We need your help now
Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.
You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.
If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.
Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
By continuing, you are indicating that you accept our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
Updated 2.30pm
FIANNA FÁIL TD Barry Cowen has declared his ambition to be leader of Fianna Fáil as he prepares to represent the party in a televised deputy leader debate tonight.
The party’s environment spokesperson will go up against James Reilly (Fine Gael), Alan Kelly (Labour) and Mary Lou McDonald (Sinn Féin) on TV3 at 10.30pm tonight.
Speaking in Dublin today, the Offaly TD insisted that he is only doing the debate because of his proximity to Dublin.
Fianna Fáil has not had an official deputy leader since Éamon Ó Cuív relinquished the position in 2012 after he defied the party whip on the EU Fiscal Treaty referendum. Cowen insisted that all of Fianna Fáil’s parliamentary party are now deputy leaders.
But when asked if he wanted to be the official deputy leader of Fianna Fáil, he responded:
Of course I’d like to be deputy leader, I’d love to be leader.
“But that’s neither here nor there. So would this man [Michael McGrath], so would 19 others in the parliamentary party.”
The position is in contrast to what Cowen told TheJournal.ie in June last year when he said that he has “no leadership ambitions”.
Hugh O'Connell / Twitter. @CowenBarry is the most serious man in Irish politics right now #GE16 pic.twitter.com/qd8qucEZ6Q
— Hugh O'Connell (@oconnellhugh) February 15, 2016
Today, he insisted that Micheál Martin is pitching himself to the electorate as an “alternative Taoiseach” and also said there are “great differences” between his party and Fine Gael, describing the two as “not compatible”.
There are great differences between us, in case you haven’t noticed, between Fianna Fáil and Fine Gael, in relation to tax, universal social charge, public services, pensions and pensioners, costs to families and water, just to name a few.
Cowen and McGrath faced more questions about a potential post-election coalition with Fine Gael at a press conference on mortgages this morning.
Both insisted that they would not “preempt” the verdict of the electorate.
Fianna Fáil’s proposals include legislating to force banks to reduce standard variable mortgage rates, with Central Bank sanctions for those that don’t. McGrath said current standard variable rates are double the EU average.
It’s also proposing that people who have a track record of paying their rent for three years should be given credit towards a deposit for a mortgage.
Fianna Fáil also wants to extend mortgage interest relief to 2020. It’s currently due to expire next year.
Steady figures. Keep up the good work.
The numbers are going in the right direction. RIP to those who have lost their lives. As hard as it is, keep sticking to the rules… we are nearly there.
@Olive Whyte: The Tallaght testing centre was the busiest I have ever seen it yesterday since testing started hope that ain’t a sign
@Happy entertainment: Hopefully not.
@Happy entertainment: I’d say that’s people mistaking their annual hay fever for symptoms. It’s not even a pandemic anymore.
@Happy entertainment: More testing in itself is a good thing. It all depends on the results.
@Happy entertainment: prob hay fever symtoms sending people there.
@Happy entertainment: there was no testing at the tallaght centre mon, tues or today. Must be fewer cases being referred for testing so they are doing them all in one day now rather than spreading them out over 5 days.
@Colm Malone: do you mean its not a pandemic locally or globally?
@Bill Clay: pandemics tend not to be local affairs.
@Happy entertainment: Th roads were the buissiest i’ve seen them too in months. And i’ve been driving to work the whole time. bit worried about what we may see in about 2 weeks time.
@Happy entertainment: just to balance that I’ve heard from someone that tests two places are only doing afternoon testing now as there’s no need for a.m at at present
@Trevor Donoghue: let’s call their bluff if it is a scam we all survive if not we get a cold.
@Colm Malone: It is still capable of being one again and that is why it should not be taken that it is done and dusted
5th worst per capita in the world, New Zealand is better than us, US is better than us,Cheltenham was the governments fault, Italian tourists, 2 meter rule. Ok, got all the negatives out of the way ( usual ones). Positively. Nice to see it steadying out and going the right way. Sad for those who died and their families.
