Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.
You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.
If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.
A LEVY ON streaming services such as Netflix and Amazon Prime should be introduced to fund independent Irish productions, a Dáil committee has recommended.
The move has been welcomed by Screen Producers Ireland (SPI), who say it could a raise a minimum of €23 million in additional funding for the creation of original Irish content.
The report by the Oireachtas Committee on Media also recommends the creation of an Online Safety Commissioner post, with powers to police and regulate harmful content on social media platforms.
Committee chair, Fianna Fail TD Niamh Smyth, said the new legislation would “place Ireland among the first countries in the world to provide systemic regulation of online platforms”.
SPI CEO Susan Kirby said: “The Oireachtas Media Committee has shown strong, cross-party support today for the Irish independent production sector by not only recommending a new content levy on online media services, but also clearly stating that it should only be accessed by the Irish independent production sector.
This levy, which would be no extra cost to the exchequer, has been identified by (economic consultants) Indecon that it could raise a minimum of €23 million in additional funding for the creation of original Irish content.
Kirby said the SPI was grateful to the committee for “taking our concerns into consideration” ahead of the development of the report, adding that they looked forward to “further engagement” with them over the coming months as the legislation is debated in the Oireachtas.
“SPI’s focus now is the introduction of the content levy without delay so that new funding possibilities for Irish producers to create original Irish content for Irish, and international audiences, happen,” she said.
Advertisement
The committee has recommended the measure not be introduced until its viability can be researched and reviewed by the Media Commission.
The recommendations were made in the Pre-Legislative Scrutiny of the General Scheme of the Online Safety and Media Regulation Bill 2020, published today.
Smyth said: “We call for an individual complaints mechanism to be established for designated online platforms, for an Online Safety Commissioner to be explicitly included in the legislation, for designated online platforms to be required to provide data for public interest research, and for children’s navigation of online spaces to be protected so as not to render them vulnerable to data profiling or to harmful advertisements.
“At the forefront of the Committee’s approach to this pre-legislative scrutiny process was the Irish citizen.
“Our 33 recommendations champion effective and robust measures to deliver an optimal regulatory framework for the online environment and overarching mediascape insofar as these fall within the scope of the Bill.”
The Bill would also require social media platforms provide a quarterly report to the Media Commission on their complaints handling.
It would introduce a minimum age requirement for children to create accounts on designated online services and introduce a ban on advertising to children online, with junk food, advertising, alcohol and gambling specifically outlined.
Disinformation and financial harm, including online gambling, would be designated as “harmful content” under the Bill.
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
Close
52 Comments
This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic.
Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy
here
before taking part.
The sad fact Mike is you could replace Palestine for Israel in your statement and it would be equally valid! It’s the same on both sides! They are killing each other and it’s beyond me how it will ever stop. The Palestine’s have an avowed aim of the total destruction of Israel and it’s people and will stop at nothing short of this. Israel in defending itself have morphed into that which they detested most a murdering callous statelet. Vicious circle doomed to be played out endlessly!!
There is a large percentage of posters on here who are completely blind to the atrocities committed by Palestinians\Hamas. Anthony Kelly’s statement is innocuous and true, yet he is overwhelmingly red thumbed and I am sure this post will suffer the same fate!
This crime is unspeakably evil, and so soon after the Jewish terrorist attack in Jerusalem yesterday.
The Israeli government must abide by international law and end the illegal settlements. They are complicit in this nefarious murder.
“extreme right Israeli activists”, there’s really no reason to pretend these people are part of some minority group. “settlers” doesn’t really cover them either, they are actively looting their neighbours. We all saw the face of Israel last summer during the child cull. Like the unionists in NI, hate and violence have become part of their own identity, ignoring that is not going to help.
No it is not ‘the same’ on both sides. One is an illegal occupier, the other is trying to resist the terror.
Hamas have committed war crimes which they must be held accountable for, but that does not mean they’re morally equivalent to a zionist, expansionist state.
This false equivalence is designed to shield Israel from consequences for their illegal and contemptible crimes. The facilitation of these crimes by Western powers is one of its greatest crimes.
Thanks to the new era of online journalism these crimes are now reported in some media outlets. The world is becoming aware of the extreme hardship the Palestinians go through daily.
If only it was a lion instead of a child. Then we’d get some real uproar.
An occupied people (Palestinians) have the moral right to resist peacefully or with arms the illegal occupation of their country by settler apartheid nut jobs. Viva Palestina.
Jews are indigenous to the area and Israel was around a lot longer than Palestine, so I’m not too sure what you mean by calling Palestinians occupied people
ANother. ..save your breath, the pond life are out from under their rocks, where they hide until an Israel article appears, then they appear like flies around poo!
