Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.
You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.
If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.
A JUNIOR MINISTER has admitted that some Labour TDs, including himself, may miss today’s Dáil vote on Clare Daly’s fatal foetal abnormality bill.
Kevin Humphreys, the junior social protection minister, told Morning Ireland that it may not be because of the particular vote but because “a Dáil deputy’s schedule is a very busy schedule”.
His comments come as party colleague, Anne Ferris, prepares to oppose her party and vote for Daly’s bill. The vote is due to take place in the Dáil at 5pm. The government is opposing the bill on the advice of the Attorney General that it is unconstitutional.
“First of all it’s a Tuesday, many people have the different things to do, and different commitments. I myself may not be in the chamber because I’m taking legislation through the Seanad today,” Humphreys explained.
“So there may be people missing. It may not be because they’re particularly missing to avoid the vote.”
He added: “I would say the maximum number of Labour TDs that are there, are present, will be in the house and will vote with the party.
Minister Kevin Humphreys says he's surprised by Anne Ferris's decision to support Clare Daly's bill. "I'm disappointed." #morningireland
Humphreys said that he was surprised by party colleague Ferris’s decision to defy the party whip and support the bill but said the advice was that it was unconstitutional.
However, he added: ”In principle, what Clare Daly has said, I agree with it.
“It’s not really the right thing to do to put a woman on a place to go over and have an abortion when the foetus isn’t viable, is not going to survive and make her go through that nine months. A woman in that position should have a choice.”
The Dublin South-East TD also appeared to agree that the Attorney General’s advice to government on this issue should be published and said that the wider issue was the need to repeal the 8th Amendment.
Speaking on his way into cabinet this morning, Public Expenditure Minister Brendan Howlin said Labour had a long record of campaigning on issues surrounding abortion law, but that the bill being proposed would be “cruel”.
“We want to give real redress to these people, real solutions to these people, not enact legislation that constitutionally is infirm and therefore will have no effect for them. That, I believe, would be cruel.”
Sam Boal / Photocall Ireland
Sam Boal / Photocall Ireland / Photocall Ireland
Elsewhere, while Sinn Féin plans to abstain on tonight’s vote, Fianna Fáil will allow free vote.
The party’s health spokesperson Billy Kelleher plans to vote for Daly’s bill while its children’s spokesperson Robert Troy said he remained undecided.
“I believe the idea of a free vote would allow this parliament to mature and have a very open debate on this issue, that it wouldn’t come down hard and fast on party lines,” Kelleher said.
Speaking outside Leinster House today, Kelleher called on the government parties to allow a free vote among their TDs, arguing the constitutionality of the bill can only be tested by the Supreme Court.
The Cork North-Central TD added: “I don’t see why the parliament is always obliged to take the Attorney General’s advice. The government is, but the Dáil certainly isn’t.”
Last night, Anne Ferris confirmed her intentions in an interview on RTÉ’s Claire Byrne Live last night, saying: ”It is a matter of principle for me.”
The Wicklow TD will automatically forfeit the Labour whip with her vote against the government, the party’s chief whip Emmet Stagg confirmed to TheJournal.ie last night.
Speaking to RTÉ, Ferris said she was willing to accept the consequences of her decision if it results in her being expelled from the Labour Party.
The bill is above politics.
Advertisement
Ferris said that she has been campaigning for this all her adult life.
“I am pro-choice and I make no apologies for it.”
She clarified that the vote today will not enact legislation, but is merely allowing it to go on to Committee Stage, where the bill will be gone through line-by-line by legal experts.
Ferris said that Tánaiste Joan Burton had not been in contact with her about her decision or the impending vote.
Labour TD Anne Ferris confirms she will vote against her party on Clare Daly’s bill tomorrow, says legislation is “above politics”.
There is growing unease among backbenchers at the prospect of the government again opposing a bill from the United Left TD that was debated in the Dáil last Friday.
Labour will hold a special briefing on the legal advice from the Attorney General in a bid to convince uneasy TDs of the reasons why it must be opposed.
This is set to take place at 3.30pm today before a Dáil vote sometime after 5pm.
The bill would provide for two suitably qualified medical professionals (an obstetrician and a perinatologist) to jointly certify in good faith that the foetus in question is suffering from a fatal foetal abnormality.
Proponents of it have argued it does not confer any new rights in relation to abortion, merely clarifies existing rights and, they argue, it is constitutional.
