Skip to content
Support Us

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

The song has topped Billboard’s Hot 100 chart for the past six years in a row Alamy Stock Photo

US judge rules Mariah Carey didn’t steal All I Want For Christmas from other songwriters

Carey’s Christmas colossus has become an even bigger hit in recent years than it was in the 1990s.

A US FEDERAL judge has ruled that Mariah Carey did not steal her perennial seasonal hit All I Want for Christmas Is You from other songwriters.

Judge Monica Ramirez Almadani, sitting in in Los Angeles, granted Carey’s request for summary judgment, giving her and co-writer and co-defendant Walter Afanasieff a victory without going to trial.

In 2023, Andy Stone – who goes by the stage name Vince Vance – and Troy Powers filed the $20m (€18.5m) lawsuit alleging that Carey’s 1994 song, which has become a Christmas standard and annual streaming sensation, infringed the copyright of their country 1989 song with the same title.

Their lawyer Gerard P Fox said he was “disappointed” by the ruling.

He said judges at this level “nearly always now dismiss a music copyright case and… one must appeal to reverse and get the case to the jury”.

Fox added: “My client will make a decision shortly on whether to appeal. We filed based on the opinions of two esteemed musicologists who teach at great colleges.”

Stone and Powers’ suit said their song “contains a unique linguistic structure where a person, disillusioned with expensive gifts and seasonal comforts, wants to be with their loved one, and accordingly writes a letter to Santa Claus”.

They said there was an “overwhelming likelihood” that Carey and Afanasieff had heard their song – which at one point reached No 31 on Billboard’s Hot Country chart – and infringed their copyright by taking significant elements from it.

After hearing from two experts for each side, Judge Ramirez Almadani agreed with those from the defence, who said the writers employed common Christmas cliches that existed before both songs, and that Carey’s song used them differently.

She said the plaintiffs had not met the burden of showing the songs are substantially similar.

The judge also ordered sanctions against the plaintiffs and their lawyers, saying their suit and subsequent filings were frivolous and that the lawyers “made no reasonable effort to ensure that the factual contentions asserted have evidentiary support”.

She said they must pay at least part of the defendants’ legal fees.

Carey’s Christmas colossus has become an even bigger hit in recent years than it was in the 1990s.

It has topped Billboard’s Hot 100 chart for the past six years in a row by airplay, sales and streaming.

Carey and Afanasieff have had their own public disagreement – though not one that has gone to court – over who wrote how much of the song, but the case made them at least temporary allies.

Close
11 Comments
This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic. Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy here before taking part.
Leave a Comment
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Maurice F Glennon
    Favourite Maurice F Glennon
    Report
    Fri 10:14 AM

    Listened to it just there. It’s a completely different song. The only similarity was the song title. They really were chancing their arm.

    22
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Dogg
    Favourite Dogg
    Report
    Sat 8:45 AM

    @Maurice F Glennon: No foal, No fee

    1
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Con Cussed
    Favourite Con Cussed
    Report
    Fri 9:39 AM

    Apart from the crazies on here it looks like there is good reason to throw it out, after all the party taking the case, “said their song “contains a unique linguistic structure where a person, disillusioned with expensive gifts and seasonal comforts, wants to be with their loved one, and accordingly writes a letter to Santa Claus”

    That’s very general and not very specific. How would other Christmas chimes, such as ‘Last Christmas, I gave you my heart,’ stand up to that criterion?

    14
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute The Rossie
    Favourite The Rossie
    Report
    Fri 10:48 AM

    The Chewbacca Defense was never used . That does not make sense .

    9
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Luas Vuitton - Penneys Drag Queen
    Favourite Luas Vuitton - Penneys Drag Queen
    Report
    Fri 9:27 AM

    Incel flamers up early this AM. Have the run of Mammy’s underwear while she is out at Mass. TGIF.

    15
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Kevin O'Brien
    Favourite Kevin O'Brien
    Report
    Fri 11:45 AM

    I think it should never be played again, just to keep them all happy but especially me.

    7
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Padraig O'Brien
    Favourite Padraig O'Brien
    Report
    Fri 12:08 PM

    Good galloping galaxies, is this what passes for news. Crap song and crap singer sued by crappier singer/songwriter looking for a pay day.

    6
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Fergus O'Donnell
    Favourite Fergus O'Donnell
    Report
    Fri 10:38 AM

    Had a listen. Chorus is vaguely similar.

    2
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Me Me
    Favourite Me Me
    Report
    Fri 11:53 AM

    @Fergus O’Donnell: They both mention Christmas?

    4
Submit a report
Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
Thank you for the feedback
Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.

Leave a comment

 
cancel reply
JournalTv
News in 60 seconds