Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.
You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.
If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.
RTÉ BROADCASTER CLAIRE Byrne has spoken out on the station’s payments scandal, saying that that she has never sought any “side deal” in her contracts with RTÉ.
Byrne said it was “heartbreaking” to hear members of the public speak about how their trust had been broken due to the controversy.
Beginning her morning radio programme by addressing the issue, Byrne outlined the details of her recent salaries with RTÉ in what she called an attempt to be “open and honest” on the topic.
“Just like everyone else, I’ve been grappling over the last few days with what has happened and the implications are that for all of us here in RTÉ, and for you, who rely on us and expect us to be completely transparent.
“I listened to Liveline on Friday, and I listened to the callers who spoke to Joe [Duffy] and I heard them talking about being disappointed about trust being broken and the importance of transparency,” she said.
“And for me, and for all the great people that I work with here every day on this show hearing that is nothing short of heartbreaking.
“Because I can tell you that as programme makers, our aim is always to be consistent, to be fair, to be professional, and to respect the hard-earned trust that you the audience has placed in us.”
Advertisement
She said her most recently published annual salary of €350,000 is “correct, as are those published in the past” and that her salary at present is €280,000 due to her stepping away from her Monday night television show.
“I’ve never sought, been offered or discussed any kind of commercial or side deal. No other payment exists or has ever existed beyond my published fee,” she said.
“Secondly, my most recent published fee was €350,000 and that was the fee agreed by RTÉ for me to present both this radio programme and Claire Byrne Live, and as you may know I decided not to continue with that television show for personal and for family reasons.
“And so in order to be fully transparent with you here today, I want you to know that my RTE fee now is 280,000 euro and that fee was agreed for presenting this programme.”
She said the most recent contract was negotiated by Noel Kelly, the agent whose firm NK Management handled Ryan Tubridy’s controversial contracts with RTÉ.
Byrne added that a quiz show she recently presented for RTÉ One on television quiz show – Ireland’s Smartest – saw her receive a separate fee of €25,000, which she said was also negotiated by NK Management.
“I acknowledged that fee is significant and it’s way beyond what many people could hope to and there are others who will no doubt have more to say about it, I’m sure but my personal decision here this morning is to be open and honest with you,” she said.
“Having said that, my decision to do this is not meant to set a precedent for others or to force anyone else to release their information. That’s a matter entirely for themselves. I felt that for me. It was the right thing to do this morning.”
Byrne said her absence from the programme last Thursday and Friday, as the scandal broke, was a “complete coincidence” as she had booked time away for a family break.
Related Reads
RTÉ Director General Dee Forbes resigns 'with immediate effect' over Ryan Tubridy pay scandal
Arts Minister announces external review into governance and culture at RTÉ
Inside RTÉ: Pay, roster and contract issues constant for lower paid staff
“I had no prior warning, no inkling that there was a problem on the horizon,” she said.
“I wasn’t even aware that presenter fees including my own were subjected to a Grant Thornton torn Thornton review. I knew absolutely nothing about it.”
The controversy arose after it was revealed on Thursday that RTÉ’s highest paid star Ryan Tubridy earned €345,000 more over the course of over six years than RTÉ had previously disclosed.
Tubridy’s annual earnings published by RTÉ between the years 2017-2022 ranged from €440,000-€491,667 but a review carried out by Grant Thornton found that his annual earnings from RTÉ in those years actually ranged from €511,667-€545,000.
The issue was partly the result of a deal which saw Tubridy receive additional income from commercial partner Renault, with that income guaranteed and underwritten by RTÉ.
The manner in which these payments were recorded led to an understatement of his earnings, with RTÉ apologising for the mistake. Tubridy himself apologised on Friday for ‘not questioning’ the published figures.
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
Close
84 Comments
This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic.
Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy
here
before taking part.
