Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
IRELAND IS THE worst country in the EU at using renewable energy to heat things up and cool things down.
In 2020, only 6% of the energy consumed for heating and cooling in Ireland came from renewable sources. 2021 was worse again at just 5.2%. In both years, it was the lowest proportion of any EU country and well below the union-wide average.
A major national heat study carried out by the Sustainable Energy Authority of Ireland last year tried to identify how to reverse an upwards trend in Ireland’s emissions from heating.
It found that up to 50% of heat demand from buildings could be met by low-carbon sources through a type of system called ‘district heating’, which effectively delivers heat through insulated pipes instead of individual buildings generating their own heat.
District heating can be powered by fossil fuels, but also works very well with renewable sources, which has garnered it favour in some countries’ plans to cut greenhouse gas emissions.
The concept is nothing new: it’s widespread in plenty of European countries, particularly in Sweden, Denmark, Lithuania and Estonia.
For Ireland, though, it is a relatively new idea. One plan that has been in the works for many years is to develop a district heating system in the Docklands area of Dublin, which could provide heating for tens of thousands of homes by using heat created by the Poolbeg incinerator as it burns waste.
Up-and-running as of last week is a district heating scheme for Tallaght which is set to heat South Dublin County Council offices, Tallaght library, part of the TU Dublin campus, and 133 apartments (with plans to expand to a greater number of apartments in the future).
Unlike the Poolbeg-fuelled plan for the Docklands, however, the Tallaght scheme was carried out in partnership with an Amazon Web Services data centre and will be powered by waste heat that the data centre creates.
The very presence of data centres in Ireland has been a major source of contention in recent years due to the massive amounts of energy they consume.
In 2021, data centres used 14% of all metered electricity – more than rural homes, which collectively accounted for 12%.
The Journal’s investigative platform Noteworthy recently found that direct onsite carbon emissions from data centres have risen by a massive 35 times within a decade.
Looking forward, should Ireland be leveraging data centres to develop a network of district heating systems, or is the impact of data centres on the energy grid and emissions too great to be mitigated?
Speaking to The Journal, Dr Patrick Bresnihan, a lecturer in Maynooth University’s Department of Geography, said that Ireland’s district heating infrastructure (or lack thereof) is “far behind” other countries.
He said that current development is being “partly driven by the data centre industry” but that he believes that “isn’t the way we should be developing district heating”.
“It should be developed separately from data centres. The data centres that do exist, they should be brought into district heating, they do produce a lot of waste heat. But I would be worried – which is probably the best word – about the role that data centres may play in developing district heating in Ireland,” Dr Bresnihan said.
The problem is that data centres use too much energy and they shouldn’t be allowed to continue to grow when we have such problems with energy security and the need to reduce energy consumption overall.”
Dr Bresnihan said that rather than limiting data centre expansion, proposed solutions that emerge rely instead on technological innovations like a district heating systems that use waste heat.
However, he says the benefit of these is “relatively minimal” compared to the energy consumption data centres are responsible for.
Additionally, he suggests that reliance on private enterprises for energy supplies can render systems “quite vulnerable”.
“You should develop public infrastructure based on strategic plans, long-term investment, and what is best for the population and what is affordable. But if you build infrastructure around data centres, they can leave, they have no requirement to stay here.
“And once they leave, then what happens? Our energy infrastructures, which are so, so important, need to be developed along different principles and with different considerations, not with the data centres at the heart of it.”
If data centres are to be used in heating schemes, though, he said that such schemes should be funded in part by those data centres.
“I think if district heating systems are going to be developed and if they are going to be built to use waste heat from data centres, then those data centres should pay for a large part of those district heating systems,” Dr Bresnihan said.
“I think another reason why that might be important is that it locks them into that infrastructure. They might be less likely to just leave because they have some kind of financial commitment there.
“The district heating schemes should be about sustainability and making our heating systems more efficient and so on but they should also be about making energy cheaper. There may be a way in which if the developer or the data centre developer has to pay something that could go towards offsetting energy prices for households, for example.”
In Denmark, district heating accounts for 46% of domestic heating and hot water consumption.
Professor Jakob Zinck Thellufsen, an associate professor at Aalborg University in Denmark, researches energy planning and renewable energy systems, including district heating. In 2018, he conducted research into the viability of district heating systems for Ireland.
“I investigated what could potentially be the benefits of district heating in a country where it historically hasn’t been but where there is clearly a heat demand,” Professor Thellufsen told The Journal.
He found that it is possible to achieve a “more efficient and, if you look at it from a socioeconomic point of view, a cheaper energy system by going to these district heating systems”.
He noted that Irish cities are less densely populated than Danish ones – district heating is most effective in urban areas where people live more closely to each other – but that nonetheless, the study’s conclusions were that “compared to people having their old gas or electric boiler at home, it is more efficient if we in the cities can implement district heating compared to other individual solutions”.
“Economically, it’s typically cheaper to have a good, well-operating district heating plant than it is to have an individual solution [such as a gas or electric boiler]. And comfort-wise, there’s some benefits too for some people, because all the technical part is handled by a central actor instead of you as an individual at home figuring [it] out.”
