Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.
You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.
If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.
CATHERINE MURPHY HAS called for an independent inquiry into a number of large transactions by IBRC (formerly Anglo Irish Bank) prior to it being wound up two years ago.
The independent TD received documents from the Department of Finance today in relation to freedom of information requests.
She said the highly-redacted files, which she distributed to the media today, contradict responses to parliamentary questions she received from Finance Minister Michael Noonan.
In the documents, senior officials at the department express reservations about a number of “poorly executed” large transactions made by IBRC (Irish Bank Resolution Corporation), including the sale of Siteserv to the Denis O’Brien-owned company Millington.
Former chairman of Anglo, Alan Dukes, has in a statement this evening rejected any suggestions of impropriety in the sale of Siteserv, Newstalk reports.
Murphy: A whistleblower told me Millington was initially not even considered to buy SiteServ #dail
Murphy said the files highlight that there were “serious problems in the relationship that existed between the IBRC, formerly Anglo, and the Department of Finance”.
She claimed that this likely played a role in the winding down of IBRC in February 2013.
Michael Noonan Sam Boal / Photocall Ireland
Sam Boal / Photocall Ireland / Photocall Ireland
In one memo, a senior department official states that “events over the past few months have led me to question the effectiveness of the management team in IBRC … I am concerned that the reputation of the IBRC and by extension the State has been damaged as a result of these events.”
One document states:
Siteserv is the subject of a separate memo but to summarise we are concerned with the quality of some of the decisions taken in respect of this transaction. The sale decision has raised a number of areas where we believe that decisions taken by IBRC resulted in a less than optimum return for the bank. The transaction has also been the subject of a number of PQs and press queries which further questioned the commercial rationale for some elements of the sale including payments made to existing stakeholders. We are recommending that the Chairman is asked to commission a full independent review in relation to the Siteserv transaction.
Murphy questioned whether Noonan was being genuine when he “insisted he was satisfied that the Siteserv deal represented the best deal for the State”.
“The documents I receive today really make me question whether or not the Minister really believed that was the case,” she told reporters.
The State lost €105 million due to the transaction, in which Millington bought SiteServ for €45 million in 2012. A subsidiary of the company, GMC/Sierra, went on to be awarded a large water metering contract.
GMC/Sierra water meter installers Sasko Lazarov / Photocall Ireland
Sasko Lazarov / Photocall Ireland / Photocall Ireland
“I am calling for a full, independent inquiry into the circumstances surrounding this deal, and other large deals, as it appears to me to go to the heart of the problems that led to the very rushed winding up of IBRC on the infamous ‘prom night’.
The citizens, who every day feel the brunt of Anglo’s problems in their pocket, have a right to know why such deals would have been done and who was a party to those decisions,” Murphy said.
During Leaders’ Questions in the Dáil this afternoon, Fianna Fáil leader Micheál Martin praised Murphy for “doggedly” pursuing this issue. The Sunday Times also reported on the topic over the weekend.
Martin noted that Siteserv shareholders received €5 million at the time of the sale.
He asked Enda Kenny if he would initiate “a proper inquiry” into the matter. The Taoiseach said he didn’t read the Sunday Times article, adding: “I don’t have the detail to reply in detail to you … I don’t want to say anything that I can’t stand over here.”
Kenny said it would be better for Noonan to reply to Martin directly.
Sam Boal / Photocall Ireland
Sam Boal / Photocall Ireland / Photocall Ireland
Martin said he found it “very, very difficult to comprehend” that Kenny hadn’t seen the article
Did Minister Noonan ring you about it? Did anybody alert you?
Advertisement
He said that if Kenny was telling the truth he was “oblivious” to serious issues “going on under your nose”.
Kenny responded by saying he doesn’t “have the opportunity to read every newspaper article”, adding that officials in each department deal with Freedom of Information requests independently of his office.
The Taoiseach said that when IBRC approved the Siteserv deal in March 2012, it was not required to inform Noonan prior to the sale as the 2009 framework under which it was operating did not include any specific monetary thresholds.