However, speaking for the government last Friday, Health Minister Leo Varadkar said the bill was flawed legislation and would require a referendum which the government has no mandate to do.
Labour’s official party policy is to seek the repeal of the 8th Amendment which provides the mother and unborn child with an equal right to life. But the party argues it currently has no mandate for a referendum and would seek one after the next election.
Just one Labour TD, Joanna Tuffy, spoke on the bill last Friday, saying she believed it was unconstitutional.
Other TDssaid to be particularly uneasy about opposing Daly’s legislation are Ciara Conway and Michael McNamara. Several Labour TDs contacted by TheJournal.ie yesterday did not return comment.
It’s thought that several could fail to show up for today’s vote as happened last December when 13 Labour deputies failed to show for a vote on a bill that would have provided for a referendum to repeal the 8th Amendment.
Dublin Mid-West deputy Robert Dowds said the issue could not be tackled until the 8th Amendment is repealed, and added: ”That won’t be until after the next general election.”
Free vote calls
There have been calls on the Labour leadership to allow its TDs a free vote on the legislation.
However, this could prove problematic as a whip was applied to Fine Gael TDs during the debate on the Protection of Life during Pregnancy Bill in 2013 and several members of the senior coalition partner were expelled for opposing the government.
Speaking to LMFM yesterday morning Meath East TD Dominic Hannigan said that he didn’t know why the AG’s advice was that the bill is unconstitutional.
“I want to hear what the legal expert says before I make up my mind,” he said.
He said that many within the party would “love to support Clare’s bill” and added that the “time has come for legislation on this”.
- additional reporting Christina Finn and Daragh Brophy
First published 10.22am on Monday, 09 February 2015
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
This is nothing to do with pro-life or pro-choice Linda. You can believe abortion is wrong, but feel like it’s okay to end the suffering of a child that is never going to live outside the womb, who is going to be born into horrendous pain and then die. This is about parents who are losing a child, and making sure they’re not being put through more suffering, and children who are never going to live being allowed to die with their own family in their own country.
It’s a totally different debate from abortion on demand.
We already have abortion on demand, we just have to travel to the UK to avail of it.
I can’t see any problem with Clare Daly’s proposal, why should a woman be forced to bring a dead baby to full term and endure labour and the risk of her own death?
I am pro life, but I 100% support legislation that will allow for abortion under circumstances where there is a significant threat to the life of the mother or the baby. I’m fairly sure we will never end up like America where life has no value whatsoever, so you can relax, Linda.
Oh but Linda is “Pro-life” meaning she is only for life if you live it by her principles!
How Linda has time to read the Journal, I’ll never know, because she is so pro life she spends as many hours a day as she can, helping all the people in Ireland who are being abused, sick, homeless, etc after all she’s PRO-LIFE!!!
Oh no that’s right pro-lifers only worry about children who aren’t born yet, once they take their first breath they are no longer their problem.
The stress of carrying a child to term with no possibility of intervention is too much for some women. Its too emotionally painful. Its cruel and its unfair and its not at all “pro life”..
I dont personally know of any woman who has been through this. So the only knowledge i have is reading stories which i find heartbreaking.
I do hope we see TMFR very soon. Its tragic that a couples only options are to go to full term OR travel to England and get their much wanted childs ashes sent home by courier.
Sinead, I know of someone who did have this happen to them, they travelled to the UK for an abortion, she went public about her decision and after that received lots of parcels from ‘pro-lifers” more than one of those parcels contained human excrement!!!
While the bill in itself is sensible the worry for many pro-life campaigners is that it would open the flood gates to abortion on demand campaigners. What many of these pro-lifers forget is that the only way that can be changed is through a referendum.
If the child will die anyway, doesn’t it make sense to potentially allow the parents to conceive a healthy child that would survive for a lifetime after birth?
Carrying a child that will not survive outside the womb, taking up the space a healthy child could occupy with a constant reminder every day for the parents, is no good for anybody!
So Linda, as a woman, imagine you are a mother, you have one or two little kids, you find out you are expecting again, you tell your children and they are so excited. Four months into the pregnancy you find out your unborn child is not going to survive. They can’t tell you if you will miscarrie, maybe you will carry to term and it will be stillborn or maybe it will survive a few minutes outside the womb.