@John fitzpatrick: praaaaaaatttttttt New York and London far worse than us.
@John fitzpatrick: nonsense moans. Social media mob rubbish about Cheltenham and Italians. Zero proof. I suppose today’s are keelings fault and next week will be leo and his picnics fault. Virus was here since before Christmas and certainly well active in the community before March.
Lunacy comparing us to New Zealand and US. Doesn’t even deserve a response. Stats are totally skewed by how countries report it.
@John fitzpatrick: where did you get 5th?
@John fitzpatrick: No. It’s all down to volume of testing and what countries attribute to death on death cert. The only way we will know exactly how different countries mortality rates will be in 12 months when you can see the % increase in average deaths over a previous 5 year period. Brazil looking to be number one for sure. Many scientists believe the true number of infections in brazil is north of 5 million.
I wouldn’t be so sure about the U.S. Their numbers are SLIGHTLY better, but firstly, they are a couple of weeks behind us as it hit the U.S. a little later, I think, and their numbers haven’t really started coming down yet to the extent ours have, so we should probably be comparing their figures with ours a couple of weeks ago, the way we compared ourselves with Italy a couple of weeks before earlier. Also, I am not sure if they are counting probable deaths, so their death rate may actually be higher if they counted as we did. It’s very hard to compare across countries, given that different countries count deaths differently and different countries are at different places as it arrived in different countries at different times.
@Philip King ⚡️: awwww come guys. I could not find the sarcasm font on here. I was only trying to get all the moans we usually see on here out early. Phillip. It’s a stat usually thrown out here that has been proven wrong many times.
@John fitzpatrick: ahh the old per head of capita nonsense. If other countries were reporting as transparently as us then we would be 15-20th on the list. Can’t have a league table if some teams are not reporting dropped points.
@Philip King ⚡️: he’s talking about the “per capita” figures, which if looked at like that, yes Ireland has fared pretty badly compared to the rest of the world. We have one of the highest number of cases per 100,000, well ahead of other EU countries. We’re certainly in the top 10 most affected countries. You can track it here: https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/data/cumulative-cases
@Daniel O Sullivan: again it depends hows its reported. We were Including community, hospital, nursing home and also probable deaths. The uk were reporting on hospital deaths at one stage.
@John fitzpatrick: Jo
@John fitzpatrick: john
it is way too early to do comparative stats. all deaths are sad!
@Paul O’Sullivan: he said Per Capita – Not Per Capital. So the figures for New York and London are not what he is comparing to Dublin!. The USA has an approximate population of 331,000,000 with 100,418 deaths – meaning 303deaths per million. Ireland has a population of 4,937,000 with 1639 deaths – meaning 332 deaths per million. clearly, Ireland is worse “Per Capita”.
However, using per capita figures can be misleading. Belgium has a population of 11,460,000 with 9,364 deaths – meaning 817 deaths per million.
In fact Ireland has the 8th highest mortality rate per capita in the world. https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/data/mortality
@Brian Madden: yes and there is still some issues about what is being reported when especially as regards in the community. They are sdtill only settin gv and up their track and trace unit.
@John fitzpatrick: I give up, well at least I give up my satire career. Over before it started, shot down in a ball of flames. I have spent weeks saying that stat was not correct and only a stat on reported deaths, not actual deaths. But today I thought I’d mention it before the usual suspects. And just for the record, I don’t blame Cheltenham, the Italians or anyone else. Yesterday someone compared us to the Isle of Man. Ok, into retirement I go.
@John fitzpatrick: Ah ye brat ye.
@Nioe: how would Cheltenham not have had an impact. Italian rugby fans too for that matter?
@Brian Madden: we shouldn’t be comparing to the UK. We should be comparing to countries who have handled it well
@Daniel O Sullivan:
Deaths per 1m pop we are 11th
Cases per 1m pop we are 13th.
@Gary Pheasey: well aware what he was implying, but I’m sick of all that per capita nonsense…. they are only statistics, it means nothing to the individuals that have lost their lives.