@reg morrisey: Why is she getting paid to much. I just posted a comment about negotiating your salary. If Claire got what she wanted then her employer agreed to that figure. If RTE said we are only playing a contract figure of let’s say €125,000 , Claire has the option then to except this figure or go elsewhere to get a contract she wants. Again as I said in an earlier post, if we were all in a position to negotiate salary terms with our employer would we be working for the income we are on now. I doubt it
@reg morrisey: CB is a talented presenter and commands a fee that reflects that. The Irish citizen and listener benefits from the impartiality and transparency that allows her to do her job.
@Frank: Michael D living in the Phoenix Park mortgage free and probably utilities paid for by our good selves is on €250,000 down from €325,000 p/a.. is he worth it.. does he work as hard as Claire ??? . The island of begrudgers showing its true self again
@Michael Costello: comparing Michael Higgins to a newscaster is a bit of a stretch! I think he works extremely hard and seems like a lovely man. RTE and their employees are just bleeding the taxpayer dry and not offering much in return.
@Michael Costello: Possibly for the one term he originally promised. However, he got greedy and put himself up for a second term. Nice work if you can get it. A nice little retirement home for himself and his token wife. The original champagne socialist and a charlatan to boot.
@Frank: The point I want to make is its not the individual person/employees fault that an employer had in your words “obscene,unethical ” wage structure. I agree with you , but it’s not Claire fault. No employee is going into an employer and say , you know what, I’m being grossly overpaid, please reduce my wage. If she did this she would have more haters getting on her back. ” who does she think she is, rich b***h, etc etc. So your right let’s look at the employer and sort them out .
Each of the 10 top employees should not be on any more than €100,000 and an RTE-only contract if they do not like that let them leave for the commercial sector… each contract has to be transparent and open to public scrutiny…we who pay the TV license have no option but to pay.
Poor, poor Claire – she’s only getting €280,000 a year now, for speaking on the radio. We should set up a GoFundMe for her, it can’t be easy getting a €70,000 pay-cut. We need to all come together and help her get back on her poor feet.
@Balloon Boy: I’m saying Claire is clearly going through a tough time, financially – so we should all come together and help her out. €280,000 a year is only like… €5500 a week, every week, of every year, of every decade – it can’t be easy for her. She used to be on €6750 a week, and now that has been DECIMATED to only €5500 a week, every week, of every year, of every decade – for speaking on the radio. It’s not right, so we need to come together to help her back on to her poor, poor feet.
@Frank: I understand the hilarious joke you’re trying to make, but she didn’t actually complain about her salary. She’s way overpaid, but no need to start making stuff up.
@Balloon Boy: I thought she sounded embarrassed about her income. Momentarily, and for show. But as posters here never tire of saying: would you turn down the money?
@Balloon Boy: Where did I make anything up? She used to receive €350,000 – now she only receives €280,000, that’s a €70,000 pay-cut. She used to receive, in one year, what would take the average person 10 years to earn, now – the average person would have to work only 8 years of hard, often back-braking work to earn the same – this is outrageous. Solidarity with Claire and all of the RTÉ workers.
@Alan Leahy: nope, be taxed at source… A brighter accountancy brain might be able to explain the anomaly where you’re paid from taxes, by the collector and that salary is in-turn taxed again (sort of pointless to present state jobs as gross really).
@Pauline Gallagher: Ah that’s a lovely idea, I’m sure she’d love that – let’s make it happen! See what happens when we come together folks? Sure… it’s only one RTÉ presenter, and they all probably could do with some help – but it’s a start. I just read this evening there, that Brendan O’Connor is only on… get this: €245,000 per year. Apparently he only has 4 hours a week in there, the poor man. That’s only works out around €1200 an hour. Claire has it tough, we all do – but poor Brendan… I don’t know how he’s keeping it together, on that sort of money. There’s something seriously wrong in our society when we can’t look after our Radio Presenters properly, something seriously, seriously wrong.
Public broadcaster service should be a simple service not a gravy train for a few . Time to reform it . Let’s see the “talent” get snapped up by multinationals as they keep saying.