However, a spokeswoman for Murphy was quick to point out that a new framework, under which IBRC would have had to discuss the issue with the finance minister, was “ready to go”.
Enda tries to vindicate IBRC's handling of Siteserv sale by saying they operated under 2009 Framework. New framework was ready to go
There is such a web here. There is serious role for the media to play in untangling that web and making it accessible to the public. There’s a limit to what a slightly OCD independent member of the Oireachtas can do on this.
Department of Finance response
A spokesperson for the Department of Finance said Murphy’s claim that “all along the Minister [Noonan] has insisted he was satisfied that the Siteserv deal represented the best deal for the State….” is incorrect.
They said Noonan was “given assurances from the Chairman [former TD Alan Dukes] and CEO [Mike Aynsley] of IBRC at a meeting which he attended on 25 July 2012 that the transaction had been thoroughly assessed by the IBRC Board and that the Management and Board of IBRC were satisfied that the transaction was managed in the best manner possible to achieve the best result for the State”.
In a statement this evening, Alan Dukes categorically rejected suggestions of any impropriety in the March 2012 SiteServ sale by IBRC.
Newstalk reports that Dukes said the Department of Finance was kept informed, though later became concerned about the deal.
Simon Harris Sam Boal / Photocall Ireland
Sam Boal / Photocall Ireland / Photocall Ireland
The spokesperson said that “to help prevent such concerns regarding the quality of decisions taken by IBRC management arising in the future”, Noonan requested a further meeting take place between the former Secretary General of the Department of Finance, John Moran, and the then CEO of IBRC.
This meeting took place in August 2012. The spokesperson said: “At that point, the transaction had been concluded and no further action could have been taken.”
As part of the deal with the Troika, the government put in place new frameworks to ensure proper handling of the sale of assets (on 29 March 2012).
A senior Department of Finance official was seconded to IBRC in October 2012 to “explore opportunities for deleveraging with a view to maximising the recovery for the taxpayer”, the spokesperson added.
They said this provided “greater oversight, given that a number of matters within IBRC at that time raised concerns with Department of Finance officials”.
‘Hen’s teeth’
Junior finance minister Simon Harris echoed these comments when answering Murphy’s questions about the issue in the Dáil this evening. He said the decision to liquidate IBRC was taken in the context of minimising the overall cost to the state.
Murphy: Getting information on this is like finding hen's teeth #dail
Murphy was not impressed with his response, saying she could have written it herself by piecing together the answers she got to previous parliamentary questions.
She also noted her disappointment that Noonan was not present to answer her queries directly.
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
Why did you put “obsessive’ TD” in the headline, Is this intended to make Ms Murphy appear deluded, Or just more journal spin,It’s Time to stop this your readers are not stupid.
Hi ItsTheLaw, Orla is out of the newsroom at the moment so I’ll answer for her.
It comes from Catherine Murphy TD herself, who describes herself as “a slightly OCD independent member of the Oireachtas’ in the second-last paragraph of the story. We wanted to put that in the headline, but OCD is an anxiety disorder with a specific set of conditions, and without the context of the rest of Deputy Murphy’s quote, it looks as though we were belittling her work if we used the phrase ‘OCD TD’. Also, on a more stylistic issue, as opposed to that substantive one, ‘OCD TD’ looked very clunky in the headline. So we took the ‘obsessive’ from OCD and used that instead. Hope that clears it up.
Christine can you answer my question ? Why do so many comments get deleted if they slag off Fg/Ff/L as a lot of mine do yet some of the comments against Sf/Aaa etc are disgraceful yet you leave them on
The Esat Digiphone licensing scandal all over again? In the Blue corner: DoB, Kenny, Smoothie Noonan…and in the Red corner….Micheal Martin…Ms. Murphy and just about everyone else! IW the scandal that keeps on giving…
Ok DoB gets a discount of €15mln then buys Site Serv for €45mln then gets €100′s of millions in a water meter installation contract. Nice! And FG in charge of the Min. Finance, Min. Environment (Iw)-Hogan {what Party does Tierney vote for I wonder?}, and…IBRC {Chairman former Fg Taoiseach}. The optics ain’t good-great deal though-Insider Trading, anyone? If I’d known I’d get the water contract would have found that measly €45mln somewhere :))
Pontius, the pension bill for the current Labour Ministers alone is €15mln. Despite an economic crisis no appetite for “cuts” there-not even within reason. Scam Artists the lot, 1 rule for us, another for them €2500 per week pension FFS! Why do we take this **it lying down?