Denmark has also ventured into using waste heat from data centres for district heating systems, including a partnership between a Facebook data centre and Danish district heating company Fjernvarme Fyn.
“If you have to have these data centres and the electricity consumption they come with, then the excess heat you can get from these processes would be really beneficial to the heating system,” Professor Thellufsen said.
“But obviously if you don’t gain these benefits, it is a burden to the energy system to have data centres, so when we have them, we have to also consider how we can get the best out of them.”
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
Unless people want to give up their phones and any smart technologies they are now using, data centres won’t be going anywhere. So I can’t see how it would be greenwashing. As much as they are becoming more efficient, the need for them is still growing. So yes, reuse the heat..
Why ask the question? Isn’t it obvious that using the heat for the purpose of heating homes is the sensible option? There must be something seriously defective in our educational system when the efficient and effective use of a source of heat is beyond the ability of public officials to implement. Oh, right, I’ve got it. Silly me. They need to figure out a way to tax it.
@TheQueenofHibernia: apparently the temperature reaching a home is 10°c so based on that fossil fuels will still have to be used to boost the temperature in the home.
@: 10°c? Soil temperatures below 50cm (half a metre) are at that temperature for much if not all of the year as it is. If it was 10°c travelling through the pipes, insulation would almost be rendered useless!
Depends how close you are to the source so most likely more than 10c but yes you would need to top up for radiators. Underfloor heating no. I’m here in Denmark at the minute and we are working on waste heat recovery from a DC to a town.
Mixed up greenwashing and whitewashing once. Now all of my shirts clash with my ties.. badum pish
Even these comments are in data centres. They are part of life, great for Ireland.
Yes data centres are a requirement for any modern society. If we have a pop of 5M then there must be a calculation that says we require X amount of data centre capacity to support that population.
The problem is data centres are also a business and beyond what the 5M population needs you fall into an area where governemnt collusion, subsidies and corruption means we end up with non-essential data centres that are processing data from outside the state. To dupe the people into accepting this excessive data centre capacity you then get this green washing tactic of free heat to offset the correct perception of them being energy guzzlers.
So we then have, on one hand, thousands of citizens struggling to pay ever increasing energy bills, and on the other hand we have unnecessary data centres getting tax breaks and incentives and low cost energy from electrical generation infrastructure that taxpayers paid for.
The article alludes to the incinerator plan and I wonder how many people who live in that area agreed to the incinerator location based on the free heating offer for those in need in the locality.
@Paddy Short: unnecessary? As in the 100s of thousands of well paid jobs the companies that need these data centres provide, not to mention the billions in corporation tax they contribute every year
@Stephen Kearon: Beyond the original construction jobs, most data centres generate up to 30 sustainable jobs and they don’t generate any income directly for the companies that own them. Any taxes will be paid for the services provided rather than the data stored and these taxes will be paid in the country that the services is provided.
The 30 jobs are high value, but the contribution to society is probably negated by the energy usage and subsequent rise in energy costs.
@Paul Ennis: On top of that, the government tell us that the reason so few new houses are being built is because of a shortage of construction workers. It’s like Ireland is Schrödinger’s Economy.
@Stephen Kearon: There’s always one!
@Stephen Kearon: 100s of thousands of jobs. Haha. Hardly, and the cost of energy has more than doubled since the introduction of these Data centres, and they pay very little tax.
It’s already done in multiple countries (not Ireland obviously). Also recycling center used to heat homes.
Ireland is just few decades late when it comes to heating, energy… it’s improving slowly.
What a ridiculous virtue signalling article!
This is probably the first time it’s been this has been highlight in the media in the debates around Data Centres, that they are an asset not a liability and they could help decommission thousands of fossil fuel home heating systems and reduce our dependence on volatile foreign gas imports. We need to invest majorly in renewable energy and district heating to meet are carbon emission targets.
Retrofitting buildings, both residential and commercial for district heating is crazy. To solve the Climate crisis on Planet Earth, sorry, Planet Ireland doesn’t exist, is going to need a massive move into new nuclear, meaning SMRs. That is the only way we can get over the intermittency problem of renewables. Thus a more logical future model, is for instance, old peat station, SMRs, data centres, then all the waste heat to a mega complex of totally pesticide free hydroponic / aquaponic / aeroponic growing. Then the fly, their larvae eating a large part of our in Ireland alone, over one million tonnes of food waste a year, before being fed to the fish and the fowl, the present feeding of which are two of the biggest environmental scandals of the past forty years.
Apart from data centres to heat our homes, at 5.2% Ireland is the worst in EU for renewable heating/cooling.
A sensible long-term government plan to encourage genuine growth in home renewables like solar PV or solar water heating is badly needed. Current grant incentives are only for the already wealthy with money to spare. Those in society struggling the worst with energy price inflation are unable to access grants.
How hard could it be to design a Government scheme to take a % of energy savings towards paying installers to reduce people’s electricity costs? Everyone could afford to participate, electricity bills would be reduced, jobs would be created, energy needs would drop, EU fines for carbon purchase would fall – what’s not to like ?
Can we is a better question. We ought to be where feasible is the appropriate answer
have your say