AN Other that’s grand as long as they’re indigenous. Lets put a blockade on the border to Northern Ireland, try to annihilate them to build houses in South tyrone. Sure if anyone says anything the wooden planks will speak up for us and veto any action at the UN
@Anthony Kelly. You’re so right Anthony and sadly it looks like it’s gonna get much worse when we look at what Hamas is doing in Gaza.,ie.,violating UN law giving military training to kids(25,000 kids) and hardening the hearts against all their fellow human beings with instruction in Sharia law telling them not to make friends among the ‘infidels. (See full article from link below).
However there’s one brave voice, below, who does speak out- so let us wish her well!
–”Only a few Palestinians have dared to speak out against Hamas’s exploitation of children. Palestinian activist Eyad al-Atal criticized Hamas for “depriving an entire generation of Palestinians of their childhood.” He said that apart from creating new supporters of the Islamic State, the military training of the children was in violation of human rights principles.
Addressing the Hamas leaders, the al-Atal said: “Teach your children how to play, how to smile, how to rejoice. Build for them an institution for education and entertainment that would raise them on the love of Palestine and not how to get themselves killed.—”
–http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/6259/hamas-camps-child-abuse
.
Firstly Jewish people are not homogeneous. There are Sephardic, Ashkenazi, Ethiopian, Convert Jews etc Secondly not all Israelis are Jews and there are Arab, Druze, Baha’i, Christian and other people living in Israel. Thirdly, the modern state of Israel, as defined by the border of 1967 and its citizens are not the same as the Israel and Israelites of the old testament. A recent article did show that for many Jewish people who were genetically linked to the land had Arab Palestinians as their closest genetic relatives.
Finally, Palestine is occupied by definition under International Law and by historical fact. When Israel was founded in 1948 it was preceded by the promise of “A land without a people for a people without a land” despite the fact that there were millions of people living, cultivating and thriving on that land. Following 1948 there were numerous conflicts but in 1967 there was an internationally agreed Armistice line that makes up the 1967 border that is the modern, agreed border between Israel and Occupied Palestine. All encroachments of land beyond this point represent illegal annexation in violation of international law.
Internationally Occupied Palestine is recognised an under occupation. Under the Geneva conventions an occupying power cannot move its own people onto the land it occupies. Which means that Israel is in violation of internation law by providing incentives, protection and support to settlers encroaching, stealing and destroying Palestinian lands. Under the same Geneva Convention (IV) an occupying power cannot displace the occupants of the occupied land which is violated by the forced displacement and demolition of Bedouin and Palestinian communities repeatedly.
It looks like you should read up on your history, both of the Jewish Diaspora and of the foundation of the modern state of Israel and the Israel/Palestine conflict. You have a lot to learn.
There’s always a narrative in comments on stories that involve Israel and occupied Palestine where people are apparently expected to denounce every single wrong action by anyone on any side. We’ve seen plenty of comments where people have actually done that – where people have acknowledged that “Israel” and “Jewish” are not synonymous, that while Gaza is a prison, Hamas also deserve criticism.
It doesn’t seem to matter if you acknowledge that no side is acting as examples of peace – some people will never accept criticism and never actually allow a conversation to happen because they will almost viciously defend the side they have chosen and acknowledge no reasonable criticism. It’s always the way here – it always turns into “why don’t you criticise this….” and assumptions are made that not making a comprehensive statement of position on anything and everything that has happened worldwide means that someone must be some kind of evil. It’s been said a lot on this site – and it doesn’t allow for anything other than pathetic points scoring.
@Freebetcitydotcom Mike.
—’Hamas – Human Shield Confession:Hamas leader uses children,women,elderly as human shields admission.
YOU TUBE VIDEO/SHORT https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g0wJXf2nt4Y
Patrick, you claim “jew hatred” in pretty much every comment you make on the journal – several people have already acknowledged deserved criticism of Hamas.
You often ask people for their criticism of terrorists and have in the past pointed at the lack of it as some kind of indication of their motivation – If that’s the case, how have you made several comments on here; in a story about a child being murdered, without once criticising or condemning this disgusting murder?
@Tony Canning. Because like most commentators I greent-humb those who have made such comments and feel that adequate. And when you make a similar comment I’l green-thumb it too.
Richard how am I trolling? I’m giving some much needed perspective to some of the anti-Isreal and pro-Muslim fanatics on this site. The baby’s death is a tragedy
Hamas are in charge in Gaza, a coastal enclave separated from the rest of Israel and The Palestinian territories by miles of razor wire, watchtowers and landmined areas. The majority of Palestinian territory is ruled by the IDF, under Israeli military law, with civil matters run by the Palestinian National Authority (Fatah party) in area A (3% of the west Bank) and some oversight in area B (25% of the west bank).