The ‘obsessive’ is there as it was how Murphy describes herself in the article, in fact she is quoted as calling herself “a slightly OCD independent member of the Oireachtas”. OCD refers to Obsessive Compulsive Disorder. I don’t think it’s there for malicious reasons.
There should have been no requirement to mention OCD or Obsessiveness at all. After all, this is an independent politician doing what is correct on behalf of the people of Ireland. Investigating shady transactions, of the IBRC and KPMG.
One would have to wonder why Noonan, was seeking consultation from commercial financial consultants an stock brokers, such as KPMG, PWC, and now Goldman Sachs, with huge swaths of venture capitalists clients? This in effect threw open the doors to the Irish treasury, with such vast sums of money now available to these companies, there is no doubt that some underhanded movements where made. Instead Noonan overruled any queries from our own Department of Finance.
I will never believe that KPMG, and Noonan ever worked to “gain the best return for the tax payer”, their on going rhetoric from the beginning. Instead, they had a fire sale with many commercial portfolios, with massive losses to the tax payer of Billions.
One would wonder, given the chance to help thousands of Mortgage holders strangely caught up in the IBRC with Anglo Irish Bank, the chance to refinance there own loans with other regulated entities. Allowing them to get some foothold again on their lives, by helping those who where maybe defaulting and in great danger of losing their homes, or assisting those in negative equity, to re-aline their mortgage more in line with the current value of their homes.
This would have better influenced other banks, including AIB, and PTSB, owned by the taxpayer, to follow suit. In the long run it would better served the Tax payer, as they would have received a better return from this type of sales transaction. Instead we now see AIB, PTSB, and BOI, selling of their loans in similar fashion, and leaving people, already in dire financial difficulty to deal with Venture Capitalist companies who have little remorse, no requirement to adhere to the Code of Conduct on Mortgage Arrears, and a singular interest on maximising their own profitability. Although these companies including MARS Capital are not reported on when it comes to Home Repossessions, so the overall statistic on repossessions is marred.
KPMG, always used the line that “it would take too long to deal with individual mortgage holders. So time constraints where against them.” Yet the IBRC was running for over three years, at a cost to the taxpayer of 1.5 billion, managing INBS, book of just 1.8billion, short of any fees payed to KPMG, and PWC. Three years would have been enough to address a substantial number of mortgages, and receive a higher return on sales than the less than 30cent in the Euro payed by Oaktree, who subsequently set up MARS Capital. Now staffed with ex IBRC personnel.
Whatever decisions that where being made, they where not in the interest of the tax payer that is for sure.
Oh and while we are obsessing about the 100million write down Denis O’Brien received for Sierra/Sitserv, the MARS Capital deal in buying the INBS Mortgage book, constitutes a 1Billion Euro write down. Not sure where the savings where made?
We truly need more people like her running this country,She has an objective view rather than the parasitical morons who facilitate the demise and privatisation of our republc
I hope she is given credit for the work she has done. Many reluctant to give mick wallace appraisal for exposing some serious issues with our police force.
I have always felt that Irish Water and the corruption behind it , would be the absolute downfall of this arrogant Government and its beginning to happen .
Even with all the cover ups , the jobs for the boys corruption, with Denis O’Brien – Excuse the pun – but it has finally Leaked completely at last – thanks to a persistent TD .
Congratulations Catherine .
While those corrupt articles in FF try to jump on the bandwagon !
If anyone was getting contracts would prefer Joe the Plumber who lives in Ireland and pays Tax! You know the biggest beneficiary in this pays No Tax FFS. I’d say owning the Media-Tv-Radio-Newspapers-Petrol stations was enough already. Are there no laws in the EU against 1 guy owning the whole country? Makes Berlusconi look like an amateur :) . Bannana Republic.
