Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

PA

US judge rules Britney Spears’ ex-husband can go on trial for stalking

Jason Alexander crashed the wedding of Spears and Sam Asghari in Los Angeles earlier this month.

A JUDGE HAS found there is sufficient evidence for a man once briefly married to Britney Spears to go on trial for stalking.

After a two-hour preliminary hearing, Ventura County Judge David Worley ruled that 40-year-old Jason Allen Alexander should be held to answer on the charge, along with misdemeanor counts of trespassing, vandalism and battery, court records showed.

Not guilty pleas to all the charges were entered by an attorney for Alexander, who did not attend and remains imprisoned.

Spears married longtime boyfriend Sam Asghari at her home in Thousand Oaks, California on 9 June in front of several dozen guests including Selena Gomez, Drew Barrymore, Paris Hilton and Madonna.

Alexander, a childhood friend of Spears to whom she was married for less than three days in 2004, appeared uninvited at the house before the ceremony, livestreaming his raid on Instagram.

Richard Eubler, a since-fired security guard for Spears, testified at Monday’s hearing that Alexander got inside her house and up to the locked door of Spears’ bedroom while she was inside, according to multiple media reports.

The ex-guard said Alexander had also tried to enter the property in the days before the wedding.

Alexander’s lawyer, Sandra Bisignani, argued there was no evidence he had any intention of harming Spears.

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

View 6 comments
Close
6 Comments
This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic. Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy here before taking part.
Leave a Comment
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Maggie Elizabeth Walsh
    Favourite Maggie Elizabeth Walsh
    Report
    Mar 5th 2012, 11:24 AM

    This law will do nothing to stop violent people being violent. It will simply take the onus off the police to sort it out, now abused men and women will be told its their fault for not doing the adequate checks in the first place.

    48
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute John Conniffe
    Favourite John Conniffe
    Report
    Mar 5th 2012, 11:33 AM

    Seems a good idea, but I’d be very worried about all the privacy of information issues. If someone applied to gain access to information held another person’s file, what proof would the have to give to confirm that they are in a relationship with that first person? What structures would be in place to avoid misuse by marketing / profiling agencies…

    45
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Multi talentless
    Favourite Multi talentless
    Report
    Mar 5th 2012, 12:14 PM

    Many people know that their partners are violent long before they raise a hand to them , i know some never leave even when given the oppurtunity arises.
    I don’t think This law will change anything

    21
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Donal McCarthy
    Favourite Donal McCarthy
    Report
    Mar 5th 2012, 1:35 PM

    I think the main problem here is that the vast majority of the perpetrators of domestic violence never make it to the courts, never mind acquire a conviction for it.

    20
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Charly Julienne
    Favourite Charly Julienne
    Report
    Mar 5th 2012, 4:45 PM

    I hate the trend of naming laws after victims. It encourages the passing of bad laws (I’m not talking about this one specifically) by appealing to emotion over reason.

    13
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Sean Mc Avinue
    Favourite Sean Mc Avinue
    Report
    Mar 6th 2012, 2:42 AM

    Wouldn’t you like to know the history of a car before you buy it?

    2
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Gemma Hickey
    Favourite Gemma Hickey
    Report
    Mar 6th 2012, 11:12 AM

    If some one hits you or slaps you once they will more than likely do it again, so there is no need for this law just people need to wise up and realise that if it happens once its time to get out just leve, dont ask why, dont listen to the made up excuses, just run . This law is just another way of invading privacy, anyone think what may happen in the event of a wrongful conviction, because this happens too.

    1
Submit a report
Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
Thank you for the feedback
Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.

Leave a commentcancel

 
JournalTv
News in 60 seconds