The Palestinian people are stateless and prisoners for the most part, as such there is no ‘Palestine,’ and The Hamas are not the democratically elected rulers of it.
@Alan White. Well said Alan. Hamas who callously smothered to death over 200 kids used as slave labour
building Hamas’s terror tunnels and who is right now preparing the next generation of child suicide bombers by instilling hatred of Jews and promises of eternal joy with the 75 ‘Virgins’.
Let me guess IDF will not be able to track down these baby killers. No surprise, can’t wait for the pro Israel brigade to tell us what this child did wrong.
Seamus, well he was saying sarcasticly that the baby had pretrol bomb, and I was just pointing out that Hamas (you know the democraticly elected extremeist rulers of Palestinine) and Boko Haram (with whom Hamas has links) have in fact used children as suicide bombers.
@Alan White. Boko Haram also are officially liked up to ISIS and now going under the Islamic State of West Africa. ISIS last month murdered 5 women in the street outside their homes for refusing to allow ISIS to take them away to be child soldiers. No outrage here for that! Or for the 4 kids decapitated by ISIS for refusing “to follow Mohammed’. Obviously these incidents can’t tap into the Jew-hatred.
Four Iraqi Christian kids beheaded after refusing to convert … http://www.barenakedislam.com/…/four-iraqi-christian-kids-beheaded-after-ref…;
@Le Tigre. Your expression of outrage for those children is laudable . I wish there were more outrage for all those children caught up in conflicts. After all, all children are the same regardless.
@Mr BF.— I condemn all acts of terror especially where they involve children such as this latest in Israel yesterday by ‘terrorists’ as Netanyahu calls them.
I, and many others, see terror regularly on video perpetrated mostly by Islamo-Fascists.
I especially feel for the 200 kids who suffocated to death building Hamas’s Terror Tunnels in Hamas’s maniacal drive to genocide the Jews. Haven worked in the mines for ten yrs. I know what it is like when the lights go out;and I can imagine what was going on in the minds of those kids trapped in total darkness unable to breath the dust -filled air and with no-one to help.
Meanwhile Hamas leaders lived it up, in luxury hotels, in Doha, in Terror -state Qatar- unconcerned with the suffering they caused.
This won’t be the case in Israel. The family will be looked after and the perpetrators,whoever they may be, will be punished.
And you just have to go and belittle what you call an apology by going on about Hamas. Hamas, as we all know are evil and do horrible things to the palestinians. But there was no need for them to be mentioned here – as they were not involved this time.
Israel is vital ally for the US in a highly volatile and often hostile region. Part of this is close military cooperation, in areas like missle defence – as seen last year. We share our intelligence. Again nothing wrong with that. We also supply weaponry to other countries like Egypt and Saudi.
The fact is most ordinary Americans support Israel to varying degrees, D and GOP. Nothing wrong with that. And yes there are of course votes there.
The US frequently uses its veto power on the UN Security Council to block resolutions that condemn Israel and moves to rwcognise the Palistinians right to exist. And the coeardly Isralis hide behind them. It’s disgusting. They are as bad as each other
Jurgen. I fully agree with you that it’s a volatile and often hostile region. Big question is why is that the case? Wouldn’t be anything to do with kicking people out of their homes and off their lands now would it? But I don’t think the Americans would agree with that behaviour …..oh hang on. . ..Apache crow Navaho Cherokee!!!
John S, I have to say that yes the US does use its Sec Council veto in that way. Sometimes its justified, more times it’s not. Yes the US needs to be more even handed but the ME regional circumstances dictate Israeli considerations come first.
I’d like to see a two state solution, it’s the only way. But to me neither the current leadership in Israel, or the PA and Hamas are willing to make the necessary compromises.
And Israel are cowards? They saw off numerous Arab armies since 1948 – often unfair, harsh or excessive in their responses yes, but cowards no.
John C, you have a valid point but when I say region I mean the entire ME. The region where right now there is effectively a civil war between various sets of Muslims. The casualties, displacement and geopolitical ramifications of the conflict in Syria and Iraq are huge and dwarf the Israel
/Palestine conflict. Yet Israel Palestine gets disproportinate attention.
Your reference to Native Americans – true, but there were also plenty of Irish (like many Europeans) that settled westwards, served in the army that destroyed those peoples.
jurgen…..answer to the first part of your reply…… watch the movie “Wag the dog” you can stream it online from all the usual places. second part of your comment….yes they were born in Ireland or another country but that is the case with all Americans excluding native tribes so your excuse in trying to pass the blame doesn’t hold water. Better to accept your history of barbarism to your own and other people’s rather than try to avoid it.
