trouble. The government punishes the compliant while letting the non compliant do as they please.
@Karl: I couldn’t visit my ill mother in hospital. My wife’s gran passed we hadn’t seen her in person in months. Not all punishment involves garda. These all relate to numbers climbing because of this sort of fu behaviour.
And what about the 50+ group of teenagers in blackrock having fun pushing each over and group hugs with not a mask or garda in sight today? or the packed canals i drove past from work filled of people having drinks and a picnic? It’s not like everyone in the city knows they are there, well apart from every Guard it seems. So checkpoints on the roads. Hands up who has seen people partying and drinking in the middle of the roads all day?
This is why Dublin has been moved to level 3. It is unfortunate that these people are selfish and lack intelligence. They don’t care if they get the virus. They don’t care if they pass the virus on. They have no compassion, no empathy, and not a brain cell among them. They need to be locked up for their own safety, but more importantly for the safety of others. So why did the Gardai disperse them to further spread the virus instead of locking them up for fourteen days?
Local Shinner TD ‘Snotty’ when asked on Morning Ireland about personal responsibility of those attending the ‘large gathering’ he ignored the question and took off on a rant blaming the Guards. He is going to see the Commissioner, GSOC et al. about it. No point in laying any of the blame on your constituency voters. Shinners have history when it comes to blaming the Guards.
@Mary Cahill: Why dont you actually have a pop at the current government parties for not legislating properly in order to allow police to do their jobs? Doesnt suit your agenda. The current “guidelines” are a mess but let’s blame the opposition for this.
@Gerard Smith:
You are right. We don’t know whether these are restrictions, advice or legal requirements. That goes without saying. However I was commenting on a Sinn Fein TD who refused to agree that it was the personal responsibility of everyone, whatever the age, to behave so as not to endanger anybody else. Instead the Shinner went for the populist option and carried on a rant against the garda. The Garda may have a case to answer but Snodig was not interested in the facts just votes.
@Ross: they’d never be able to pay then they’d end up in court and give a sob story broken home drug & alcohol abuse get community service fail to show end up in court again get sentenced to 3 months turn up at mount joy sign a form get a meal and bus money home or taxi. About the best thing to happen these people who had the party is they get Covid and suffer badly but survive then become advocates of lockdown and spread the message not the virus
@Ross: Totally agree. In other countries people who break the rules must be fined. It’s when people’s pockets are hit the rule breakers might see sense. We need to make a law first and warn the public that there will be fines for those who break the restrictions. The UK have now imposed fines. Other counties in Europe have done the same. Why is Ireland not doing the same!!
I’m sick of seeing that phrase “only oxygen thieves” thrown in. It implies that anyone you personally can’t get on with, who dresses too casually, deserves to die – especially if they have no money. I thought we were a republic, not a monarchy at the whim of an autocrat. Apparently we’re all paying customers now or dead men.
Should have arrested every single one of the little runts, make them spend the rest of the pandemic behind bars for their complete and utter selfishness
@Adam J: As a society we should appreciate young adults who help generate herd immunity by living normal lives and keeping society afloat. Thank you, thank you, thank you. When people throw misguided complaints at you, falsely claiming that you are endangering others, remember that the opposite is true.
@Gary Kearney: okay. It’s an alternative opinion. I’m not sure how the Irish approach is going to work all winter into the future like this. So when i see other opinions i would like to think NPHET would consider them. Herd immunity is not what is needed but immunity in general population that stops the virus surging again, this is what Sweden appears to have.
For all the “my rights” keyboard warriors, this reckless behaviour is the reason we need to legislate to make breaching the regulations a prosecutable offence. It’s so easy to complain that “your rights” are paramount but unfortunately too many forget that their responsibilities are the flip side of their rights.
As the landlord, what will the council do? As the council starts buying its way into more and more private housing developments around the city, people are watching, warily.
“No breaches of regulations detected”..,,, what an absolute joke. A 100 people squeezed into a small outdoor football pitch. If regulations weren’t been breached then why were they asked to disperse.
