Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
AS ANOTHER NEW year approaches, some of you may be looking to change careers – and it’s never too late.
To help you in your quest for a new occupation we’ve come up with some outside the box suggestions. Here are eight jobs you’ve (probably) never heard of:
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
This headline is inappropriate and sensationalist. It does nothing to advocate the amazing work Tom has been doing in promoting the role of the White Ribbon Campaign, and the calm and dignified way in which he has been doing it.
The murderer should have been castrated after his first rape conviction, but no that would make too much sense, and there is too much money to be made by the circus courts on this type of cash cow.
I listened to the interview and this headline is not at all a representation of the true tone of Mr. Meaghar’s interview. It makes him sound like someone who is obsessed with hatred and thoughts of revenge. Truer is the representation that Sean O’Rourke outlined, where he has turned his energies to forming a collective of men who will impress, through their unity, a united voice opposed to violence against women that will influence all men. This is his legacy to Jill, as Sean O’Rourke pointed out, not obsession and hatred as the headline suggests. Very tabloid…
Hi John,
Thanks for your feedback. Just a little explanation on headline choice as I agree that the tone of the interview was how Tom’s work came out of the horrific events.
If you read the subtitle and the first line of the article, that is how I have framed the story – that a huge positive came from the initial obsession. Headlines are not meant to tell the whole story.
Thanks
Sinéad
“If you read the subtitle and the first line of the article, that is how I have framed the story – that a huge positive came from the initial obsession. Headlines are not meant to tell the whole story”
The font size of the subheading is even smaller than the actual content. Headlines are meant to st the tone for a story.
A very feeble excuse, Sinead.
Why wasn’t Tom’s positivity expressed in the headline and the initial obsession in the subtitle?
Surely that would best reflect how you claim you wanted to frame the story?
“Headlines are not meant to tell the whole story.” Why was the title of a recent Ask.fm/IDA article changed? Honest question.
I agree with Sinead. Nor did I take the negative perspective from either the headline or the story that some have. Indeed, I think it highly important that people know that despite the work this wonderful man has undertaken since the death of his wife he is still so deeply affected by this horrendous crime. His detestation and hatred of the rapist murderer does not detract in any way from his wonderful compassionate work. In fact it makes him more human. He is incredibly open and honest about his feelings and I admire him all the more. I do not find this feelings towards the rapist in any way detract from his contribution on other fronts. He is clearly a deep and compassionate man and I can relate to both his anger and rage at the rapist and to his compassion. His is a very human story and we are better for knowing the full of it. A great guy.
“His detestation and hatred of the rapist murderer does not detract in any way from his wonderful compassionate work.”
No, but the headline does.
@JohnR
The whole point of people’s disgust is based on their great admiration of how Tom has been coping with horrendous adversity.
They feel strongly – as I do – that he deserves better than a tabloid style headline to introduce his noble story.
The least Sinead could do is to apologise and admit that she made a journalistic blunder.
Twink and Fraj, I appreciate what you’re saying. I just don’t feel the same way about the headline. I know the story of what happened. The headline did not in my view diminish his story nor did the article seek to minimise his wonderful contribution. I think people are over reacting. It’s a headline designed to draw people into his story. It appears to have succeeded. Just my view but I appreciate that others may see things very differently.
I would imagine the headline – “Jill Meagher’s husband has turned his anger and grief into positive action” would receive vastly less clicks then the current one. It is as simple as that.
Here is the same story portrayed in a more honest and less sensationalistic [i.e. click generating] fashion.
The headline is nasty and misleading and only relates to one quote as to where the poor man’s head was at even while he aimed to help, so it is, at most, a reference point, not the central thread which should surely be reflected in headline.
The headline has set a wrong tone for the actual article. I wonder how many people skipped your story be cause of this sinead
Very few I would imagine if we are to judge by the success of such headlines. You and I didn’t anyway!
I didn’t intend causing a furore with my initial observation and certainly don’t think that any apology is necessary as Fraj suggested. I do, however agree with him when he says that Tom Meagher, ” deserves better than a tabloid-style headline to introduce his noble story”.
As a famous Corkonian once said, several times, ” We’ll leave it there now so…ok?”
You cannot heal until you forgive.i know that’s very difficult.
have your say