A lot of questions need answering from the likes of Michael Noonan et al. Labours support for this government could become untenable with many of its back benchers calling it a day….early election possibly??
Always nice to see articles that the trolls dont go near…well done Catherine Murphy…accountability in Irish Politics is an issue that needs to be addressed ASAP…otherwise its just an endless pitiful cycle
I have immense respect for Catherine Murphy. She is immensely diligent, principled, fearless and highly effective.
There could not be more contrast between her effective an invaluable role and the impotent pawns, yoked by the party whip in political parties.
IBRC deserves full investigation and scrutiny. The redaction needs to be removed. we need full transparency. The tax payers have picked up the tab. Let’s have the full truth.
Who has paid big into fine gaels election pot and who has taken fine gaels crippling debt and cleared it since the last election as prior to the last election fine gael coffers were in a dire situation ,and if we go back to the last time fine gael were elected in the 90s , a debt of over 3 million was cleared during their short tenure in goverment
I know she is calling for an inquiry but please NO. I can tell you the outcome. Cost=100 million. Outcome: no one is guilty, perhaps “we all made mistakes”. Waste of time and money, justice is not something that happens in Ireland.
Fair play to Murphy. For every Healy-Rae or Lowry on the Ind benches there’s a Murphy or Daly doing work of substance. Much better value than vast majority of party backbenchers.
I’m just wondering about the headline; does Murphy describe herself as “obsessive”, or is it a term others have used about her? It’s not clear from the article, and I’d be interested to know who used the term if it was not Murphy.
Added to that, the “2013 IBRC liquidation Bill” passed by unanimous vote in Dail on the so called Prom Night, and or Night of Lapgate, contains paragraphs of text citing any Micheal Noonan, and the Management team of KPMG, are protected from any investigation, summons or litigation should any example of wrong doing resulting from the process of sales be revealed.
This is written into the act, all signed and passed by members of the Dail, on that night, overseen by the Ceann Comhairle, and put into writ by Micheal D.Higgins.
This Bill should never have been passed without proper knowledge of it contents being revealed to the house, the members being confused and distracted, and not all being fully in control of their own faculties, or focused on the matter at hand, it should be deemed fundamentally flawed and as such, should be found unconstitutional, and be amended.
Not even Micheal Noonan would pass the Mortgage Protections Bill, without thoroughly reviewing it’s contents, this he stated at a chamber meeting himself in September 2014, and that bill has yet to be passed at all.
When it comes to his own protection he is precious, when it comes to the protection of the Public he is reckless, and ignorant and condescending.
stinks to hi heaven,great work Catherine,i wasn”t impressed either with that Twerp” Simon Harris”s answer,little jumped up Article,Not fit for Purpose,,,,roll on the Election”"
imprisonment for all those who don’t pay for water or tv licences!
meanwhile rapists and robbers get away with a slap on the back.
ireland definitely has its priorities right.
We need some really good journalists to get into this – - along the lines of Woodward and Bernstein. Follow the money, it stinks of Lowryism. Something tells me this is their Watergate.
I am so proud of Catherine Murphy as my TD from North Kildare. She is tireless, hardworking & utterly principled. Obsessional” is self deprecating & an unnecessary part of the article title. Great work, Catherine!!
Love to start a petition on change.org for Kenny’s resignation. He hasn’t a clue what’s going on or he’s party to it, either way his position is no longer tenable and needs to go. Sick of this. Said all along this is a multi-million tribunal in the making, a waste of money tribunal to find out how we wasted money.
Kenny won’t go hungry, while the people he ‘represents’ pay for the continued corruption and greed
€5m to the directors of a company which was being sold at a €100m write off. Sometimes I think I’m dreaming reading the news here
Bowe, the Trolls are already primed on strategies to post against IW protestors/objectors. etc. This is new. They’re awaiting the “Party Line”/guidance.