@ibrahim Sudane: Claire B goes for a job in a retail store paying minimum wage contract and she is successful as the employer deems she has the skill set to do the job.. A.N.Other goes for the same position and to is successful as again the employer deems she has the skill set to do the job.. Claire B goes for a €250,000 job in RTE and is successful as the employer deems she has the skill set to do the job.. A.N.Other goes for same job but is unsuccessful as the employer deems they don’t have the skill set to do the job.. where is there a problem here
Noel Kelly seems to be the problem here , the minute someone shows any sort of talent he hoovers them up and negotiates some obscene wage , cap the wages , simple as
@pkunzip doom2.zip: well it has nothing to do with the church or the Angelus, now does it? This is woke RTE and this is now a time of reflection for all religions and none.
This discussion should be about transparency
Of salaries not about people taking cheap shots at people just because they personally don’t like them.Look in the mirror and see if you’re such a hot shot
Main reason why Rte is cash strapped is because they feel its to overpay a joe a Claire & ryan whose combined wages add to nearly a million. Yet they want to increase license fee well food luck with that.
Rte is a small sized broadcaster in country with a small population so why is it paying British broadcast salaries. No one is ever going to poach these broadcasters as nobody outside Ireland knows who they are
I would firstly say fair play to her to coming and speaking about it. I’d also say fair play to her for negotiating such a salary. We all would 100% do the same. That said I think it’s time for RTE to go it alone or close down, bulldoze the RTE campus and put modular homes there instead for our homeless or sorry I mean for every Tom/Dick and Harry who are not our homeless but take priority.
One of the Poor Claires should sue RTE for not having the same deal as Tubs along with PoorJoe, Poor Miriam, Poor Ray, Gerry Ryan’s Poor daughter, I can’t remember her name etc.
Shes a presenter not a producer & sits and presses buttons &getting that much and she doesn’t deny it fine hand 200,00 50 k is by far enough to be earning. So disheartening to see such a massive amount of money been wasted
Not 1 presenter in rte should be on that sort of money.
Scare Byrne terrified the auld ones telling them they would be getting their hair done if lucky in a box with face nappies, gloves etc etc. Despicable doom mongering
99% of the comments here are off the target.
As a contractor, ANY contractor, you try to get as much as you can from your employer.
Everyone complaining here would exactly do the same, without exception.
It is solely RTE to blame, living in their own cloud.
It seems they have still the same attitude from the housing boom.
Remember, when house prices were posted as a success story when they reached the level of London?
This is the same mind set: Our Presenters are as expensive than the ones in the BBC
= “we’re on the same level”.
RTE needs to be cleaned out, contracts re-negotiated and halved for a lot of them.
If they’re not happy, I’m pretty sure there’re good replacements waiting in the queue.
Admittedly, I’m not as well informed as most of the commenters, but I did a Google search of top BBC presenters and top Canadian presenters on CBC and Claire’s salary seems on par with similar posts in those countries. I am astonished at Ryan’s salary. Apart from Linnekar and ZoeB, he makes more than the 3rd highest presenter on BBC. Don Cherry, Canadian icon and national treasure, makes less. I really don’t think many people would disagree that Ryan is awkward and cringe, and the comment he made a few years ago on the radio about women getting fat as soon as they get a ring on their finger turned me off of him completely. I’m confused as to who decides who is that valuable? At a family gathering this weekend, I was told they pay these people so much so they won’t go to BBC. Really?
All should come out and declare their deals. Where is the 50m the whistleblower mentioned? Her payment is fair enough, she is far better than Tubridy or Darcy.