There were NO police at this gig. They’re too afraid to go into the flats – absolute drivel that the Gardai responded to this! This went on until 5am and it happens every weekend.
Probably un-PC to call this lot what we all know they are. From birth they contribute nothing positive to society and blame everyone else for their situation. When it comes to a pandemic they raise their ugly heads again and make a bad situation worse.
@Owen:
I am amazed that off licences were not closed when pubs were closed as well as the licensed sections of supermarkets. It would cut down on the availablity of alcohol and restrict house parties.
Ah yes The “Up De Flats” lot showing true colours as always. Law onto themselves. Irony being in this very complex they’ve Irish flags “thanking” The HSE frontline workers everywhere. Hypocrites, most of them anyway.
Once again our boys in blue leave it late in catching someone deliberately breaking the law, if they reacted when it was happening they wouldn’t have to try and find them.
The government, if they were any use, should declare a state of emergency and use the army in a support role. Perhaps if they tackle gangs who care for no one other than themselves with water cannon or tear gas they wouldn’t be so quick to go to these so called parties. There is absolutely no point in ministers wringing their hands and appealing to these baboons to behave responsibly. They don’t know what responsible behaviour is.
@Barry Delaney: Putting the army on the streets would mean the civil power have failed, they haven’t. Putting troops on the streets is a dangerous option, look at the North, when Jim Callaghan put the British army on the streets it was to protect the catholic population and looked what happened afterwards.
@Kevin50: OK Kevin, let’s not bother with that idea. The Gardai can continue driving around the area and doing nothing until there are thousands of cases a day and the health service is totally overwhelmed with the elderly population being wiped out but that wouldn’t be an emergency would it?
That’s why these people have these sort of gatherings cos they know there is no consequences for them. The government are are joke. Bring in fines to anyone that attends and jail the people who organise. That will soften their cough.
Only just read the article now and it would seem that it was a high profile drug party and guards arrived 5 hour after being called. Well done lads, you make us proud! Keep focused on your silly checkpoints where you have no powers rather than putting in some effort where required. Avoid real policing at all costs, a shambles like the Govt and NPHET. With these making and implementing the guidelines what can possibly go wrong!!!!!!
@Liam Crowe: Good luck getting cash out of them. Sure after buying lotto tickets, ciggies and drink there’s no cash left to pay fines.I feel sorry for the non partying residents that have to put up with that. There is probably non stop fireworks too.
Surely no where in the constitution it states no more than 15 people outside together. So this rule is only a recommendation. It would be scary if the powers that be can rush in such “laws”
Remember VAT & universal social tax were meant to be temporary. I’m not condoning 100 people party but aware of rushed in draconian laws with not an eye lid batted by the public.
Under what law are the guards allowed to move people on or arrest?
@delmatey: Do some people have amnesia or something? I keep seeing this argument posted as some kind of defence for the Oliver Bond party, implying that the criticism is classism… But if you cast your mind back a few weeks ago to the golfgate scandal, you will remember that the whole country was fuming about it, even more so than about this..so much so in fact that we sacrificed having the trade portfolio in Europe to hold people to account.. I feel huge sympathy for the decent people in the Oliver Bond flats who have to live amongst the toe rags who organised this party but those that organised this party and attended fully deserve to be slated! Even if there wasn’t a pandemic, the mess alone that they left behind them was selfish and disgusting!
Covid aside is this event not illegal? Noise pollution? Drug use? Health and safety concerns? Private property? Unaccompanied Minors? Drinking in a public place? Surely cannot just have a large event like this unless have some kind of licence to do so besides the drugs?
The cops are responsible for enforcing public order.
According to the law.
The messers in Kildare St. need to give them the legal mandate to deal with feral youths.
No quarter for social ignorami, the responsible citizens health depends on it.
Now.