So now after that devastating revelation you have to try and wrap your own head around it, then tell your kids and then make a decision. Do you keep going, maybe let your kids see your belly expand and every day wonder is today going to be the day? Or do you end all suffering as much as you can? What ever decision is made is up to the parents. nobody has a right to judge. I personally don’t know what choice i would make in this situation. However getting on a plane, leaving your support and flying to England should not have be part of the decision.
It’s nothing to do with pro life or pro choice. It has to do with being humane and looking after people who find themselves in this awful, cruel situation.
Always worried about what other people might do, Finbarr/Linda? Little bit of advice – how about you attend to your own daily life and leave serious and intimate matters of family life to the family in question? It is because of your ilk, and the eighth amendment, that we are still having unnecessary maternal deaths – you will notice that I don’t say YOU because It appears to me that you are probably of tender years and I am uncertain as to your educational needs.
Do we know as a fact that the child is born into “horrendous” pain?? We do know the child will die. The parents must exercise their choice one way or another and either choice should be facilitated for. If the child is born can the parents then donate the child’s organs for transplant? The question of what constitutes a person is very important here? Is the child a person at the moment directly preceding a birth or after? Has the child a right to live for those moments immediately after birth even though it will certainly not live?
It is perhaps the worst tragedy for parents who through no fault of their own may be faced with such a decision.
Internet Troll. Any reasonable person would understand that two medical professionals in good faith would never agree to a termination of a viable pregnancy, furthermore you are the kind of extreme basher that lacks any empathy for your fellow sisters in their most vulnerable state. For. Shame. I hope you never get put in the position that your happy to let others be in because I wouldn’t wish it on my worst enemy. Wake up!
No one knows what sex lindabar is because he/she is linda AND finbarr, and makes very poor effort to keep this under wraps.
Now, as for “pro life”, pro who’s life?
In cases of fatal foetal abnormality, the foetus is not capable of life. Even if it manages to be kept going until birth it will die. So what “life” are those making comments about being “pro life” trying to preserve?
No one on this earth wants these babies to live more than their parents. But there’s nothing that can be done to make sure that happens, so why drag out the torture? The diagnosis is heartache enough.
As for the slippery slope argument. The reason Claire Daly is pushing this bill is because, like I said above, these fetuses are as good as dead already, and given rulings in other cases it would be fair to assume that as the “unborn” is not capable of life that it’s “right to life” is not engaged, so how can you vindicate this right?
This is a long way away from down syndrome abortions, or abortion on demand. Those abortions are carried out because the woman does not wish to continue the pregnancy, not because the pregnancy is doomed and she likely wants to be able to conceive again sooner rather than later (in fact, the majority of repeat abortions in the UK are older women who get FFA diagnoses repeatedly and wish to maximise their chance of delivering a healthy baby).
The “thin end if the wedge” is the slippery slope argument. If A happens then Z will automatically happen, despite the fact that there’s a road block at every other letter along the way.
If this was legislated for under the 8th amendment, then it would still require a repeal of the 8th to widen access. This would mean the majority would have to vote on the matter. If we vote to widen abortion access then the wedge will indeed get bigger, but that’s democracy. Abortion access cannot, I repeat CANNOT be widened without a public vote.
As a matter of interest, if the public did vote to repeal the 8th, would the anti choicers accept that? Seeing as how they refused to accept that the people voted against the removal of the “suicide clause” arising from The X Case, TWICE. They still wanted it left out of legislation..
Micheal, I wouldn’t consider it a “right to live” considering some of the conditions we’re talking about here. The ability of the child to feel pain varies case by case depending on the exact conditions and how they have affected the pre-birth growth of the child.
Isn’t it much more humane for everyone involved to terminate the pregnancy before the child can grow to a point where they might feel pain rather than bringing them to term when they might feel pain and will certainly die?
Abortion is Murder. A Crime Calling to Heaven for Vengeance.
Let them be Born and Baptize them. The 5th Commandment, You Shall not Kill, ( Murder).
Td’s are not God.
Factual and logical as always from the religious. : / Great comment Poraic O’hEipicín. :/ But for the non – religious, can you say something less pious?
Absolutely Chris; I hate the term “abortion on demand”, as if one simply goes to the abortion clinic and “demands” their abortion like they would a bag of chips.
We do have ‘abortion on demand’, it’s just that it involves Ryanair. Maybe replace that additional element with compassion for those in a dreadful situation.
This government has had repeated opportunities to show us that they have moved on from old fashioned corrupt politics that put parties before the people and they have missed every single opportunity to do so.