Fair play to Catherine Murphy- it’s a shame the rest of the muppets running this country are more worried about lining their own pockets and not putting the interests of our people first. This Banana Republic has to change- why do we stand waiting nearly 7 years for a banking inquiry- bend over and take being asked to pay for water a 3rd time which will only line the pockets of a semi- private company that will continue to raise water charges. And why do we continue to stand for our so called ‘leaders’ continuing to run our country into the ground- not build housing to address the housing crisis (yes it’s a crisis and its all about supply – lack of), address homelessness and chronic waiting lists across the healthcare system that is taxpayers are bent over paying for….. All the time the big €€€’s pay back the bond holders/ investors who gambled on good old Ireland who will pay back on their gambles even when not required (and bond holders are insured against) at the expense of its people.
Really! Are we proud of the Gombeens running this country who really couldn’t give a sh&t about the country’s people? No- and as for their inquiries and tribunals…. Don’t even go there. More lined pockets. What about the Bernie Madoff clanger in the states- the biggest Ponzi scheme of all times- he was fast tracked to jail- no fear of that happening here in the Banana Republic…. Sure we’d have to admit then that most of those in power are crooked and bent and we believe all their crap – sure don’t we vote for them and once they are in they couldn’t care less.
Here’s a novel idea- what about requiring all TD’s ministers to forfeit their pensions from previous jobs- sure we wouldn’t give 3 pensions to our rulers … Would we? And how big are the pensions ??? Huge. Yes, really !
And while we are at it – how about ensuring that TD’s must be trained in their ministery’s? Sure it wouldn’t be fair to expect a teacher or solicitor to be a Taoiseach or finance minister- would it? No disrespect to either profession but anyone that excels in their field normally has a background in it.
Anyway, sure it will be all grand.
Catherine Murphy- I hope there are many more like you and I hope the people of this Banana Republic appreciate the good work you are doing with limited resources.
Well done to the journal.ie for not following the media herd/ govt propaganda and actually reporting on this issue – keep up the good work.
People of this Banana Republic- listen , question and expect more from those highest paid govt. ministers, TD’s and officials who we pay more than most other country’s in the world….. And we a bankrupt country! Sure they must be doing something right….. And won’t we be grand?
Health unions suspend planned 'work-to-rule' following talks with the HSE
Updated
22 mins ago
1.5k
Sentebale
Harry’s ‘toxic brand’ impacted charity he founded in honour of Diana, says chair
38 mins ago
3.1k
15
social welfare changes
If you lose your job and have worked for 5 years you'll get up to €450 a week under new rules
13 hrs ago
36.2k
74
Your Cookies. Your Choice.
Cookies help provide our news service while also enabling the advertising needed to fund this work.
We categorise cookies as Necessary, Performance (used to analyse the site performance) and Targeting (used to target advertising which helps us keep this service free).
We and our 161 partners store and access personal data, like browsing data or unique identifiers, on your device. Selecting Accept All enables tracking technologies to support the purposes shown under we and our partners process data to provide. If trackers are disabled, some content and ads you see may not be as relevant to you. You can resurface this menu to change your choices or withdraw consent at any time by clicking the Cookie Preferences link on the bottom of the webpage .Your choices will have effect within our Website. For more details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
We and our vendors process data for the following purposes:
Use precise geolocation data. Actively scan device characteristics for identification. Store and/or access information on a device. Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development.
Cookies Preference Centre
We process your data to deliver content or advertisements and measure the delivery of such content or advertisements to extract insights about our website. We share this information with our partners on the basis of consent. You may exercise your right to consent, based on a specific purpose below or at a partner level in the link under each purpose. Some vendors may process your data based on their legitimate interests, which does not require your consent. You cannot object to tracking technologies placed to ensure security, prevent fraud, fix errors, or deliver and present advertising and content, and precise geolocation data and active scanning of device characteristics for identification may be used to support this purpose. This exception does not apply to targeted advertising. These choices will be signaled to our vendors participating in the Transparency and Consent Framework.
Manage Consent Preferences
Necessary Cookies
Always Active
These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work.
Targeting Cookies
These cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.
Functional Cookies
These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and personalisation. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we have added to our pages. If you do not allow these cookies then these services may not function properly.
Performance Cookies
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not be able to monitor our performance.