Eh, I watched the movie in the 90′s when it came out John. I’m well aware of it thanks. My point still stands – Muslims are killing Muslims in numbers that dwarf Israel Palestine.
Secondly, not trying to pass any blame John. Colonial and US Govt policy clearly drove the Native Americans to near extinction, along with pressures from settlors and soldiers. Many of these were European 1st gen, more were descendants with a memory of persecution in their own lands.
I constantly hear how the proud claim that the Irish ‘built America’. Some of that may be true but if so they also contributed in less constructive ways, as I mentioned. They were 1st, 2nd 3rd gen yet are appropriated as Irish. Take the less attractive parts of Irish emigration as well as the other stuff – I’m sure you would be very quick to point out US negatives.
1. John, as I said Israel is our most reliable ally in this volatile and strategic region. This is the broadest ME circumstance I am talking about. The protection of our ally Israel therefore comes first, trumping practically all others. Israel is surrounded by unfriendly and hostile states and it is US foreign policy to maintain the qualitative edge of Israels military that enables it to defeat any or all of its potential enemies.
2. The Israeli considerations are always security from their enemies or potential enemies. The Iran deal, despite what Bibi says is actually good for Israel. Obama is acting in Israels interest and the wider ME.
3. Why? Answer above. We need Israel as an ally and they need us. Again, most Americans are sympathetic to an isolated, not perfect, but a thriving democratic Israel. Intelligence, counter terrorism, defence technology and economic benefits all factor.
Entire books have been written on the subject so I can’t address everything about the US Israel alliance. But despite Obama and Bibi despising each other the alliance is rock solid. I expect Hilary to continue this if and when she wins next year.
Ok I got it now. The US condone the slaughter and dehumanisation of Palestinians and are happy to support it and ensure it continues because it’s in its best interests.
It’s hard to believe that this is the same country outraged by whats happening in the Ukraine.
Jurgen, There is little doubt that the US is the world super power.The problem is that you do consider yourselves to be also the world police. All a bit rich coming from a country that wouldn’t allow some of it’s own citizens to choose where they wanted to sit on the bus up until the mid 1960s.
What compromises should the Palestinians make? Seriously. They have been wiped off the map by the ethnic cleansing Zionist nut jobs and your country backs it’s apartheid racist policies. America is just a parody itself.
John C , I agree. No excuse ever for segregation and racism. But that was the 60’s and in law at least that is forbidden. Racism is still a problem, never claimed the US is perfect – far from it.
John S, the US supports a two state solution and we also view settlements as illegal. Obama has been clear on that. The realpolitik means support for Israel makes it less likely the US will pressure Israel.
Regarding other conflicts and hypocrisy, you have a valid point. For example you might recall the Yugoslav civil war went on and on and European states such as Ireland and Britain did little or nothing. It took American military and diplomatic power to end it. I can never see neutral Ireland having the inclination, balls or ability to intervene. Peacekeeping is great, but perhaps Ireland could do more in future and show the US the way.
Also I sincerely hope you feel the same level of outrage and compassion as you show for Palestinians, for the 220k plus killed in Syria or for the 5 million plus killed in the Congo civil war. Hypocrisy is not the preserve of the US John, it’s everywhere and when I read articles such as this the level of invective against Israel and the US is always high, it is just not repeated in articles against those responsible for conflicts such as those I mentioned. Little interest where the US or Israel is not to blame – if even conflicts in Africa get an article.
This is another example of how the press utterly fail the people in this conflict. ‘Israeli settlers in the west bank’ as always they are referring to the most recent wave. Fact is since the 67 they are all settlers in the West Bank. But only Robert Fisk and John Pilger make reference to this.
The Israeli authorities tell us they have problems moving them and they get attacked! They have no problem bulldozing entire Palestinian villages. This was happens in broad daylight with the exception of Al Jezeera and Gideon Levy this goes unquestioned.
Not sure where you’re coming from Mark?, I’d say the Israeli/Palestinian conflict is the most covered conflict in the entire world. Its what you would call a populist cause.
Bad bad Israel poor poor Palestinians.
Yes this was a despicable act by Jewish extremists but the simple fact is the vast majority of Israeli’s will be very vocal in their condemnation of such an act done in their name, not so the vast majority of Palestinians who usually celebrate in their droves on the street and sing the praises of the perpetrators of unspeakable acts against innocent Israeli’s.