@linda…. I do not know why pro life people are so afraid of bringing in abortion. If they are against abortion just don’t have one. Simple ! But you have to right to try and impose your will on the rest the country who do not agree with your ideas . You are not the Moral police ……….. Let people make up your minds.
@Sailtee How dare you insinuate that I am a liar, the story is very true, I don’t have pictures if that’s what you need as proof, but the lady I refer to I know to be honest & I have no reason to doubt her word.
Sapien, that commenter is an American Anti-abortion activist masquerading as an ordinary commenter on this Journal. Wonder how many more of them there are. The Journal seems to seek all sorts of details of who we are, how come the same doesn’t apply to these people?
That’s a good point Sheik, any Irish person would realise that is not how to spell that name..
“Poraic” sounds like someone trying to spell Irish phonetically.. And as for the surname, what on earth is that supposed to be?
I have commented from personal experience on this topic over the last week. Claire Daly is not my ideal politician but she’s trying to move this country forward and I admire her for that.
As for Linda and all the other pro life supporters – until you are in the situation where you know your child is dying, inside you, don’t get up on your soap box to preach.
Salitee. Ask around, the women from TFMR, you know, the ones who have actually been through it rather than relying on biased information from a lobby group, they and doctors will tell you.
The method of abortion used is BIRTH. It just happens prematurely because it is induced. These women give birth, hold their babies, grieve and then hand them over to be cremated and sent to them in the post because they can’t bring the dead body home.
If you need to lie to make your case then you don’t have one. Give it up.
As someone who has personally been through this Claire Daly is right this is not about abortion on demand. I found out I was pregnant with my much wanted 1st baby in September 2013. Then when I got to my 12 week scan was told “there’s a problem”, what followed was weeks of clinging on to hope and having endless tests as I so wanted this baby. Then at my 16 week scan I was told my baby didn’t have hands, didn’t have a lower jaw (so wouldn’t be able to feed or breathe unaided), her heart had a irregular ventricles and a hole in it and her liver was growing into her stomach, squashing and would eventually cause it to burst. This baby would either die before being born, during birth or very shortly after it and if that was the case whatever short existence she had would be excrutiating. I’m from Ireland but I live in the UK and in this way was lucky. I had a termination and was treated with nothing but dignity and kindess. My baby had a peaceful end and I still had to go through labour and birth. And unlike many of the Irish ladies I was able to have a funeral for my baby.
It is appalling making women carry a baby that will never survive or having them make the choice to travel to the UK like fugitives and have to leave their much wanted babies there or have their ashes delivered in a cardboard box. I don’t believe you should just have abortion on demand but this is not about that. It’s about people’s human dignity and protecting the welfare of the mother whether that be protecting her physically or psycholgically and limiting what is already the worst thing that can ever happen to a parent.
Karen, I’m unspeakably sad at your loss. And for all those parents who have experienced it. I cannot imagine how awful it is. There is NO good reason to vote this bill down.
Thanks Jeanette (have used alternative log in). It was the single worst year of my entire life and it was only through the care and understanding I received from the NHS that I managed to get through. These ladies don’t even have this. They are made to feel ashamed. And all the pro-life are saying is that can offer is extra hospice care. I don’t see the point. It’s causing extra suffering. Not to mention what the body goes through bringing a baby to term and the recovery afterwards. And having to endure people seeing you and getting excited only for you to tell them this baby isn’t going to live. It’s absolutely torturous and I can’t understand the pro-lfie argument who say it’s about the sanctity of life. The baby will have no life whereas the mother does and this kind of thing could destroy a person.
Karen, my deepest condolences. I hope that you have had success since.
I’m sorry this country failed you. I know myself and others will do all in our power to ensure that this inhumane treatment is brought to an end as soon as we can. No one should have to endure what you went through.
My mother had to bring my sister to full term and unfortunately she didn’t survive, this was over 20 years ago and my mother still can’t talk about it. I’m sorry for your loss but glad you got treated right and I hope your next pregnancy is a success. I can’t even imagine how difficult this is for a woman.
deepest sympathies Karen and fair play for sharing! just shows you what a bit of compassion as per in the UK can do compared to the fear, subjugation women endure in ROI
Thank you for your reply but luckily, if that’s the correct way to put it, I live in the UK so was well looked after by the NHS. I would love to be able to do something to able promote this cause. It is disgusting that this is happening to Irish ladies every day. On a positive note I am currently 22 weeks pregnant and everything is going really well. x
This is ridiculous, if a baby has zero chance of being born without excruciating pain for a couple of hours before dying shouldn’t it be up to the parents to diside, can any of the pro lifers here tell us if they have spent time either as a parent or direct observer of such a situation, I haven’t but even just imagining what it’s like is unbearable.