Behind every life lost is a personal journey of one person on earth. And we only live once. Statistics especially per capita are useless information…
But a country with 330 million and having 100 000 deaths plus and our small nation having just over 1600 plus it is all immaterial it is a loss of a life, an individual, ……
@John fitzpatrick: for anyone really interested in stats, this link was posted by a journal commenter this morning https://www.euromomo.eu/graphs-and-maps/
It is a measure and comparison of death rates and variences over the last few years in European countries. It uses a scoring system to even out population differences. Over the last 16 weeks while our death rate is above the norm Ireland had one of the flattest curves and is regarded as moderate. Most of the other countries have spikes. An interesting point is that reported deaths last week were below our norm.
@John fitzpatrick: You can’t believe ANYTHING coming from America. The people are afraid to even GET a test. There’s crazy rumours it will stop you getting health insurance or join the military
@Paul O’Sullivan: sure of course that’s what you meant.
@John fitzpatrick: they simply aren’t counting deaths in the same way, we include ALL PROBABLE deaths whereas many countries do not and only go off whether or not the deceased have had a positive test before they passed.
@Derdaly: actually that’s a very interesting chart. It shows that we had nearly the same spikes in 2017 and 2018. But compared to other countries at just over a 6% increase in actual deaths , we are way better than many and sitting somewhere in the middle. Ok, that’s a stat that you can compare countries as it measures increases in deaths year on year.
@Derdaly: that’s a great link, the z-scores would seem to indicate we’ve done alright compared to many other countries. Must keep an eye on that one.
Won’t suit the doomlords though.
@John fitzpatrick:
Give it a rest ffs. So Cheltenham was the Government’s fault? The last time I checked Chaltenham is in England not Ireland. Also those Italian fans who came over had nothing got to do with cases here.
Sinn Fein voter by any chance? Yawn
@Nioe: failed maths at school i see
@John fitzpatrick: muted I love this platform!!
@John fitzpatrick:
I am blue in the face saying this…
We don’t know how many cases because they are all running different amount of tests…
We don’t know death count because there are different methods of counting (or in UK missing them entirely)
What we do know is excess deaths i.e. the excess deaths or normal…
Here is that result…
https://www.euromomo.eu/graphs-and-maps
Ireland looks very good here when compared… We have done a great job and one of them is our testing levels are some of the highest in the world… We counted people despite the political cost unlike some other countries.
I would ask, should we be testing everyone coming from other countries?
Half the figure from yesterday. Still think the meat factories have a lot to do with the new cases yesterday
@Michael Fleming: any evidence?
@Person who has cloned my name and avatar: How come your twitter account doesn’t exist??
@The Risen: Guarantee you it’s the usual muppet. Sad.
@The Risen: oh great, now we’ve got two risen’s to contend with.
@Bernard Sweeney: Fear not Bernard. I’m often imitated, but never emulated.
@The Risen: yep two twonks of your ilk would render mankind untenable.
@Michael Fleming: It’s not that they are allowed to do much else at that weather.
@The Risen: how can I tweet if I don’t have an account that exists?
@The Risen: I am Spartacus…you are Spartacus…
@The Risen: how do we know it’s you? I’ve seen that in movies. What if we shoot the wrong risen?
@Muppet pretending to be The Risen: I just clicked on your name. The twitter account doesn’t exist.
@Bernard Sweeney: If you look at the twitter handles there appears to be 18 of them.
@The Risen: no evidence as he pulled that nugget of information straight out of his arse.
OPEN THE PUBS!!(grabs popcorn)
@Lets be real: who needs to open the pubs when the beaches are thronged with people and kids running around during this good weather
@Lets be real: OPEN THE CINEMAS!!(grabs pints)
@Pauliebhoy: Open your wallet wide when the eye watering taxes hit
That’s good , but just look how many people are traveling to the beach today
@john: just drove around beaches here in Wexford loads of cars parked on road as beaches are closed if anything happened no way emergency services could get through. Car reg nos being taken
@Mary Oliver: The Gestapo would have loved you.