They condemn it William but will they pack bags and leave all illegally occupied land? Given the last election and history I think not. Condemning something is useless unless your willing to change the circumstances that cause the problem.
Carlin the Israeli’s totally disengaged from Gaza and removed all Jewish settlements and also removed a certain amount of settlements in the West Bank back in 2005 and granted autonomy.
What did they get for their troubles but a militant ruling Palestinian body in the shape of Hamas which done nothing to alleviate the mistrust the Israeli’s have about the Palestinians true motives.
This was a huge step in the quest for peace by Israel but of course the useful idiots for Palestine will simply ignore this as it doesn’t fit well with their populist banner of condemning evil evil Israel at every opportunity.
Well said William. Ignorant commentators on here simply don’t know their history, or conveniently forget sections of it that don’t back up their pro Hamas agenda.
That’s total crap William. They took extra land in the West Bank and withdrew from the most worthless areas. They didn’t make a total withdrawal from illegally occupied land. Coincidently the land the kept had access to water supply.
Let’s not pull punches here. Zionism is basically Russian immigrants fleeing the Tzars programs who took it upon themselves to take over the country they fled too. Their mantra of a people with no country to a country with no people has been proven time and time again to be utterly false. The argument that God promised them the land is laughable.
If a group of Russians came to Ireland claiming a right to the land because they are the dependents of pagans who ruled the roost over a thousand years ago, we would laugh at them!
What history Alan. Pick a point! Or let’s start with Herzl himself. Show me where Israel has moral ground.
Hamas agenda. Hamas are a bunch of muppets. A pure reactionary organisation to Israeli cruelty.
Carlin you’re latching onto the past thats not going to solve anything, the fact is Israel exists today and it won’t be going anywhere.
It seems Israel is not as bad as you useful idiots like proclaim,
Palestinian journalist Majed Azzam wrote: “We should have the courage to acknowledge the truth… The [only] thing that prevents the chaos and turmoil in Gaza from spreading to the West Bank is the presence of the Israeli occupation [in the West Bank]… [as opposed to] its absence from the Gaza Strip.”
Bassem Al-Nabris, a Palestinian poet from Khan Younis in the Gaza Strip, wrote: “If a there was a referendum in the Gaza Strip [on the question of] ‘would you like the Israeli occupation to return?’ half the population would vote ‘yes’… But in practice, I believe that the number of those in favor is at least 70%, if not more – [a figure] much higher than is assumed by the political analysts and those who follow [events]. For the million and a half people living in this small region, things have [simply] gone too far – in practice, not just as a metaphor. [It did not begin] with the internal conflicts, but even earlier, in the days of the previous Palestinian administration, which was corrupt and did not give the people even the tiniest [ray of] hope. The fundamentalist forces which came into power [after it] also promised change and reform, but [instead, people] got a siege, with no security and no [chance of] making a living… If the occupation returns, at least there will be no civil war, and the occupier will have a moral and legal obligation to provide the occupied people with employment and food, which they now lack.”
William. You can’t ignore or move on from history if you want to ethically resolve a conflict.
Israel is an absolutely beautiful country and with lots of really nice people (don’t mention the war. Even liberals in Israel can be funny about such things as entitlement to land)
You can have a wonderful time swanning around in trendy Coffey shops and bars in TV or even working on a pretentious Kibbutz. It’s like staying in Fox Rock for a few months and then saying you know about Dublin.
Go to Hebron, Gaza what’s left of Palestinian areas in Jerusalem or stand with the protestors in Bilin.
Move on from history. That attitude only serves the Israelis.
Richard its also about putting a bit of balance to years old conflict, now if say Palestinians broke into an Israeli settlers house and stabbed the entire family to death (which did happen btw) why do I get the feeling you would be all on here condemning in your usual roundabout way?, that every Palestinian atrocity is somehow justifiable but if a callous act is carried out by Israeli’s you all flock to the article almost like men and women possessed in your haste to condemn evil Israel, using ridiculous words like genocide and making comparisons to the Nazi’s which is just pure BS, but I suppose if you say black is white often enough you will start to believe it?
That’s a great point William. Had this been an israeli child who was killed by Palestinians, the journal.ie would be full of commentators saying how this death is Israels fault for it’s history. You couldn’t make it up!
You should see what the Palestinians do to their own people in that case, Hammas murder millions of toddlers every year yet the journal seems to go ape when Israel do it
There was an election recently, the Israeli people chose to stay on this path, they backed their warmongering chief in a “massive victory”. The majority want to continue the violence, they gave their leader a mandate for it.