From what I’ve seen, it’s only the die-hard pro-life supporters who would oppose a bill like this. The moderate supporters can recognise that, in the cases that this bill is designed to address, the child has absolutely no chances of survival outside of the womb for more than a few hours.
I have seen it happen first hand and I am a Pro-Life supporter.
I agree with the principle of the bill and would like to see it introduced to give parents an option where there is no doubt that the baby wont survive birth.
I’d like to see more pre and post counselling being made available to help parents in this awful scenario – and IMHO is the biggest area we could improve upon.
I too am glad to find some common ground with Hurler. We frequently disagree, but realistically, only someone more concerned with ideology than the actual reality would oppose this bill.
But just to point out that parents should get full support and care throughout if they wanted to continue with the pregnancy and not ever feel compelled to terminate because our health services wouldnt provide proper counselling etc. I think thats very important..
I think the options at the moment for mothers diagnosed with FFA are ridiculous..
Sinead, that should go without saying really. Just because the option to terminate is there does not imply an obligation to do so, nor should it.
There are women who will choose to continue their pregnancy no matter what. That is their choice to make and I wholeheartedly agree, they should receive all the support they need, it’s an incredibly difficult thing to do and I salute anyone who feels strong enough to carry to term in such tragic circumstances. But if a woman feels she cannot continue with a doomed pregnancy, she too should receive support and the option to be induced early to end the suffering if that is what she (and her partner) feels is best.
At present it seems you only get support if you choose to carry to term. Otherwise you are told “travel or tough luck”. This, to my mind, is unacceptable.
Causing a lot of trouble for labour…. ???? Really …think hard about all the suffering that we have had endure, think of all the problems and utter heartache it is to carry a dying baby…think of all the future families that will have to suffer this barbaric treatment due to your inability to make a stand. sorry for your troubles labour but don’t be cowards make a stand and do the right thing.
Labour TDs sending out the line that they don’t want to vote against this, before dutifully and inevitably voting against this. We’ve seen this movie ten times already. If you support the bill, vote for it, if not, spare us this conflicted conscience BS.
As I have mentioned many times before, I am in my sixties, am a life-long Labour voter, and am absolutely HEARTSICK at what the Labour party has become. I have also said, and I meant it, that I will devote every spare moment and bit of energy remaining to me to ensure the defeat and, indeed, the obliteration of what now passes for the proud party I voted for in my youth. Labour, I warn you now, your treachery up until now is appalling and abysmal, but if you once again vote down a bill designed to aleviate terrible suffering in a section of our community, at no cost or disruption to us the vast and lucky majority, then you consign yourselves to the cesspit of history. Poor oul’ Barry Desmond would take to his bed at the carry on of the current mob.
Read the article three times but could not find the part where politicians said that they can’t vote for it because the Catholic Church said so… can you guide me to the part in the article?
Trevor, i think it is more than simply a catholic thing. This government dont want to see any sort of sensible, compassionate legislation being brought forward by the “likes” of Clare Daly They dont want to be seen giving it any support whatsoever, regardless of how right and just it is.
FG and Labour are sick, selfish, and completely out of touch with people. They wont do this because they are afraid of how it will affect their chances of getting reelected.
The only thing Labour is “pro” at the moment is holding on to their perks and expenses til 2016 because they know they’ll be obliterated. No rocking the boat and keep brownnosing.
Show some backbone and common sense. Support Clare Daly’s bill. It’s the right and compassionate thing to do.
As for constitutionality – if it’s possibly unconstitutional Higgins can refer it to the Supreme Court to test it. The AG does not have a role in deciding constitutionality – that’s the President and Supreme Court’s job.
Typical politicians. Make a big fuss about how they disagree with or ‘feel uncomfortable with’ something and then vote for it anyway.
Either support/vote for it or don’t. Stop trying to pander to both sides of the debate.
My sincere sympathies to every parent who has to go through this hell. If a baby cannot survive outside of the womb it is NOT abortion. I see absolutely no compassion in forcing women to carry babies full term who will be born n die in pain _ this is not merciful to anyone. I wouldn’t share all of Claire Daly’s convictions however I applaud her for having the cahoneys in raising this issue.