As a society we should appreciate young adults who help generate herd immunity by living normal lives and keeping society afloat. Thank you, thank you, thank you. When people throw misguided complaints at you, falsely claiming that you are endangering others, remember that the opposite is true.
@Rory Mac Daibhéid: so while we are waiting for all the young people to become immune how many older people will die. Nice of you to think of yourself.
With flu pandemics, herd immunity is usually attained after two to three epidemic waves, each interrupted by the typical seasonality of influenza virus and more rarely by interventions, with the help of cross-protection through immunity to previously encountered influenza viruses, and vaccines when available10. For COVID-19, which has an estimated infection fatality ratio of 0.3–1.3%1,5, the cost of reaching herd immunity through natural infection would be very high, especially in the absence of improved patient management and without optimal shielding of individuals at risk of severe complications.
@paul mccoy: it’s called an opinion from an Professor from Harvard.
I can’t predict the future and neither can you so not sure why you think I would be happy for people to die.
The Article is very clear it that less people would die. Maybe try read it first. It’s not my expert advice and it’s clearly not considered by NPHET and maybe , just maybe you might like to think they’ve considered it!?
@Rory Mac Daibhéid: Herd immunity has been debunked many times as you have a chance of getting reinfected, and on top of that you can spread it recklessly to your nearest and dearest without realising. Just don’t do it.
@Paul Cunningham: debunked how, we don’t know or can’t predict the next few months. I would not be reckless so need to suggest that . I kind of think young people picking up the virus at this time of year could be a good things, its a theory. Also it’s not my decision to approve government policy. I would like to think that NPHET might consider we need to follow the immunity for general population, not herd immunity , model to stop surges. This is believe is the Swedish approach. So i don’t think its reckless. It also suggests its safer for vunerable people to do this. Anders Tegnell would explain better.
Man arrested after €1.8 million worth of cannabis seized in Co Louth
20 mins ago
613
Oireachtas Committee
‘No need’ to call Camogie Association before sporting committee over skorts (yet) says Kelly
28 mins ago
1.4k
8
Road Safety
CCTV from petrol station captured clear images of crash that killed Garda Kevin Flatley
Updated
8 hrs ago
105k
Your Cookies. Your Choice.
Cookies help provide our news service while also enabling the advertising needed to fund this work.
We categorise cookies as Necessary, Performance (used to analyse the site performance) and Targeting (used to target advertising which helps us keep this service free).
We and our 187 partners store and access personal data, like browsing data or unique identifiers, on your device. Selecting Accept All enables tracking technologies to support the purposes shown under we and our partners process data to provide. If trackers are disabled, some content and ads you see may not be as relevant to you. You can resurface this menu to change your choices or withdraw consent at any time by clicking the Cookie Preferences link on the bottom of the webpage .Your choices will have effect within our Website. For more details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
We and our vendors process data for the following purposes:
Use precise geolocation data. Actively scan device characteristics for identification. Store and/or access information on a device. Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development.
Cookies Preference Centre
We process your data to deliver content or advertisements and measure the delivery of such content or advertisements to extract insights about our website. We share this information with our partners on the basis of consent. You may exercise your right to consent, based on a specific purpose below or at a partner level in the link under each purpose. Some vendors may process your data based on their legitimate interests, which does not require your consent. You cannot object to tracking technologies placed to ensure security, prevent fraud, fix errors, or deliver and present advertising and content, and precise geolocation data and active scanning of device characteristics for identification may be used to support this purpose. This exception does not apply to targeted advertising. These choices will be signaled to our vendors participating in the Transparency and Consent Framework.
Manage Consent Preferences
Necessary Cookies
Always Active
These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work.
Targeting Cookies
These cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.
Functional Cookies
These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and personalisation. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we have added to our pages. If you do not allow these cookies then these services may not function properly.
Performance Cookies
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not be able to monitor our performance.