Quote about Palestinian mothers from the Israeli minister of Justice, Ayelet Shaked:
“They have to die and their houses should be demolished so that they cannot bear any more terrorists,” Shaked said, adding, “They are all our enemies and their blood should be on our hands. This also applies to the mothers of the dead terrorists.”
Also “Behind every terrorist stand dozens of men and women, without whom he could not engage in terrorism. They are all enemy combatants, and their blood shall be on all their heads. Now this also includes the mothers of the martyrs, who send them to hell with flowers and kisses. They should follow their sons, nothing would be more just. They should go, as should the physical homes in which they raised the snakes. Otherwise, more little snakes will be raised there.”
@Ahren Boache. Here’s a couple of quotes from Hamas Charter you might like.
HAMAS CHARTER.
—”Israel will exist and will continue to exist until Islam will obliterate it, just as it obliterated others before it” (The Martyr, Imam Hassan al-Banna, of blessed memory).—”
AND.
–”"The Day of Judgement will not come about until Moslems fight the Jews (killing the Jews), when the Jew will hide behind stones and trees. The stones and trees will say O Moslems, O Abdulla, there is a Jew behind me, come and kill him.—”
AND
————-=======The Slogan of the Islamic Resistance Movement—————————————————————
—”Allah is its target, the Prophet is its model, the Koran its constitution: Jihad is its path and death for the sake of Allah is the loftiest of its wishes.—”
the parents of the child must be beyond grief, and this act was carried out not by soldiers against armed resistance but by citizens of one side of the community against another. the shankill butchers got away with murder for so long by using the flag of loyalism as a cover when really they were psychopaths. if the person who did this has any moral compass they should turn themselves in, if they don’t and the Israeli police don’t try to find them they are complicit in allowing child murderers walk free.
People are ignorant of the facts and believe whatever fits in with their cynicism. I’d bet my house that these people will be found and serve life sentences. The difference between Israelis and Palestinians for me is that when Israel launches an attack it’s in retaliation, and if Palestinians die the only Israelis celebrating are the type of nutters who murdered this poor child. When an Israeli dies it seems the vast majority of Gaza are out celebrating Jewish blood being spilled.
This country seems to pride itself on ridding itself of Catholic influence, yet wants to see an astonishingly violent group steeped in warped religious ideologies extinguish the only real democracy in that region. It’s not good for the Israeli’s, it’s not good for the Palestinians, and in the long run it’s not good for Western society.
Another baby killing by Israelis. The Blot on civilisation that is Israel should be ostracised by the rest of the world,and would be, but for the the disturbing influence of Jews on American foreign policy. A total Boycott of everything Israeli, as we did with apartheid South Africa, would go some way for civilised people to show their disgust.
Yeah mate. Tell ya what, why don’t you bugger off to the Gaza Strip and fight for yer cause. You’d no doubt be murdered by Hamas and paraded in front of the camera’s as another victim of the Israelis.
This isn’t about Israel, this is about some nutters in Israel who committed an appalling act and will be hunted down for it. To think that security services in Israel would take this less seriously than the murder of a Jewish person is evidence of your ignorance.
So go ahead and boycott all ya want, call for the end of the Jewish state, spread your misinformation all ya want, won’t make one bit of difference.
Also worth remembering that if the Israeli government decided to slaughter every single Palestinian they could easily do so. Why haven’t they?
Ordinary Israeli Jews have no time for those settlers or for ultra-Orthodox Jews, e.g. the perpetrator of the knife attack at the LGBT Pride parade, and would prefer the disbandment of the settlements.
I am antisemitic, if hating the way Israel is treating their neighbours is being antisemitic ….despite all the propaganda from America and Israel it seems to me that the palistinian people are being treated in a cruel and sadistic way. ….I am sure I am not antisemitic because I don’t know any Jewish people, but I wish some of them would distance themselves from what is happening in Palestine. …
To be fair to Hamas if there was an election in the west bank they would win by a landslide. The PA in the West bank have not help an election since 2006 they know they would loose.
Hamas are at least honest they want the total destruction of the Jewish state.
Firstly Jewish people are not homogeneous. There are Sephardic, Ashkenazi, Ethiopian, Convert Jews etc
Like all religions out there. Yet we still have homelands for every major religion
Secondly not all Israelis are Jews and there are Arab, Druze, Baha’i, Christian and other people living in Israel.
Most Israelis are Jews, Israel is defined as the Jewish homeland (see the Star of David on the flag) but religious freedom is enshrined there, unlike Palestine I might add!
Thirdly, the modern state of Israel, as defined by the border of 1967 and its citizens are not the same as the Israel and Israelites of the old testament. A recent article did show that for many Jewish people who were genetically linked to the land had Arab Palestinians as their closest genetic relatives.