I’d personally like to see Joan Burton arrested if she decides to continue to support this barbaric treatment of couples who have to go through this ordeal.
Only Joan? Why not Enda or the Minister for Health? Fine Gael have nearly half the seats in the Dail so shouldn’t they be responsible too? Should Sinn Fein be criticised for abstaining, Fianna Fail for having a free vote? No? Ah yes, I understand now.
Yes, all them too if it makes you happy. I think it’s crazy that people are being arrested for so called kidnapping of Joan Burton while she supports this barbaric treatment of couples. As someone who has personally gone through this pain you I understand the eternal frustration and disappointment that people in these circumstances are feeling. The fact that people in government are digging their heels in and not supporting this is a disgrace. You might have given me time to answer your question before you answered for me.
You hit the nail on the head, the vast majority of Irish ‘politicians’ are moral cowards when it comes to abortion. They are so frightened of the vocal anti-choice shouters and ravers and the religious taliban of the catholic church and various other religious groupings that they are paralysed and running scared. Ireland is an international laughing stock when it comes to the issue of abortion and how it has been handled by these political pygmies and the population at large, these yellow streaked politicians who put their own re-election above that of the suffering of women and families who have to go through the kind of pain and anguish so eloquently described by Karen Reynolds in this thread. It is beyond contempt that these cowards are once again dragging their feet on this issue yet again, the same old nonsense from the same old parties which has gone on for over 30 years. It’s ridiculous and it’s shameful that in the 21st century the Irish are still living in the Victorian era when it comes to the rights of women. It is inhumane to allow this to continue and Burton only shows why Labour are finished with the likes of her at the helm. Don’t get me wrong the other parties, Fine Fail and Fianna Gael (what’s the difference?) are equally to blame for this latest shameful foot dragging. Ireland as a country needs to grow up and get on with tackling the abortion issue once and for all. I watched a documentary on the BBC last week entitled “Abortion. Ireland’s guilty secret” it highlighted the very issues we are discussing along with the fact that thousands of Irish women from North and South are having to travel abroad to have a termination because they can’t have one in their own country, typical Ireland exporting it’s problems rather than dealing with them. It’s disgusting that Daly’s bill is being opposed like this it just shows that for all the talk of Ireland moving on from catholic domination the sad reality is that it is still firmly in the grip of the Romans and their medieval mindset.
“Health Minister Leo Varadkar said the bill was flawed legislation and would require a referendum which the government has no mandate to do.” You didn’t have a mandate to bail out bondholders at the taxpayers expense but you did it anyway, funny how they can pick and choose what they have a mandate to do and not do.
It is somewhat ironic that the majority of our young population who would be effected by this legislation are way more educated and have way more educational qualifications than the T.Ds in Dáil Éireann who will be making the decisions for them. Forget about party loyalty and do the right and vote to support this bill. This is from an old age pensioner and a father of five children and a grandfather of sixteen grandchildren.
There is something sick and horrible in our parliament. A majority of MPs support this. A consensus of the people support it. But it cannot happen because a disease has eaten away at parliamentary democracy in our country.
* Deliberately avoiding the Irish terms, Oireachtas and TDs, so that the disease can be seen more clearly.
Joan burton is finished after Paul murphys arrest the people of west dublin will make sure she is political dead for ever (how dare ye protest u pheasants)
To terminate or switch off a machine on a loved one is the most unbelievable painful experience ever & i’m talking from experience. We received medical consultation from a number of different consultants & i know we made the right decision. If there is a medical reason for a termination then it should be available. As for people who haven’t a clue what they are talking about to make that decision is just wrong. I will never forget the Doctor who gave us the best advice which was “you have to live with your decision & if you can live with it then it;s right for you” We made the right decision Would I do it again! I have no idea what I would do if i was put in that position again but I would hope I would do the right thing for everyone.
Duh! Dominic, Marie Whelan is an unknown fine gael solicitor who was given the job to ‘assist’ the government…She is not independent just like some of FG’s judicial appointments who haven’t a clue…fine gael corruption
Yeah, maybe it should be extended to include them. Paddy Scully calls LGBT people the taliban, equally as ridicilous. So that could be added also. Boko Haram too, let’s preempt that one
TD’s who don’t turn up to vote because they disagree with the whip are cowards at least there is 1 TD in Labour still with the courage of her convictions.