I partly read this story but i like Clair Burn and her programs and just my opinion i think she should have got the Late show Job or at least a talk show that is controversial or even dave Fanning should get a show that people want to watch in stead of all this right wing bull shit were watching with sky and virgin media, No one should have to reveal their salaries or address on the T.V for one it puts them and their family in direct danger from the criminal world and two its none of anyone’s business if Ryan Tubs was a bad at his job then he would not be on the ,money he is on but he was good at his job that’s why he got side deals it happens in all walks of life and jobs and Leo is no one to call anyone out about because FF/FG do the same if you don’t fit their moulid for a certain job or business then they give it to some one who does and that goes for houses as well, there are worse things happening in the country at the moment so deal with those issues first,
@daniel keane: are you for real??. If Claire Byrne got the Late Late show it would be over in no time. She is a daily moan. We need a bit of entertsinment,not this constant flow of negativity. Listen to lyric,,with Marty Whelan and his lovely music and positive attitude
@Pavel Shipilov:
Their agent is doing the negotiation. If you can get it, sure, everyone would take it.
It is not their fault, but RTE splashing out the cash.
If you apply for a 40k job, ask for 60k and they say “okay” – would YOU complain,
even when in your head you’re thinking “man, they overpay”?
For sure you will take the money without a blink of the eye.
@Wolfgang Bonow: Anyone with any integrity wouldn’t ask for more than they think they are worth. And the people getting a 40k job and immediately trying to negotiate a salary of 60k, who are THESE people?
Nurses is leaving this country because of their salary and this people doing nothing just like parrot repit repit and repit to entertain your brain.wake up people
Wow, nothing like your RTE colleagues having your back. Ryan wouldn’t know anything about that. They’re all rich, its all taxpayers money, and none of them are worth the amount they are paid, so they can all stop being so faux outraged and sanctimonious about how transparent they are.
CB is a talented presenter and commands a fee that reflects that. The Irish citizen and listener benefits from the impartiality and transparency that allows her to do her job.
A suggestion, does any body think this whole controversy about pay scales in RTE, is a distraction, designed by the government, to distract the general public about the seriousness of the Real problem, namely the Asylum Seekers. Just food for thought.
Teenage boy charged with assault after 15-year-old girl hit in the head with a brick in Belfast
20 mins ago
69
Seanad
Senators propose Israeli arms embargo to block gun exports and transit through Ireland
40 mins ago
695
RIP
'An uber-creative firecracker': Tributes as film star Val Kilmer dies aged 65
5 hrs ago
37.5k
26
Your Cookies. Your Choice.
Cookies help provide our news service while also enabling the advertising needed to fund this work.
We categorise cookies as Necessary, Performance (used to analyse the site performance) and Targeting (used to target advertising which helps us keep this service free).
We and our 161 partners store and access personal data, like browsing data or unique identifiers, on your device. Selecting Accept All enables tracking technologies to support the purposes shown under we and our partners process data to provide. If trackers are disabled, some content and ads you see may not be as relevant to you. You can resurface this menu to change your choices or withdraw consent at any time by clicking the Cookie Preferences link on the bottom of the webpage .Your choices will have effect within our Website. For more details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
We and our vendors process data for the following purposes:
Use precise geolocation data. Actively scan device characteristics for identification. Store and/or access information on a device. Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development.
Cookies Preference Centre
We process your data to deliver content or advertisements and measure the delivery of such content or advertisements to extract insights about our website. We share this information with our partners on the basis of consent. You may exercise your right to consent, based on a specific purpose below or at a partner level in the link under each purpose. Some vendors may process your data based on their legitimate interests, which does not require your consent. You cannot object to tracking technologies placed to ensure security, prevent fraud, fix errors, or deliver and present advertising and content, and precise geolocation data and active scanning of device characteristics for identification may be used to support this purpose. This exception does not apply to targeted advertising. These choices will be signaled to our vendors participating in the Transparency and Consent Framework.
Manage Consent Preferences
Necessary Cookies
Always Active
These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work.
Targeting Cookies
These cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.
Functional Cookies
These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and personalisation. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we have added to our pages. If you do not allow these cookies then these services may not function properly.
Performance Cookies
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not be able to monitor our performance.