The border of 1967 was rejected by Palestinians and most of the Arab league decided to go to war with Israel instead of accept those borders
Finally, Palestine is occupied by definition under International Law and by historical fact. When Israel was founded in 1948 it was preceded by the promise of “A land without a people for a people without a land” despite the fact that there were millions of people living, cultivating and thriving on that land. Following 1948 there were numerous conflicts but in 1967 there was an internationally agreed Armistice line that makes up the 1967 border that is the modern, agreed border between Israel and Occupied Palestine. All encroachments of land beyond this point represent illegal annexation in violation of international law.
Internationally Occupied Palestine is recognised an under occupation. Under the Geneva conventions an occupying power cannot move its own people onto the land it occupies. Which means that Israel is in violation of internation law by providing incentives, protection and support to settlers encroaching, stealing and destroying Palestinian lands.
The lands that you refer to are not Palestinian lands, they were British before 1948 Jewish long before British, and afterwards were considered essentially no man’s land.
Arabs have no claim at all to the vemake?and they are living on!
Firstly Jewish people are not homogeneous. There are Sephardic, Ashkenazi, Ethiopian, Convert Jews etc
Like all religions out there. Yet we still have homelands for every major religion
Secondly not all Israelis are Jews and there are Arab, Druze, Baha’i, Christian and other people living in Israel.
Most Israelis are Jews, Israel is defined as the Jewish homeland (see the Star of David on the flag) but religious freedom is enshrined there, unlike Palestine I might add!
Thirdly, the modern state of Israel, as defined by the border of 1967 and its citizens are not the same as the Israel and Israelites of the old testament. A recent article did show that for many Jewish people who were genetically linked to the land had Arab Palestinians as their closest genetic relatives.
The border of 1967 was rejected by Palestinians and most of the Arab league decided to go to war with Israel instead of accept those borders
Finally, Palestine is occupied by definition under International Law and by historical fact. When Israel was founded in 1948 it was preceded by the promise of “A land without a people for a people without a land” despite the fact that there were millions of people living, cultivating and thriving on that land. Following 1948 there were numerous conflicts but in 1967 there was an internationally agreed Armistice line that makes up the 1967 border that is the modern, agreed border between Israel and Occupied Palestine. All encroachments of land beyond this point represent illegal annexation in violation of international law.
Internationally Occupied Palestine is recognised an under occupation. Under the Geneva conventions an occupying power cannot move its own people onto the land it occupies. Which means that Israel is in violation of internation law by providing incentives, protection and support to settlers encroaching, stealing and destroying Palestinian lands.
The lands that you refer to are not Palestinian lands, they were British before 1948 Jewish long before British, and afterwards were considered essentially no man’s land.
Arabs have no claim at all to the vemake?and they are living on!
Report this comment
Reply
7 5 .
5 hours ago
To be fair to Hamas if there was an election in the west bank they would win by a landslide. The PA in the West bank have not help an election since 2006 they know they would loose.
Hamas are at least honest they want the total destruction of the Jewish state.
Since 1948 the UN have not being an honest broker in the situation They have kept the Palestinians refugees for 3 generations No other refugee group have had such special treatment from the UN which prevents a deal with Israel happening
Three arrested as gardaí target organised crime group's alleged involvement with drugs in Cork city
3 mins ago
0
Inaugural
Thousands take part in Dublin City Half Marathon as first champions crowned
18 mins ago
378
social welfare changes
If you lose your job and have worked for 5 years you'll get up to €450 a week under new rules
15 hrs ago
41.3k
80
Your Cookies. Your Choice.
Cookies help provide our news service while also enabling the advertising needed to fund this work.
We categorise cookies as Necessary, Performance (used to analyse the site performance) and Targeting (used to target advertising which helps us keep this service free).
We and our 161 partners store and access personal data, like browsing data or unique identifiers, on your device. Selecting Accept All enables tracking technologies to support the purposes shown under we and our partners process data to provide. If trackers are disabled, some content and ads you see may not be as relevant to you. You can resurface this menu to change your choices or withdraw consent at any time by clicking the Cookie Preferences link on the bottom of the webpage .Your choices will have effect within our Website. For more details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
We and our vendors process data for the following purposes:
Use precise geolocation data. Actively scan device characteristics for identification. Store and/or access information on a device. Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development.
Cookies Preference Centre
We process your data to deliver content or advertisements and measure the delivery of such content or advertisements to extract insights about our website. We share this information with our partners on the basis of consent. You may exercise your right to consent, based on a specific purpose below or at a partner level in the link under each purpose. Some vendors may process your data based on their legitimate interests, which does not require your consent. You cannot object to tracking technologies placed to ensure security, prevent fraud, fix errors, or deliver and present advertising and content, and precise geolocation data and active scanning of device characteristics for identification may be used to support this purpose. This exception does not apply to targeted advertising. These choices will be signaled to our vendors participating in the Transparency and Consent Framework.
