Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
THE AVERAGE SIZE of families in Ireland is continuing to decline – but at a slower pace than previous years – according to census data released today.
The figures show that the average number of children in each family is now 1.38 – a drop from 1.41 in 2006. However, the decrease observed in the census taken last year was less pronounced than data seen in censuses from 1991 to 2006, according to the report.
The number of families with four or more children has remained relatively stable over the period examined by the most recent census, with 64.2 per cent of families being made up in this way in 2011 in comparison with 64.7 per cent in 2006.
Meanwhile, the average number of children per family in 2011 remained unchanged from 2006 at 1.4, while the number of one-child families increased by 13 per cent.
Data showed there were 1,592 families with seven or more children in Ireland.
Of the 1.18 million families in Ireland, 143,600 were comprised of cohabiting couples, according to the report. The majority of these couples had no children (58 per cent) but the average the number of children in this family type was observed to be rising – with 0.7 children per cohabiting couple in 2011, up from 0.6 in 2006.
The report noted that in general co-habiting couples are younger than married couples.
Meanwhile, 87 per cent of lone parent families were headed by mothers, with two-fifths of lone parents being single and just under a quarter widowed.
Some 31.8 per cent of lone parents were separated or divorced – an increase from 29.8 per cent in 2006.
The census found that there were 4,042 same-sex couples living together in Ireland, with 2,321 being male and 1,721 being female. Some 230 same-sex couple had children, the vast majority of which were women.
Most same-sex couples (3,876) were cohabiting, however 166 indicated that they were married. The report notes that, as same-sex civil unions had only recently been introduced in Ireland at the time of the census, it is likely that most of these couples were married abroad.
Despite the high number of births in recent years, the report notes this is not an indicator of any change in the underlying fertility rate – saying that increased birth were due to a simple increase of women of “peak” child-bearing age (25 – 39 years old).
The biggest increases in numbers of children were among women in their thirties: this number rose 11 per cent from 460,095 in 2006 to 510,879 in April 2011. The average age of a mother for births registered in the three months around April 2011 was 31.8 years.
The counties with the highest birth rates were:
Offaly: 3.15 children per woman
Donegal: 3.12 children per woman
Monaghan: 3.11 children per woman
The areas with the lowest birth rates were:
Dún Laoghaire Rathdown: 2.44 children per woman
Dublin city: 2.47 children per woman
Galway city: 2.52 children per woman
Another example of the weaning influence of the catholic church in this country to whom the sole purpose of women was no more than that of a brood mare who dare not use contraception and be subjected to mutilation in hospital in order to have as many potential little catholics as possible to maintain the church’s position of power and authority.
There is also the matter of easily influenced couples in the 40′s and 50′s who were driven into this nonsense of having large family’s to be subsequently reared in abject poverty. Their day is over and not a day too soon.
Stony broke after childcare costs. Cannot afford more children.
…or maybe some people like to have a large family?
Isn’t the replacement rate 2.1 . So falling fertility rates is not always good.
This article is a complete mess.
I think that it is great the people are having fewer children, and it tells us that the roman catholic church has lost it’s hold over the people of Ireland. It was really ridiculous, that the roman catholic church was preventing women from taking contraceptives, telling them it was a mortal sin to take them and not realising like this present government, that they couldn’t afford to keep their children, as in Greece where they are adopting them because of difficult circumstances. I used to live near a roman catholic family of 13 children living in a two roomed house, and ask myself how on earth did the church expect a woman to bring up a large amount of children in that little space, and with very little money. oh yes, I forgot, the priest themselves lived in big houses, where the mother with lots of children,in the little cottage and who was asked not to take contraceptives by the person living in the mansion. Does it remind you of anything that happens today. Is it a matter of deja vu?
As a non-religious individual i found what u are saying is very offensive and non-sense. I apparently u hate catholics but Having 3 kids is essential to catch the replacement rate. Otherwise economic and social sustainability doesnt exist. Like it or not, this is the scientific truth…
How can any woman have 3.15/3.11 or 3.12 children? Are children pre-packed in fractions?
the average number is worked out by number of babies number of mammues and divising the number. if your talking 2 woman one with 2 children one with 3 the average would be 2.5, simples no? averages in the mathematical sense dont always lead to nice whole numbers
have your say