Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
FIGURES RELEASED BY the Standards in Public Office Commission (Sipo) show that political parties disclosed donations worth €166,392 for 2014.
Fine Gael disclosed €102,567, with the Socialist Party dislosing the next highest amount: €30,405.
Fianna Fáil was the only major party not to receive a donation above €1,500 – the threshold at which contributions must be declared publicly.
Donations disclosed came to the following total amounts:
No other party disclosed any donations in 2014.
Taoiseach Enda Kenny was one of several TDs who made a financial donation to Fine Gael – €1,686.
TDs Paul Murphy and Joe Higgins made respective donations of €2,500 and €1,700 to the Anti-Austerity Alliance. The pair also made donations to the Socialist Party (€2,496 and €2,500). TD Joan Collins donated €2,500 to the United Left Alliance.
Trade unions Siptu and TSSA both made donations of €2,500 to Labour.
There were 18 political parties registered during 2014 to contest Dáil or European elections. Each of these parties was required to furnish a donation statement in respect of 2014 to Sipo by 31 March 2015.
The maximum value of donations which a political party could accept from the same donor in the same year was €2,500.
Four parties (Communist Party of Ireland, Direct Democracy Ireland, Independents for Equality Movement and the Workers’ Party) failed to furnish the required documentation to the commission by the specified date.
Of these four, Direct Democracy Ireland has not yet submitted the required statutory documentation and the commission referred a file on the matter to the gardaí on 1 May.
A full breakdown of donations received is available here.
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
I totally believe and trust them, that’s fantastic news!!!
@Stephen Duggan: not sure why you think this is good news, they found that only 40% of people who were infected developed neutralising antibodies, which prevent reinfection. It means 60% were still vulnerable to reinfection. It shows that herd immunity isn’t possible with SARS-CoV-2, and there’s the additional fact that immunity wears off after 6 months. This agrees with research in the Denmark (before the new variants arrived) that found that immunity to reinfection was just 47% for people over 65, about 6 months after recovery from COVID-19.
Ref.:
@David Jordan: i believe it was sarcasm, David. Anyway, if only 40% of people develop long lasting antibodies, and if protection from second infection was due to antibodies only, there would have been many thousands of second infections in this country alone by now, which there has not been. From what I have read, it seems that the answer is that the presence of long-lasting T-cells is the reason that so few people get reinfected. The study referred to here did not look at T-cells, yet they confidently announced that mass vaccination is needed die to low levels of antibodies. Why? Indirect links to vaccine manufacturers may explain some of this.
@Jason Shortt: I know it was sarcasm, but it did no favor to the findings of the research which are quite serious.
The findings inform the debate on whether we can cocoon and attain herd immunity (Sweden and early UK approach) or we have to socially distance and flatten the curve to prevent excess deaths and wait to escape restrictions via vaccination (which offer much more robust and longer lasting immunity than natural infection).
“T-cells is the reason that so few people get reinfected.”
No. T-cells do not prevent reinfection, antibodies prevent infection. T-cells fight an infection after it is established. T-cells, for example, prevent infected cells from infecting neighboring cells, they help reduce vial levels. It is proposed that T Cells may increase the odds that a Reinfection will be milder than the first.
However, this is not what we are seeing.
The ongoing outbreak in Brazil is reinfecting people in areas previously measured to have attained “herd immunity” e.g. Manaus (Sabino et al., 2021), and the fatality rate / severity is not ameliorated by the hypothesised existence of T Cells from previous infection.
In fact, there’s evidence that that 2nd infections are more severe (Dos Santos et al., 2021). Increases virulence (lethality) and infectiousness is why Brazil is now experiencing it’s most severe outbreak yet.
https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-d&q=brazil+covid
“Recurrent episodes tended to be more severe, with one fatal infection.”
Ref.:
Sabino, E.C., Buss, L.F., Carvalho, M.P., Prete, C.A., Crispim, M.A., Fraiji, N.A., Pereira, R.H., Parag, K.V., da Silva Peixoto, P., Kraemer, M.U. and Oikawa, M.K., 2021. Resurgence of COVID-19 in Manaus, Brazil, despite high seroprevalence. The Lancet, 397(10273), pp.452-455.
Dos Santos, L.A., de Góis Filho, P.G., Silva, A.M.F., Santos, J.V.G., Santos, D.S., Aquino, M.M., de Jesus, R.M., Almeida, M.L.D., da Silva, J.S., Altmann, D.M. and Boyton, R.J., 2021. Recurrent COVID-19 including evidence of reinfection and enhanced severity in thirty Brazilian healthcare workers. Journal of Infection.
‘ The extraordinary rapid, and effective control measures implemented in Wuhan………..’
@Padraic O Sullivan: Like welding apartment block doors shut, that’s some lockdown
Ah the Chinese, a great bunch of lads
I stopped reading at “a Chinese study said….”
@TonyB: China publish half the papers on Pubmed your realise….
Finally, a totally independent research body with no links to the WHO (an organisation partially funded by the pharmaceutical industry) declares that “mass vaccination” is the only way out of the pandemic. Oh….wait a minute….they run six ‘WHO collaborating centers ‘ and they are a member of the M8 Alliance, the main advisors to the World Health Summit, which is run by the WHO. Vaccinate the vulnerable and leave the rest of us alone.
Can it be trusted? Would u trust them?
@Bart O Brien: What about all the different strains that has developed after Wuhan? Of course I want to Believe!
have your say