@Tereck:
@john: According to Prof Luke O’Neil (Professor (Chair of Biochemistry) Affiliations: School of Biochemistry and Immunology TCD) today, you’re 19 times less likely to catch it outdoors than in so beach seems like a good idea. Also said that 10% of cases caused other 80%,super spreaders he called them. Most people don’t infect anyone else. Also said singing or shouting in close quarters not a good idea. Obviously paraphrasing him but interview is on Newstalk.
@Tereck: I am only saying what happened merely an observation
@john: People going to the beach on a fine day, imagine that, thats really awful that people are enjoying their lives
@Mary Oliver: why are people jumping to the wrong conclusion all I was saying was what the situation at the beaches were today not criticising
@Mary Oliver: I Hope you remembered what Simon says….not to be getting any new curtains for all that window squinting
@Dave Hammond:???
@Mary Oliver: you need to find some other more productive way to fill your time instead of policing beaches.
Oooooh me nerves….
LOCKDOWN UNTIL 2027!!!!
RIP. As always. Figures will tell a lot next week, they’ll reflect restrictions being eased and hopefully cases/deaths keep falling.
We have the bugger on the run. Now, let’s lock down our land and sea border. #buildthatwall
@Jane Aelst: good woman Jane. Let’s lock us all in our country. The air is clear so we should have a good view of the rest of the world opening up around us.
@John fitzpatrick: I’d rather be locked down in Ireland than just my house.
@Mr Cylinical: jet setter
@Jane Aelst: you’re like a conflicted Gemma O Doherty Jane.
@Jane Aelst: Make Arlene pay
Fergus O’Dowd is blaming the big companies who own the Nursing Homes for not investing more. We just rented out every private fascility in the country (with staff) but did not utilise it. He said that only 23% were viral control complacent. If the companies werent up to scratch or finacially liable thats an oversight and questions why they had licenses to operate. The government were the ones to oversee. Everyone knew what was coming with the Nursing Homes. Its an absolute tragedy. Its not about blame, but our ability to take responsibility.
@tadhgkelleher: And St Mary’s, Phoenix Park, publicly owned, had one of the worst number of deaths.
@tadhgkelleher: caused by respite care admissions from public hospitals perhaps?
Kick leo out and send him back to his own house.
No way of ever knowing but i wonder how many people who died with covid in ireland would have past away regardless
@sean bergin.
Every one of them would have.eventually.
But unfortunately they all contracted Covid -19, which caused their premature deaths.
@Feardorcha Ó Maolomhnaigh: you don’t know it caused their premature deaths. If someone had covid and got knocked down by a car and died they would go into the stats as died “with” covid 19. Lots of those who had covid had mild symptoms but if they died of a stroke or heart attack which they were in imminent danger of but covid didn’t cause then they would also go down as died “with” covid 19.
@Feardorcha Ó Maolomhnaigh: Holohan doesn’t even admit that.
@Dino:
The numbers recorded, are people who have died because of contracting Covid-19. Your example of a car accident in completely incorrect.
The Maynooth /UL study of RIP.ie show an increase in deaths for the March/ April period over 2019 which is close to the reported number of Covid-19 deaths.
This virus kills causes people to die, and has been the cause of death for over 1600 Irish people since early March.
You need to reattach yourself to the real world.
@Dino: Covid is listed if it is the cause or part cause of the death.
your attempt to show otherwise is a false premise at best
@Gary Kearney: have you a source for that? Because otherwise its just going to be a back and forwards me saying your wrong and you saying I’m wrong. It says died “with” not dies as a result or part result of having contracted coronavirus, seems pretty clear to me
The day we had zero was the day after Leo’s lark in the park
@523StarBar: Leos nipples are the cure. Part of me already knew that.
Did Tony say they will continue to report confirmed and probable deaths? I haven’t heard probable figures been mentioned in a long time. Are they just included in the overall and not declared as X amount of the total are probable? Probable means they suspect the person who died might of had covid but not based on any testing?
