Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
THAT WAS A fast 12 months wasn’t it?
Let’s put that in perspective. This time last year, Donald Trump hadn’t become President yet and Enda Kenny was still Taoiseach.
In a year of people saying outlandish things, how close were you paying attention?
Take our quiz and find out…
could use the land to house members of the travelling community.
im sure pat would have no problems with that.
@Nick Flavin: and they don’t do high rise caravans either.
@Nick Flavin: a group of travellers or a Direct Provision Centre would enhance the rich tapestry of ethic diversion he so often talks about
@Jack O’Meara: no direct provision in patients jenny’s area
@Nick Flavin: Why would any sane property owner agree to that ?Would you object ? Be honest
The elite prevail once again. I doubt the ordinary joe soap would have won this
@Anthony: Pat living in his ivory tower.
@Anthony: when you can afford a good legal team
@Geraldine Fenton: Or a top planning consultant to ghost your letters.
Could be developed as a centre for asylum seekers
High profile NIMBY.
@Michael Lynch: NIMBY?
@Michael Lynch: Jealously can make you very bitter Michael.
@John: So can stupidity
And Pat will be on the radio tomorrow talking about the housing crisis.
@paul jones: and sympathy for asylum seekers
Yessss!!! Delighted for him. Nobody messes with the K-man and gets away with it.
Irish water should build a little office there because you wont hear pat say a bad word about them
Thankfully somebody is taking a stand against this mania of property development. Now at least some part of the towns surrounding Dublin will have a bit of breathing space. Tired of seeing what Luke Kelly called “New Glass Cages” springing up on every small green and street corner. Fair play Pat!
@Nick Hall: Breathing space … behind security gates
This is the worst thing to happen since the other bad thing like this thing that happened happened. Oh god, when will it end.
Judging by the comments here, a lot of people would like to see every scrap of available land in suburban Dublin being built upon in the highest possible density, regardless of suitability, regardless of design and regardless of consequences. This stance they attribute to the housing ‘crisis’ and homelessness. So, let’s just pay scant regard to the future and how our environment will look, just throw up boxes of houses wherever whenever. Yeah, that’ll do for now lads. Good job.
@Deborah Blacoe: no need to worry Deborah they only build in west Dublin
@matthew o reilly: not true.
@Deborah Blacoe: from tallaght to blanch is one big block & there’s another so called town clonburis being built between lucan & clondalkin.the lovely dalkey wont be touched
@matthew o reilly: lots of green belt land being built upon, not just in West Dublin.
@matthew o reilly: perhaps the real answer to the issue is moving some businesses and services away from the Capital? Goodness knows that the greater Dublin area is bursting at the seams. There has to be another way other than choking the city with more and more houses, cars, manufacturing industry and services industry. The bald fact is that space is this city is finite and in order to leave ‘breathing room’, there possibly has to be a move to thinking outside the box?
@Deborah Blacoe: Pat Kenny was always a mouth piece for the status quo. Agree with the reckless building that destroys our heritage, but when it suits the powers that be this is not a consideration. Kenny is and always was an overpaid puppet.
@Donal Desmond: There were quite a number of objections to this proposed development. It was not solely about Mr Kenny. Yes, living beside the site in question, he had the most to lose. However, given the high density of the proposed units, I think perhaps this development didn’t need a high profile objector for the plans to be rejected.
@Deborah Blacoe: Ignore them, they are peasants, council estate riff raff, what would they know
@matthew o reilly: Perhaps Dalkey of this world, being big tax payers, have a back bone and ability to gather together and fight for their area
Disgrace
Pat is too well off he wouldn’t know what in need is or like. Sure he contradicts himself when he talking about housing on radio, just like the way he suits who he has on his show call show.
@William Gorry: Oh don’t you worry, the tenants intended for those places were to be those in need or of a certain background
His neighbour adjoining the site on the far side also objected, has a media profile, and she wasn’t named in this article. And she is a vocal proponent of asylum rights. Funny that.
Pat the plank
Aaaaaaand here come the trolls ………..
@Ian Holmes: no builders no rolls
I would say that more than him objected but he is taken the slack
Delighted this had been refused but no doubt Bartra will appeal. There is no outcome yet regarding the appeal regarding the development at Bulloch Harbour. Bartra seemed determined to wreck Dalkey and it’s surrounds.
Pat Kenny is an overpaid media bore. He is wealthy though not in the slimy business entrepreneur league of wealth. His “developer” neighbours who own (or owned the land – looks like they sold to Bartra) are equally wealthy and probably more so than Pat. His neighbours who joined in the objection/observations will not be wantin for a few bob either. Bartra seems to be a well funded aggressive developer – they had plans to destroy the nearby harbour turned down too. In other words all parties to this could be described as rich and powerful… or at least as rich and powerful as Pat Kenny. So to say that Kenny’s money or influence has determined the outcome of the planning decision is total nonsense.
Very interesting from Council: price depreciation is now a valid reason to object so travellers are now a valid reason to object because they not only bring down the tone but the value unless you live near all the presidential candidates and Dr Ciara Kelly who actually want them
obviously an over-development
Looks like the usual profit before people crowd and sinners are out tonight. Pat you need to invite them to newstalk and ask them would they object to same on their piece of turf. I certainly would object, if it was I.
I posted this on Facebook and might as well post it here too. This whole talk about “seriously injurious to the setting, amenity and appreciation of neighbouring properties” comes off as though the site in question should also be treated as an extension of amenities to neighbouring residents.
I would like to remind the residents of “neighbouring properties” that the only amenities they own are those WITHIN the confines of their walls. I had a look at the plans which weren’t bad looking. They were quite smart looking actually. It will be very rich (no pun intended) to hear the head objector complaining about the housing crisis in future NewsTalk broadcasts.
In all fairness, I think anyone who would be able to afford to buy in that proposed development wouldn’t be in danger of becoming homeless anyway. I bet the 2 bed apartments would be going for about 750k
Didn’t read the article but went straight to comment..clickbait is what’s it all about …headlines win but journalism is a sore loser
The Bias drips of the FFG Newstalk Presenter every time he opens his mouth
Let all new asylum seekers live there, do the decent thing Pat, and give everyone else a break from that threat.
Pats nothing but a shitehawk like the rest of them in their ivory towers
WGAF!
have your say