A VET HAS won his High Court challenge against the decision to remove him from all temporary inspector panels after he wore a Donald Trump mask while working at a meat plant.

In her judgment Justice Tara Burns said in the “cold light of day” Dr Declan Gill must know his actions including wearing a mask of the current US president the day after he was elected at the Rosderra Irish Meats plant in Roscrea, Tipperary was “inappropriate”.

However, the judge said the Department of Agriculture Food and the Marine decision to remove Dr Gill from the panel, which resulted in him losing a very significant portion of his earnings seemed “very extreme” for “his accepted behaviour”.

After considering submissions from Dr Gill, represented by Peter Ward SC, and the Department, the judge said she was satisfied the vet’s dismissal from the panel “flies in the face of fundamental reason and common sense”.

The decision, made by a group appointed by the Department to look into complaints against the vet, was disproportionate, unreasonable and irrational, the judge said, adding that “using a sledgehammer to crack a nut is the most appropriate adage for this case”. 

Quashed

In all the circumstances the judge said she was satisfied to quash the decision removing Dr Gill from the panel.

Dr Gill, Newgarden, Castleconnell, Co Limerick, sued the Department over the 20 February 2017 decision removing him from all temporary veterinary panels which oversee slaughter of animals at meat plants.

That arose from an incident on 9 November 2016 when Dr Gill went to work at the Rosderra Irish Meats plant, where he was a temporary inspector since 1998.

Dr Gill claimed wore the mask “as a joke” and gave “a fist pump gesture a la Donald Trump” to a human resources manager Tony Delaney.

Delaney, who the court heard had difficulties with Dr Gill, had claimed the vet approached him with the mask on, made a closed fist gesture and said: “You’re dead”, leaving him feeling intimidated.

Complaint

Following a complaint from the meat plant to the Department of Agriculture, a departmental decision group removed Dr Gill in February 2017 from temporary veterinary inspector panels, work from which he derived 70% of his income.

Dr Gill claimed this was an unlawful decision made in breach of his right to fair procedures and without his having had an oral hearing.

Dr Gill denied it was a closed fist gesture and the decision group had said it was not possible for the department to assess whether there was a “threat event” and had not considered that aspect in reaching its decision.

He also claimed there was no issue when he wore a Barack Obama mask in the plant eight years earlier and neither the safety of Delaney nor others were at risk.

In the High Court action, the Department denied the claims and had opposed the application.

It argued it had concerns about Dr Gill for his inappropriate and unprofessional attire and behaviour and of not fulfilling his contract in a professional manner.

After giving her judgment the judge adjourned the case to a date in Octobers when final orders will be made.

Comments are closed as legal proceedings are ongoing.