Open the spuds
Day 1: 60 cases
Day 2: 50 cases
“Fantastic, numbers heading in the right direction”
Day 3: 53 cases
“OMFG WE’RE ALL GOING TO DIE VOTE SINN FEIN”
Day 4: 52 cases
“Fantastic, numbers heading in the right direction”
@Peter McKenna: for goodness sake. Have a bit of respect for the families that have lost loved ones before you start spinning your hoola hoop.
Am I wrong ?
I taught he said 8 death’s in his speech ??
Not 9 as in all other news !
Lets all top ourselves lads. The virus cant get us if we are already dead.
Use precise geolocation data. Actively scan device characteristics for identification. Store and/or access information on a device. Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development.
These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work.
These cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.
These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and personalisation. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we have added to our pages. If you do not allow these cookies then these services may not function properly.
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not be able to monitor our performance.
Cookies, device or similar online identifiers (e.g. login-based identifiers, randomly assigned identifiers, network based identifiers) together with other information (e.g. browser type and information, language, screen size, supported technologies etc.) can be stored or read on your device to recognise it each time it connects to an app or to a website, for one or several of the purposes presented here.
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times an ad is presented to you).
Information about your activity on this service (such as forms you submit, content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (for example, information from your previous activity on this service and other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (that might include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present advertising that appears more relevant based on your possible interests by this and other entities.
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on your advertising profiles, which can reflect your activity on this service or other websites or apps (like the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects.
Information about your activity on this service (for instance, forms you submit, non-advertising content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (such as your previous activity on this service or other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (which might for example include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present content that appears more relevant based on your possible interests, such as by adapting the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find content that matches your interests.
Content presented to you on this service can be based on your content personalisation profiles, which can reflect your activity on this or other services (for instance, the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects. This can for example be used to adapt the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find (non-advertising) content that matches your interests.
Information regarding which advertising is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine how well an advert has worked for you or other users and whether the goals of the advertising were reached. For instance, whether you saw an ad, whether you clicked on it, whether it led you to buy a product or visit a website, etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of advertising campaigns.
Information regarding which content is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine whether the (non-advertising) content e.g. reached its intended audience and matched your interests. For instance, whether you read an article, watch a video, listen to a podcast or look at a product description, how long you spent on this service and the web pages you visit etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of (non-advertising) content that is shown to you.
Reports can be generated based on the combination of data sets (like user profiles, statistics, market research, analytics data) regarding your interactions and those of other users with advertising or (non-advertising) content to identify common characteristics (for instance, to determine which target audiences are more receptive to an ad campaign or to certain contents).
Information about your activity on this service, such as your interaction with ads or content, can be very helpful to improve products and services and to build new products and services based on user interactions, the type of audience, etc. This specific purpose does not include the development or improvement of user profiles and identifiers.
Content presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type, or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times a video or an article is presented to you).
With your acceptance, your precise location (within a radius of less than 500 metres) may be used in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
With your acceptance, certain characteristics specific to your device might be requested and used to distinguish it from other devices (such as the installed fonts or plugins, the resolution of your screen) in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Your data can be used to monitor for and prevent unusual and possibly fraudulent activity (for example, regarding advertising, ad clicks by bots), and ensure systems and processes work properly and securely. It can also be used to correct any problems you, the publisher or the advertiser may encounter in the delivery of content and ads and in your interaction with them.
Certain information (like an IP address or device capabilities) is used to ensure the technical compatibility of the content or advertising, and to facilitate the transmission of the content or ad to your device.
Information about your activity on this service may be matched and combined with other information relating to you and originating from various sources (for instance your activity on a separate online service, your use of a loyalty card in-store, or your answers to a survey), in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
In support of the purposes explained in this notice, your device might be considered as likely linked to other devices that belong to you or your household (for instance because you are logged in to the same service on both your phone and your computer, or because you may use the same Internet connection on both devices).
Your device might be distinguished from other devices based on information it automatically sends when accessing the Internet (for instance, the IP address of your Internet connection or the type of browser you are using) in support of the purposes exposed in this notice.
The choices you make regarding the purposes and entities listed in this notice are saved and made available to those entities in the form of digital signals (such as a string of characters). This is necessary in order to enable both this service and those entities to respect such choices.
have your say