Manage Consent Preferences
Necessary Cookies
Always Active
These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work.
Targeting Cookies
These cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.
Functional Cookies
These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and personalisation. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we have added to our pages. If you do not allow these cookies then these services may not function properly.
Performance Cookies
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not be able to monitor our performance.
Store and/or access information on a device 110 partners can use this purpose
Cookies, device or similar online identifiers (e.g. login-based identifiers, randomly assigned identifiers, network based identifiers) together with other information (e.g. browser type and information, language, screen size, supported technologies etc.) can be stored or read on your device to recognise it each time it connects to an app or to a website, for one or several of the purposes presented here.
Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development 143 partners can use this purpose
Use limited data to select advertising 113 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times an ad is presented to you).
Create profiles for personalised advertising 83 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (such as forms you submit, content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (for example, information from your previous activity on this service and other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (that might include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present advertising that appears more relevant based on your possible interests by this and other entities.
Use profiles to select personalised advertising 83 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on your advertising profiles, which can reflect your activity on this service or other websites or apps (like the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects.
Create profiles to personalise content 39 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (for instance, forms you submit, non-advertising content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (such as your previous activity on this service or other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (which might for example include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present content that appears more relevant based on your possible interests, such as by adapting the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find content that matches your interests.
Use profiles to select personalised content 35 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on your content personalisation profiles, which can reflect your activity on this or other services (for instance, the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects. This can for example be used to adapt the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find (non-advertising) content that matches your interests.
Measure advertising performance 134 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which advertising is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine how well an advert has worked for you or other users and whether the goals of the advertising were reached. For instance, whether you saw an ad, whether you clicked on it, whether it led you to buy a product or visit a website, etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of advertising campaigns.
Measure content performance 61 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which content is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine whether the (non-advertising) content e.g. reached its intended audience and matched your interests. For instance, whether you read an article, watch a video, listen to a podcast or look at a product description, how long you spent on this service and the web pages you visit etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of (non-advertising) content that is shown to you.
Understand audiences through statistics or combinations of data from different sources 74 partners can use this purpose
Reports can be generated based on the combination of data sets (like user profiles, statistics, market research, analytics data) regarding your interactions and those of other users with advertising or (non-advertising) content to identify common characteristics (for instance, to determine which target audiences are more receptive to an ad campaign or to certain contents).
Develop and improve services 83 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service, such as your interaction with ads or content, can be very helpful to improve products and services and to build new products and services based on user interactions, the type of audience, etc. This specific purpose does not include the development or improvement of user profiles and identifiers.
Use limited data to select content 37 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type, or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times a video or an article is presented to you).
Use precise geolocation data 46 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, your precise location (within a radius of less than 500 metres) may be used in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Actively scan device characteristics for identification 27 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, certain characteristics specific to your device might be requested and used to distinguish it from other devices (such as the installed fonts or plugins, the resolution of your screen) in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Ensure security, prevent and detect fraud, and fix errors 92 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Your data can be used to monitor for and prevent unusual and possibly fraudulent activity (for example, regarding advertising, ad clicks by bots), and ensure systems and processes work properly and securely. It can also be used to correct any problems you, the publisher or the advertiser may encounter in the delivery of content and ads and in your interaction with them.
Deliver and present advertising and content 99 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Certain information (like an IP address or device capabilities) is used to ensure the technical compatibility of the content or advertising, and to facilitate the transmission of the content or ad to your device.
Match and combine data from other data sources 72 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Information about your activity on this service may be matched and combined with other information relating to you and originating from various sources (for instance your activity on a separate online service, your use of a loyalty card in-store, or your answers to a survey), in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Link different devices 53 partners can use this feature
Always Active
In support of the purposes explained in this notice, your device might be considered as likely linked to other devices that belong to you or your household (for instance because you are logged in to the same service on both your phone and your computer, or because you may use the same Internet connection on both devices).
Identify devices based on information transmitted automatically 88 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Your device might be distinguished from other devices based on information it automatically sends when accessing the Internet (for instance, the IP address of your Internet connection or the type of browser you are using) in support of the purposes exposed in this notice.
Save and communicate privacy choices 69 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
The choices you make regarding the purposes and entities listed in this notice are saved and made available to those entities in the form of digital signals (such as a string of characters). This is necessary in order to enable both this service and those entities to respect such choices.
have your say