Store and/or access information on a device 126 partners can use this purpose
Cookies, device or similar online identifiers (e.g. login-based identifiers, randomly assigned identifiers, network based identifiers) together with other information (e.g. browser type and information, language, screen size, supported technologies etc.) can be stored or read on your device to recognise it each time it connects to an app or to a website, for one or several of the purposes presented here.
Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development 165 partners can use this purpose
Use limited data to select advertising 129 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times an ad is presented to you).
Create profiles for personalised advertising 91 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (such as forms you submit, content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (for example, information from your previous activity on this service and other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (that might include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present advertising that appears more relevant based on your possible interests by this and other entities.
Use profiles to select personalised advertising 92 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on your advertising profiles, which can reflect your activity on this service or other websites or apps (like the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects.
Create profiles to personalise content 44 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (for instance, forms you submit, non-advertising content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (such as your previous activity on this service or other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (which might for example include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present content that appears more relevant based on your possible interests, such as by adapting the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find content that matches your interests.
Use profiles to select personalised content 41 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on your content personalisation profiles, which can reflect your activity on this or other services (for instance, the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects. This can for example be used to adapt the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find (non-advertising) content that matches your interests.
Measure advertising performance 150 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which advertising is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine how well an advert has worked for you or other users and whether the goals of the advertising were reached. For instance, whether you saw an ad, whether you clicked on it, whether it led you to buy a product or visit a website, etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of advertising campaigns.
Measure content performance 69 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which content is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine whether the (non-advertising) content e.g. reached its intended audience and matched your interests. For instance, whether you read an article, watch a video, listen to a podcast or look at a product description, how long you spent on this service and the web pages you visit etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of (non-advertising) content that is shown to you.
Understand audiences through statistics or combinations of data from different sources 88 partners can use this purpose
Reports can be generated based on the combination of data sets (like user profiles, statistics, market research, analytics data) regarding your interactions and those of other users with advertising or (non-advertising) content to identify common characteristics (for instance, to determine which target audiences are more receptive to an ad campaign or to certain contents).
Develop and improve services 95 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service, such as your interaction with ads or content, can be very helpful to improve products and services and to build new products and services based on user interactions, the type of audience, etc. This specific purpose does not include the development or improvement of user profiles and identifiers.
Use limited data to select content 40 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type, or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times a video or an article is presented to you).
Use precise geolocation data 56 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, your precise location (within a radius of less than 500 metres) may be used in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Actively scan device characteristics for identification 29 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, certain characteristics specific to your device might be requested and used to distinguish it from other devices (such as the installed fonts or plugins, the resolution of your screen) in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Ensure security, prevent and detect fraud, and fix errors 107 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Your data can be used to monitor for and prevent unusual and possibly fraudulent activity (for example, regarding advertising, ad clicks by bots), and ensure systems and processes work properly and securely. It can also be used to correct any problems you, the publisher or the advertiser may encounter in the delivery of content and ads and in your interaction with them.
Deliver and present advertising and content 111 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Certain information (like an IP address or device capabilities) is used to ensure the technical compatibility of the content or advertising, and to facilitate the transmission of the content or ad to your device.
Match and combine data from other data sources 79 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Information about your activity on this service may be matched and combined with other information relating to you and originating from various sources (for instance your activity on a separate online service, your use of a loyalty card in-store, or your answers to a survey), in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Link different devices 60 partners can use this feature
Always Active
In support of the purposes explained in this notice, your device might be considered as likely linked to other devices that belong to you or your household (for instance because you are logged in to the same service on both your phone and your computer, or because you may use the same Internet connection on both devices).
Identify devices based on information transmitted automatically 100 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Your device might be distinguished from other devices based on information it automatically sends when accessing the Internet (for instance, the IP address of your Internet connection or the type of browser you are using) in support of the purposes exposed in this notice.
Save and communicate privacy choices 83 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
The choices you make regarding the purposes and entities listed in this notice are saved and made available to those entities in the form of digital signals (such as a string of characters). This is necessary in order to enable both this service and those entities to respect such choices.
have your say