Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

File photo of a US Predator drone. AP Photo/Eric Gay/PA

Use of drones 'ethical' and 'wise' says White House adviser

Counter-terrorism chief John Brennan defended US drone attacks.

THE CHIEF COUNTER-TERRORISM adviser to the White House has defended US use of drone aircraft, saying that they are used to target terrorists and are “ethical” and “wise”.

“Yes, in full accordance with the law—and in order to prevent terrorist attacks on the United States and to save American lives—the United States Government conducts targeted strikes against specific al-Qaida terrorists, sometimes using remotely piloted aircraft, often referred to publicly as drones,” John Brennan said yesterday.

The White House adviser said that “as a matter of international law”, the US is engaged in armed conflict with the Taliban, al-Qaida and “associated forces” in response to the 9/11 attacks of 2001.

“There is nothing in international law that bans the use of remotely piloted aircraft for this purpose or that prohibits us from using lethal force against our enemies outside of an active battlefield, at least when the country involved consents or is unable or unwilling to take action against the threat,” he added.

He said that the unmanned strikes were wise because they reduce the danger to US personnel and can fly over treacherous terrain. Brennan denied there was “anything casual” about the deployment of drone strikes and acknowledged that the weapons had accidentally killed civilians.

Brennan’s remarks in Washington yesterday were the first time a member of Obama’s administration has described the use of drones in detail and so openly. He said the president had “instructed us to be more open with the American people about these efforts”.

US relations with its ally Pakistan have soured over the use of drones in missile attacks on locations in Pakistan. Relations between the two were also strained by the raid on bin Laden’s Abbottabad compound.

Pakistani human rights lawyer and director of the Foundation for Fundamental Rights has told Pakistani media that he believes US drone attacks have killed more than 2,800 civilians over the past seven years.

Brennan’s speech at the Woodrow Wilson Center yesterday was interrupted by a protester who said she was “speaking out on behalf of the victims” of drone strikes in Pakistan, Yemen and Somalia. She was removed from the premises while calling on Brennan to apologise for the deaths:

(Video uploaded by HuffPostPolitics)

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Close
15 Comments
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Too Trueleft
    Favourite Too Trueleft
    Report
    May 1st 2012, 11:32 AM

    Must be comforting to the families of the innocent men, women and children killed by US drones that it was a wise and ethical bomb that was dropped on their loved ones.

    Sick

    27
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Rob
    Favourite Rob
    Report
    May 1st 2012, 1:20 PM

    as opposed to the innocent men woman and children killed by manned aircraft strikes??

    8
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Cranky Yank
    Favourite Cranky Yank
    Report
    May 1st 2012, 11:01 PM

    @trueleft: your comment lacks depth and clarity of thought. Yes it’s terrible that civilians are casualties…But the bad guys locate themselves amongst civilians and deliberately put them at risk. Yet you pound the U.S.

    4
    See 1 more reply ▾
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Kitalpha
    Favourite Kitalpha
    Report
    May 2nd 2012, 7:25 AM

    Ah yes, ethical and wise.

    http://www.uruknet.info/?p=m87698&fb=1

    @Cranky Yank If that happened in the western world they would be absolute outcry, innocent civilians killed. Will you listen to yourself? The bad guys, oh ffs, they dont see themselves as the bad guys do they???? The US Army are reknowned for attacking civilian areas with no proof of the ‘bad guys’. If you were constantly seeing these images on the news or in the media you would not be saying it. Ignorance may be bliss for some but its still ignorance.

    2
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Robert Hogan
    Favourite Robert Hogan
    Report
    May 1st 2012, 11:10 AM

    I always thought drone attack referred to a Joan Burton speech

    27
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Mick Brennan
    Favourite Mick Brennan
    Report
    May 1st 2012, 11:57 AM

    Complete and utter bolloxology out of that guy!!

    17
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute gingerman
    Favourite gingerman
    Report
    May 1st 2012, 12:20 PM

    Murder is neither ethical nor wise

    12
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Rob
    Favourite Rob
    Report
    May 1st 2012, 1:21 PM

    who’s calling it murder?? no ones asking you to like it but its not illegal and its not murder!

    9
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Fiachra Maolmordha Ó Raghallaigh
    Favourite Fiachra Maolmordha Ó Raghallaigh
    Report
    May 1st 2012, 12:55 PM

    Unfortunately for the people of the middle east, as Al Qaeda and the Taliban are irregulars, they aren’t protected by international law. If you’re not wearing uniform, and you’re hiding among the civilian population, you aren’t protected. Simple as. These drone attacks are unfortunately legal.

    11
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute John
    Favourite John
    Report
    May 1st 2012, 1:32 PM

    “Not to mince words here, if it is not in a situation of armed conflict, unless it falls into this very narrow area of imminent threat then it is an extra-judicial execution.”
    Naz Modirzadeh, Harvard

    http://www.thebureauinvestigates.com/2012/02/04/a-question-of-legality/

    8
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Cranky Yank
    Favourite Cranky Yank
    Report
    May 1st 2012, 11:06 PM

    @john: you are mincing words. You dont need a uniform to organize into a real threat.

    1
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Vinnie Mulvihill
    Favourite Vinnie Mulvihill
    Report
    May 1st 2012, 3:03 PM

    its a great way to fight terrorism and should be heavely invested

    9
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Mick
    Favourite Mick
    Report
    May 1st 2012, 3:26 PM

    Try investing in a bit of education for yourself, tends to help with the ignorant comments.

    6
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Peter
    Favourite Peter
    Report
    May 1st 2012, 1:47 PM

    Obamas the same dirt bag Bush was when it comes to forgine policy if not worse

    7
Submit a report
Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
Thank you for the feedback
Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.
JournalTv
News in 60 seconds