Skip to content
Support Us

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Former Australian foreign minister Kevin Rudd smiles at a G20 summit in Mexico last weekend. Rudd has quit amid speculation he may launch a leadership heave. Alexandre Meneghini/AP

Former premier Kevin Rudd quits Australian cabinet amid growing rift

Members of the Australian Labor party may vote on Julia Gillard’s leadership on Monday after former premier Kevin Rudd quit.

MEMBERS OF AUSTRALIA’S ruling Labor party are set to vote on the leadership of Julia Gillard next Monday after her predecessor Kevin Rudd quit the country’s cabinet.

Rudd, who himself was party leader and Prime Minister until ousted by Gillard in June 2010, quit the cabinet amid suggestions that he would directly call a vote on whether Gillard should remain at the helm.

In a statement released from Washington DC, where Rudd had been on duty at a series of meetings, Rudd said he had no option but to leave the front bench after attacks from senior colleagues.

“It’s time for some plain speaking on this,” he said. “the truth is I can only serve as foreign minister if I have the confidence of Prime Minister Gillard and her senior ministers.

“In recent days, minister [Simon] Crean and a number of other faceless men have publicly attacked my integrity and therefore my fitness to serve as a minister in government,” he said.

“When challenged today on these attacks, Prime Minister Gillard chose not to repudiate them. I can only reluctantly conclude that she therefore shares these views.”

Rudd did not immediately call a caucus vote on Gillard’s leadership, indicating that he does not necessarily believe he has the numbers to oust Gillard himself, but has also left open the possibility of quitting politics altogether.

If he does quit the parliament, the government would be forced into a by-election – which, if lost, would mean the loss of its single-seat majority in the Australian House of Representatives.

Gillard’s deputy PM Wayne Swan issued a statement condemning Rudd for seeking “tear down the 2010 [federal election] campaign”, and deliberately risked the prospect of the party falling into opposition. “Now he undermines the Government at every turn,” he said.

Gillard herself has been reluctant to comment, simply saying she was “disappointed” with Rudd’s decision and saying he had not contacted her to raise any concerns before his decision to resign.

Sky News Australia said Gillard was likely to call a leadership ballot at next week’s parliamentary Labor party meeting in order to put an end to the continuing tumult within the party.

Opposition leader Tony Abbott said the ongoing disputes within the cabinet confirmed that the government was not worthy of remaining in office.

Rudd was ousted by members of Labor in June 2010, with MPs fearing that the party would be unable to win the federal election of that August with him at the helm.

That election resulted in a hung parliament, with Gillard only retaining power thanks to the support of independent MPs.

Previously: Former Aussie PM denies rumours of leadership challenge against Gillard >

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Close
7 Comments
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Trish O'Gorman
    Favourite Trish O'Gorman
    Report
    Feb 22nd 2012, 11:21 AM

    As someone living in Australia, I agree with Rudd that the whole thing has turned into a soap opera. It’s a complete farce and just makes me think that they don’t believe they have any significant issues to deal with as they dedicate so much energy to a personality contest.

    11
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Conor Peoples
    Favourite Conor Peoples
    Report
    Feb 22nd 2012, 10:48 AM

    What goes around comes around

    10
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Marguerite Hoiby
    Favourite Marguerite Hoiby
    Report
    Feb 22nd 2012, 11:24 AM

    Rudd the dud was ousted for a reason, he was a micro managing control freak that didn’t know how to lead his party.
    Nobody else could do any job as well as he could, or so he thought and as a result nothing got done and the PM’s office was total chaos..
    He is all ego and no substance.
    Sick to the back teeth of this distraction about the leadership, good thing the economy is strong and doesn’t seem to require any governement intervention.
    After, last election no government was formed for 3 weeks, country ticked along no problem!
    There might be a message in that somewhere!

    3
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Keith Barton
    Favourite Keith Barton
    Report
    Feb 22nd 2012, 11:26 AM

    Shouldn’t there be a ‘u’ in Labour?

    1
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Conor Kirwan
    Favourite Conor Kirwan
    Report
    Feb 22nd 2012, 11:32 AM

    Australian spelling, so ‘Labor’ is indeed correct!

    7
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Marguerite Hoiby
    Favourite Marguerite Hoiby
    Report
    Feb 22nd 2012, 11:37 AM

    ? possibly American way of spelling it.

    1
    See 1 more reply ▾
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute vv7k7Z3c
    Favourite vv7k7Z3c
    Report
    Feb 22nd 2012, 11:45 AM

    We used Labour in the past, when we were covering the 2010 elections, but we had a chat about foreign spellings after the 9/11 anniversary and decided that it was more appropriate to call parties/buildings/etc by their local spellings, as they’re proper nouns and not just regular nouns or adjectives.

    Ergo, we refer to the World Trade Center attacks and the Australian Labor party.

    FYI: Even some Australian linguists are puzzled at how Australia keeps the ‘u’ in ‘colour’ but not in ‘honor’ or ‘labor’. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_English#Spelling_and_grammar

    6
Submit a report
Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
Thank you for the feedback
Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.