Pro-Life = against democracy. They are forcing you to have it their way. If bills like this will be passed – everyone will have their choice and the pro-life activists can still do it the old and medieval way if they want to. Everyone would be happy. But nooo. They want YOU to live THEIR way. What a bunch of radical fanatics.
So basically, they can blame a busy schedule for not having the balls to stand up and vote?!? I do hate my country sometimes, being run by such spineless bads****s
As this story keeps developing, it should really be given a new post, so instead of voting ‘Nay” or “Yay” they are just going to not show up for the vote COWARDS!!!
Sack the lot of them!
We should organise a petition to give to Leo, to show him there is a mandate for this vote!!
For those TDs who dont have the kahunas to turn up and represent their constituants as they are elected to, in a Dàil vote, will their constituants remember that when they call to your doors next year!!!
So this is what Labour has now become. The party that is totally against everything it votes to support and totally supports the things it votes against.
The Labour Party would want to remember, before they take any action against Anne Ferris, that there is overwhelming public support for legislative change that allows a woman to make her own choice about whether she carries this kind of pregnancy to term. I admire Anne for taking this stand, whatever the consequences for her own career.
What on earth does this have to do with abortion on demand? The only sick thing is trying to conflate the issue.
These babies have no prospect of survival. The humane thing is to induce labour early and let the woman birth the child. Which is what they do in these situations in case you were unaware.
But I’m guessing you weren’t. If you were you might have at least an ounce of compassion.
Well Leo, you in FG and Labour have no mandate on anything, you all lied to get into power, therefore you are there under false pretences and represent no one but yourselves.
By the way, having read the article a second time I must say Kevin Humphrey’s remarks are egregious, to say the least. “We’re busy people, busy, busy, busy – the plight of couples in the worst situation of their lives can wait until we have a minute or two to spare”. That is actually the gist of what was said. SHAMEFUL LABOUR PARTY.
This woman has voted with her party on issues that put young workers on the bread line, then pulls any sort of safety net from underneath them, but this is where she draws the line? Biggest political stunt ever!
Anything except a free vote is pointless for any situation as its been proved again and again.
Another thing that pisses me off is how they opt out for whatever excuse they come up with, we the people put them there for the very reason to vote for these matters and if they can’t be bothered they should be docked a weeks pay for everyone they miss.
It has nothing to do with Pro Life or Pro Choice. It is the usual religious B’**S Ireland can not seem to rid it self of. It the elephant in the room no one want to talk about or own up to!
Rats are a bit more intelligent than Right wing Christians. They won’t quit until they’re extinct. We have another 50 years of this shit I would guess.
The number of schools needing financial crisis help has increased by 540% in two years
Muiris O'Cearbhaill
10 mins ago
24
1
Alexei Navalny
Russian security service carry out 'revenge' raid on house of Alexei Navalny ally's father
1 hr ago
3.1k
Live Blog
US stocks drop sharply as EU considers response to Trump tariffs
6 hrs ago
46.9k
68
Your Cookies. Your Choice.
Cookies help provide our news service while also enabling the advertising needed to fund this work.
We categorise cookies as Necessary, Performance (used to analyse the site performance) and Targeting (used to target advertising which helps us keep this service free).
We and our 161 partners store and access personal data, like browsing data or unique identifiers, on your device. Selecting Accept All enables tracking technologies to support the purposes shown under we and our partners process data to provide. If trackers are disabled, some content and ads you see may not be as relevant to you. You can resurface this menu to change your choices or withdraw consent at any time by clicking the Cookie Preferences link on the bottom of the webpage .Your choices will have effect within our Website. For more details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
We and our vendors process data for the following purposes:
Use precise geolocation data. Actively scan device characteristics for identification. Store and/or access information on a device. Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development.
Cookies Preference Centre
We process your data to deliver content or advertisements and measure the delivery of such content or advertisements to extract insights about our website. We share this information with our partners on the basis of consent. You may exercise your right to consent, based on a specific purpose below or at a partner level in the link under each purpose. Some vendors may process your data based on their legitimate interests, which does not require your consent. You cannot object to tracking technologies placed to ensure security, prevent fraud, fix errors, or deliver and present advertising and content, and precise geolocation data and active scanning of device characteristics for identification may be used to support this purpose. This exception does not apply to targeted advertising. These choices will be signaled to our vendors participating in the Transparency and Consent Framework.