Store and/or access information on a device 110 partners can use this purpose
Cookies, device or similar online identifiers (e.g. login-based identifiers, randomly assigned identifiers, network based identifiers) together with other information (e.g. browser type and information, language, screen size, supported technologies etc.) can be stored or read on your device to recognise it each time it connects to an app or to a website, for one or several of the purposes presented here.
Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development 143 partners can use this purpose
Use limited data to select advertising 113 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times an ad is presented to you).
Create profiles for personalised advertising 83 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (such as forms you submit, content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (for example, information from your previous activity on this service and other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (that might include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present advertising that appears more relevant based on your possible interests by this and other entities.
Use profiles to select personalised advertising 83 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on your advertising profiles, which can reflect your activity on this service or other websites or apps (like the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects.
Create profiles to personalise content 39 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (for instance, forms you submit, non-advertising content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (such as your previous activity on this service or other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (which might for example include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present content that appears more relevant based on your possible interests, such as by adapting the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find content that matches your interests.
Use profiles to select personalised content 35 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on your content personalisation profiles, which can reflect your activity on this or other services (for instance, the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects. This can for example be used to adapt the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find (non-advertising) content that matches your interests.
Measure advertising performance 134 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which advertising is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine how well an advert has worked for you or other users and whether the goals of the advertising were reached. For instance, whether you saw an ad, whether you clicked on it, whether it led you to buy a product or visit a website, etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of advertising campaigns.
Measure content performance 61 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which content is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine whether the (non-advertising) content e.g. reached its intended audience and matched your interests. For instance, whether you read an article, watch a video, listen to a podcast or look at a product description, how long you spent on this service and the web pages you visit etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of (non-advertising) content that is shown to you.
Understand audiences through statistics or combinations of data from different sources 74 partners can use this purpose
Reports can be generated based on the combination of data sets (like user profiles, statistics, market research, analytics data) regarding your interactions and those of other users with advertising or (non-advertising) content to identify common characteristics (for instance, to determine which target audiences are more receptive to an ad campaign or to certain contents).
Develop and improve services 83 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service, such as your interaction with ads or content, can be very helpful to improve products and services and to build new products and services based on user interactions, the type of audience, etc. This specific purpose does not include the development or improvement of user profiles and identifiers.
Use limited data to select content 37 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type, or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times a video or an article is presented to you).
Use precise geolocation data 46 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, your precise location (within a radius of less than 500 metres) may be used in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Actively scan device characteristics for identification 27 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, certain characteristics specific to your device might be requested and used to distinguish it from other devices (such as the installed fonts or plugins, the resolution of your screen) in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Ensure security, prevent and detect fraud, and fix errors 92 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Your data can be used to monitor for and prevent unusual and possibly fraudulent activity (for example, regarding advertising, ad clicks by bots), and ensure systems and processes work properly and securely. It can also be used to correct any problems you, the publisher or the advertiser may encounter in the delivery of content and ads and in your interaction with them.
Deliver and present advertising and content 99 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Certain information (like an IP address or device capabilities) is used to ensure the technical compatibility of the content or advertising, and to facilitate the transmission of the content or ad to your device.
Match and combine data from other data sources 72 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Information about your activity on this service may be matched and combined with other information relating to you and originating from various sources (for instance your activity on a separate online service, your use of a loyalty card in-store, or your answers to a survey), in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Link different devices 53 partners can use this feature
Always Active
In support of the purposes explained in this notice, your device might be considered as likely linked to other devices that belong to you or your household (for instance because you are logged in to the same service on both your phone and your computer, or because you may use the same Internet connection on both devices).
Identify devices based on information transmitted automatically 88 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Your device might be distinguished from other devices based on information it automatically sends when accessing the Internet (for instance, the IP address of your Internet connection or the type of browser you are using) in support of the purposes exposed in this notice.
Save and communicate privacy choices 69 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
The choices you make regarding the purposes and entities listed in this notice are saved and made available to those entities in the form of digital signals (such as a string of characters). This is necessary in order to enable both this service and those entities to respect such choices.
have your say