Store and/or access information on a device 110 partners can use this purpose
Cookies, device or similar online identifiers (e.g. login-based identifiers, randomly assigned identifiers, network based identifiers) together with other information (e.g. browser type and information, language, screen size, supported technologies etc.) can be stored or read on your device to recognise it each time it connects to an app or to a website, for one or several of the purposes presented here.
Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development 143 partners can use this purpose
Use limited data to select advertising 113 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times an ad is presented to you).
Create profiles for personalised advertising 83 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (such as forms you submit, content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (for example, information from your previous activity on this service and other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (that might include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present advertising that appears more relevant based on your possible interests by this and other entities.
Use profiles to select personalised advertising 83 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on your advertising profiles, which can reflect your activity on this service or other websites or apps (like the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects.
Create profiles to personalise content 39 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (for instance, forms you submit, non-advertising content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (such as your previous activity on this service or other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (which might for example include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present content that appears more relevant based on your possible interests, such as by adapting the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find content that matches your interests.
Use profiles to select personalised content 35 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on your content personalisation profiles, which can reflect your activity on this or other services (for instance, the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects. This can for example be used to adapt the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find (non-advertising) content that matches your interests.
Measure advertising performance 134 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which advertising is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine how well an advert has worked for you or other users and whether the goals of the advertising were reached. For instance, whether you saw an ad, whether you clicked on it, whether it led you to buy a product or visit a website, etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of advertising campaigns.
Measure content performance 61 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which content is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine whether the (non-advertising) content e.g. reached its intended audience and matched your interests. For instance, whether you read an article, watch a video, listen to a podcast or look at a product description, how long you spent on this service and the web pages you visit etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of (non-advertising) content that is shown to you.
Understand audiences through statistics or combinations of data from different sources 74 partners can use this purpose
Reports can be generated based on the combination of data sets (like user profiles, statistics, market research, analytics data) regarding your interactions and those of other users with advertising or (non-advertising) content to identify common characteristics (for instance, to determine which target audiences are more receptive to an ad campaign or to certain contents).
Develop and improve services 83 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service, such as your interaction with ads or content, can be very helpful to improve products and services and to build new products and services based on user interactions, the type of audience, etc. This specific purpose does not include the development or improvement of user profiles and identifiers.
Use limited data to select content 37 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type, or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times a video or an article is presented to you).
Use precise geolocation data 46 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, your precise location (within a radius of less than 500 metres) may be used in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Actively scan device characteristics for identification 27 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, certain characteristics specific to your device might be requested and used to distinguish it from other devices (such as the installed fonts or plugins, the resolution of your screen) in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Ensure security, prevent and detect fraud, and fix errors 92 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Your data can be used to monitor for and prevent unusual and possibly fraudulent activity (for example, regarding advertising, ad clicks by bots), and ensure systems and processes work properly and securely. It can also be used to correct any problems you, the publisher or the advertiser may encounter in the delivery of content and ads and in your interaction with them.
Deliver and present advertising and content 99 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Certain information (like an IP address or device capabilities) is used to ensure the technical compatibility of the content or advertising, and to facilitate the transmission of the content or ad to your device.
Match and combine data from other data sources 72 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Information about your activity on this service may be matched and combined with other information relating to you and originating from various sources (for instance your activity on a separate online service, your use of a loyalty card in-store, or your answers to a survey), in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Link different devices 53 partners can use this feature
Always Active
In support of the purposes explained in this notice, your device might be considered as likely linked to other devices that belong to you or your household (for instance because you are logged in to the same service on both your phone and your computer, or because you may use the same Internet connection on both devices).
Identify devices based on information transmitted automatically 88 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Your device might be distinguished from other devices based on information it automatically sends when accessing the Internet (for instance, the IP address of your Internet connection or the type of browser you are using) in support of the purposes exposed in this notice.
Save and communicate privacy choices 69 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
The choices you make regarding the purposes and entities listed in this notice are saved and made available to those entities in the form of digital signals (such as a string of characters). This is necessary in order to enable both this service and those entities to respect such choices.
have your say