Manage Consent Preferences
Necessary Cookies
Always Active
These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work.
Targeting Cookies
These cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.
Functional Cookies
These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and personalisation. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we have added to our pages. If you do not allow these cookies then these services may not function properly.
Performance Cookies
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not be able to monitor our performance.
Store and/or access information on a device 110 partners can use this purpose
Cookies, device or similar online identifiers (e.g. login-based identifiers, randomly assigned identifiers, network based identifiers) together with other information (e.g. browser type and information, language, screen size, supported technologies etc.) can be stored or read on your device to recognise it each time it connects to an app or to a website, for one or several of the purposes presented here.
Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development 143 partners can use this purpose
Use limited data to select advertising 113 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times an ad is presented to you).
Create profiles for personalised advertising 83 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (such as forms you submit, content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (for example, information from your previous activity on this service and other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (that might include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present advertising that appears more relevant based on your possible interests by this and other entities.
Use profiles to select personalised advertising 83 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on your advertising profiles, which can reflect your activity on this service or other websites or apps (like the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects.
Create profiles to personalise content 39 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (for instance, forms you submit, non-advertising content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (such as your previous activity on this service or other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (which might for example include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present content that appears more relevant based on your possible interests, such as by adapting the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find content that matches your interests.
Use profiles to select personalised content 35 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on your content personalisation profiles, which can reflect your activity on this or other services (for instance, the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects. This can for example be used to adapt the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find (non-advertising) content that matches your interests.
Measure advertising performance 134 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which advertising is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine how well an advert has worked for you or other users and whether the goals of the advertising were reached. For instance, whether you saw an ad, whether you clicked on it, whether it led you to buy a product or visit a website, etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of advertising campaigns.
Measure content performance 61 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which content is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine whether the (non-advertising) content e.g. reached its intended audience and matched your interests. For instance, whether you read an article, watch a video, listen to a podcast or look at a product description, how long you spent on this service and the web pages you visit etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of (non-advertising) content that is shown to you.
Understand audiences through statistics or combinations of data from different sources 74 partners can use this purpose
Reports can be generated based on the combination of data sets (like user profiles, statistics, market research, analytics data) regarding your interactions and those of other users with advertising or (non-advertising) content to identify common characteristics (for instance, to determine which target audiences are more receptive to an ad campaign or to certain contents).
Develop and improve services 83 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service, such as your interaction with ads or content, can be very helpful to improve products and services and to build new products and services based on user interactions, the type of audience, etc. This specific purpose does not include the development or improvement of user profiles and identifiers.
Use limited data to select content 37 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type, or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times a video or an article is presented to you).
Use precise geolocation data 46 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, your precise location (within a radius of less than 500 metres) may be used in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Actively scan device characteristics for identification 27 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, certain characteristics specific to your device might be requested and used to distinguish it from other devices (such as the installed fonts or plugins, the resolution of your screen) in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Ensure security, prevent and detect fraud, and fix errors 92 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Your data can be used to monitor for and prevent unusual and possibly fraudulent activity (for example, regarding advertising, ad clicks by bots), and ensure systems and processes work properly and securely. It can also be used to correct any problems you, the publisher or the advertiser may encounter in the delivery of content and ads and in your interaction with them.
Deliver and present advertising and content 99 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Certain information (like an IP address or device capabilities) is used to ensure the technical compatibility of the content or advertising, and to facilitate the transmission of the content or ad to your device.
Match and combine data from other data sources 72 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Information about your activity on this service may be matched and combined with other information relating to you and originating from various sources (for instance your activity on a separate online service, your use of a loyalty card in-store, or your answers to a survey), in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Link different devices 53 partners can use this feature
Always Active
In support of the purposes explained in this notice, your device might be considered as likely linked to other devices that belong to you or your household (for instance because you are logged in to the same service on both your phone and your computer, or because you may use the same Internet connection on both devices).
Identify devices based on information transmitted automatically 88 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Your device might be distinguished from other devices based on information it automatically sends when accessing the Internet (for instance, the IP address of your Internet connection or the type of browser you are using) in support of the purposes exposed in this notice.
Save and communicate privacy choices 69 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
The choices you make regarding the purposes and entities listed in this notice are saved and made available to those entities in the form of digital signals (such as a string of characters). This is necessary in order to enable both this service and those entities to respect such choices.
have your say